- Lead
- 24,707
- Total
- 58,362
- vs nation
- R+40.9
- Turnout
- 60.8%
Richland County, OH
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 60.8% of 97,203 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 23,832
- Total
- 59,975
- vs nation
- R+44.2
- Turnout
- 64.2%
- Lead
- 20,505
- Total
- 56,106
- vs nation
- R+38.6
- Turnout
- 59.3%
- Lead
- 11,180
- Total
- 58,241
- vs nation
- R+23.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 8,307
- Total
- 61,239
- vs nation
- R+20.8
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 12,234
- Total
- 61,840
- vs nation
- R+17.3
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 9,566
- Total
- 52,779
- vs nation
- R+18.6
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 2,865
- Total
- 51,451
- vs nation
- R+14.1
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+42.3MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 125,0992024 5-year
- Median household income
- $59,5092024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 83.9%2024 5-year
- Black
- 7.1%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 2.3%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+27.0 in 1936MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+43.1 in 1928MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Muskingum County, OH · twin score 81.5
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 60.8%59,092 participants ÷ 97,203 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +20.6 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off versus state
- +0.0 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 40.2%–45.0%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 56,106 | 94,625 | 59.3% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 45,508 | 94,345 | 48.2% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 60,336 | 94,024 | 64.2% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 42,397 | 97,203 | 43.6% | A/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 59,092 | 97,203 | 60.8% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
185 precincts · 58,358 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -PRECINCT JEFF APRECINCT JEFF A | 242 | 942 | 9 | 1,193 | 20.3% | 79.0% | R+58.7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -PRECINCT WORTH BPRECINCT WORTH B | 217 | 925 | 8 | 1,150 | 18.9% | 80.4% | R+61.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MAN 1 - EPRECINCT MAN 1 - E | 400 | 710 | 10 | 1,120 | 35.7% | 63.4% | R+27.7 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT ONT 3 - APRECINCT ONT 3 - A | 345 | 692 | 3 | 1,040 | 33.2% | 66.5% | R+33.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WELLERPRECINCT WELLER | 179 | 850 | 7 | 1,036 | 17.3% | 82.0% | R+64.8 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT LEX EPRECINCT LEX E | 304 | 723 | 7 | 1,034 | 29.4% | 69.9% | R+40.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT ONT 4 - APRECINCT ONT 4 - A | 281 | 739 | 7 | 1,027 | 27.4% | 72.0% | R+44.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT JEFF DPRECINCT JEFF D | 182 | 833 | 4 | 1,019 | 17.9% | 81.7% | R+63.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MAN 1 - DPRECINCT MAN 1 - D | 379 | 633 | 7 | 1,019 | 37.2% | 62.1% | R+24.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WASH FPRECINCT WASH F | 200 | 797 | 12 | 1,009 | 19.8% | 79.0% | R+59.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SPFLD BPRECINCT SPFLD B | 221 | 754 | 6 | 981 | 22.5% | 76.9% | R+54.3 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MAD EPRECINCT MAD E | 189 | 774 | 6 | 969 | 19.5% | 79.9% | R+60.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT TROY BPRECINCT TROY B | 224 | 725 | 7 | 956 | 23.4% | 75.8% | R+52.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT FRANKPRECINCT FRANK | 129 | 780 | 6 | 915 | 14.1% | 85.2% | R+71.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MAD APRECINCT MAD A | 185 | 701 | 11 | 897 | 20.6% | 78.1% | R+57.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT PLYPRECINCT PLY | 171 | 710 | 6 | 887 | 19.3% | 80.0% | R+60.8 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT LEX CPRECINCT LEX C | 259 | 597 | 8 | 864 | 30.0% | 69.1% | R+39.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MON BPRECINCT MON B | 175 | 680 | 3 | 858 | 20.4% | 79.3% | R+58.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MAN 2 - EPRECINCT MAN 2 - E | 336 | 514 | 4 | 854 | 39.3% | 60.2% | R+20.8 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MAD GPRECINCT MAD G | 163 | 686 | 4 | 853 | 19.1% | 80.4% | R+61.3 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MAD IPRECINCT MAD I | 209 | 633 | 5 | 847 | 24.7% | 74.7% | R+50.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MAN 2 - DPRECINCT MAN 2 - D | 341 | 495 | 5 | 841 | 40.5% | 58.9% | R+18.3 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MON APRECINCT MON A | 126 | 704 | 10 | 840 | 15.0% | 83.8% | R+68.8 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT ONT 1 - APRECINCT ONT 1 - A | 290 | 543 | 6 | 839 | 34.6% | 64.7% | R+30.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WASH CPRECINCT WASH C | 205 | 616 | 9 | 830 | 24.7% | 74.2% | R+49.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MAN 2 - FPRECINCT MAN 2 - F | 338 | 454 | 12 | 804 | 42.0% | 56.5% | R+14.