- Lead
- 10,390
- Total
- 20,475
- vs nation
- R+49.3
- Turnout
- 68.8%
Champaign County, OH
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 68.8% of 30,090 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 9,527
- Total
- 19,972
- vs nation
- R+52.2
- Turnout
- 66.8%
- Lead
- 8,037
- Total
- 18,548
- vs nation
- R+45.4
- Turnout
- 62.1%
- Lead
- 4,001
- Total
- 18,669
- vs nation
- R+25.3
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 3,756
- Total
- 18,936
- vs nation
- R+27.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 4,750
- Total
- 18,776
- vs nation
- R+22.8
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 3,265
- Total
- 15,680
- vs nation
- R+21.3
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 578
- Total
- 14,893
- vs nation
- R+12.4
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+50.7MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 38,8042024 5-year
- Median household income
- $75,5562024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 91.7%2024 5-year
- Black
- 1.6%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 1.8%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+12.2 in 1964MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+50.7 in 2024MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Brown County, OH · twin score 92.3
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 68.8%20,716 participants ÷ 30,090 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +17.9 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off versus state
- -2.6 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 51.0%–54.4%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 18,548 | 29,882 | 62.1% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 15,304 | 29,942 | 51.1% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 20,096 | 30,073 | 66.8% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 14,721 | 30,074 | 48.9% | A/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 20,716 | 30,090 | 68.8% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
55 precincts · 20,468 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -PRECINCT GOSHENPRECINCT GOSHEN | 228 | 917 | 10 | 1,155 | 19.7% | 79.4% | R+59.7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -PRECINCT MAD RIVER BPRECINCT MAD RIVER B | 259 | 826 | 12 | 1,097 | 23.6% | 75.3% | R+51.7 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WAYNEPRECINCT WAYNE | 192 | 875 | 7 | 1,074 | 17.9% | 81.5% | R+63.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT JOHNSONPRECINCT JOHNSON | 171 | 741 | 15 | 927 | 18.4% | 79.9% | R+61.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT ST PARISPRECINCT ST PARIS | 202 | 701 | 13 | 916 | 22.1% | 76.5% | R+54.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT CONCORDPRECINCT CONCORD | 179 | 701 | 9 | 889 | 20.1% | 78.9% | R+58.7 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT URBANA SOUTHPRECINCT URBANA SOUTH | 237 | 636 | 9 | 882 | 26.9% | 72.1% | R+45.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT URBANA 2-BPRECINCT URBANA 2-B | 305 | 515 | 9 | 829 | 36.8% | 62.1% | R+25.3 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT URBANA 2-APRECINCT URBANA 2-A | 326 | 465 | 9 | 800 | 40.8% | 58.1% | R+17.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT URBANA NORTHPRECINCT URBANA NORTH | 152 | 595 | 8 | 755 | 20.1% | 78.8% | R+58.7 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT NORTH LEWISBURGPRECINCT NORTH LEWISBURG | 175 | 560 | 4 | 739 | 23.7% | 75.8% | R+52.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MECHANICSBURGPRECINCT MECHANICSBURG | 203 | 528 | 7 | 738 | 27.5% | 71.5% | R+44.0 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT URBANA 3-APRECINCT URBANA 3-A | 258 | 457 | 6 | 721 | 35.8% | 63.4% | R+27.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT URBANA 3-BPRECINCT URBANA 3-B | 261 | 422 | 6 | 689 | 37.9% | 61.2% | R+23.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT UNION NORTHPRECINCT UNION NORTH | 162 | 510 | 6 | 678 | 23.9% | 75.2% | R+51.3 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT JACKSON WESTPRECINCT JACKSON WEST | 130 | 542 | 3 | 675 | 19.3% | 80.3% | R+61.0 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SALEM SOUTHPRECINCT SALEM SOUTH | 154 | 514 | 7 | 675 | 22.8% | 76.1% | R+53.3 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SALEM NORTHPRECINCT SALEM NORTH | 101 | 564 | 4 | 669 | 15.1% | 84.3% | R+69.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT JACKSON EASTPRECINCT JACKSON EAST | 93 | 568 | 6 | 667 | 13.9% | 85.2% | R+71.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MAD RIVER APRECINCT MAD RIVER A | 137 | 506 | 2 | 645 | 21.2% | 78.4% | R+57.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT ADAMSPRECINCT ADAMS | 77 | 510 | 5 | 592 | 13.0% | 86.1% | R+73.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT RUSHPRECINCT RUSH | 91 | 486 | 5 | 582 | 15.6% | 83.5% | R+67.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT UNION SOUTHPRECINCT UNION SOUTH | 128 | 420 | 2 | 550 | 23.3% | 76.4% | R+53.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT URBANA 1-BPRECINCT URBANA 1-B | 210 | 323 | 4 | 537 | 39.1% | 60.1% | R+21.0 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT URBANA 4-APRECINCT URBANA 4-A | 139 | 390 | 6 | 535 | 26.0% | 72.9% | R+46.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT URBANA 4-BPRECINCT URBANA 4-B | 168 | 340 | 6 | 514 | 32.7% | 66.1% | R+33.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT HARRISONPRECINCT HARRISON | 72 | 427 | 4 | 503 | 14.3% | 84.9% | R+70.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT URBANA 1-APRECINCT URBANA 1-A | 134 | 295 | 6 | 435 | 30.8% | 67.8% | R+37.0 |
