- Lead
- 9,962
- Total
- 18,217
- vs nation
- R+53.2
- Turnout
- 66.2%
Washington County, TX
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 66.2% of 27,708 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 8,698
- Total
- 17,449
- vs nation
- R+54.3
- Turnout
- 66.8%
- Lead
- 7,563
- Total
- 14,832
- vs nation
- R+53.1
- Turnout
- 59.8%
- Lead
- 7,476
- Total
- 14,397
- vs nation
- R+55.8
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 6,142
- Total
- 14,377
- vs nation
- R+50.0
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 6,208
- Total
- 13,063
- vs nation
- R+45.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 5,649
- Total
- 11,809
- vs nation
- R+48.4
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 2,859
- Total
- 10,419
- vs nation
- R+36.0
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+54.7MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 36,6472024 5-year
- Median household income
- $77,8252024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 61.4%2024 5-year
- Black
- 14.2%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 18.5%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+94.3 in 1932MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+54.7 in 2024MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Austin County, TX · twin score 92.6
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 66.2%18,342 participants ÷ 27,708 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +14.8 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off versus state
- -4.3 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 51.4%–55.7%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 15,172 | 25,382 | 59.8% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 13,639 | 25,427 | 53.6% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 17,543 | 26,248 | 66.8% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 14,130 | 27,142 | 52.1% | A/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 18,342 | 27,708 | 66.2% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
19 precincts · 18,265 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -Precinct 205Precinct 205 | 476 | 1,462 | 30 | 1,968 | 24.2% | 74.3% | R+50.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Precinct 307Precinct 307 | 416 | 1,238 | 11 | 1,665 | 25.0% | 74.4% | R+49.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 203Precinct 203 | 295 | 1,297 | 20 | 1,612 | 18.3% | 80.5% | R+62.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 320Precinct 320 | 201 | 1,300 | 18 | 1,519 | 13.2% | 85.6% | R+72.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 413Precinct 413 | 204 | 1,230 | 11 | 1,445 | 14.1% | 85.1% | R+71.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 208Precinct 208 | 187 | 1,075 | 15 | 1,277 | 14.6% | 84.2% | R+69.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 406Precinct 406 | 349 | 911 | 11 | 1,271 | 27.5% | 71.7% | R+44.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 104Precinct 104 | 634 | 453 | 8 | 1,095 | 57.9% | 41.4% | D+16.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 312Precinct 312 | 138 | 871 | 5 | 1,014 | 13.6% | 85.9% | R+72.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 311Precinct 311 | 156 | 827 | 13 | 996 | 15.7% | 83.0% | R+67.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 410Precinct 410 | 166 | 817 | 5 | 988 | 16.8% | 82.7% | R+65.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 101Precinct 101 | 281 | 637 | 10 | 928 | 30.3% | 68.6% | R+38.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 109Precinct 109 | 141 | 716 | 6 | 863 | 16.3% | 83.0% | R+66.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 115Precinct 115 | 164 | 566 | 6 | 736 | 22.3% | 76.9% | R+54.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 418Precinct 418 | 108 | 276 | 8 | 392 | 27.6% | 70.4% | R+42.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 419Precinct 419 | 93 | 291 | 7 | 391 | 23.8% | 74.4% | R+50.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 121Precinct 121 | 17 | 38 | 3 | 58 | 29.3% | 65.5% | R+36.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 117Precinct 117 | 32 | 12 | 0 | 44 | 72.7% | 27.3% | D+45.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 202Precinct 202 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
Presidential margin, 1904–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | +31.3% |
| 1908 | +31.8% |
| 1912 | +30.5% |
| 1916 | −7.7% |
| 1920 | +3.5% |
| 1924 | +74.3% |
| 1928 | +80.1% |
| 1932 | +94.3% |
| 1936 | +83.6% |
| 1940 | −12.6% |
| 1944 | +21.2% |
| 1948 | −6.9% |
| 1952 | −44.4% |
| 1956 | −52.1% |
| 1960 | −16.7% |
| 1964 | +18.5% |
| 1968 | −27.8% |
| 1972 | −48.8% |
| 1976 | −18.2% |
| 1980 | −30.7% |
| 1984 | −44.7% |
| 1988 | −34.1% |
| 1992 | −23.3% |
| 1996 | −27.4% |
| 2000 | −47.8% |
| 2004 | −47.5% |
| 2008 | −42.7% |
| 2012 | −51.9% |
| 2016 | −51.0% |
| 2020 | −49.8% |
| 2024 | −54.7% |
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 22,951 |
| 2018 | 23,238 |
| 2020 | 23,947 |
| 2022 | 24,644 |
| 2024 | 25,794 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+563 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +4,132 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $121,685 in average income, against $95,061 for residents who stayed — 28% higher. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+16.0 on average — 39 points more Democratic-leaning than Washington County, TX itself (R+54.7).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Harris County, TX273D+5.5
- Austin County, TX81R+62.7
- Brazos County, TX66R+24.8
- Travis County, TX38D+39.3
- Fort Bend County, TX36D+1.6
- Williamson County, TX36R+2.4
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Harris County, TX127
- Brazos County, TX91
- Austin County, TX54
- Burleson County, TX39
- Travis County, TX32
- Waller County, TX32
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +146 |
| 2012 | −115 |
| 2013 | +194 |
| 2014 | +136 |
| 2015 | +382 |
| 2016 | −157 |
| 2017 | +92 |
| 2018 | +614 |
| 2019 | +409 |
| 2021 | +220 |
| 2022 | +543 |
| 2023 | +822 |
| 2024 | +283 |
| 2025 | +563 |
Washington County, home to the historic town of Brenham, posts some of the widest Republican presidential margins in the Brazos Valley region, with ranching and small-town demographics anchoring a consistently lopsided electorate.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 94.3 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 54.7 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 4.8 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 54.7 points.
A population of 36,647, a 61% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $77,825 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Austin County and Cooke County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Washington County, Texas. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/48477/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.