- Lead
- 17,273
- Total
- 39,331
- vs nation
- R+42.4
- Turnout
- 59.9%
Muskingum County, OH
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 59.9% of 66,516 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 15,896
- Total
- 40,465
- vs nation
- R+43.7
- Turnout
- 61.5%
- Lead
- 12,933
- Total
- 37,708
- vs nation
- R+36.4
- Turnout
- 57.6%
- Lead
- 2,262
- Total
- 37,603
- vs nation
- R+9.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 2,819
- Total
- 39,225
- vs nation
- R+14.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 5,833
- Total
- 38,866
- vs nation
- R+12.6
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 4,580
- Total
- 32,624
- vs nation
- R+14.6
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 48
- Total
- 32,972
- vs nation
- R+8.7
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+43.9MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 86,4112024 5-year
- Median household income
- $60,7802024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 90.5%2024 5-year
- Black
- 3.1%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 1.3%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+28.2 in 1964MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+54.2 in 1928MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Marion County, OH · twin score 93.8
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 59.9%39,845 participants ÷ 66,516 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +19.7 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off versus state
- -0.9 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 40.2%–43.8%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 37,708 | 65,459 | 57.6% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 29,605 | 65,820 | 45.0% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 40,766 | 66,243 | 61.5% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 27,865 | 66,531 | 41.9% | A/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 39,845 | 66,516 | 59.9% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
153 precincts · 39,327 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -PRECINCT PERRY SOUTHPRECINCT PERRY SOUTH | 209 | 779 | 4 | 992 | 21.1% | 78.5% | R+57.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -PRECINCT FALLS DPRECINCT FALLS D | 325 | 655 | 3 | 983 | 33.1% | 66.6% | R+33.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT ZANESVILLE 5-CPRECINCT ZANESVILLE 5-C | 407 | 560 | 7 | 974 | 41.8% | 57.5% | R+15.7 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MUSKINGUM BPRECINCT MUSKINGUM B | 265 | 680 | 4 | 949 | 27.9% | 71.7% | R+43.7 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MUSKINGUM APRECINCT MUSKINGUM A | 252 | 642 | 10 | 904 | 27.9% | 71.0% | R+43.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT CASSPRECINCT CASS | 202 | 677 | 8 | 887 | 22.8% | 76.3% | R+53.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MUSKINGUM CPRECINCT MUSKINGUM C | 162 | 673 | 0 | 835 | 19.4% | 80.6% | R+61.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WAYNE BPRECINCT WAYNE B | 195 | 615 | 6 | 816 | 23.9% | 75.4% | R+51.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SPRINGFIELD BPRECINCT SPRINGFIELD B | 200 | 605 | 7 | 812 | 24.6% | 74.5% | R+49.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT FALLS BPRECINCT FALLS B | 229 | 558 | 9 | 796 | 28.8% | 70.1% | R+41.3 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WAYNE CPRECINCT WAYNE C | 170 | 594 | 3 | 767 | 22.2% | 77.4% | R+55.3 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT NEW CONCORDPRECINCT NEW CONCORD | 288 | 440 | 12 | 740 | 38.9% | 59.5% | R+20.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT LICKING BPRECINCT LICKING B | 212 | 500 | 8 | 720 | 29.4% | 69.4% | R+40.0 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT ZANESVILLE 2-APRECINCT ZANESVILLE 2-A | 242 | 457 | 5 | 704 | 34.4% | 64.9% | R+30.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT HARRISONPRECINCT HARRISON | 130 | 564 | 9 | 703 | 18.5% | 80.2% | R+61.7 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT LICKING APRECINCT LICKING A | 105 | 588 | 9 | 702 | 15.0% | 83.8% | R+68.8 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT ZANESVILLE 6-BPRECINCT ZANESVILLE 6-B | 271 | 411 | 10 | 692 | 39.2% | 59.4% | R+20.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT FALLS EPRECINCT FALLS E | 282 | 406 | 3 | 691 | 40.8% | 58.8% | R+17.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SOUTH ZANESVILLEPRECINCT SOUTH ZANESVILLE | 188 | 492 | 9 | 689 | 27.3% | 71.4% | R+44.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WASHINGTON CPRECINCT WASHINGTON C | 179 | 498 | 4 | 681 | 26.3% | 73.1% | R+46.8 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WASHINGTON APRECINCT WASHINGTON A | 155 | 520 | 3 | 678 | 22.9% | 76.7% | R+53.8 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT ZANESVILLE 4-BPRECINCT ZANESVILLE 4-B | 288 | 376 | 7 | 671 | 42.9% | 56.0% | R+13.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT DUNCAN FALLSPRECINCT DUNCAN FALLS | 171 | 495 | 3 | 669 | 25.6% | 74.0% | R+48.