Communities / race
The most Hispanic or Latino places in America
Counties and cities ranked by Hispanic/Latino population share — with how each voted in 2024 and its shift since 2020. Of the top 100 counties by hispanic, 81 voted Republican and 19 Democratic in 2024 (median R+22.5); as a group they shifted −8.5 points toward Republicans from 2020 to 2024.
Top 100 counties
| # | Place | Hispanic | 2024 | Since ’20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Starr County, TX | 97.2% | R R+16.0 | −21.0 |
| 2 | Webb County, TX | 95.0% | R R+2.2 | −25.4 |
| 3 | Maverick County, TX | 94.8% | R R+18.5 | −27.9 |
| 4 | Zapata County, TX | 93.9% | R R+22.4 | −17.1 |
| 5 | Zavala County, TX | 92.6% | D D+14.4 | −17.0 |
| 6 | Hidalgo County, TX | 91.9% | R R+2.9 | −19.9 |
| 7 | Brooks County, TX | 90.1% | D D+9.6 | −9.4 |
| 8 | Cameron County, TX | 89.3% | R R+5.8 | −18.9 |
| 9 | Willacy County, TX | 87.3% | R R+3.3 | −15.2 |
| 10 | Dimmit County, TX | 87.1% | D D+3.3 | −20.7 |
| 11 | Imperial County, CA | 86.0% | R R+0.9 | −25.2 |
| 12 | Reeves County, TX | 85.3% | R R+36.9 | −13.7 |
| 13 | El Paso County, TX | 82.7% | D D+15.1 | −20.0 |
| 14 | Santa Cruz County, AZ | 82.5% | D D+18.6 | −16.8 |
| 15 | Duval County, TX | 81.6% | R R+9.8 | −12.4 |
| 16 | Val Verde County, TX | 81.2% | R R+26.6 | −16.7 |
| 17 | Jim Wells County, TX | 79.5% | R R+15.5 | −5.8 |
| 18 | Presidio County, TX | 79.5% | D D+30.2 | −3.2 |
| 19 | Frio County, TX | 77.8% | R R+24.5 | −16.9 |
| 20 | Deaf Smith County, TX | 76.4% | R R+51.7 | −7.6 |
| 21 | San Miguel County, NM | 75.2% | D D+27.9 | −10.8 |
| 22 | La Salle County, TX | 71.8% | R R+20.5 | −8.7 |
| 23 | Kleberg County, TX | 71.4% | R R+12.7 | −11.0 |
| 24 | Pecos County, TX | 71.3% | R R+44.8 | −5.6 |
| 25 | Uvalde County, TX | 70.9% | R R+33.4 | −13.1 |
| 26 | Miami-Dade County, FL | 69.3% | R R+11.4 | −18.8 |
| 27 | Doña Ana County, NM | 67.9% | D D+9.8 | −8.6 |
| 28 | Seward County, KS | 67.4% | R R+39.0 | −9.9 |
| 29 | Rio Arriba County, NM | 67.2% | D D+19.4 | −14.2 |
| 30 | Luna County, NM | 67.1% | R R+18.9 | −8.5 |
| 31 | Parmer County, TX | 66.7% | R R+70.1 | −7.9 |
| 32 | Tulare County, CA | 66.6% | R R+20.7 | −12.9 |
| 33 | Bailey County, TX | 66.0% | R R+61.1 | −5.9 |
| 34 | Castro County, TX | 65.6% | R R+58.1 | −3.6 |
| 35 | Yoakum County, TX | 65.6% | R R+70.9 | −4.4 |
| 36 | Atascosa County, TX | 65.4% | R R+43.3 | −9.3 |
| 37 | Yuma County, AZ | 64.9% | R R+20.4 | −14.2 |
| 38 | Adams County, WA | 64.5% | R R+43.1 | −7.4 |
| 39 | Ector County, TX | 63.5% | R R+52.9 | −5.1 |
| 40 | Merced County, CA | 63.4% | R R+4.4 | −14.9 |
| 41 | Colusa County, CA | 62.9% | R R+28.2 | −11.7 |
| 42 | Lea County, NM | 62.7% | R R+61.6 | −2.0 |
| 43 | Nueces County, TX | 62.5% | R R+11.5 | −8.6 |
| 44 | Winkler County, TX | 62.5% | R R+70.5 | −4.9 |
| 45 | San Benito County, CA | 62.4% | D D+12.6 | −11.8 |
| 46 | Bee County, TX | 61.8% | R R+39.9 | −11.0 |
