HarrisDemocratic48.5%31,952TrumpRepublican50.7%33,384SteinIndependent0.4%283
R+2.2- Lead
- 1,432
- Total
- 65,865
- vs nation
- R+0.7
- Turnout
- 48.3%
Akashiccounty
Webb County, TX
Office (updates table and map)
President margin by year
Place winner margin
Boundary by 2024 margin · Precinct returns · VEST · MIT Election Lab
President results by year
2024 turnout 48.3% of 142,475 citizens 18+
BidenDemocratic61.1%41,842TrumpRepublican37.8%25,904JorgensenLibertarian0.7%446
D+23.3- Lead
- 15,938
- Total
- 68,534
- vs nation
- D+18.8
- Turnout
- 49.4%
ClintonDemocratic73.5%42,307TrumpRepublican22.5%12,947JohnsonLibertarian1.8%1,033
D+51.0- Lead
- 29,360
- Total
- 57,585
- vs nation
- D+48.9
- Turnout
- 45.2%
ObamaDemocratic76.4%37,597RomneyRepublican22.5%11,078GrayLibertarian0.6%303
D+53.9- Lead
- 26,519
- Total
- 49,196
- vs nation
- D+50.0
- Turnout
- —
ObamaDemocratic71.4%33,452McCainRepublican28.0%13,119OtherAll other candidates0.5%250
D+43.4- Lead
- 20,333
- Total
- 46,821
- vs nation
- D+36.2
- Turnout
- —
KerryDemocratic56.9%23,654BushRepublican42.7%17,753OtherAll other candidates0.4%149
D+14.2- Lead
- 5,901
- Total
- 41,556
- vs nation
- D+16.7
- Turnout
- —
GoreDemocratic57.4%18,120BushRepublican41.4%13,076NaderGreen0.8%256
D+16.0- Lead
- 5,044
- Total
- 31,571
- vs nation
- D+15.5
- Turnout
- —
ClintonDemocratic76.7%18,997DoleRepublican19.0%4,712PerotReform3.8%936
D+57.7- Lead
- 14,285
- Total
- 24,777
- vs nation
- D+49.1
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+2.2MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 269,2942024 5-year
- Median household income
- $63,0582024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 3.6%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.4%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 95.0%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+80.3 in 1964MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+65.3 in 1908MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Hidalgo County, TX · twin score 98.5
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 48.3%68,822 participants ÷ 142,475 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +16.5 ptsPersistently low turnout
- Drop-off versus state
- -2.6 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 31.8%–35.9%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 58,264 | 128,842 | 45.2% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 49,381 | 133,675 | 36.9% | C/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 68,397 | 138,569 | 49.4% | C/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 46,002 | 139,976 | 32.9% | A/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 68,822 | 142,475 | 48.3% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 150/138.
- 2020: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 152/2.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
82 precincts · 65,995 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -Precinct 356Precinct 356 | 1,253 | 1,590 | 18 | 2,861 | 43.8% | 55.6% | R+11.8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Precinct 349Precinct 349 | 1,039 | 1,726 | 20 | 2,785 | 37.3% | 62.0% | R+24.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 359Precinct 359 | 1,319 | 1,417 | 16 | 2,752 | 47.9% | 51.5% | R+3.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 344Precinct 344 | 1,199 | 1,318 | 27 | 2,544 | 47.1% | 51.8% | R+4.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 447Precinct 447 | 819 | 1,221 | 19 | 2,059 | 39.8% | 59.3% | R+19.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 458Precinct 458 | 913 | 1,122 | 14 | 2,049 | 44.6% | 54.8% | R+10.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 132Precinct 132 | 800 | 898 | 18 | 1,716 | 46.6% | 52.3% | R+5.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 370Precinct 370 | 723 | 920 | 11 | 1,654 | 43.7% | 55.6% | R+11.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 274Precinct 274 | 680 | 942 | 12 | 1,634 | 41.6% | 57.6% | R+16.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 446Precinct 446 | 858 | 720 | 15 | 1,593 | 53.9% | 45.2% | D+8.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 309Precinct 309 | 930 | 590 | 13 | 1,533 | 60.7% | 38.5% | D+22.