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT NORWICHPRECINCT NORWICH | 157 | 505 | 2 | 664 | 23.6% | 76.1% | R+52.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT ZANESVILLE 6-CPRECINCT ZANESVILLE 6-C | 239 | 415 | 6 | 660 | 36.2% | 62.9% | R+26.7 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT ZANESVILLE 5-APRECINCT ZANESVILLE 5-A | 267 | 383 | 4 | 654 | 40.8% | 58.6% | R+17.7 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT FALLS APRECINCT FALLS A | 199 | 443 | 2 | 644 | 30.9% | 68.8% | R+37.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT HOPEWELL CPRECINCT HOPEWELL C | 101 | 536 | 3 | 640 | 15.8% | 83.8% | R+68.0 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SALT CREEKPRECINCT SALT CREEK | 115 | 515 | 7 | 637 | 18.1% | 80.8% | R+62.8 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT JACKSONPRECINCT JACKSON | 104 | 510 | 5 | 619 | 16.8% | 82.4% | R+65.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WASHINGTON BPRECINCT WASHINGTON B | 166 | 441 | 5 | 612 | 27.1% | 72.1% | R+44.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WHITE COTTAGEPRECINCT WHITE COTTAGE | 140 | 451 | 5 | 596 | 23.5% | 75.7% | R+52.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT PERRY NORTHPRECINCT PERRY NORTH | 100 | 484 | 3 | 587 | 17.0% | 82.5% | R+65.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SPRINGFIELD APRECINCT SPRINGFIELD A | 134 | 447 | 5 | 586 | 22.9% | 76.3% | R+53.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT HOPEWELL BPRECINCT HOPEWELL B | 137 | 435 | 5 | 577 | 23.7% | 75.4% | R+51.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT ROLLING PLAINSPRECINCT ROLLING PLAINS | 137 | 425 | 12 | 574 | 23.9% | 74.0% | R+50.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT ZANESVILLE 6-APRECINCT ZANESVILLE 6-A | 223 | 338 | 3 | 564 | 39.5% | 59.9% | R+20.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT FRAZEYSBURGPRECINCT FRAZEYSBURG | 114 | 436 | 11 | 561 | 20.3% | 77.7% | R+57.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MOXAHALAPRECINCT MOXAHALA | 125 | 427 | 3 | 555 | 22.5% | 76.9% | R+54.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT ZANESVILLE 4-APRECINCT ZANESVILLE 4-A | 270 | 266 | 5 | 541 | 49.9% | 49.2% | D+0.7 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT BRUSH CREEKPRECINCT BRUSH CREEK | 127 | 412 | 1 | 540 | 23.5% | 76.3% | R+52.8 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT ZANESVILLE 1-BPRECINCT ZANESVILLE 1-B | 192 | 340 | 6 | 538 | 35.7% | 63.2% | R+27.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT ZANESVILLE 3-APRECINCT ZANESVILLE 3-A | 202 | 312 | 3 | 517 | 39.1% | 60.3% | R+21.3 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT HIGHLANDPRECINCT HIGHLAND | 83 | 420 | 4 | 507 | 16.4% | 82.8% | R+66.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT HOPEWELL APRECINCT HOPEWELL A | 97 | 385 | 5 | 487 | 19.9% | 79.1% | R+59.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT FALLS FPRECINCT FALLS F | 157 | 300 | 4 | 461 | 34.1% | 65.1% | R+31.0 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SALEMPRECINCT SALEM | 66 | 390 | 2 | 458 | 14.4% | 85.2% | R+70.7 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT ZANESVILLE 1-APRECINCT ZANESVILLE 1-A | 173 | 275 | 3 | 451 | 38.4% | 61.0% | R+22.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT ZANESVILLE 2-BPRECINCT ZANESVILLE 2-B | 203 | 229 | 8 | 440 | 46.1% | 52.0% | R+5.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT ZANESVILLE 5-BPRECINCT ZANESVILLE 5-B | 195 | 232 | 3 | 430 | 45.3% | 54.0% | R+8.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT DRESDEN NORTHPRECINCT DRESDEN NORTH | 104 | 322 | 2 | 428 | 24.3% | 75.2% | R+50.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT FALLS CPRECINCT FALLS C | 124 | 300 | 3 | 427 | 29.0% | 70.3% | R+41.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT ZANESVILLE 3-BPRECINCT ZANESVILLE 3-B | 241 | 173 | 7 | 421 | 57.2% | 41.1% | D+16.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT FALLS GPRECINCT FALLS G | 114 | 303 | 2 | 419 | 27.2% | 72.3% | R+45.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WAYNE APRECINCT WAYNE A | 117 | 299 | 3 | 419 | 27.9% | 71.4% | R+43.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT DRESDEN SOUTHPRECINCT DRESDEN SOUTH | 108 | 307 | 1 | 416 | 26.0% | 73.8% | R+47.8 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SPRINGFIELD CPRECINCT SPRINGFIELD C | 78 | 325 | 5 | 408 | 19.1% | 79.7% | R+60.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT UNIONPRECINCT UNION | 76 | 330 | 1 | 407 | 18.7% | 81.1% | R+62.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT FULTONHAMPRECINCT FULTONHAM | 97 | 300 | 2 | 399 | 24.3% | 75.2% | R+50.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT FALLS HPRECINCT FALLS H | 127 | 268 | 1 | 396 | 32.1% | 67.7% | R+35.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT BLUE ROCKPRECINCT BLUE ROCK | 60 | 305 | 1 | 366 | 16.4% | 83.3% | R+66.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT CLAYPRECINCT CLAY | 76 | 287 | 1 | 364 | 20.9% | 78.8% | R+58.0 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT RICH HILLPRECINCT RICH HILL | 54 | 246 | 3 | 303 | 17.8% | 81.2% | R+63.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT IRONSPOTPRECINCT IRONSPOT | 57 | 203 | 1 | 261 | 21.8% | 77.8% | R+55.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MADISONPRECINCT MADISON | 39 | 192 | 0 | 231 | 16.9% | 83.1% | R+66.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT ADAMSPRECINCT ADAMS | 27 | 171 | 0 | 198 | 13.6% | 86.4% | R+72.7 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MONROEPRECINCT MONROE | 19 | 172 | 3 | 194 | 9.8% | 88.7% | R+78.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MEIGSPRECINCT MEIGS | 6 | 107 | 2 | 115 | 5.2% | 93.0% | R+87.8 |
