Explore / all combined areas

All 180 combined statistical areas

Combined Statistical Areas — adjacent metros and micros linked by commuting ties, like “Greater New York” and the Bay Area — grouped by primary state.

combined statistical areas ranked by presidential margin, one column per election from 1892 to 2024, with the latest demographic snapshot (population, income, $200k+ households, poverty, median age, education, race and ethnicity, language, religion) pinned at the right. Use the column headers to re-sort.

1Burlington-South Burlington-Barre, VTVT	−26.4	−50.3	−37.0	−46.6	−38.3	−6.9	−15.9	−40.2	−50.5	−11.5	+1.4	+8.9	+9.9	+8.5	−4.3	−25.3	−24.3	+3.5	+40.3	+1.6	−22.2	−9.1	+0.5	−11.6	+1.4	+19.1	+26.2	+14.7	+24.6	+40.4	+38.4	+34.3	+44.7	+41.8	287,863	$91.3k	—	9.6%	9.0%	39.6	95.7%	50.0%	21.0%	87.9%	1.6%	2.7%	2.9%	6.9%	9.1%	29.4%	52.4%
2San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CACA	+3.2	−6.2	−18.3	−37.3	−26.5	+44.1	+2.9	−43.7	−47.3	−18.1	+20.5	+37.0	+13.6	+15.8	−0.3	−10.1	−8.6	+3.7	+31.3	+8.5	−1.5	+4.3	−4.5	+1.0	+14.6	+28.3	+28.8	+29.7	+33.7	+44.0	+43.8	+49.4	+47.9	+39.4	9,107,604	$129.9k	—	9.5%	10.4%	38.8	87.4%	45.8%	19.9%	33.0%	5.3%	29.3%	25.8%	44.7%	6.9%	23.1%	59.6%
3Madison-Janesville-Beloit, WIWI	−4.4	−24.6	−29.7	−37.9	−20.4	+6.8	−6.9	−67.6	−34.9	−23.5	+11.0	+24.8	+6.1	+2.7	+6.8	−19.8	−19.5	−10.4	+29.3	+3.5	+1.2	+6.0	+5.5	+0.6	+11.3	+18.3	+22.1	+22.2	+24.2	+39.0	+35.1	+32.6	+36.1	+34.4	922,189	$85.9k	—	9.8%	9.5%	38.0	95.2%	44.4%	16.9%	79.2%	4.2%	7.6%	4.1%	9.8%	9.3%	14.1%	61.7%
4Ithaca-Cortland, NYNY	−15.4	−24.7	−20.8	−23.6	−22.0	+2.3	−19.1	−50.2	−54.6	−49.4	−34.1	−35.9	−36.6	−31.3	−38.7	−51.7	−57.7	−33.6	+28.2	−17.9	−26.8	−14.8	−8.8	−10.6	+5.9	+18.7	+19.0	+13.6	+18.9	+31.1	+30.2	+27.6	+32.8	+31.9	150,783	$72.9k	—	15.3%	11.0%	33.7	94.5%	49.7%	28.4%	78.5%	3.0%	5.7%	7.4%	13.8%	7.1%	10.6%	69.3%
5Seattle-Tacoma, WAWA	−7.3	+10.4	−15.9	−52.2	−25.3	+2.5	+8.1	−36.4	−43.9	−35.2	+26.8	+37.5	+22.6	+18.9	+9.4	−6.6	−8.0	−1.0	+26.1	+5.1	−17.8	−2.7	−9.9	−10.4	+3.9	+15.7	+18.1	+15.0	+16.8	+27.0	+25.4	+28.0	+31.5	+30.7	5,010,168	$112.0k	—	8.7%	10.1%	38.3	93.5%	44.5%	17.9%	59.7%	5.2%	11.6%	13.7%	23.4%	20.1%	10.7%	59.0%
6Washington-Baltimore-Arlington, DC-MD-VA-WV-PAVA	+13.3	−8.7	−5.4			+72.6	+11.5	−11.0	−1.1	−14.2	+27.2	+26.4	+18.7	+4.0	−1.8	−12.1	−18.7	+6.3	+34.5	+6.2	−18.8	+8.6	+2.0	−3.0	−2.0	+14.8	+15.2	+14.4	+13.7	+26.8	+26.4	+30.0	+35.3	+29.8	10,092,159	$119.0k	—	8.7%	11.1%	38.7	91.6%	49.0%	23.8%	47.4%	24.0%	14.3%	8.6%	24.4%	11.9%	14.4%	56.3%