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 343Precinct 343 | 777 | 721 | 13 | 1,511 | 51.4% | 47.7% | D+3.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 371Precinct 371 | 666 | 830 | 14 | 1,510 | 44.1% | 55.0% | R+10.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 154Precinct 154 | 662 | 771 | 13 | 1,446 | 45.8% | 53.3% | R+7.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 340Precinct 340 | 632 | 767 | 17 | 1,416 | 44.6% | 54.2% | R+9.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 255Precinct 255 | 618 | 750 | 8 | 1,376 | 44.9% | 54.5% | R+9.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 342Precinct 342 | 651 | 667 | 11 | 1,329 | 49.0% | 50.2% | R+1.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 231Precinct 231 | 579 | 637 | 10 | 1,226 | 47.2% | 52.0% | R+4.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 250APrecinct 250A | 560 | 644 | 9 | 1,213 | 46.2% | 53.1% | R+6.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 252Precinct 252 | 563 | 541 | 13 | 1,117 | 50.4% | 48.4% | D+2.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 239Precinct 239 | 648 | 461 | 6 | 1,115 | 58.1% | 41.3% | D+16.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 345Precinct 345 | 555 | 539 | 17 | 1,111 | 50.0% | 48.5% | D+1.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 130Precinct 130 | 493 | 543 | 8 | 1,044 | 47.2% | 52.0% | R+4.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 267Precinct 267 | 524 | 476 | 5 | 1,005 | 52.1% | 47.4% | D+4.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 341Precinct 341 | 431 | 543 | 10 | 984 | 43.8% | 55.2% | R+11.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 218Precinct 218 | 516 | 448 | 14 | 978 | 52.8% | 45.8% | D+7.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 272Precinct 272 | 438 | 494 | 5 | 937 | 46.7% | 52.7% | R+6.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 134Precinct 134 | 422 | 486 | 8 | 916 | 46.1% | 53.1% | R+7.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 176APrecinct 176A | 365 | 521 | 3 | 889 | 41.1% | 58.6% | R+17.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 129Precinct 129 | 409 | 438 | 7 | 854 | 47.9% | 51.3% | R+3.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 169Precinct 169 | 395 | 434 | 6 | 835 | 47.3% | 52.0% | R+4.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 273Precinct 273 | 370 | 411 | 6 | 787 | 47.0% | 52.2% | R+5.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 219Precinct 219 | 396 | 336 | 8 | 740 | 53.5% | 45.4% | D+8.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 124Precinct 124 | 404 | 326 | 7 | 737 | 54.8% | 44.2% | D+10.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 413Precinct 413 | 404 | 319 | 7 | 730 | 55.3% | 43.7% | D+11.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 405Precinct 405 | 373 | 325 | 7 | 705 | 52.9% | 46.1% | D+6.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 361Precinct 361 | 397 | 299 | 8 | 704 | 56.4% | 42.5% | D+13.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 133Precinct 133 | 319 | 379 | 2 | 700 | 45.6% | 54.1% | R+8.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 311Precinct 311 | 401 | 277 | 7 | 685 | 58.5% | 40.4% | D+18.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 266Precinct 266 | 366 | 309 | 7 | 682 | 53.7% | 45.3% | D+8.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 404Precinct 404 | 355 | 286 | 6 | 647 | 54.9% | 44.2% | D+10.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 221Precinct 221 | 369 | 254 | 12 | 635 | 58.1% | 40.0% | D+18.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 415Precinct 415 | 327 | 238 | 9 | 574 | 57.0% | 41.5% | D+15.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 128Precinct 128 | 297 | 267 | 8 | 572 | 51.9% | 46.7% | D+5.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 401Precinct 401 | 331 | 231 | 8 | 570 | 58.1% | 40.5% | D+17.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 226Precinct 226 | 307 | 233 | 6 | 546 | 56.2% | 42.7% | D+13.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 275APrecinct 275A | 223 | 313 | 6 | 542 | 41.1% | 57.7% | R+16.