- Lead
- 10,509
- Total
- 18,857
- vs nation
- R+54.3
- Turnout
- 69.1%
Morrow County, OH
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 69.1% of 27,622 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 10,029
- Total
- 18,457
- vs nation
- R+58.8
- Turnout
- 68.5%
- Lead
- 8,187
- Total
- 16,820
- vs nation
- R+50.8
- Turnout
- 63.9%
- Lead
- 3,932
- Total
- 16,340
- vs nation
- R+27.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 3,890
- Total
- 16,679
- vs nation
- R+30.6
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 4,699
- Total
- 16,328
- vs nation
- R+26.3
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 3,313
- Total
- 12,839
- vs nation
- R+26.3
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,028
- Total
- 12,275
- vs nation
- R+16.9
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+55.7MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 35,4042024 5-year
- Median household income
- $75,2832024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 93.7%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.4%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 1.9%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+14.3 in 1912MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+55.7 in 2024MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Highland County, OH · twin score 92.9
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 69.1%19,074 participants ÷ 27,622 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +18.7 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off versus state
- -1.8 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 50.4%–52.9%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 16,820 | 26,340 | 63.9% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 13,397 | 26,622 | 50.3% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 18,570 | 27,092 | 68.5% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 13,552 | 27,182 | 49.9% | A/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 19,074 | 27,622 | 69.1% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
66 precincts · 18,855 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -CONGRESS TWP WESTCONGRESS TWP WEST | 287 | 747 | 6 | 1,040 | 27.6% | 71.8% | R+44.2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -BENNINGTON TWP WESTBENNINGTON TWP WEST | 237 | 693 | 5 | 935 | 25.3% | 74.1% | R+48.8 |
| Precinct -BENNINGTON TWP EASTBENNINGTON TWP EAST | 174 | 729 | 8 | 911 | 19.1% | 80.0% | R+60.9 |
| Precinct -PERU TWPPERU TWP | 196 | 699 | 13 | 908 | 21.6% | 77.0% | R+55.4 |
| Precinct -HARMONY TWP SHARMONY TWP S | 177 | 674 | 7 | 858 | 20.6% | 78.6% | R+57.9 |
| Precinct -FRANKLIN TWPFRANKLIN TWP | 152 | 672 | 5 | 829 | 18.3% | 81.1% | R+62.7 |
| Precinct -CONGRESS TWP EASTCONGRESS TWP EAST | 113 | 585 | 8 | 706 | 16.0% | 82.9% | R+66.9 |
| Precinct -WESTFIELD TWPWESTFIELD TWP | 150 | 522 | 9 | 681 | 22.0% | 76.7% | R+54.6 |
| Precinct -WASHINGTON TWPWASHINGTON TWP | 141 | 520 | 10 | 671 | 21.0% | 77.5% | R+56.5 |
| Precinct -LINCOLN TWP WLINCOLN TWP W | 118 | 510 | 5 | 633 | 18.6% | 80.6% | R+61.9 |
| Precinct -N BLOOMFIELD TWP EN BLOOMFIELD TWP E | 114 | 501 | 7 | 622 | 18.3% | 80.5% | R+62.2 |
| Precinct -S BLOOMFIELD TWP ES BLOOMFIELD TWP E | 105 | 511 | 1 | 617 | 17.0% | 82.8% | R+65.8 |
| Precinct -TROY TWPTROY TWP | 118 | 497 | 1 | 616 | 19.2% | 80.7% | R+61.5 |
| Precinct -CARDINGTON TWPCARDINGTON TWP | 143 | 462 | 7 | 612 | 23.4% | 75.5% | R+52.1 |
| Precinct -HARMONY TWP NHARMONY TWP N | 113 | 484 | 8 | 605 | 18.7% | 80.0% | R+61.3 |
| Precinct -CHESTER TWP EASTCHESTER TWP EAST | 92 | 416 | 8 | 516 | 17.8% | 80.6% | R+62.8 |
| Precinct -S BLOOMFIELD TWP WS BLOOMFIELD TWP W | 125 | 385 | 1 | 511 | 24.5% | 75.3% | R+50.9 |
| Precinct -CHESTER TWP WESTCHESTER TWP WEST | 116 | 390 | 0 | 506 | 22.9% | 77.1% | R+54.2 |
| Precinct -CANAAN TWPCANAAN TWP | 93 | 402 | 1 | 496 | 18.8% | 81.0% | R+62.3 |
| Precinct -CARDINGTON VILLAGE ECARDINGTON VILLAGE E | 116 | 367 | 2 | 485 | 23.9% | 75.7% | R+51.8 |
| Precinct -MT GILEAD VILLAGE NWMT GILEAD VILLAGE NW | 154 | 326 | 0 | 480 | 32.1% | 67.9% | R+35.8 |
| Precinct -CARDINGTON VILLAGE WCARDINGTON VILLAGE W | 123 | 344 | 2 | 469 | 26.2% | 73.3% | R+47.1 |
| Precinct -N BLOOMFIELD TWP WN BLOOMFIELD TWP W | 81 | 385 | 2 | 468 | 17.3% | 82.3% | R+65.0 |
| Precinct -LINCOLN TWP ELINCOLN TWP E | 113 | 348 | 6 | 467 | 24.2% | 74.5% | R+50.3 |
| Precinct -GILEAD TWP SEGILEAD TWP SE | 118 | 330 | 6 | 454 | 26.0% | 72.7% | R+46.7 |
| Precinct -GILEAD TWP WGILEAD TWP W | 81 | 365 | 5 | 451 | 18.0% | 80.9% | R+63.0 |
| Precinct -PERRY TWP NPERRY TWP N | 63 | 352 | 3 | 418 | 15.1% | 84.2% | R+69.1 |
| Precinct -MT GILEAD VILLAGE NMT GILEAD VILLAGE N | 112 | 286 | 2 | 400 | 28.0% | 71.5% | R+43.5 |
| Precinct -GILEAD TWP NEGILEAD TWP NE | 71 | 299 | 2 | 372 | 19.1% | 80.4% | R+61.3 |
| Precinct -MT GILEAD VILLAGE EMT GILEAD VILLAGE E | 116 | 228 | 4 | 348 | 33.3% | 65.5% | R+32.2 |
| Precinct -MT GILEAD VILLAGE SWMT GILEAD VILLAGE SW | 88 | 220 | 1 | 309 | 28.5% | 71.2% | R+42.7 |
| Precinct -PERRY TWP SPERRY TWP S | 51 | 209 | 0 | 260 | 19.6% | 80.4% | R+60.8 |
| Precinct -EDISON VILLAGEEDISON VILLAGE | 49 | 151 | 1 | 201 | 24.4% | 75.1% | R+50.7 |
