HarrisDemocratic48.7%84,205TrumpRepublican50.2%86,713SteinIndependent0.5%846
R+1.5- Lead
- 2,508
- Total
- 172,780
- vs nation
- Even
- Turnout
- 63.0%
Akashiccounty
Osceola County, FL
Office (updates table and map)
President margin by year
Place winner margin
Boundary by 2024 margin · Precinct returns · VEST · MIT Election Lab
President results by year
2024 turnout 63.0% of 276,678 citizens 18+
BidenDemocratic56.4%97,297TrumpRepublican42.6%73,480JorgensenLibertarian0.6%964
D+13.8- Lead
- 23,817
- Total
- 172,436
- vs nation
- D+9.4
- Turnout
- 71.6%
ClintonDemocratic61.0%85,458TrumpRepublican35.9%50,301JohnsonLibertarian2.0%2,811
D+25.1- Lead
- 35,157
- Total
- 140,206
- vs nation
- D+23.0
- Turnout
- 68.8%
ObamaDemocratic61.9%67,239RomneyRepublican37.3%40,592OtherAll other candidates0.8%867
D+24.5- Lead
- 26,647
- Total
- 108,698
- vs nation
- D+20.7
- Turnout
- —
ObamaDemocratic59.6%59,962McCainRepublican39.8%40,086OtherAll other candidates0.6%622
D+19.7- Lead
- 19,876
- Total
- 100,670
- vs nation
- D+12.5
- Turnout
- —
KerryDemocratic47.0%38,633BushRepublican52.5%43,117OtherAll other candidates0.6%454
R+5.5- Lead
- 4,484
- Total
- 82,204
- vs nation
- R+3.0
- Turnout
- —
GoreDemocratic50.6%28,187BushRepublican47.1%26,237NaderGreen1.3%733
D+3.5- Lead
- 1,950
- Total
- 55,690
- vs nation
- D+3.0
- Turnout
- —
ClintonDemocratic47.0%21,874DoleRepublican39.4%18,337PerotReform13.1%6,092
D+7.6- Lead
- 3,537
- Total
- 46,491
- vs nation
- R+0.9
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+1.5MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 427,4152024 5-year
- Median household income
- $72,6372024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 27.2%2024 5-year
- Black
- 9.9%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 56.0%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+94.2 in 1892MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+66.3 in 1972MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Cameron County, TX · twin score 91.4
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 63.0%174,394 participants ÷ 276,678 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +31.8 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off versus state
- +8.7 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 31.2%–38.5%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 142,716 | 207,525 | 68.8% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 116,475 | 225,928 | 51.6% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 173,695 | 242,760 | 71.6% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 103,173 | 259,572 | 39.7% | A/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 174,394 | 276,678 | 63.0% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
