- Lead
- 8,937
- Total
- 21,089
- vs nation
- R+40.9
- Turnout
- 63.1%
Branch County, MI
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 63.1% of 33,635 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 7,905
- Total
- 20,536
- vs nation
- R+42.9
- Turnout
- 64.1%
- Lead
- 6,725
- Total
- 17,663
- vs nation
- R+40.2
- Turnout
- 54.9%
- Lead
- 3,122
- Total
- 17,147
- vs nation
- R+22.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,121
- Total
- 18,285
- vs nation
- R+13.4
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 3,780
- Total
- 17,967
- vs nation
- R+18.6
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 2,052
- Total
- 15,783
- vs nation
- R+13.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 246
- Total
- 14,805
- vs nation
- R+6.9
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+42.4MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 45,3002024 5-year
- Median household income
- $63,7242024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 86.4%2024 5-year
- Black
- 1.7%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 6.8%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+21.1 in 1964MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+49.7 in 1928MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Newaygo County, MI · twin score 96.3
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 63.1%21,240 participants ÷ 33,635 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +15.1 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off versus state
- -0.1 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 48.1%–51.8%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 17,932 | 32,644 | 54.9% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 15,448 | 32,724 | 47.2% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 20,668 | 32,248 | 64.1% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 16,256 | 33,160 | 49.0% | A/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 21,240 | 33,635 | 63.1% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
43 precincts · 21,089 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -Coldwater Township, Precinct 1Coldwater Township, Precinct 1 | 520 | 1,480 | 17 | 2,017 | 25.8% | 73.4% | R+47.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Quincy Township, Precinct 1Quincy Township, Precinct 1 | 547 | 1,441 | 28 | 2,016 | 27.1% | 71.5% | R+44.3 |
| Precinct -Ovid Township, Precinct 1Ovid Township, Precinct 1 | 429 | 1,160 | 9 | 1,598 | 26.8% | 72.6% | R+45.7 |
| Precinct -City of Coldwater, Ward 3, Precinct 1City of Coldwater, Ward 3, Precinct 1 | 575 | 897 | 34 | 1,506 | 38.2% | 59.6% | R+21.4 |
| Precinct -Union Township, Precinct 1Union Township, Precinct 1 | 414 | 1,038 | 29 | 1,481 | 28.0% | 70.1% | R+42.1 |
| Precinct -City of Coldwater, Ward 2, Precinct 1City of Coldwater, Ward 2, Precinct 1 | 492 | 799 | 19 | 1,310 | 37.6% | 61.0% | R+23.4 |
| Precinct -Girard Township, Precinct 1Girard Township, Precinct 1 | 289 | 780 | 20 | 1,089 | 26.5% | 71.6% | R+45.1 |
| Precinct -Sherwood Township, Precinct 1Sherwood Township, Precinct 1 | 254 | 773 | 14 | 1,041 | 24.4% | 74.3% | R+49.9 |
| Precinct -Algansee Township, Precinct 1Algansee Township, Precinct 1 | 225 | 778 | 7 | 1,010 | 22.3% | 77.0% | R+54.8 |
| Precinct -City of Coldwater, Ward 4, Precinct 1City of Coldwater, Ward 4, Precinct 1 | 338 | 613 | 32 | 983 | 34.4% | 62.4% | R+28.0 |
| Precinct -Kinderhook Township, Precinct 1Kinderhook Township, Precinct 1 | 258 | 690 | 11 | 959 | 26.9% | 71.9% | R+45.0 |
| Precinct -City of Coldwater, Ward 1, Precinct 1City of Coldwater, Ward 1, Precinct 1 | 298 | 570 | 33 | 901 | 33.1% | 63.3% | R+30.2 |
| Precinct -City of Bronson, Precinct 1City of Bronson, Precinct 1 | 261 | 574 | 16 | 851 | 30.7% | 67.5% | R+36.8 |
| Precinct -Bronson Township, Precinct 1Bronson Township, Precinct 1 | 146 | 585 | 7 | 738 | 19.8% | 79.3% | R+59.5 |
| Precinct -Matteson Township, Precinct 1Matteson Township, Precinct 1 | 217 | 473 | 6 | 696 | 31.2% | 68.0% | R+36.8 |
| Precinct -Batavia Township, Precinct 1Batavia Township, Precinct 1 | 171 | 502 | 18 | 691 | 24.7% | 72.6% | R+47.9 |
| Precinct -Bethel Township, Precinct 1Bethel Township, Precinct 1 | 138 | 522 | 8 | 668 | 20.7% | 78.1% | R+57.5 |
| Precinct -Butler Township, Precinct 1Butler Township, Precinct 1 | 143 | 492 | 12 | 647 | 22.1% | 76.0% | R+53.9 |
| Precinct -Gilead Township, Precinct 1Gilead Township, Precinct 1 | 87 | 261 | 3 | 351 | 24.8% | 74.4% | R+49.6 |
| Precinct -California Township, Precinct 1California Township, Precinct 1 | 51 | 221 | 2 | 274 | 18.6% | 80.7% | R+62.0 |
