- Lead
- 206
- Total
- 1,611
- vs nation
- R+11.3
- Turnout
- 90.1%
Keweenaw County, MI
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 90.1% of 1,807 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 190
- Total
- 1,557
- vs nation
- R+16.7
- Turnout
- 88.3%
- Lead
- 287
- Total
- 1,434
- vs nation
- R+22.1
- Turnout
- 80.5%
- Lead
- 192
- Total
- 1,392
- vs nation
- R+17.6
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 146
- Total
- 1,410
- vs nation
- R+17.6
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 151
- Total
- 1,439
- vs nation
- R+8.0
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 200
- Total
- 1,343
- vs nation
- R+15.4
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 81
- Total
- 1,242
- vs nation
- R+2.0
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+12.8MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 2,1332024 5-year
- Median household income
- $52,5832024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 92.7%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.0%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 2.0%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+39.4 in 1964MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+90.4 in 1904MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Hinsdale County, CO · twin score 73.7
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 90.1%1,629 participants ÷ 1,807 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +8.8 ptsHigh-turnout, durable
- Drop-off versus state
- -6.4 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 81.4%–83.5%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 1,465 | 1,819 | 80.5% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 1,348 | 1,775 | 75.9% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 1,566 | 1,774 | 88.3% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 1,401 | 1,762 | 79.5% | A/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 1,629 | 1,807 | 90.1% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
10 precincts · 1,611 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -Allouez Township, Precinct 1Allouez Township, Precinct 1 | 346 | 640 | 19 | 1,005 | 34.4% | 63.7% | R+29.3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Eagle Harbor Township, Precinct 1Eagle Harbor Township, Precinct 1 | 127 | 106 | 3 | 236 | 53.8% | 44.9% | D+8.9 |
| Precinct -Grant Township, Precinct 1Grant Township, Precinct 1 | 128 | 82 | 2 | 212 | 60.4% | 38.7% | D+21.7 |
| Precinct -Sherman Township, Precinct 1Sherman Township, Precinct 1 | 55 | 31 | 1 | 87 | 63.2% | 35.6% | D+27.6 |
| Precinct -Houghton Township, Precinct 1Houghton Township, Precinct 1 | 34 | 37 | 0 | 71 | 47.9% | 52.1% | R+4.2 |
| 0830152000001083-01520-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 0832362000001083-23620-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 0833430000001083-34300-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 0833938000001083-39380-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 0837322000001083-73220-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −32.4% |
| 1896 | −79.2% |
| 1900 | −85.9% |
| 1904 | −90.4% |
| 1908 | −85.0% |
| 1912 | −39.5% |
| 1916 | −60.4% |
| 1920 | −83.8% |
| 1924 | −87.9% |
| 1928 | −55.5% |
| 1932 | −46.2% |
| 1936 | −0.5% |
| 1940 | −5.5% |
| 1944 | +5.4% |
| 1948 | −10.3% |
| 1952 | −3.5% |
| 1956 | −9.5% |
| 1960 | −2.2% |
| 1964 | +39.4% |
| 1968 | +6.4% |
| 1972 | −21.9% |
| 1976 | +4.1% |
| 1980 | −1.0% |
| 1984 | +2.4% |
| 1988 | +8.1% |
| 1992 | +17.4% |
| 1996 | +6.5% |
| 2000 | −14.9% |
| 2004 | −10.5% |
| 2008 | −10.4% |
| 2012 | −13.8% |
| 2016 | −20.0% |
| 2020 | −12.2% |
| 2024 | −12.8% |
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | R | 44.1%684 | 55.9%866 | 1,550 |
| 2020 | R | 39.5%594 | 60.5%909 | 1,503 |
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 1,957 |
| 2018 | 1,921 |
| 2020 | 2,058 |
| 2022 | 2,091 |
| 2024 | 2,124 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+28 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +191 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $65,279 in average income, against $72,085 for residents who stayed — 9% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +12 |
| 2012 | −11 |
| 2013 | −18 |
| 2014 | +33 |
| 2015 | −53 |
| 2016 | +20 |
| 2017 | −34 |
| 2018 | +12 |
| 2019 | +39 |
| 2021 | +67 |
| 2022 | +66 |
| 2023 | +40 |
| 2024 | −10 |
| 2025 | +28 |
Keweenaw's tiny, geographically isolated population — spread across a former copper-mining peninsula jutting into Lake Superior — has shifted steadily toward Republican margins over the past decade, reaching R+12.8 in 2024.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 39.4 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 90.4 points in 1904. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 0.6 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 12.8 points.
A population of 2,133, a 93% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $52,583 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Hinsdale County and Curry County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Keweenaw County, Michigan. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/26083/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.