| PRECINCT ADAMS TWP39_39119119AAX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT BLUE ROCK39_39119119AAY | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT BRUSH CREEK A39_39119119AAZ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT BRUSH CREEK B39_39119119ABA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT CASS39_39119119ABB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT CLAY39_39119119ABC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT DRESDEN NORTH39_39119119ABV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT DRESDEN SOUTH39_39119119ABW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT DUNCAN FALLS39_39119119ADD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT FALLS A39_39119119ABD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT FALLS B39_39119119ABE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT FALLS C39_39119119ABF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT FALLS D39_39119119ABG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT FALLS E39_39119119ABH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT FALLS F39_39119119ABI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT FALLS G39_39119119ABJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT FALLS H39_39119119ABK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT FALLS I39_39119119ABL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT FALLS J39_39119119ABM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT FRAZEYSBURG39_39119119ABT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT FULTONHAM39_39119119ACF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT HARRISON39_39119119ABN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT HIGHLAND39_39119119ABP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT HOPEWELL A39_39119119ABQ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT HOPEWELL B39_39119119ABR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT HOPEWELL C39_39119119ABS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT IRONSPOT39_39119119ACG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT JACKSON39_39119119ABU | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT LICKING A39_39119119ABX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT LICKING B39_39119119ABY | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT MADISON39_39119119ABZ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT MEIGS39_39119119ACA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT MONROE39_39119119ACB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT MOXAHALA39_39119119ACH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT MUSKINGUM A39_39119119ACC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT MUSKINGUM B39_39119119ACD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT MUSKINGUM C39_39119119ACE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT NEW CONCORD A39_39119119ACX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT NEW CONCORD B39_39119119ACY | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT NORWICH39_39119119ACV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT PERRY NORTH39_39119119ACK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT PERRY SOUTH39_39119119ACL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT PHILO39_39119119ABO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT RICH HILL39_39119119ACM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT ROLLING PLAINS39_39119119ACI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT S ZANESVILLE EAST39_39119119ACT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT S ZANESVILLE WEST39_39119119ACU | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT SALEM39_39119119ACN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT SALT CREEK39_39119119ACO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT SPRINGFIELD A39_39119119ACP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT SPRINGFIELD B39_39119119ACQ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT SPRINGFIELD C39_39119119ACR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT SPRINGFIELD D39_39119119ACS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT UNION39_39119119ACW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT WASHINGTON A39_39119119ACZ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT WASHINGTON