126 precincts · 173,285 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -42014201 | 3,324 | 4,540 | 86 | 7,950 | 41.8% | 57.1% | R+15.3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -30063006 | 4,382 | 2,684 | 86 | 7,152 | 61.3% | 37.5% | D+23.7 |
| Precinct -20022002 | 3,727 | 2,674 | 75 | 6,476 | 57.6% | 41.3% | D+16.3 |
| Precinct -50015001 | 2,218 | 3,052 | 79 | 5,349 | 41.5% | 57.1% | R+15.6 |
| Precinct -15141514 | 2,620 | 2,541 | 76 | 5,237 | 50.0% | 48.5% | D+1.5 |
| Precinct -50005000 | 2,380 | 2,586 | 66 | 5,032 | 47.3% | 51.4% | R+4.1 |
| Precinct -52015201 | 2,023 | 2,877 | 58 | 4,958 | 40.8% | 58.0% | R+17.2 |
| Precinct -20042004 | 2,840 | 2,004 | 58 | 4,902 | 57.9% | 40.9% | D+17.1 |
| Precinct -30093009 | 2,733 | 2,078 | 70 | 4,881 | 56.0% | 42.6% | D+13.4 |
| Precinct -52005200 | 1,710 | 2,634 | 62 | 4,406 | 38.8% | 59.8% | R+21.0 |
| Precinct -10011001 | 2,122 | 1,542 | 77 | 3,741 | 56.7% | 41.2% | D+15.5 |
| Precinct -40054005 | 1,742 | 1,756 | 34 | 3,532 | 49.3% | 49.7% | R+0.4 |
| Precinct -50105010 | 746 | 2,642 | 37 | 3,425 | 21.8% | 77.1% | R+55.4 |
| Precinct -50035003 | 1,450 | 1,772 | 32 | 3,254 | 44.6% | 54.5% | R+9.9 |
| Precinct -30073007 | 2,138 | 1,011 | 36 | 3,185 | 67.1% | 31.7% | D+35.4 |
| Precinct -41024102 | 1,609 | 1,491 | 61 | 3,161 | 50.9% | 47.2% | D+3.7 |
| Precinct -21052105 | 1,732 | 1,343 | 35 | 3,110 | 55.7% | 43.2% | D+12.5 |
| Precinct -20052005 | 1,449 | 1,524 | 41 | 3,014 | 48.1% | 50.6% | R+2.5 |
| Precinct -10041004 | 1,449 | 1,236 | 83 | 2,768 | 52.3% | 44.7% | D+7.7 |
| Precinct -30043004 | 1,408 | 1,238 | 40 | 2,686 | 52.4% | 46.1% | D+6.3 |
| Precinct -30003000 | 1,452 | 1,119 | 22 | 2,593 | 56.0% | 43.2% | D+12.8 |
| Precinct -40044004 | 932 | 1,540 | 24 | 2,496 | 37.3% | 61.7% | R+24.4 |
| Precinct -11021102 | 1,198 | 1,053 | 58 | 2,309 | 51.9% | 45.6% | D+6.3 |
| Precinct -42004200 | 1,011 | 1,245 | 32 | 2,288 | 44.2% | 54.4% | R+10.2 |
| Precinct -25012501 | 1,206 | 1,033 | 18 | 2,257 | 53.4% | 45.8% | D+7.7 |
| Precinct -15211521 | 1,038 | 1,081 | 23 | 2,142 | 48.5% | 50.5% | R+2.0 |
| Precinct -50085008 | 497 | 1,611 | 18 | 2,126 | 23.4% | 75.8% | R+52.4 |
| Precinct -52025202 | 981 | 1,059 | 32 | 2,072 | 47.3% | 51.1% | R+3.8 |
| Precinct -55055505 | 751 | 1,253 | 27 | 2,031 | 37.0% | 61.7% | R+24.7 |
| Precinct -50095009 | 530 | 1,358 | 15 | 1,903 | 27.9% | 71.4% | R+43.5 |
| Precinct -21042104 | 903 | 937 | 20 | 1,860 | 48.5% | 50.4% | R+1.8 |
| Precinct -30083008 | 1,190 | 627 | 27 | 1,844 | 64.5% | 34.0% | D+30.5 |
| Precinct -30033003 | 1,011 | 725 | 17 | 1,753 | 57.7% | 41.4% | D+16.3 |