| Voting District ADAMS39_39021021AAT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District CONCORD39_39021021ABY | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District GOSHEN39_39021021AAW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District HARRISON39_39021021ABA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District JACKSON EAST39_39021021ABD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District JACKSON WEST39_39021021ABB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District JOHNSON39_39021021ABF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District MAD RIVER A39_39021021ACA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District MAD RIVER B39_39021021ABK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District MECHANICSBURG39_39021021AAY | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District NORTH LEWISBURG39_39021021ABO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District RUSH39_39021021ABM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District SALEM NORTH39_39021021ABQ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District SALEM SOUTH39_39021021ABR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District ST PARIS39_39021021ABH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District UNION NORTH39_39021021ABS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District UNION SOUTH39_39021021ABT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District URBANA 1-A39_39021021AAA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District URBANA 1-B39_39021021AAB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District URBANA 2-A39_39021021AAE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District URBANA 3-A39_39021021AAK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District URBANA 3-B39_39021021AAN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District URBANA 4-A39_39021021AAP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District URBANA 4-B39_39021021AAR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District URBANA NORTH39_39021021ABU | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District URBANA SOUTH39_39021021ABV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District WAYNE39_39021021ABW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −13.3% |
| 1896 | −11.3% |
| 1900 | −14.6% |
| 1904 | −27.4% |
| 1908 | −13.3% |
| 1912 | +5.4% |
| 1916 | −5.0% |
| 1920 | −20.7% |
| 1924 | −25.4% |
| 1928 | −39.6% |
| 1932 | +1.6% |
| 1936 | −2.8% |
| 1940 | −13.9% |
| 1944 | −23.8% |
| 1948 | −17.2% |
| 1952 | −32.1% |
| 1956 | −39.0% |
| 1960 | −33.4% |
| 1964 | +12.2% |
| 1968 | −20.4% |
| 1972 | −40.7% |
| 1976 | −15.5% |
| 1980 | −26.6% |
| 1984 | −47.0% |
| 1988 | −35.3% |
| 1992 | −11.1% |
| 1996 | −3.9% |
| 2000 | −20.8% |
| 2004 | −25.3% |
| 2008 | −19.8% |
| 2012 | −21.4% |
| 2016 | −43.3% |
| 2020 | −47.7% |
| 2024 | −50.7% |
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | R | 24.8%5,016 | 75.2%15,227 | 20,243 |
| 2020 | R | 23.6%4,569 | 76.4%14,766 | 19,335 |
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 25,696 |
| 2018 | 26,398 |
| 2020 | 26,492 |
| 2022 | 26,512 |
| 2024 | 27,055 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+168 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −902 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $56,666 in average income, against $68,765 for residents who stayed — 18% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+25.5 on average — 25 points more Democratic-leaning than Champaign County, OH itself (R+50.7).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Clark County, OH221R+29.5
- Logan County, OH141R+56.2
- Franklin County, OH114D+28.4
- Union County, OH76R+29.6
- Montgomery County, OH50D+0.5
- Madison County, OH40R+43.7
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Clark County, OH235
- Logan County, OH112
- Franklin County, OH88
- Union County, OH78
- Miami County, OH75
- Montgomery County, OH48
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −292 |
| 2012 | −293 |
| 2013 | −166 |
| 2014 | −410 |
| 2015 | −81 |
| 2016 | −214 |
| 2017 | +100 |
| 2018 | −80 |
| 2019 | +87 |
| 2021 | +122 |
| 2022 | +41 |
| 2023 | +90 |
| 2024 | +26 |
| 2025 | +168 |
Champaign County's small-city core of Urbana anchors a largely agricultural landscape where the 2024 presidential margin exceeded 50 points, placing it among Ohio's most one-sided counties in recent cycles.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 12.2 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 50.7 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 3.0 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 50.7 points.
A population of 38,804, a 92% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $75,556 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Brown County and Highland County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Champaign County, Ohio. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/39021/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.