7Chicago-Naperville, IL-IN-WIIL	+6.9	−20.5	−10.2	−35.2	−21.9	+11.0	−11.5	−51.2	−44.1	−10.6	+10.8	+22.8	+6.4	+10.1	+4.2	−5.9	−18.8	+6.6	+20.6	+1.3	−15.8	−0.1	−1.4	−9.0	−0.2	+16.4	+23.4	+19.8	+19.5	+34.6	+27.9	+31.1	+29.9	+22.3	9,905,766	$91.0k	—	11.3%	15.0%	38.7	90.0%	40.6%	16.5%	50.7%	15.2%	23.4%	7.0%	29.4%	8.3%	28.2%	48.1%
8Portland-Vancouver-Salem, OR-WAOR	−29.3	−10.6	−21.1	−52.9	−24.6	+7.9	−8.5	−25.6	−27.0	−27.2	+21.7	+37.7	+10.1	+9.5	+1.1	−16.9	−9.8	−6.1	+30.0	−1.6	−7.3	−0.3	−5.0	−8.4	+7.3	+12.3	+13.1	+7.6	+10.4	+22.7	+18.3	+19.1	+23.5	+21.9	3,299,262	$93.0k	—	10.5%	11.6%	39.1	92.0%	39.0%	15.0%	68.7%	2.4%	15.2%	5.9%	18.0%	14.9%	12.5%	63.7%
9Keene-Brattleboro, NH-VTVT	−25.7	−63.6	−45.1	−46.8	−45.4	−12.3	−19.6	−44.2	−56.0	−39.3	−23.9	−21.0	−16.4	−17.9	−27.6	−39.0	−47.4	−22.8	+36.9	−9.5	−19.5	−8.6	−15.8	−19.7	−3.0	+17.8	+22.8	+13.8	+25.0	+35.0	+33.0	+21.8	+28.3	+21.7	123,220	$79.2k	—	9.8%	11.0%	45.0	94.7%	38.7%	16.7%	90.9%	0.7%	2.8%	1.0%	3.7%	5.3%	12.4%	75.2%
10Raleigh-Durham-Cary, NCNC	+15.8	+16.1	+9.4	+31.9	+9.5	+48.3	+20.8	+19.6	+24.9	−4.6	+54.6	+64.6	+63.8	+51.4	+49.5	+28.8	+21.5	+21.0	+19.4	−1.0	−34.7	+10.1	+6.6	−13.6	−5.7	+8.2	+4.7	−0.9	+2.6	+16.9	+14.4	+19.6	+22.7	+21.3	2,336,314	$92.9k	—	10.3%	13.2%	37.7	92.1%	48.8%	20.6%	55.8%	20.2%	13.1%	5.8%	17.8%	19.6%	10.5%	52.7%
11Denver-Aurora-Greeley, COCO	−43.9	+74.4	+14.0	−10.4	+3.6	+26.3	+27.5	−28.3	−43.8	−31.3	+9.4	+26.4	0	−4.4	+4.3	−18.1	−17.8	−7.6	+24.3	−7.8	−25.3	−10.3	−20.9	−24.1	−2.0	+9.7	+4.9	+0.5	+4.5	+18.6	+14.6	+16.4	+24.8	+21.0	3,682,078	$106.0k	—	8.7%	10.6%	37.3	92.2%	48.9%	18.8%	62.1%	4.6%	23.8%	4.1%	19.3%	9.7%	15.9%	66.1%
12Springfield-Amherst Town-Northampton, MAMA	−7.5	−47.4	−23.6	−30.1	−24.1	−5.9	−7.4	−43.1	−40.2	−2.3	+0.3	+13.3	+10.6	+13.0	+8.5	−9.8	−17.6	+19.5	+47.8	+26.4	+3.3	+19.1	+5.0	+1.0	+16.1	+21.1	+35.2	+24.7	+29.4	+33.2	+32.5	+24.4	+28.0	+20.8	695,787	$75.3k	—	14.7%	19.6%	40.1	89.9%	35.6%	16.4%	67.1%	5.8%	20.2%	3.1%	20.7%	4.3%	25.8%	60.6%
13Philadelphia-Reading-Camden, PA-NJ-DE-MDNJ	−8.3	−36.6	−36.4	−48.0	−29.2	+2.1	−23.3	−42.7	−54.2	−33.8	−14.9	+17.7	+12.0	+9.6	−5.3	−0.8	−8.0	+9.6	+32.1	+6.8	−14.8	+8.2	−4.8	−8.3	−4.6	+13.8	+21.9	+21.1	+18.8	+28.4	+25.9	+23.2	+25.3	+20.7	7,417,149	$91.5k	—	11.7%	15.6%	39.6	91.7%	40.0%	16.6%	58.7%	18.2%	12.4%	5.9%	17.8%	7.7%	26.2%	51.3%
14Albuquerque-Santa Fe-Los Alamos, NMNM						−13.9	−13.0	−18.6	−14.7	−21.5	+13.9	+17.7	+4.2	−0.6	+0.6	−13.3	−20.7	+4.3	+21.5	−9.1	−17.7	−1.9	−13.9	−14.5	0	+13.8	+12.6	+8.1	+9.9	+25.9	+21.0	+20.1	+24.5	+20.3	1,168,091	$72.5k	—	14.5%	19.0%	41.3	90.7%	36.8%	17.1%	37.5%	2.0%	49.2%	2.1%	27.9%	11.8%	37.1%	41.5%