| Precinct -21032103 | 859 | 854 | 13 | 1,726 | 49.8% | 49.5% | D+0.3 |
| Precinct -52035203 | 656 | 897 | 17 | 1,570 | 41.8% | 57.1% | R+15.4 |
| Precinct -11031103 | 803 | 713 | 18 | 1,534 | 52.3% | 46.5% | D+5.9 |
| Precinct -30023002 | 691 | 772 | 23 | 1,486 | 46.5% | 52.0% | R+5.5 |
| Precinct -10071007 | 773 | 661 | 40 | 1,474 | 52.4% | 44.8% | D+7.6 |
| Precinct -20002000 | 679 | 691 | 21 | 1,391 | 48.8% | 49.7% | R+0.9 |
| Precinct -52055205 | 585 | 760 | 20 | 1,365 | 42.9% | 55.7% | R+12.8 |
| Precinct -21002100 | 687 | 555 | 40 | 1,282 | 53.6% | 43.3% | D+10.3 |
| Precinct -41034103 | 689 | 570 | 18 | 1,277 | 54.0% | 44.6% | D+9.3 |
| Precinct -36003600 | 725 | 522 | 20 | 1,267 | 57.2% | 41.2% | D+16.0 |
| Precinct -55035503 | 561 | 680 | 16 | 1,257 | 44.6% | 54.1% | R+9.5 |
| Precinct -52065206 | 579 | 661 | 15 | 1,255 | 46.1% | 52.7% | R+6.5 |
| Precinct -55015501 | 600 | 599 | 14 | 1,213 | 49.5% | 49.4% | D+0.1 |
| Precinct -30103010 | 586 | 589 | 10 | 1,185 | 49.5% | 49.7% | R+0.3 |
| Precinct -45004500 | 568 | 562 | 22 | 1,152 | 49.3% | 48.8% | D+0.5 |
| Precinct -15041504 | 593 | 521 | 17 | 1,131 | 52.4% | 46.1% | D+6.4 |
| Precinct -15001500 | 661 | 437 | 15 | 1,113 | 59.4% | 39.3% | D+20.1 |
| Precinct -50125012 | 192 | 871 | 21 | 1,084 | 17.7% | 80.4% | R+62.6 |
| Precinct -10001000 | 564 | 504 | 12 | 1,080 | 52.2% | 46.7% | D+5.6 |
| Precinct -47034703 | 533 | 519 | 18 | 1,070 | 49.8% | 48.5% | D+1.3 |
| Precinct -50025002 | 313 | 719 | 15 | 1,047 | 29.9% | 68.7% | R+38.8 |
| Precinct -35023502 | 604 | 405 | 13 | 1,022 | 59.1% | 39.6% | D+19.5 |
| Precinct -57015701 | 481 | 508 | 9 | 998 | 48.2% | 50.9% | R+2.7 |
| Precinct -35033503 | 667 | 306 | 14 | 987 | 67.6% | 31.0% | D+36.6 |
| Precinct -10061006 | 490 | 474 | 19 | 983 | 49.8% | 48.2% | D+1.6 |
| Precinct -46004600 | 500 | 418 | 29 | 947 | 52.8% | 44.1% | D+8.7 |
| Precinct -21012101 | 491 | 426 | 25 | 942 | 52.1% | 45.2% | D+6.9 |
| Precinct -47004700 | 428 | 497 | 6 | 931 | 46.0% | 53.4% | R+7.4 |
| Precinct -47014701 | 400 | 482 | 7 | 889 | 45.0% | 54.2% | R+9.2 |
| Precinct -11011101 | 457 | 343 | 22 | 822 | 55.6% | 41.7% | D+13.9 |
| Precinct -41044104 | 500 | 275 | 11 | 786 | 63.6% | 35.0% | D+28.6 |
| Precinct -40064006 | 430 | 319 | 14 | 763 | 56.4% | 41.8% | D+14.5 |
| Precinct -30053005 | 382 | 369 | 9 | 760 | 50.3% | 48.6% | D+1.7 |
| Precinct -50055005 | 189 | 548 | 6 | 743 | 25.4% | 73.8% | R+48.3 |
| Precinct -55045504 | 303 | 424 | 10 | 737 | 41.1% | 57.5% | R+16.4 |
| Precinct -15031503 | 320 | 384 | 7 | 711 | 45.0% | 54.0% | R+9.0 |
| Precinct -15081508 | 378 | 317 | 8 | 703 | 53.8% | 45.1% | D+8.7 |