| 47 | Monterey County, CA | 61.6% | D D+29.9 | −11.4 |
| 48 | Hale County, TX | 61.3% | R R+57.9 | −6.8 |
| 49 | Moore County, TX | 61.0% | R R+67.1 | −7.3 |
| 50 | Madera County, CA | 60.9% | R R+20.8 | −9.2 |
| 51 | Valencia County, NM | 60.8% | R R+16.4 | −6.8 |
| 52 | Bexar County, TX | 59.7% | D D+9.7 | −8.4 |
| 53 | Ford County, KS | 59.1% | R R+38.4 | −6.3 |
| 54 | Chaves County, NM | 58.4% | R R+44.8 | −3.5 |
| 55 | Lamb County, TX | 58.3% | R R+64.3 | −3.6 |
| 56 | Kings County, CA | 58.2% | R R+23.0 | −10.8 |
| 57 | Floyd County, TX | 58.1% | R R+64.9 | −8.8 |
| 58 | Hendry County, FL | 57.6% | R R+38.3 | −15.3 |
| 59 | Andrews County, TX | 57.5% | R R+72.6 | −2.8 |
| 60 | Caldwell County, TX | 57.0% | R R+14.4 | −5.3 |
| 61 | Terry County, TX | 56.9% | R R+65.1 | −8.3 |
| 62 | Ochiltree County, TX | 56.8% | R R+81.5 | −2.0 |
| 63 | Kern County, CA | 56.5% | R R+21.1 | −10.9 |
| 64 | San Patricio County, TX | 56.5% | R R+36.4 | −7.3 |
| 65 | Crosby County, TX | 56.3% | R R+51.3 | −6.8 |
| 66 | Ward County, TX | 56.2% | R R+66.1 | −5.1 |
| 67 | Osceola County, FL | 56.0% | R R+1.5 | −15.3 |
| 68 | Dawson County, TX | 55.8% | R R+61.0 | −4.4 |
| 69 | Franklin County, WA | 55.3% | R R+22.6 | −8.1 |
| 70 | San Bernardino County, CA | 55.2% | R R+2.1 | −12.8 |
| 71 | Bronx County, NY | 55.1% | D D+45.1 | −22.5 |
| 72 | Fresno County, CA | 54.5% | R R+4.4 | −12.2 |
| 73 | Dallam County, TX | 54.3% | R R+78.3 | −4.2 |
| 74 | Grant County, KS | 53.4% | R R+63.0 | −6.3 |
| 75 | Karnes County, TX | 53.4% | R R+58.1 | −6.1 |
| 76 | Finney County, KS | 53.2% | R R+34.7 | −10.0 |
| 77 | Yakima County, WA | 52.4% | R R+14.3 | −6.6 |
| 78 | Texas County, OK | 52.1% | R R+67.7 | −2.3 |
| 79 | Eddy County, NM | 51.6% | R R+55.8 | −4.0 |
| 80 | Medina County, TX | 51.5% | R R+42.7 | −3.6 |
| 81 | Riverside County, CA | 51.3% | R R+1.3 | −9.2 |
| 82 | Gonzales County, TX | 51.1% | R R+54.8 | −6.7 |
| 83 | Taos County, NM | 50.6% | D D+47.5 | −7.3 |
| 84 | Refugio County, TX | 50.4% | R R+39.5 | −6.8 |
| 85 | Socorro County, NM | 50.3% | R R+3.7 | −10.2 |
| 86 | Hansford County, TX | 50.2% | R R+84.8 | −2.6 |
| 87 | Hockley County, TX | 50.2% | R R+66.3 | −3.9 |
| 88 | Stanislaus County, CA | 50.0% | R R+11.0 | −11.7 |
| 89 | Conejos County, CO | 49.8% | R R+17.8 | −10.3 |
| 90 | Garza County, TX | 49.5% | R R+72.6 | −1.1 |
| 91 | Calhoun County, TX | 49.4% | R R+52.2 | −7.8 |
| 92 | Bernalillo County, NM | 49.1% | D D+21.0 | −3.4 |
| 93 | Los Angeles County, CA | 48.4% | D D+32.9 | −11.0 |
| 94 | Santa Barbara County, CA | 48.2% | D D+26.7 | −5.2 |
| 95 | Alamosa County, CO | 48.2% | R R+10.8 | −10.1 |
| 96 | Victoria County, TX | 48.1% | R R+42.5 | −4.6 |
| 97 | Santa Fe County, NM | 47.9% | D D+48.9 | −4.8 |
| 98 | Colfax County, NE | 47.8% | R R+50.9 | −7.7 |
| 99 | Grant County, NM | 47.8% | D D+5.1 | −2.1 |
| 100 | Howard County, TX | 47.7% | R R+62.8 | −4.4 |
Top 50 cities