B39_39119119ADA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT WASHINGTON C39_39119119ADB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT WASHINGTON D39_39119119ADC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT WAYNE A39_39119119ADE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT WAYNE B39_39119119ADF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT WAYNE C39_39119119ADG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT WHITE COTTAGE39_39119119ACJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT ZANESVILLE 1-A39_39119119AAA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT ZANESVILLE 1-B39_39119119AAB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT ZANESVILLE 1-C39_39119119AAC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT ZANESVILLE 1-D39_39119119AAD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT ZANESVILLE 2-A39_39119119AAE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT ZANESVILLE 2-B39_39119119AAF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT ZANESVILLE 2-C39_39119119AAG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT ZANESVILLE 2-D39_39119119AAH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT ZANESVILLE 3-A39_39119119AAI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT ZANESVILLE 3-B39_39119119AAJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT ZANESVILLE 3-C39_39119119AAK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT ZANESVILLE 4-A39_39119119AAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT ZANESVILLE 4-B39_39119119AAM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT ZANESVILLE 4-C39_39119119AAN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT ZANESVILLE 5-A39_39119119AAO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT ZANESVILLE 5-B39_39119119AAP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT ZANESVILLE 5-C39_39119119AAQ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT ZANESVILLE 5-D39_39119119AAR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT ZANESVILLE 5-E39_39119119ADH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT ZANESVILLE 6-A39_39119119AAS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT ZANESVILLE 6-B39_39119119AAT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT ZANESVILLE 6-C39_39119119AAU | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT ZANESVILLE 6-D39_39119119AAV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +0.8% |
| 1896 | −2.6% |
| 1900 | −4.8% |
| 1904 | −15.0% |
| 1908 | −9.7% |
| 1912 | +8.9% |
| 1916 | −8.8% |
| 1920 | −18.7% |
| 1924 | −37.4% |
| 1928 | −54.2% |
| 1932 | −9.9% |
| 1936 | +2.5% |
| 1940 | −10.4% |
| 1944 | −16.0% |
| 1948 | −11.4% |
| 1952 | −26.0% |
| 1956 | −38.5% |
| 1960 | −23.8% |
| 1964 | +28.2% |
| 1968 | −6.8% |
| 1972 | −30.8% |
| 1976 | −3.9% |
| 1980 | −16.3% |
| 1984 | −36.7% |
| 1988 | −25.4% |
| 1992 | −7.2% |
| 1996 | −0.1% |
| 2000 | −14.0% |
| 2004 | −15.0% |
| 2008 | −7.2% |
| 2012 | −6.0% |
| 2016 | −34.3% |
| 2020 | −39.3% |
| 2024 | −43.9% |
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 53,925 |
| 2018 | 55,015 |
| 2020 | 55,078 |
| 2022 | 54,697 |
| 2024 | 54,637 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+831 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +418 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $49,602 in average income, against $64,960 for residents who stayed — 24% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+27.2 on average — 17 points more Democratic-leaning than Muskingum County, OH itself (R+43.9).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Licking County, OH275R+30.0
- Franklin County, OH223D+28.4
- Perry County, OH173R+54.5
- Guernsey County, OH135R+52.0
- Coshocton County, OH78R+52.2
- Morgan County, OH70R+53.2
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Franklin County, OH215
- Licking County, OH206
- Guernsey County, OH169
- Perry County, OH129
- Coshocton County, OH89
- Fairfield County, OH58
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −150 |
| 2012 | −568 |
| 2013 | −236 |
| 2014 | +120 |
| 2015 | +173 |
| 2016 | −306 |
| 2017 | +102 |
| 2018 | −61 |
| 2019 | +15 |
| 2021 | +193 |
| 2022 | −214 |
| 2023 | +227 |
| 2024 | +292 |
| 2025 | +831 |
Muskingum County, anchored by Zanesville at the confluence of the Muskingum and Licking rivers, has shifted decisively rightward over two decades — its R+43.9 margin in 2024 places it among Ohio's most lopsided presidential results.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 28.2 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 54.2 points in 1928. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 4.6 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 43.9 points.
A population of 86,411, a 91% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $60,780 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Marion County and Perry County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Muskingum County, Ohio. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/39119/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.