| Precinct -55025502 | 286 | 407 | 8 | 701 | 40.8% | 58.1% | R+17.3 |
| Precinct -35043504 | 388 | 301 | 5 | 694 | 55.9% | 43.4% | D+12.5 |
| Precinct -11001100 | 363 | 312 | 15 | 690 | 52.6% | 45.2% | D+7.4 |
| Precinct -15171517 | 394 | 280 | 13 | 687 | 57.4% | 40.8% | D+16.6 |
| Precinct -15121512 | 230 | 411 | 15 | 656 | 35.1% | 62.7% | R+27.6 |
| Precinct -41014101 | 346 | 279 | 11 | 636 | 54.4% | 43.9% | D+10.5 |
| Precinct -50115011 | 111 | 514 | 4 | 629 | 17.6% | 81.7% | R+64.1 |
| Precinct -10031003 | 236 | 355 | 11 | 602 | 39.2% | 59.0% | R+19.8 |
| Precinct -35013501 | 350 | 245 | 6 | 601 | 58.2% | 40.8% | D+17.5 |
| Precinct -40004000 | 118 | 461 | 3 | 582 | 20.3% | 79.2% | R+58.9 |
| Precinct -40034003 | 233 | 332 | 12 | 577 | 40.4% | 57.5% | R+17.2 |
| Precinct -25002500 | 325 | 235 | 8 | 568 | 57.2% | 41.4% | D+15.8 |
| Precinct -50045004 | 161 | 385 | 4 | 550 | 29.3% | 70.0% | R+40.7 |
| Precinct -45014501 | 271 | 269 | 9 | 549 | 49.4% | 49.0% | D+0.4 |
| Precinct -57005700 | 267 | 260 | 5 | 532 | 50.2% | 48.9% | D+1.3 |
| Precinct -15021502 | 227 | 280 | 1 | 508 | 44.7% | 55.1% | R+10.4 |
| Precinct -15191519 | 257 | 210 | 5 | 472 | 54.4% | 44.5% | D+10.0 |
| Precinct -10051005 | 190 | 270 | 11 | 471 | 40.3% | 57.3% | R+17.0 |
| Precinct -10081008 | 216 | 240 | 4 | 460 | 47.0% | 52.2% | R+5.2 |
| Precinct -35003500 | 255 | 190 | 5 | 450 | 56.7% | 42.2% | D+14.4 |
| Precinct -15101510 | 252 | 191 | 5 | 448 | 56.3% | 42.6% | D+13.6 |
| Precinct -10021002 | 274 | 147 | 6 | 427 | 64.2% | 34.4% | D+29.7 |
| Precinct -20012001 | 186 | 232 | 5 | 423 | 44.0% | 54.8% | R+10.9 |
| Precinct -31003100 | 217 | 193 | 6 | 416 | 52.2% | 46.4% | D+5.8 |
| Precinct -15071507 | 160 | 116 | 2 | 278 | 57.6% | 41.7% | D+15.8 |
| Precinct -15091509 | 166 | 100 | 3 | 269 | 61.7% | 37.2% | D+24.5 |
| Precinct -31013101 | 127 | 135 | 6 | 268 | 47.4% | 50.4% | R+3.0 |
| Precinct -41004100 | 105 | 150 | 8 | 263 | 39.9% | 57.0% | R+17.1 |
| Precinct -15051505 | 157 | 98 | 6 | 261 | 60.2% | 37.5% | D+22.6 |
| Precinct -20032003 | 127 | 106 | 3 | 236 | 53.8% | 44.9% | D+8.9 |
| Precinct -45024502 | 110 | 118 | 3 | 231 | 47.6% | 51.1% | R+3.5 |
| Precinct -21022102 | 110 | 99 | 1 | 210 | 52.4% | 47.1% | D+5.2 |
| Precinct -55005500 | 90 | 109 | 8 | 207 | 43.5% | 52.7% | R+9.2 |
| Precinct -55095509 | 69 | 94 | 3 | 166 | 41.6% | 56.6% | R+15.1 |
| Precinct -52045204 | 72 | 84 | 1 | 157 | 45.9% | 53.5% | R+7.6 |
| Precinct -15201520 | 82 | 48 | 0 | 130 | 63.1% | 36.9% | D+26.2 |
| Precinct -50065006 | 29 | 92 | 1 | 122 | 23.8% | 75.4% | R+51.6 |
| Precinct -36013601 | 43 | 45 | 0 | 88 | 48.9% | 51.1% | R+2.3 |