15Boston-Worcester-Providence, MA-RI-NHMA	−6.0	−42.5	−19.7	−20.2	−24.0	+4.4	−3.2	−37.3	−33.6	+0.4	+5.6	+9.4	+7.6	+6.8	+11.9	−8.0	−19.2	+20.0	+52.6	+28.0	+3.9	+12.4	−2.2	−6.8	+3.3	+15.5	+29.9	+23.6	+19.9	+22.0	+19.2	+21.2	+27.9	+20.2	8,383,885	$106.8k	—	9.4%	10.8%	40.5	91.6%	46.3%	20.7%	69.0%	5.7%	12.4%	6.6%	23.4%	3.8%	34.7%	52.8%
16Portland-Lewiston-South Portland, MEME	−9.9	−36.5	−22.8	−33.8	−24.9	+18.1	−1.1	−34.5	−45.6	−28.1	−9.8	−0.9	+9.6	+6.8	−3.1	−22.6	−31.1	−2.3	+45.3	+23.0	−15.5	+5.7	+1.0	−16.9	−11.1	+8.8	+21.7	+8.9	+13.2	+23.8	+20.8	+12.9	+21.4	+20.2	676,266	$88.2k	—	8.8%	11.3%	43.2	95.7%	42.2%	16.1%	87.7%	2.9%	2.5%	1.6%	7.2%	5.3%	18.9%	66.6%
17Los Angeles-Long Beach, CACA	−10.3	−3.2	−16.9	−44.0	−26.1	+34.0	−9.7	−47.2	−57.5	−43.2	+16.8	+32.7	+15.4	+12.2	−0.8	−14.3	−13.0	−2.0	+11.9	−7.3	−19.0	−4.0	−20.4	−22.4	−8.8	+11.1	+12.9	+13.4	+8.1	+23.2	+22.8	+30.8	+28.2	+18.0	18,487,660	$95.3k	—	12.3%	15.6%	37.9	82.7%	34.5%	12.5%	28.4%	6.0%	47.0%	13.9%	49.9%	9.6%	29.5%	51.2%
18Edwards-Rifle, COCO	−24.4	+92.3	+48.4	−4.8	+20.8	+27.9	+40.9	−11.4	−24.4	−20.4	+29.5	+20.0	−3.9	−10.0	+4.2	−28.9	−23.2	−14.0	+22.2	−13.9	−17.1	−22.6	−22.5	−32.6	−8.6	+11.1	+5.8	−4.6	+5.9	+18.0	+10.5	+12.9	+21.7	+17.8	134,599	$97.9k	—	8.4%	8.5%	39.7	92.6%	44.4%	16.0%	64.2%	0.6%	29.0%	1.2%	24.5%	9.7%	17.3%	65.5%
19Tucson-Nogales, AZAZ						+23.5	−7.5	−14.6	−8.8	−11.9	+29.5	+33.9	+19.7	+10.5	+2.9	−19.9	−24.8	−4.3	+7.3	−9.7	−10.4	−3.8	−15.2	−15.0	−1.7	+11.1	+13.5	+8.4	+6.4	+6.9	+8.0	+14.8	+19.2	+15.3	1,109,416	$69.6k	—	14.6%	19.0%	39.7	89.9%	36.2%	15.7%	48.9%	3.2%	38.4%	2.8%	28.0%	10.2%	21.5%	59.0%
20New York-Newark, NY-NJ-CT-PANY	+14.6	−16.2	−2.9	−3.6	−9.4	+23.3	−3.2	−37.1	−21.6	+4.1	+21.3	+31.8	+9.1	+8.9	+1.7	−6.8	−18.7	+8.5	+35.2	+6.0	−16.4	+7.3	−6.6	−8.6	+0.4	+15.2	+30.4	+29.2	+20.2	+28.4	+30.6	+27.8	+27.1	+14.2	21,212,180	$101.7k	—	12.6%	16.1%	39.7	87.8%	43.5%	18.7%	43.9%	14.6%	25.3%	11.5%	39.2%	4.4%	32.3%	46.9%
21Cedar Rapids-Iowa City, IAIA	+0.5	−12.1	−14.3	−23.6	−7.1	+13.7	−8.8	−38.8	−36.9	−27.7	+8.9	+7.1	−5.7	−0.8	+0.5	−22.2	−20.4	−11.2	+29.8	−2.8	−3.0	+3.8	−0.7	+1.0	+17.8	+14.3	+20.9	+12.5	+13.8	+25.5	+21.0	+13.9	+18.1	+13.9	455,824	$77.0k	—	12.0%	11.1%	36.7	95.5%	40.2%	15.2%	81.2%	5.8%	5.0%	3.2%	9.3%	9.6%	14.9%	60.4%
22El Paso-Las Cruces, TX-NMTX						+41.9	+15.9	−9.5	+39.0	−5.2	+51.8	+60.7	+40.9	+45.5	+38.8	−15.0	−11.7	+8.8	+24.2	−1.0	−21.2	+0.9	−13.9	−14.6	+3.1	+13.4	+25.7	+14.9	+10.2	+28.4	+27.3	+36.4	+30.9	+13.6	1,098,448	$59.2k	—	19.2%	25.2%	33.8	81.5%	27.0%	9.6%	14.3%	2.7%	79.6%	1.2%	63.4%	9.9%	42.1%	42.8%
23Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WIMN	−3.4	−17.7	−23.5	−51.5	−22.7	+12.5	+6.2	−47.2	−44.5	−11.7	+21.8	+27.7	+1.3	+5.5	+15.3	−7.8	−8.9	+2.6	+27.7	+15.3	−4.2	+13.2	+8.0	+1.9	+8.5	+13.4	+18.2	+5.0	+5.4	+12.0	+9.9	+9.3	+15.8	+13.1	4,106,223	$98.2k	—	8.5%	9.7%	38.0	94.2%	43.6%	15.4%	72.4%	8.8%	6.8%	6.4%	14.6%	10.8%	20.5%	52.3%
24Tallahassee-Bainbridge, FL-GAFL	+12.1	+54.1	+61.3	+67.0	+43.7	+70.0	+71.0	+64.0	+71.0	+35.9	+88.1	+87.5	+79.6	+70.7	+42.3	+24.5	+20.1	+15.7	−18.0	+9.0	−31.2	+14.4	+10.9	−8.8	−5.6	+16.0	+18.3	+18.9	+20.4	+19.7	+19.1	+18.4	+19.8	+12.7	420,925	$64.7k	—	19.0%	20.8%	35.0	91.2%	40.5%	17.1%	52.8%	31.8%	8.2%	2.6%	10.0%	25.6%	5.6%	51.6%
25Sacramento-Roseville, CACA	−2.5	+3.4	−8.2	−31.0	−12.4	+50.6	+15.9	−35.4	−32.7	−3.3	+41.7	+53.8	+33.5	+26.7	+15.8	−3.9	+4.7	+9.2	+29.0	+5.8	−2.8	+6.6	−11.7	−16.3	−7.4	+4.2	+1.7	−4.8	−7.5	+9.7	+6.8	+12.3	+14.7	+9.5	2,712,233	$96.0k	—	11.7%	13.7%	38.8	89.7%	36.1%	13.4%	48.6%	6.0%	23.0%	14.3%	28.7%	10.6%	16.6%	62.5%
26Lansing-East Lansing-Owosso, MIMI	−7.0	+2.0	−10.2	−34.4	−18.3	+0.6	−6.5	−45.9	−62.3	−57.4	+5.1	+9.1	−22.3	−27.3	−29.9	−39.6	−36.4	−27.6	+23.0	−14.2	−18.4	−18.6	−13.5	−29.1	−9.6	+6.3	+9.7	+6.6	+3.3	+20.1	+14.1	+7.9	+11.9	+9.3	540,660	$71.9k	—	13.4%	14.9%	37.4	93.9%	35.6%	14.4%	75.6%	7.4%	7.0%	4.0%	9.3%	13.8%	10.8%	65.6%
27Virginia Beach-Chesapeake, VA-NCVA	+12.4	+5.0	+17.9	+48.4	+40.4	+68.2	+54.0	+41.9	+43.7	−7.5	+44.6	+63.5	+62.8	+48.6	+28.2	+5.4	−4.6	+12.0	+23.0	+3.9	−31.7	+9.0	−2.3	−21.5	−18.0	−2.4	+4.8	−2.6	−7.0	+10.6	+10.4	+6.9	+12.3	+9.1	1,865,944	$84.6k	—	10.8%	14.7%	37.9	92.9%	35.7%	14.1%	53.2%	28.6%	8.0%	3.9%	9.3%	21.1%	8.3%	56.4%
28Detroit-Warren-Ann Arbor, MIMI	+1.6	−10.1	−12.2	−36.5	−26.6	−0.4	−7.2	−53.2	−67.9	−34.7	+13.9	+27.7	+13.8	+16.4	+10.7	+3.3	+3.0	+17.6	+43.0	+21.6	−7.3	+4.7	+2.6	−9.6	−0.9	+13.7	+23.0	+16.9	+14.7	+26.2	+20.8	+11.2	+13.9	+8.1	5,403,875	$77.1k	—	13.7%	18.6%	40.0	91.6%	34.9%	14.3%	65.3%	19.5%	5.3%	4.8%	13.5%	9.8%	17.3%	57.4%
29Atlanta--Athens-Clarke County--Sandy Springs, GA-ALGA	+36.6	+20.3	+36.6	+43.7	+20.2	+68.0	+68.9	+30.2	+49.6	+3.2	+84.5	+72.2	+69.0	+65.1	+43.6	+39.9	+32.8	+22.4	+2.0	−6.3	−47.1	+29.5	+11.0	−24.2	−21.4	−0.6	−2.2	−10.2	−14.0	−0.5	−3.8	+2.8	+9.7	+7.7	7,156,958	$88.4k	—	11.5%	15.3%	37.3	90.3%	40.3%	15.9%	45.5%	30.9%	12.7%	6.0%	19.4%	23.7%	10.9%	48.1%