| BENNINGTON TWP EAST39_39117117AAA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BENNINGTON TWP WEST39_39117117AAC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CANAAN TWP39_39117117AAD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CARDINGTON TWP39_39117117AAE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CARDINGTON VILLAGE E39_39117117AAF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CARDINGTON VILLAGE W39_39117117AAG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CHESTER TWP EAST39_39117117AAH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CHESTER TWP WEST39_39117117AAI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CONGRESS TWP EAST39_39117117AAJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CONGRESS TWP WEST39_39117117AAK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| EDISON VILLAGE39_39117117AAM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FRANKLIN TWP39_39117117AAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GILEAD TWP NE39_39117117AAN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GILEAD TWP SE39_39117117AAO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GILEAD TWP W39_39117117AAP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HARMONY TWP N39_39117117AAV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HARMONY TWP S39_39117117ABJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LINCOLN TWP E39_39117117AAW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LINCOLN TWP W39_39117117AAX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MT GILEAD VILLAGE E39_39117117AAQ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MT GILEAD VILLAGE N39_39117117AAR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MT GILEAD VILLAGE NW39_39117117AAS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MT GILEAD VILLAGE SW39_39117117AAT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| N BLOOMFIELD TWP E39_39117117AAY | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| N BLOOMFIELD TWP W39_39117117AAZ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PERRY TWP N39_39117117ABA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PERRY TWP S39_39117117ABB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PERU TWP39_39117117ABC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| S BLOOMFIELD TWP E39_39117117ABD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| S BLOOMFIELD TWP W39_39117117ABE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TROY TWP39_39117117ABF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON TWP39_39117117ABH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WESTFIELD TWP39_39117117ABI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −7.2% |
| 1896 | +0.2% |
| 1900 | −6.5% |
| 1904 | −15.8% |
| 1908 | −5.3% |
| 1912 | +14.3% |
| 1916 | +6.2% |
| 1920 | −22.0% |
| 1924 | −21.4% |
| 1928 | −44.5% |
| 1932 | +0.5% |
| 1936 | −1.7% |
| 1940 | −25.9% |
| 1944 | −39.6% |
| 1948 | −24.6% |
| 1952 | −43.9% |
| 1956 | −43.1% |
| 1960 | −39.8% |
| 1964 | +4.3% |
| 1968 | −28.3% |
| 1972 | −44.7% |
| 1976 | −8.7% |
| 1980 | −29.5% |
| 1984 | −47.8% |
| 1988 | −33.6% |
| 1992 | −10.2% |
| 1996 | −8.4% |
| 2000 | −25.8% |
| 2004 | −28.8% |
| 2008 | −23.3% |
| 2012 | −24.1% |
| 2016 | −48.7% |
| 2020 | −54.3% |
| 2024 | −55.7% |
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 24,860 |
| 2018 | 25,316 |
| 2020 | 25,186 |
| 2022 | 25,184 |
| 2024 | 24,667 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+257 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +1,281 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $63,317 in average income, against $72,212 for residents who stayed — 12% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+16.1 on average — 40 points more Democratic-leaning than Morrow County, OH itself (R+55.7).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Delaware County, OH231R+6.6
- Franklin County, OH190D+28.4
- Marion County, OH109R+41.4
- Richland County, OH91R+42.3
- Knox County, OH89R+44.9
- Crawford County, OH70R+52.9
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Delaware County, OH139
- Franklin County, OH120
- Richland County, OH110
- Marion County, OH97
- Crawford County, OH91
- Knox County, OH75
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −43 |
| 2012 | −91 |
| 2013 | −69 |
| 2014 | +18 |
| 2015 | −25 |
| 2016 | −56 |
| 2017 | −33 |
| 2018 | +144 |
| 2019 | +157 |
| 2021 | +239 |
| 2022 | +167 |
| 2023 | +271 |
| 2024 | +345 |
| 2025 | +257 |
Morrow County's small-town and agricultural base has delivered lopsided Republican presidential margins for decades, and its 2024 result of R+55.7 ranks among the widest gaps of any county in the state.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 14.3 points in 1912 and a Republican high of 55.7 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.4 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 55.7 points.
A population of 35,404, a 94% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $75,283 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Highland County and Brown County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Morrow County, Ohio. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/39117/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.