- Lead
- 80,103
- Total
- 5,664,186
- vs nation
- D+0.1
- Turnout
- 74.6%
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+1.4MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 10,077,7612024 5-year
- Population density
- 178 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 56,611 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $72,8752024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 72.3%2024 5-year
- Black
- 13.1%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 5.9%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+33.6 in 1964MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+62.2 in 1924MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Wisconsin, WI · twin score 68.4
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 74.6%5,706,503 participants ÷ 7,653,712 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +15.1 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off versus state
- 0.0 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 59.4%–63.1%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 4,874,619 | 7,408,626 | 65.8% | B/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 4,341,340 | 7,472,668 | 58.1% | B/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 5,579,317 | 7,528,995 | 74.1% | B/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 4,500,400 | 7,633,287 | 59.0% | B/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 5,706,503 | 7,653,712 | 74.6% | B/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-state-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 276/110.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-state-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 279/137.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-state-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 282/1.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-state-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 285/182.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-state-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 288/227.
presidential history
Party record book
Michigan · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Lyndon B. Johnson1964
66.7%
2,136,615 votes · D+33.6
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2008 · 57.4%
Republican
Calvin Coolidge1924
75.4%
874,631 votes · R+62.2
Runner-up · Warren G. Harding, 1920 · 72.8%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Barack Obama2008
2,872,579votes
57.4% of the vote · D+16.5
Runner-up · Joe Biden, 2020 · 2,804,040 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
2,816,636votes
49.7% of the vote · R+1.4
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 2,649,852 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Lyndon B. Johnson1964
+11.0pts D vs U.S.
Place D+33.6 · U.S. D+22.6
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2008 · +9.2 pts
Republican
Calvin Coolidge1924
+37.1pts R vs U.S.
Place R+62.2 · U.S. R+25.2
Runner-up · Warren G. Harding, 1920 · +24.4 pts
On the ballot
Open seat; Gov. Whitmer term-limited. SoS Jocelyn Benson won the Democratic primary with over 83% over Chris Swanson; Rep. John James (MI-10) won the GOP primary with roughly half the vote over Perry Johnson. Mike Duggan's independent bid ended May 21, 2026.
Open seat; Gary Peters (D) retired. Abdul El-Sayed won the Democratic primary ~49%-47% over Rep. Haley Stevens (AP call Aug 5; Stevens conceded). Mike Rogers, the 2024 nominee, was unopposed for the GOP nomination.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
| Year | Seats won | D % | R % | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D 6 · R 7 | 47.7% | 49.0% | 5,516,896 | |
| D 7 · R 6 | 49.9% | 47.6% | 4,375,537 | |
| D 7 · R 7 | 49.6% | 48.3% | 5,423,140 | |
| D 7 · R 7 | 52.4% | 44.6% | 4,154,703 |
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 7,514,055 |
| 2018 | 7,471,088 |
| 2020 | 8,105,524 |
| 2022 | 8,226,745 |
| 2024 | 8,440,236 |
Who moves in and out
Net domestic migration over time
+1,796 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −308,258 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −40,878 |
| 2012 | −32,963 |
| 2013 | −28,210 |
| 2014 | −28,444 |
| 2015 | −36,387 |
| 2016 | −27,092 |
| 2017 | −13,172 |
| 2018 | −16,639 |
| 2019 | −23,670 |
| 2021 | −28,290 |
| 2022 | −9,107 |
| 2023 | −17,137 |
| 2024 | −8,065 |
| 2025 | +1,796 |
As Michigan flipped to Trump by a point and a half, Wayne County — Detroit and Dearborn — gave back nine of its Democratic points.
- Blue-wall arc
- R+0.2 (2016) → D+2.8 (2020) → R+1.4 (2024) — a 4.2-pt swing in one cycle · MIT Election Lab
- Wayne County’s retreat
- D+38.1 (2020) → D+29.0 (2024) — the Detroit-and-Dearborn base shed 9 points · MIT Election Lab
- Dearborn’s community
- Arabic spoken at home in 6.6% of Wayne County households (1.8% statewide); 8.1% Muslim adherents · ACS 2024 5-year; 2020 U.S. Religion Census
- The college island
- Washtenaw (Ann Arbor) D+44.4 — the bluest county; Ingham (Lansing) D+29.7; Kent (Grand Rapids) flipped to D+5.4 · MIT Election Lab 2024
- The rural red
- Missaukee R+56.0 — the reddest county; Hillsdale R+51.4; suburban Macomb R+13.7 · MIT Election Lab 2024
- Open top and bottom in 2026
- Gov. Whitmer term-limited (Benson D / James R lead the fields); Sen. Peters retiring (Stevens, McMorrow, El-Sayed D / Rogers R) — Aug 4 primary · Akashic 2026 forecast
The states whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Michigan. Akashic. https://akashic.app/state/MI/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.