30Memphis-Clarksdale-Forrest City, TN-MS-ARMS	+48.7	+26.3	+36.2	+48.7	+38.1	+59.2	+57.7	+41.1	+45.4	+38.3	+76.6	+93.2	+80.7	+67.7	+16.9	+10.1	+3.0	+1.6	+0.2	+7.1	−34.2	+11.3	+7.1	−3.1	−4.2	+9.3	+11.2	+7.7	+6.4	+14.1	+13.0	+11.2	+13.6	+6.9	1,384,864	$66.6k	—	17.0%	25.3%	36.9	89.5%	30.6%	12.1%	40.0%	46.9%	7.3%	2.2%	9.0%	32.6%	4.7%	35.9%
31Rocky Mount-Wilson-Roanoke Rapids, NCNC	+25.5	−1.6	+29.0	+65.8	+46.0	+78.8	+66.2	+64.0	+71.4	+49.2	+88.2	+90.5	+89.5	+84.1	+80.9	+60.8	+57.1	+52.7	+28.5	+10.8	−35.9	+17.7	+6.0	−10.0	−5.2	+8.9	+7.5	+3.1	+1.9	+14.3	+16.7	+13.2	+10.2	+6.9	288,848	$55.4k	—	18.0%	27.6%	42.2	85.3%	20.0%	6.9%	41.8%	45.0%	7.9%	0.8%	8.3%	28.9%	2.2%	51.9%
32Duluth-Grand Rapids, MN-WIMN	−12.8	−17.6	−31.5	−61.8	−38.7	+7.3	+3.9	−30.9	−49.9	−26.1	+7.6	+49.9	+34.7	+37.1	+35.1	+20.4	+19.5	+25.8	+51.8	+43.1	+16.4	+33.9	+27.9	+33.8	+33.5	+30.8	+32.1	+23.8	+28.5	+29.5	+26.9	+6.3	+8.8	+6.1	326,145	$71.7k	—	12.6%	12.9%	42.2	94.9%	31.0%	10.9%	89.1%	1.4%	1.8%	0.8%	2.9%	8.5%	13.6%	64.5%
33Rochester-Batavia-Seneca Falls, NYNY	−10.1	−20.0	−17.0	−26.7	−20.6	−1.3	−24.4	−41.7	−41.7	−24.6	−15.0	−6.7	−11.2	−8.9	−10.0	−26.9	−39.7	−10.3	+39.3	−6.8	−28.9	−13.4	+0.1	−22.4	−5.8	−2.1	+10.9	−0.5	−4.6	+9.1	+9.4	+2.7	+8.4	+5.8	1,149,120	$75.9k	—	12.7%	16.7%	40.8	91.8%	37.1%	16.5%	74.3%	9.7%	8.3%	2.8%	10.4%	7.7%	26.0%	53.3%
34Syracuse-Auburn, NYNY	−15.2	−28.5	−24.6	−29.0	−23.8	−3.0	−16.2	−39.6	−40.2	−22.4	−8.6	−19.5	−19.4	−10.9	−15.0	−34.4	−48.3	−11.9	+33.3	−9.2	−39.7	−20.7	−14.9	−24.4	−7.4	+3.4	+11.7	+8.0	+5.0	+14.7	+16.5	+3.1	+8.1	+4.8	731,512	$74.6k	—	13.8%	20.0%	40.5	91.3%	34.0%	15.1%	79.3%	7.2%	4.9%	3.0%	8.8%	7.0%	30.2%	52.2%
35Albany-Schenectady, NYNY	−1.9	−18.7	−16.9	−17.7	−15.4	−2.9	−11.4	−30.5	−26.7	−10.5	−2.3	−2.5	−5.9	−7.2	−10.0	−27.5	−38.0	−2.2	+42.5	−1.9	−26.9	−12.3	−3.4	−20.7	−1.0	+5.4	+17.3	+7.5	+3.5	+11.4	+12.6	+2.5	+9.4	+4.7	1,195,206	$84.8k	—	11.4%	14.4%	41.7	92.7%	38.9%	17.9%	78.0%	6.1%	6.2%	4.0%	9.4%	5.2%	21.1%	63.7%
36Asheville-Waynesville-Brevard, NCNC	+0.5	−5.5	−9.1	−2.0	−7.7	+39.3	−1.9	+0.3	+9.2	−19.1	+22.9	+27.1	+36.7	+25.4	+12.7	−6.5	−10.9	−12.2	+16.5	−16.9	−43.1	+7.8	−4.6	−26.4	−18.1	−0.7	−5.5	−16.7	−10.6	+0.8	−2.5	−4.5	+1.8	+4.7	511,064	$70.2k	—	12.0%	16.2%	45.0	92.2%	40.7%	16.2%	82.6%	3.6%	8.8%	1.0%	8.6%	33.7%	7.5%	47.1%
37Champaign-Urbana-Danville, ILIL	−12.3	−20.0	−19.9	−38.4	−25.1	+4.6	−15.4	−41.4	−38.4	−32.2	+14.7	+8.8	−6.5	−13.6	−18.1	−26.2	−28.6	−20.7	+8.0	−16.1	−22.8	−10.3	−21.7	−19.5	−5.0	+10.9	+6.1	−2.0	−5.5	+9.0	−2.7	+1.2	+3.6	+3.5	311,228	$63.7k	—	17.8%	15.9%	34.3	94.1%	38.0%	19.7%	68.6%	12.5%	7.2%	7.9%	14.0%	17.1%	9.3%	61.5%
38Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WIWI	+6.7	−15.6	−12.3	−18.7	−3.5	+16.1	+3.5	−42.5	−27.1	+4.7	+40.6	+47.2	+12.0	+8.5	+7.7	−12.5	−20.0	+5.0	+25.0	+0.4	−7.1	+1.1	−2.9	−4.7	+4.7	+1.8	+6.6	−4.2	−3.8	+7.4	+2.9	+2.4	+4.3	+3.4	2,046,872	$79.9k	—	11.6%	15.1%	39.4	92.6%	36.7%	12.8%	67.3%	13.1%	12.0%	3.3%	12.4%	16.2%	22.9%	47.6%
39Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Olean, NYNY	−2.0	−19.1	−8.5	−17.5	−9.4	+13.9	−10.1	−38.8	−39.4	−12.7	−7.3	+5.0	−1.8	−0.2	+2.8	−15.4	−29.6	+9.6	+44.7	+14.2	−10.8	+0.2	+8.0	−1.6	+8.0	+11.7	+19.8	+14.9	+10.5	+13.2	+12.1	+0.1	+8.1	+2.9	1,237,488	$71.5k	—	14.2%	19.2%	41.0	92.2%	35.3%	15.7%	74.9%	10.5%	5.7%	4.0%	10.1%	7.3%	41.7%	37.3%
40Kalamazoo-Battle Creek-Portage, MIMI	−8.4	+2.1	−6.1	−33.4	−17.4	+7.9	+8.8	−41.4	−54.9	−59.1	−4.1	+5.1	−15.9	−19.6	−17.8	−31.9	−34.9	−24.1	+21.7	−15.0	−21.8	−17.0	−16.6	−29.6	−13.0	+5.0	+5.4	−1.6	−1.7	+14.0	+7.0	+0.7	+4.5	+2.6	457,122	$69.0k	—	12.9%	14.1%	37.2	92.7%	32.7%	12.5%	76.0%	9.3%	6.4%	2.5%	8.2%	15.1%	10.2%	62.9%
41Las Vegas-Henderson, NVNV	−2.7	+90.0	+71.2	−12.1	+3.4	+24.2	+23.3	−12.8	−17.5	−3.1	+58.8	+60.1	+37.4	+22.3	+22.7	−7.3	+0.8	+13.6	+25.9	+2.1	−18.2	+3.0	−30.0	−27.7	−16.0	+8.7	+8.8	+5.8	+4.2	+18.3	+13.6	+9.4	+8.1	+1.5	2,383,892	$76.1k	—	13.0%	17.6%	38.8	86.9%	27.5%	9.4%	39.0%	11.3%	31.6%	10.3%	33.1%	6.6%	25.8%	57.2%
42Columbia-Sumter-Orangeburg, SCSC	+57.6	+76.1	+89.8	+89.6	+85.4	+93.7	+88.7	+86.4	+95.1	+86.6	+97.8	+98.3	+95.4	+88.6	+13.6	−21.3	+7.5	−18.8	−26.8	−9.3	−38.7	+3.7	−7.7	−25.0	−20.8	−2.8	+0.1	−7.4	−4.8	+5.1	+7.0	+4.3	+7.4	+1.2	1,075,594	$65.2k	—	15.5%	20.5%	38.0	90.5%	32.8%	13.4%	51.0%	36.3%	6.5%	2.1%	8.0%	26.5%	5.9%	45.0%
43Kansas City-Overland Park-Kansas City, MO-KSMO	−7.0	+9.5	+3.6	−13.1	+3.9	+30.1	+11.0	−7.2	−14.1	−20.6	+26.2	+27.7	+6.1	+0.9	+15.5	−7.9	−6.0	−3.5	+25.1	−2.9	−28.3	+1.0	−5.0	−16.0	+1.5	+9.9	+4.2	0	−3.6	+5.4	−2.7	−2.9	+3.2	+1.0	2,555,502	$83.2k	—	10.4%	12.5%	37.6	93.1%	39.1%	15.1%	70.8%	10.6%	10.3%	2.9%	10.4%	18.8%	10.9%	55.9%
44Bloomington-Bedford, ININ	−2.4	−3.1	−6.6	−11.8	−4.3	+18.2	−4.2	−10.7	−15.6	−32.0	+4.7	−2.6	−16.3	−18.7	−13.0	−24.5	−25.7	−26.8	+5.8	−15.1	−24.0	−5.9	−18.6	−24.9	−18.7	+0.5	−2.3	−14.3	−6.9	+17.4	+3.5	−0.4	+2.4	+0.4	207,671	$65.6k	—	17.3%	15.3%	35.3	93.0%	39.8%	19.7%	84.9%	2.5%	3.8%	4.8%	8.4%	17.6%	3.7%	69.7%
45Pullman-Moscow, WA-IDID	−15.5	+35.4	+4.6	−45.4	−19.2	+14.7	+5.7	−38.2	−35.4	−42.2	+9.5	+27.4	+2.4	−3.0	−1.9	−29.1	−22.9	−12.0	+7.9	−15.4	−17.6	−12.7	−15.2	−18.2	−0.4	+9.1	+6.1	−15.8	−3.8	+6.2	+0.7	+4.3	+6.9	+0.4	88,052	$60.1k	—	20.3%	12.4%	28.4	96.2%	46.6%	19.6%	78.6%	1.2%	6.7%	4.6%	8.3%	10.1%	9.4%	69.5%