| Precinct -30013001 | 27 | 50 | 2 | 79 | 34.2% | 63.3% | R+29.1 |
| Precinct -40014001 | 12 | 47 | 1 | 60 | 20.0% | 78.3% | R+58.3 |
| Precinct -47024702 | 22 | 38 | 0 | 60 | 36.7% | 63.3% | R+26.7 |
| Precinct -55065506 | 24 | 22 | 1 | 47 | 51.1% | 46.8% | D+4.3 |
| Precinct -40024002 | 10 | 35 | 1 | 46 | 21.7% | 76.1% | R+54.3 |
| Precinct -40104010 | 17 | 25 | 0 | 42 | 40.5% | 59.5% | R+19.0 |
| Precinct -50075007 | 11 | 17 | 0 | 28 | 39.3% | 60.7% | R+21.4 |
| Precinct -55075507 | 11 | 17 | 0 | 28 | 39.3% | 60.7% | R+21.4 |
| Precinct -15011501 | 15 | 12 | 0 | 27 | 55.6% | 44.4% | D+11.1 |
| Precinct -16001600 | 13 | 9 | 3 | 25 | 52.0% | 36.0% | D+16.0 |
| Precinct -40094009 | 9 | 14 | 1 | 24 | 37.5% | 58.3% | R+20.8 |
| Precinct -55115511 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 88.9% | 11.1% | D+77.8 |
| Precinct -15111511 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 16.7% | 83.3% | R+66.7 |
| Precinct -15181518 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 100.0% | 0.0% | D+100.0 |
| Precinct -15131513 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| Precinct -45044504 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| Precinct -40074007 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0.0% | Exact tie |
| Precinct -45034503 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% | 0.0% | D+100.0 |
presidential history
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +94.2% |
| 1896 | +38.0% |
| 1900 | +60.2% |
| 1904 | +58.4% |
| 1908 | +33.3% |
| 1912 | +45.2% |
| 1916 | +5.0% |
| 1920 | −16.4% |
| 1924 | +16.8% |
| 1928 | −21.7% |
| 1932 | +29.3% |
| 1936 | +19.1% |
| 1940 | +17.0% |
| 1944 | +11.5% |
| 1948 | +0.1% |
| 1952 | −24.5% |
| 1956 | −30.4% |
| 1960 | −36.6% |
| 1964 | −12.2% |
| 1968 | −24.2% |
| 1972 | −66.3% |
| 1976 | −1.2% |
| 1980 | −23.4% |
| 1984 | −46.9% |
| 1988 | −36.8% |
| 1992 | −9.1% |
| 1996 | +7.6% |
| 2000 | +3.5% |
| 2004 | −5.5% |
| 2008 | +19.7% |
| 2012 | +24.5% |
| 2016 | +25.1% |
| 2020 | +13.8% |
| 2024 | −1.5% |
DemocraticRepublican
Federal and statewide elections · 3 House · 38 Senate · 1 Senate special · 12 governor
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1936Special · Class I | D | 40.2%Charles O. Andrews1,759 | 18.1%Howard C. Babcock794 | 4,380 |
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
voter registration
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Party registration · 2024D+8.4
Presidential vote · 2024R+1.5
Osceola County, FL registers Democratic but votes Republican — a 9.9-point gap between how voters register and how they vote, the signature of ancestral registration that trails realignment.