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 402Precinct 402 | 315 | 219 | 8 | 542 | 58.1% | 40.4% | D+17.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 220Precinct 220 | 293 | 225 | 4 | 522 | 56.1% | 43.1% | D+13.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 308Precinct 308 | 237 | 234 | 3 | 474 | 50.0% | 49.4% | D+0.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 312Precinct 312 | 266 | 180 | 9 | 455 | 58.5% | 39.6% | D+18.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 403Precinct 403 | 241 | 205 | 5 | 451 | 53.4% | 45.5% | D+8.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 164Precinct 164 | 238 | 189 | 6 | 433 | 55.0% | 43.6% | D+11.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 135Precinct 135 | 197 | 226 | 9 | 432 | 45.6% | 52.3% | R+6.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 237Precinct 237 | 124 | 250 | 6 | 380 | 32.6% | 65.8% | R+33.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 125Precinct 125 | 213 | 153 | 6 | 372 | 57.3% | 41.1% | D+16.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 123Precinct 123 | 206 | 149 | 1 | 356 | 57.9% | 41.9% | D+16.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 414Precinct 414 | 206 | 137 | 1 | 344 | 59.9% | 39.8% | D+20.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 363Precinct 363 | 185 | 152 | 3 | 340 | 54.4% | 44.7% | D+9.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 465Precinct 465 | 200 | 136 | 3 | 339 | 59.0% | 40.1% | D+18.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 416Precinct 416 | 190 | 134 | 7 | 331 | 57.4% | 40.5% | D+16.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 406Precinct 406 | 179 | 145 | 6 | 330 | 54.2% | 43.9% | D+10.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 177Precinct 177 | 170 | 151 | 4 | 325 | 52.3% | 46.5% | D+5.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 227Precinct 227 | 139 | 181 | 2 | 322 | 43.2% | 56.2% | R+13.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 268Precinct 268 | 130 | 191 | 1 | 322 | 40.4% | 59.3% | R+18.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 422Precinct 422 | 145 | 132 | 2 | 279 | 52.0% | 47.3% | D+4.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 417Precinct 417 | 147 | 95 | 1 | 243 | 60.5% | 39.1% | D+21.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 448Precinct 448 | 104 | 126 | 5 | 235 | 44.3% | 53.6% | R+9.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 251Precinct 251 | 113 | 86 | 4 | 203 | 55.7% | 42.4% | D+13.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 460Precinct 460 | 114 | 87 | 2 | 203 | 56.2% | 42.9% | D+13.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 310Precinct 310 | 109 | 84 | 3 | 196 | 55.6% | 42.9% | D+12.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 407Precinct 407 | 104 | 87 | 3 | 194 | 53.6% | 44.8% | D+8.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 453Precinct 453 | 104 | 88 | 0 | 192 | 54.2% | 45.8% | D+8.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 136Precinct 136 | 53 | 133 | 0 | 186 | 28.5% | 71.5% | R+43.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 238Precinct 238 | 58 | 85 | 3 | 146 | 39.7% | 58.2% | R+18.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 462Precinct 462 | 83 | 51 | 1 | 135 | 61.5% | 37.8% | D+23.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 457Precinct 457 | 9 | 41 | 0 | 50 | 18.0% | 82.0% | R+64.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 278Precinct 278 | 13 | 18 | 0 | 31 | 41.9% | 58.1% | R+16.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 250CPrecinct 250C | 13 | 17 | 0 | 30 | 43.3% | 56.7% | R+13.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 275BPrecinct 275B | 12 | 16 | 0 | 28 | 42.9% | 57.1% | R+14.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 176BPrecinct 176B | 10 | 15 | 0 | 25 | 40.0% | 60.0% | R+20.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 250BPrecinct 250B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
presidential history
Presidential margin, 1904–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | −31.2% |
| 1908 | −65.3% |
| 1912 | −14.8% |
| 1916 | +17.8% |
| 1920 | +14.8% |
| 1924 | +49.3% |
| 1928 | +35.6% |
| 1932 | +73.3% |
| 1936 | +67.6% |
| 1940 | +68.5% |