46Montgomery-Selma, ALAL	+57.5	+51.6	+50.3	+89.2	+88.0	+87.8	+93.4	+85.3	+81.2	+26.7	+89.8	+94.3	+93.9	+90.3	−8.3	+14.1	+0.9	−3.0	−79.5	+15.6	−41.5	−0.7	−7.1	−16.5	−15.8	−4.5	−2.8	−6.2	−11.5	+1.1	+4.5	+2.0	+4.6	0	422,882	$62.6k	—	17.8%	26.5%	38.4	89.3%	29.9%	12.4%	44.0%	46.7%	4.0%	2.1%	5.2%	35.5%	3.1%	37.4%
47St. Louis-St. Charles-Farmington, MO-ILIL	+2.5	−7.9	−1.4	−10.2	−8.9	+9.1	−4.7	−22.5	−16.1	−0.6	+28.1	+26.4	+8.7	+10.3	+18.1	+9.7	+6.6	+14.0	+35.7	+8.1	−12.6	+4.3	−5.2	−15.1	+1.5	+16.6	+13.5	+7.7	+7.3	+15.6	+6.2	−2.1	+1.8	−0.8	2,914,849	$80.8k	—	10.7%	14.0%	40.0	93.4%	37.4%	15.1%	71.3%	16.6%	3.9%	2.8%	6.7%	16.6%	20.6%	49.5%
48Des Moines-West Des Moines-Ames, IAIA	−15.6	−12.3	−23.2	−43.2	−19.6	+8.7	−2.8	−39.6	−46.3	−37.6	+3.0	+10.0	+4.8	+4.7	+8.1	−19.1	−13.3	−13.1	+30.9	−5.1	−11.2	+5.0	−4.7	−0.1	+17.1	+7.7	+12.7	+1.2	−0.3	+8.8	+7.2	+1.0	+3.7	−1.0	913,917	$84.0k	—	10.1%	11.3%	36.1	94.0%	40.5%	13.7%	79.2%	4.9%	7.8%	4.2%	11.6%	10.5%	11.2%	60.6%
49Lincoln-Beatrice, NENE	−36.4	−6.9	−13.5	−48.6	+2.3	+25.9	+7.3	−33.2	−19.1	−45.6	+3.5	+6.5	−19.1	−19.1	−12.6	−37.8	−30.9	−26.5	+19.0	−16.9	−24.9	−14.2	−18.8	−22.0	−2.1	−1.5	−2.6	−12.2	−16.3	+2.4	−3.2	−4.4	+2.3	−1.0	365,966	$74.7k	—	11.7%	12.1%	35.0	93.6%	40.4%	14.6%	79.5%	3.4%	7.9%	3.7%	11.4%	16.5%	12.8%	53.7%
50Cleveland-Akron-Canton, OHOH	−1.0	−7.1	−8.2	−33.6	−10.9	+22.1	+12.6	−29.6	−40.9	−26.2	+2.3	+29.9	+13.6	+10.0	+3.6	−7.8	−15.1	+5.0	+35.6	+7.8	−10.7	+10.2	−2.6	−4.6	+3.3	+11.8	+17.4	+9.7	+12.7	+17.8	+15.7	+3.8	+2.2	−1.1	3,749,107	$71.0k	—	13.1%	18.3%	41.6	92.0%	31.8%	12.4%	74.0%	13.7%	5.3%	2.3%	8.6%	16.4%	21.0%	49.2%
51La Crosse-Onalaska-Sparta, WI-MNWI	−8.5	−33.3	−30.3	−42.8	−21.8	+4.6	−12.5	−65.9	−27.3	−23.1	+27.9	+19.8	−12.8	−11.7	+3.3	−31.4	−23.4	−15.5	+11.4	−20.6	−31.0	−12.9	−13.4	−18.0	−0.4	+6.2	+13.6	+3.9	+4.0	+19.2	+12.3	−0.4	+1.3	−2.0	216,398	$72.7k	—	11.9%	11.0%	39.3	94.3%	31.0%	11.3%	89.1%	1.2%	3.1%	2.8%	7.6%	15.2%	15.8%	53.8%
52Miami-Port St. Lucie-Fort Lauderdale, FLFL	+91.5	+5.1	+36.6	+40.8	+41.0	+49.8	+35.3	+11.1	+7.9	−20.9	+37.1	+45.4	+33.6	+30.1	+10.4	−18.9	−21.2	+2.4	+11.4	−6.2	−32.9	+9.3	−17.0	−20.2	−10.5	+9.6	+22.8	+19.1	+15.2	+20.8	+21.4	+22.2	+12.4	−2.0	7,061,579	$76.4k	—	12.9%	16.8%	42.8	87.6%	36.0%	13.9%	31.4%	18.5%	43.6%	2.4%	51.2%	13.5%	23.9%	54.0%
53New Orleans-Metairie-Slidell, LA-MSLA	+38.8	+32.0	+60.6	+82.2	+76.5	+76.1	+82.6	+32.0	+62.0	+58.5	+87.6	+83.0	+73.1	+66.3	+11.6	+5.4	−15.5	+25.5	−3.3	+5.8	−35.6	+2.6	−6.5	−20.4	−8.4	+4.6	+14.5	+2.5	−2.8	−8.8	−3.0	−2.0	+0.6	−2.2	1,356,661	$65.9k	—	17.3%	23.9%	39.7	88.4%	32.8%	12.8%	50.0%	30.9%	11.4%	2.6%	12.3%	15.6%	39.3%	33.3%