| # | Place | Hispanic | 2024 | Since ’20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Salida del Sol Estates, TX | 99.9% | R R+10.8 | −22.3 |
| 2 | Eidson Road, TX | 99.7% | R R+18.1 | −22.4 |
| 3 | Doffing, TX | 99.6% | R R+9.0 | −28.3 |
| 4 | Olivarez, TX | 99.4% | R R+6.3 | −28.2 |
| 5 | Huron, CA | 99.3% | D D+35.4 | −30.0 |
| 6 | Anthony, NM | 99.3% | D D+20.3 | −32.5 |
| 7 | Doolittle, TX | 99.2% | R R+11.1 | −20.6 |
| 8 | Mila Doce, TX | 99.1% | R R+5.5 | −33.0 |
| 9 | Murillo, TX | 99.1% | R R+8.9 | −25.1 |
| 10 | Hidalgo, TX | 98.7% | R R+13.8 | −26.0 |
| 11 | Mecca, CA | 98.4% | D D+37.0 | −33.0 |
| 12 | La Homa, TX | 98.4% | R R+13.3 | −27.6 |
| 13 | Elsa, TX | 98.3% | D D+8.5 | −29.8 |
| 14 | Homestead Meadows South, TX | 97.8% | D D+11.5 | −31.4 |
| 15 | Penitas, TX | 97.7% | R R+18.8 | −15.8 |
| 16 | San Elizario, TX | 97.7% | D D+11.4 | −35.4 |
| 17 | Calexico, CA | 97.4% | D D+17.4 | −28.0 |
| 18 | Maywood, CA | 97.2% | D D+38.8 | −26.0 |
| 19 | Orange Cove, CA | 97.2% | D D+15.4 | −36.1 |
| 20 | Bell Gardens, CA | 97.1% | D D+34.3 | −29.1 |
| 21 | Coachella, CA | 97.1% | D D+26.8 | −31.5 |
| 22 | Cudahy, CA | 97.1% | D D+36.1 | −31.4 |
| 23 | Commerce, CA | 97.0% | D D+35.3 | −25.8 |
| 24 | Mendota, CA | 97.0% | D D+13.2 | −34.9 |
| 25 | Walnut Park, CA | 96.9% | D D+41.0 | −24.2 |
| 26 | Alton, TX | 96.8% | R R+4.8 | −28.6 |
| 27 | Cameron Park, TX | 96.8% | R R+6.2 | −27.3 |
| 28 | Huntington Park, CA | 96.7% | D D+39.1 | −24.1 |
| 29 | Parlier, CA | 96.7% | D D+27.0 | −26.2 |
| 30 | Canutillo, TX | 96.6% | D D+2.5 | −20.2 |
| 31 | Roma, TX | 96.6% | R R+7.4 | −19.2 |
| 32 | Robstown, TX | 96.5% | D D+20.8 | −13.3 |
| 33 | San Juan, TX | 96.5% | D D+2.5 | −21.5 |
| 34 | Hialeah Gardens, FL | 96.4% | R R+52.0 | −19.2 |
| 35 | Greenfield, CA | 96.1% | D D+31.2 | −28.8 |
| 36 | Rio Grande, TX | 96.0% | R R+12.9 | −18.5 |
| 37 | Somerton, AZ | 95.8% | D D+15.6 | −23.7 |
| 38 | Firebaugh, CA | 95.8% | D D+12.4 | −28.3 |
| 39 | Sweetwater, FL | 95.6% | R R+34.4 | −18.1 |
| 40 | East Los Angeles, CA | 95.5% | D D+44.6 | −23.8 |
| 41 | South Gate, CA | 95.2% | D D+35.2 | −26.2 |
| 42 | Socorro, TX | 95.2% | D D+11.4 | −32.2 |
| 43 | Gonzales, CA | 95.1% | D D+25.9 | −25.5 |
| 44 | Hialeah, FL | 95.1% | R R+52.9 | −18.5 |
| 45 | Laredo, TX | 95.1% | R R+1.5 | −25.3 |
| 46 | Pharr, TX | 94.7% | D D+1.0 | −22.2 |
| 47 | Arvin, CA | 94.6% | D D+19.6 | −31.5 |
| 48 | Heber, CA | 94.5% | D D+5.3 | −34.9 |
| 49 | Florence-Graham, CA | 94.4% | D D+43.5 | −29.2 |
| 50 | Lamont, CA | 94.3% | D D+22.1 | −28.7 |
Rankings suppress places below 5,000 population, where small-sample ACS shares get noisy. Demographic shares are American Community Survey 5-year estimates (ancestry table B04006, language C16001) and the 2020 U.S. Religion Census; every figure traces to a named federal or academic source. The vote columns are presidential — a place can be demographically homogeneous and politically split, which is exactly what these tables are built to show.