- Lead
- 646,417
- Total
- 5,767,788
- vs nation
- R+9.7
- Turnout
- 65.3%
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+11.2MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 11,810,2932024 5-year
- Population density
- 289 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 40,858 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $71,3892024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 75.8%2024 5-year
- Black
- 12.0%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 4.8%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+25.9 in 1964MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+34.6 in 1924MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Missouri, MO · twin score 69.1
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 65.3%5,851,625 participants ÷ 8,956,209 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +20.5 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off versus state
- 0.0 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 44.8%–48.7%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 5,607,641 | 8,734,125 | 64.2% | B/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 4,520,678 | 8,797,915 | 51.4% | B/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 5,974,121 | 8,855,290 | 67.5% | B/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 4,201,368 | 8,948,188 | 47.0% | B/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 5,851,625 | 8,956,209 | 65.3% | B/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-state-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 276/110.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-state-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 279/137.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-state-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 282/1.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-state-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 285/182.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-state-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 288/227.
presidential history
Party record book
Ohio · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Lyndon B. Johnson1964
62.9%
2,498,331 votes · D+25.9
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1936 · 58.0%
Republican
Herbert Hoover1928
64.9%
1,627,546 votes · R+30.4
Runner-up · Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1956 · 61.1%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Barack Obama2008
2,940,044votes
51.4% of the vote · D+4.6
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2012 · 2,827,709 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
3,180,116votes
55.1% of the vote · R+11.2
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 3,154,834 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
James M. Cox1920
+6.3pts D vs U.S.
Place R+19.9 · U.S. R+26.2
Runner-up · Woodrow Wilson, 1916 · +4.5 pts
Republican
Herbert Hoover1932
+14.9pts R vs U.S.
Place D+2.8 · U.S. D+17.8
Runner-up · Herbert Hoover, 1928 · +13.0 pts
On the ballot
OPEN seat: incumbent Gov. Mike DeWine (R) is term-limited (no third consecutive term). Vivek Ramaswamy won the Republican primary (Trump-endorsed; only nominal opposition). Former Ohio Dept. of Health director Amy Acton won the Democratic primary unopposed. Earlier-speculated Democrats Tim Ryan and Sherrod Brown did not run.
SPECIAL (Class 3, Vance→VP). Husted (R, appointed) running. Sherrod Brown (D) won primary ~89.4%.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
| Year | Seats won | D % | R % | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D 5 · R 10 | 42.8% | 55.7% | 5,570,784 | |
| D 5 · R 10 | 43.6% | 56.4% | 4,109,711 | |
| D 4 · R 12 | 42.5% | 56.5% | 5,761,540 | |
| D 4 · R 12 | 47.3% | 52.0% | 4,406,358 |
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 7,861,025 |
| 2018 | 8,070,917 |
| 2020 | 8,073,829 |
| 2022 | 8,029,950 |
| 2024 | 8,074,098 |
Who moves in and out
Net domestic migration over time
+11,926 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −236,631 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −36,491 |
| 2012 | −39,094 |
| 2013 | −20,099 |
| 2014 | −21,352 |
| 2015 | −30,255 |
| 2016 | −28,077 |
| 2017 | −8,334 |
| 2018 | −12,281 |
| 2019 | −12,916 |
| 2021 | −32,482 |
| 2022 | −6,882 |
| 2023 | +1,045 |
| 2024 | −1,339 |
| 2025 | +11,926 |
Monroe County backed Obama by nine points in 2008; in 2024 it voted Republican by sixty.
- A streak, then a break
- Backed the national winner every cycle 1964–2016; went R+8.0 in 2020 against the national result and R+11.2 in 2024 · MIT Election Lab
- The three Cs
- Cuyahoga (Cleveland) D+31.4, Franklin (Columbus) D+28.4, Hamilton (Cincinnati) D+14.9 — seven of 88 counties went Democratic · MIT Election Lab 2024
- The growing county
- Franklin cast 598,225 votes — the most of any Ohio county, ahead of Cuyahoga’s 576,520 — and still moves toward the Democrats · MIT Election Lab 2024
- Appalachia’s long swing
- Monroe County: D+9.2 for Obama in 2008 → R+59.7 in 2024, a shift of nearly 70 points · MIT Election Lab
- The poles in 2024
- Cuyahoga the bluest at D+31.4; Holmes, in the Amish country, the reddest at R+69.2 · MIT Election Lab 2024
- Two open offices in 2026
- DeWine term-limited — Ramaswamy (R) vs Acton (D) for governor; Vance’s seat, held by appointee Husted (R), draws former Sen. Brown (D) · Akashic 2026 forecast
The states whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Ohio. Akashic. https://akashic.app/state/OH/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.