54Columbus-Marion-Zanesville, OHOH	−0.5	−2.6	−6.3	−20.6	−6.4	+11.2	+7.5	−12.9	−28.5	−37.9	−1.5	+12.5	−4.0	−13.2	−9.5	−24.3	−33.4	−23.3	+12.9	−16.7	−33.5	−11.9	−18.8	−35.7	−25.3	−6.3	−1.6	−10.1	−6.2	+3.5	+4.6	−1.3	+0.8	−2.4	2,641,778	$80.5k	—	12.8%	16.8%	37.4	91.8%	36.5%	14.0%	72.0%	13.6%	5.0%	4.3%	11.4%	18.5%	10.5%	58.1%
55Rochester-Austin-Winona, MNMN	−9.2	−25.6	−25.9	−45.7	−23.9	+13.2	−14.0	−60.5	−46.1	−27.3	+18.7	+19.2	−13.6	−14.0	+8.0	−31.1	−23.1	−14.4	+20.4	−3.8	−24.7	−5.5	−10.3	−12.9	−5.4	+1.4	+8.8	−1.5	+0.2	+7.7	+5.9	−6.7	−0.6	−2.6	318,644	$86.6k	—	9.0%	8.9%	38.6	94.0%	39.0%	15.5%	80.5%	4.7%	6.1%	4.6%	11.4%	14.9%	17.8%	45.9%
56Greenville-Washington, NCNC	+13.1	+10.6	+17.0	+52.1	+31.7	+58.4	+41.3	+42.3	+50.3	+35.2	+84.4	+84.8	+84.6	+78.1	+74.2	+56.8	+57.2	+50.2	+33.1	+7.4	−41.3	+9.9	−2.5	−18.4	−13.5	+0.8	−5.0	−12.3	−12.4	+2.6	+1.1	+0.3	+1.3	−2.7	221,692	$58.2k	—	19.4%	22.5%	36.0	90.5%	31.3%	12.9%	54.8%	32.3%	7.9%	1.6%	8.0%	19.1%	6.0%	58.7%
57Bloomington-Pontiac, ILIL	−4.2	−18.9	−17.2	−32.2	−17.8	+6.6	−14.8	−44.5	−37.0	−31.7	+10.5	+5.2	−16.2	−22.1	−22.9	−34.2	−38.7	−29.5	−2.3	−29.1	−37.9	−27.3	−36.2	−36.9	−26.5	−6.1	−8.4	−16.3	−18.3	−2.3	−14.5	−7.5	−4.0	−3.4	207,121	$78.9k	—	12.5%	9.9%	35.6	94.6%	42.4%	14.4%	78.2%	7.5%	6.3%	4.4%	8.7%	20.1%	6.1%	56.2%
58Gainesville-Lake City, FLFL	+84.3	+40.1	+57.6	+36.5	+26.6	+62.7	+57.9	+51.2	+54.1	+32.3	+72.6	+77.4	+71.7	+63.1	+26.1	+2.0	+8.6	+8.1	+5.5	+1.5	−25.6	+28.8	+11.7	−14.7	−8.3	+13.9	+13.7	+5.3	−0.8	+4.9	+0.6	+1.2	+3.4	−3.8	421,712	$61.0k	—	19.6%	19.0%	35.8	92.0%	38.4%	19.0%	63.0%	16.6%	11.4%	4.3%	13.6%	28.8%	7.6%	53.0%
59McAllen-Edinburg, TXTX						+68.4	+65.8	+40.1	+60.1	+4.4	+54.9	+45.7	+28.2	+32.4	+28.1	−12.8	−4.8	+24.0	+36.2	+19.3	−7.7	+33.1	+17.8	+14.5	+33.5	+31.5	+40.7	+25.3	+13.0	+40.8	+44.2	+41.5	+16.2	−3.8	958,044	$53.2k	—	27.2%	36.7%	30.4	69.5%	20.1%	6.5%	5.7%	0.6%	92.3%	0.9%	80.9%	9.6%	48.7%	37.1%
60Allentown-Bethlehem-East Stroudsburg, PA-NJPA	+19.2	+2.6	+8.6	−4.2	+4.1	+34.5	+9.6	−17.6	−25.3	−43.6	+4.9	+17.2	+8.1	+1.9	−0.5	−11.1	−21.7	−9.4	+36.9	+1.8	−23.1	+3.9	−13.5	−18.4	−13.5	+2.3	+3.7	+0.3	−1.7	+10.5	+4.1	−4.3	0	−4.3	1,041,118	$84.9k	—	10.3%	14.7%	41.9	91.6%	32.6%	12.4%	66.7%	6.7%	19.7%	3.0%	18.9%	6.5%	18.1%	60.1%
Loading more…

180 combined statistical areas · 34 elections · 1892–2024Margins are D−R two-party share · MIT Election Lab · VEST · Demographics: ACS 2024 5-year · Religion: 2020 US Religion Census