| 1944 | +71.2% |
| 1948 | +63.1% |
| 1952 | +38.1% |
| 1956 | +35.9% |
| 1960 | +69.6% |
| 1964 | +80.3% |
| 1968 | +61.9% |
| 1972 | +16.8% |
| 1976 | +41.8% |
| 1980 | +36.6% |
| 1984 | +17.8% |
| 1988 | +36.5% |
| 1992 | +27.0% |
| 1996 | +57.7% |
| 2000 | +16.0% |
| 2004 | +14.2% |
| 2008 | +43.4% |
| 2012 | +53.9% |
| 2016 | +51.0% |
| 2020 | +23.3% |
| 2024 | −2.2% |
DemocraticRepublican
Federal and statewide elections · 2 House · 37 Senate · 4 Senate special · 12 governor
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
voter registration
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
Registered voters
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 123,291 |
| 2018 | 129,244 |
| 2020 | 137,840 |
| 2022 | 143,148 |
| 2024 | 148,536 |
domestic migration
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−2,250 net domestic migration · 2025
20112025
Net −29,288 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $53,687 in average income, against $55,182 for residents who stayed — 3% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+7.5 on average — 9.7 points more Democratic-leaning than Webb County, TX itself (R+2.2).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Bexar County, TX396D+9.7
- Harris County, TX131D+5.5
- Travis County, TX97D+39.3
- Hidalgo County, TX80R+2.9
- Dallas County, TX74D+22.2
- Tarrant County, TX45R+5.1
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Bexar County, TX895
- Harris County, TX178
- Travis County, TX158
- Hidalgo County, TX143
- Dallas County, TX99
- Tarrant County, TX62
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −700 |
| 2012 | −430 |
| 2013 | −1,096 |
| 2014 | −2,031 |
| 2015 | −2,664 |
| 2016 | −2,670 |
| 2017 | −2,916 |
| 2018 | −2,332 |
| 2019 | −2,208 |
| 2021 | −2,106 |
| 2022 | −3,141 |
| 2023 | −2,108 |
| 2024 | −2,636 |
| 2025 | −2,250 |
Webb County, anchored by Laredo on the Rio Grande, voted Democratic for decades before narrowing to R+2.2 in 2024—one of the steepest rightward shifts among majority-Hispanic counties in Texas.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 80.3 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 65.3 points in 1908. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 25.4 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 2.2 points.
A population of 269,294, a 4% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $63,058 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Hidalgo County and Maverick County.
Political twins — counties
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Hidalgo County
Texas
98.5twin score
% Latino2012–2016 trajectoryelasticity≠ % Catholic
Maverick County
Texas
97.9twin score
12-yr trend2012–2016 trajectory% Catholic≠ elasticity
Imperial County
California
96.7twin score
% Catholic% Latino2016 margin≠ 12-yr trend
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Cite this page
All citations released under CC BY 4.0. Attribution: Akashic Intelligence.
Webb County, Texas. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/48479/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.
License: CC BY 4.0
Embed this page
A live widget for your site — no API key, attribution built in, CC BY 4.0. All widgets & sizes →
Cities & towns in Webb County
Texas at the ballot boxAll elections →
Frequently asked questions
How did Webb County, Texas vote in 2024?
In 2024, Webb County, Texas voted Republican by 2.2 points (R+2.2), carried by the Republican candidate. Out of 65,865 votes cast, 31,952 went Democratic and 33,384 went Republican.
When did Webb County, Texas last vote Democratic?
The most recent presidential election in which Webb County, Texas voted Democratic was 2020.
How many people live in Webb County, Texas?
Webb County, Texas has a population of 269,294 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.
What is the median household income in Webb County, Texas?
Median household income in Webb County, Texas is $63,058 — below the national median of $80,734. The Texas state median is $78,476.
What is the political history of Webb County, Texas?
Akashic tracks 38 presidential elections in Webb County, Texas from 1876 to 2024. Of those, 27 went Democratic and 4 went Republican.