| Precinct -Noble Township, Precinct 1Noble Township, Precinct 1 | 58 | 199 | 5 | 262 | 22.1% | 76.0% | R+53.8 |
| 0230112000001023-01120-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 0230580000001023-05800-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 0230806000001023-08060-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 0231086000001023-10860-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 0231088000001023-10880-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 0231214000001023-12140-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 0231256000001023-12560-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 0231702001001023-17020-01001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 0231702002001023-17020-02001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 0231702003001023-17020-03001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 0231702004001023-17020-04001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 0231704000001023-17040-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 0233212000001023-32120-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 0233228000001023-32280-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 0234326000001023-43260-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 0235240000001023-52400-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 0235786000001023-57860-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 0236184000001023-61840-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 0236666000001023-66660-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 0236666000002023-66660-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 0237344000001023-73440-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 0238128000001023-81280-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −16.9% |
| 1896 | +4.9% |
| 1900 | −11.1% |
| 1904 | −44.3% |
| 1908 | −20.3% |
| 1912 | +5.2% |
| 1916 | −0.6% |
| 1920 | −43.1% |
| 1924 | −40.5% |
| 1928 | −49.7% |
| 1932 | +9.6% |
| 1936 | −0.9% |
| 1940 | −26.2% |
| 1944 | −35.3% |
| 1948 | −29.1% |
| 1952 | −43.9% |
| 1956 | −39.5% |
| 1960 | −29.4% |
| 1964 | +21.1% |
| 1968 | −20.2% |
| 1972 | −25.9% |
| 1976 | −13.2% |
| 1980 | −34.4% |
| 1984 | −47.8% |
| 1988 | −27.5% |
| 1992 | −0.8% |
| 1996 | +1.7% |
| 2000 | −13.0% |
| 2004 | −21.0% |
| 2008 | −6.1% |
| 2012 | −18.2% |
| 2016 | −38.1% |
| 2020 | −38.5% |
| 2024 | −42.4% |
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | R | 25.1%5,103 | 74.9%15,266 | 20,369 |
| 2020 | R | 29.4%5,929 | 70.6%14,223 | 20,152 |
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 31,518 |
| 2018 | 31,382 |
| 2020 | 33,838 |
| 2022 | 34,470 |
| 2024 | 35,394 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−260 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −3,073 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $53,134 in average income, against $66,924 for residents who stayed — 21% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+26.6 on average — 16 points more Democratic-leaning than Branch County, MI itself (R+42.4).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Calhoun County, MI126R+14.0
- St. Joseph County, MI103R+34.0
- Hillsdale County, MI97R+51.4
- Steuben County, IN41R+42.1
- Kalamazoo County, MI38D+17.7
- Jackson County, MI29R+21.3
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Calhoun County, MI174
- Hillsdale County, MI95
- St. Joseph County, MI83
- Steuben County, IN55
- Kalamazoo County, MI53
- Allen County, IN27
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −1,423 |
| 2012 | −218 |
| 2013 | −360 |
| 2014 | −30 |
| 2015 | −181 |
| 2016 | −311 |
| 2017 | −190 |
| 2018 | +64 |
| 2019 | −172 |
| 2021 | +269 |
| 2022 | −876 |
| 2023 | +557 |
| 2024 | +58 |
| 2025 | −260 |
Branch County, anchored by Coldwater, posts presidential margins that routinely exceed 40 points Republican — an outlier even within a state where rural counties trend heavily red. Its manufacturing and agricultural base has tracked rightward for more than a decade.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 21.1 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 49.7 points in 1928. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 3.9 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 42.4 points.
A population of 45,300, a 86% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $63,724 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Newaygo County and Hillsdale County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Branch County, Michigan. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/26023/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.