- Lead
- 13,665
- Total
- 20,447
- vs nation
- R+65.4
- Turnout
- 66.3%
Cooke County, TX
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 66.3% of 30,995 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 12,386
- Total
- 19,025
- vs nation
- R+69.6
- Turnout
- 66.8%
- Lead
- 10,829
- Total
- 15,955
- vs nation
- R+70.0
- Turnout
- 60.4%
- Lead
- 9,705
- Total
- 14,351
- vs nation
- R+71.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 8,820
- Total
- 15,032
- vs nation
- R+65.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 8,766
- Total
- 15,107
- vs nation
- R+55.6
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 6,975
- Total
- 13,469
- vs nation
- R+52.3
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 3,538
- Total
- 12,297
- vs nation
- R+37.3
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+66.8MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 43,0462024 5-year
- Median household income
- $73,9322024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 71.3%2024 5-year
- Black
- 3.2%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 20.9%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+77.5 in 1932MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+67.9 in 2016MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Kingfisher County, OK · twin score 94.6
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 66.3%20,547 participants ÷ 30,995 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +15.4 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off versus state
- -3.6 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 50.9%–54.8%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 16,339 | 27,073 | 60.4% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 14,540 | 27,583 | 52.7% | C/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 19,117 | 28,624 | 66.8% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 15,449 | 30,084 | 51.4% | A/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 20,547 | 30,995 | 66.3% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 150/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
17 precincts · 20,447 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -Precinct 1CPrecinct 1C | 634 | 1,736 | 34 | 2,404 | 26.4% | 72.2% | R+45.8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Precinct 11Precinct 11 | 325 | 1,709 | 9 | 2,043 | 15.9% | 83.7% | R+67.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 10Precinct 10 | 262 | 1,588 | 14 | 1,864 | 14.1% | 85.2% | R+71.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 22Precinct 22 | 300 | 1,496 | 11 | 1,807 | 16.6% | 82.8% | R+66.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 6Precinct 6 | 186 | 1,581 | 11 | 1,778 | 10.5% | 88.9% | R+78.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 4CPrecinct 4C | 376 | 1,162 | 19 | 1,557 | 24.1% | 74.6% | R+50.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 18Precinct 18 | 124 | 1,415 | 12 | 1,551 | 8.0% | 91.2% | R+83.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 7Precinct 7 | 145 | 1,124 | 11 | 1,280 | 11.3% | 87.8% | R+76.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 21Precinct 21 | 125 | 1,056 | 10 | 1,191 | 10.5% | 88.7% | R+78.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 2Precinct 2 | 368 | 790 | 13 | 1,171 | 31.4% | 67.5% | R+36.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 12Precinct 12 | 137 | 828 | 5 | 970 | 14.1% | 85.4% | R+71.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 8Precinct 8 | 88 | 754 | 3 | 845 | 10.4% | 89.2% | R+78.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 3Precinct 3 | 65 | 472 | 1 | 538 | 12.1% | 87.7% | R+75.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 17Precinct 17 | 35 | 404 | 1 | 440 | 8.0% | 91.8% | R+83.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 33Precinct 33 | 49 | 373 | 3 | 425 | 11.5% | 87.8% | R+76.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 1Precinct 1 | 52 | 278 | 4 | 334 | 15.6% | 83.2% | R+67.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 4Precinct 4 | 39 | 209 | 1 | 249 | 15.7% | 83.9% | R+68.3 |
Presidential margin, 1904–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | +62.3% |
| 1908 | +62.5% |
| 1912 | +67.1% |
| 1916 | +70.2% |
| 1920 | +34.4% |
| 1924 | +64.7% |
| 1928 | −8.1% |
| 1932 | +77.5% |
| 1936 | +68.3% |
| 1940 | +53.4% |
| 1944 | +47.6% |
| 1948 | +40.7% |
| 1952 | −24.5% |
| 1956 | −29.2% |
| 1960 | −11.4% |
| 1964 | +13.4% |
| 1968 | −13.7% |
| 1972 | −57.2% |
| 1976 | −3.4% |
| 1980 | −27.0% |
| 1984 | −43.1% |
| 1988 | −26.0% |
| 1992 | −16.8% |
| 1996 | −28.8% |
| 2000 | −51.8% |
| 2004 | −58.0% |
| 2008 | −58.7% |
| 2012 | −67.6% |
| 2016 | −67.9% |
| 2020 | −65.1% |
| 2024 | −66.8% |
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 25,086 |
| 2018 | 25,747 |
| 2020 | 27,268 |
| 2022 | 28,699 |
| 2024 | 30,193 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+49 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +3,588 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $68,716 in average income, against $92,788 for residents who stayed — 26% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+21.2 on average — 46 points more Democratic-leaning than Cooke County, TX itself (R+66.8).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Denton County, TX454R+13.1
- Grayson County, TX157R+54.2
- Tarrant County, TX86R+5.1
- Dallas County, TX64D+22.2
- Collin County, TX53R+11.1
- Montague County, TX34R+77.6
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Denton County, TX276
- Grayson County, TX189
- Carter County, OK53
- Tarrant County, TX51
- Dallas County, TX49
- Love County, OK45
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −178 |
| 2012 | +144 |
| 2013 | −440 |
| 2014 | +142 |
| 2015 | +194 |
| 2016 | −38 |
| 2017 | +416 |
| 2018 | +402 |
| 2019 | +616 |
| 2021 | +687 |
| 2022 | +578 |
| 2023 | +643 |
| 2024 | +373 |
| 2025 | +49 |
Cooke County, anchored by Gainesville on I-35 near the Oklahoma border, has delivered Republican presidential margins above 60 points in each of the last three cycles, reflecting a predominantly rural, non-Hispanic white electorate with little urban counterweight.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 77.5 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 67.9 points in 2016. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.7 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 66.8 points.
A population of 43,046, a 71% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $73,932 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Kingfisher County and Austin County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Cooke County, Texas. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/48097/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.