DemocraticRepublicanUnaffiliatedOther parties
| Year | Total registered | Democratic | Republican | Unaffiliated | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 201,641 | 86,546 | 47,017 | 67,434 | 644 |
| 2018 | 215,840 | 92,518 | 49,215 | 72,942 | 1,165 |
| 2019 | 218,338 | 91,613 | 49,229 | 75,903 | 1,593 |
| 2020 | 245,714 | 102,614 | 56,822 | 83,424 | 2,854 |
| 2021 | 242,282 | 98,423 | 55,881 | 84,891 | 3,087 |
| 2023 | 219,596 | 81,896 | 57,337 | 75,799 | 4,564 |
| 2024 | 243,261 | 87,656 | 67,156 | 81,054 | 7,395 |
domestic migration
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+7,272 net domestic migration · 2025
20112025
Net +85,484 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $59,989 in average income, against $59,382 for residents who stayed — 1% higher. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+5.7 on average — 7.1 points more Democratic-leaning than Osceola County, FL itself (R+1.5).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Orange County, FL7,271D+13.6
- Polk County, FL1,987R+20.7
- Miami-Dade County, FL775R+11.4
- Broward County, FL590D+17.0
- Seminole County, FL510R+3.6
- Lake County, FL504R+24.7
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Orange County, FL5,567
- Polk County, FL3,499
- Lake County, FL823
- Seminole County, FL552
- Brevard County, FL398
- Hillsborough County, FL339
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +3,254 |
| 2012 | +4,471 |
| 2013 | +4,531 |
| 2014 | +4,726 |
| 2015 | +5,026 |
| 2016 | +6,204 |
| 2017 | +6,532 |
| 2018 | +4,435 |
| 2019 | +4,041 |
| 2021 | +10,447 |
| 2022 | +12,148 |
| 2023 | +7,282 |
| 2024 | +5,115 |
| 2025 | +7,272 |
Osceola's large Puerto Rican community near Kissimmee has made it a closely watched barometer of Latino voting shifts in central Florida, with the 2024 margin tightening to R+1.4 after years of Democratic-leaning results.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 94.2 points in 1892 and a Republican high of 66.3 points in 1972. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 15.3 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 1.5 points.
A population of 427,415, a 27% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $72,637 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Cameron County and Hidalgo County.
Political twins — counties
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Cameron County
Texas
91.4twin score
2012–2016 trajectory% Latinoelasticity≠ Mexican ancestry
Hidalgo County
Texas
90.9twin score
elasticity% Latino2016–2020 trajectory≠ 12-yr trend
El Paso County
Texas
90.4twin score
% Latino2012–2016 trajectoryelasticity≠ % Catholic
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Cite this page
All citations released under CC BY 4.0. Attribution: Akashic Intelligence.
Osceola County, Florida. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/12097/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.
License: CC BY 4.0
Embed this page
A live widget for your site — no API key, attribution built in, CC BY 4.0. All widgets & sizes →
Cities & towns in Osceola County
Florida at the ballot boxAll elections →
Frequently asked questions
How did Osceola County, Florida vote in 2024?
In 2024, Osceola County, Florida voted Republican by 1.5 points (R+1.5), carried by the Republican candidate. Out of 172,780 votes cast, 84,205 went Democratic and 86,713 went Republican.
When did Osceola County, Florida last vote Democratic?
The most recent presidential election in which Osceola County, Florida voted Democratic was 2020.
How many people live in Osceola County, Florida?
Osceola County, Florida has a population of 427,415 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.
What is the median household income in Osceola County, Florida?
Median household income in Osceola County, Florida is $72,637 — below the national median of $80,734. The Florida state median is $74,568.
What is the political history of Osceola County, Florida?
Akashic tracks 38 presidential elections in Osceola County, Florida from 1876 to 2024. Of those, 19 went Democratic and 15 went Republican.