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MIFF EPRECINCT MIFF E | 250 | 535 | 6 | 791 | 31.6% | 67.6% | R+36.0 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT ONT 2 - APRECINCT ONT 2 - A | 241 | 546 | 2 | 789 | 30.5% | 69.2% | R+38.7 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MAN 1 - BPRECINCT MAN 1 - B | 220 | 552 | 9 | 781 | 28.2% | 70.7% | R+42.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT LEX BPRECINCT LEX B | 239 | 536 | 3 | 778 | 30.7% | 68.9% | R+38.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MAN 3 - EPRECINCT MAN 3 - E | 336 | 425 | 5 | 766 | 43.9% | 55.5% | R+11.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MIFF DPRECINCT MIFF D | 224 | 535 | 2 | 761 | 29.4% | 70.3% | R+40.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MAN 6 - BPRECINCT MAN 6 - B | 262 | 486 | 10 | 758 | 34.6% | 64.1% | R+29.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT TROY APRECINCT TROY A | 200 | 542 | 7 | 749 | 26.7% | 72.4% | R+45.7 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MAN 1 - APRECINCT MAN 1 - A | 252 | 493 | 2 | 747 | 33.7% | 66.0% | R+32.3 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MAD OPRECINCT MAD O | 197 | 541 | 4 | 742 | 26.5% | 72.9% | R+46.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MAD DPRECINCT MAD D | 158 | 575 | 5 | 738 | 21.4% | 77.9% | R+56.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT JACK BPRECINCT JACK B | 136 | 583 | 8 | 727 | 18.7% | 80.2% | R+61.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MIFF BPRECINCT MIFF B | 151 | 567 | 7 | 725 | 20.8% | 78.2% | R+57.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WASH BPRECINCT WASH B | 212 | 508 | 4 | 724 | 29.3% | 70.2% | R+40.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT JEFF CPRECINCT JEFF C | 126 | 587 | 5 | 718 | 17.5% | 81.8% | R+64.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MAN 6 - EPRECINCT MAN 6 - E | 238 | 465 | 5 | 708 | 33.6% | 65.7% | R+32.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WASH APRECINCT WASH A | 133 | 566 | 5 | 704 | 18.9% | 80.4% | R+61.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT PERRYPRECINCT PERRY | 115 | 581 | 4 | 700 | 16.4% | 83.0% | R+66.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SPFLD CPRECINCT SPFLD C | 160 | 532 | 6 | 698 | 22.9% | 76.2% | R+53.3 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MAN 3 - CPRECINCT MAN 3 - C | 303 | 373 | 10 | 686 | 44.2% | 54.4% | R+10.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MAN 3 - DPRECINCT MAN 3 - D | 300 | 370 | 11 | 681 | 44.1% | 54.3% | R+10.3 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WASH DPRECINCT WASH D | 147 | 513 | 8 | 668 | 22.0% | 76.8% | R+54.8 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT JACK APRECINCT JACK A | 135 | 518 | 7 | 660 | 20.5% | 78.5% | R+58.0 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MAN 2 - APRECINCT MAN 2 - A | 288 | 364 | 2 | 654 | 44.0% | 55.7% | R+11.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SHL 4 - APRECINCT SHL 4 - A | 175 | 465 | 3 | 643 | 27.2% | 72.3% | R+45.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MAN 3 - BPRECINCT MAN 3 - B | 290 | 338 | 6 | 634 | 45.7% | 53.3% | R+7.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SANDPRECINCT SAND | 144 | 455 | 4 | 603 | 23.9% | 75.5% | R+51.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MIFF CPRECINCT MIFF C | 125 | 462 | 6 | 593 | 21.1% | 77.9% | R+56.8 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SHL 4 - BPRECINCT SHL 4 - B | 158 | 425 | 4 | 587 | 26.9% | 72.4% | R+45.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SHARONPRECINCT SHARON | 103 | 466 | 3 | 572 | 18.0% | 81.5% | R+63.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SPFLD DPRECINCT SPFLD D | 184 | 379 | 8 | 571 | 32.2% | 66.4% | R+34.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MAN 1 - FPRECINCT MAN 1 - F | 201 | 355 | 1 | 557 | 36.1% | 63.7% | R+27.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SHL 3 - APRECINCT SHL 3 - A | 150 | 394 | 8 | 552 | 27.2% | 71.4% | R+44.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MAN 2 - BPRECINCT MAN 2 - B | 220 | 327 | 3 | 550 | 40.0% | 59.5% | R+19.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MIFF APRECINCT MIFF A | 120 | 424 | 5 | 549 | 21.9% | 77.2% | R+55.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SHL 1 - BPRECINCT SHL 1 - B | 145 | 400 | 1 | 546 | 26.6% | 73.3% | R+46.7 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MAN 1 - CPRECINCT MAN 1 - C | 214 | 323 | 5 | 542 | 39.5% | 59.6% | R+20.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MAN 4 - APRECINCT MAN 4 - A | 133 | 408 | 0 | 541 | 24.6% | 75.4% | R+50.8 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT CASSPRECINCT CASS | 71 | 459 | 3 | 533 | 13.3% | 86.1% | R+72.8 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SPFLD APRECINCT SPFLD A | 110 | 417 | 4 | 531 | 20.7% | 78.5% | R+57.8 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SHL 2 - APRECINCT SHL 2 - A | 139 | 375 | 7 | 521 | 26.7% | 72.0% | R+45.3 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SHL 2 - BPRECINCT SHL 2 - B | 132 | 382 | 6 | 520 | 25.4% | 73.5% | R+48.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SHL 1 - APRECINCT SHL 1 - A | 117 | 363 | 6 | 486 | 24.1% | 74.7% | R+50.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MAN 4 - EPRECINCT MAN 4 - E | 306 | 175 | 2 | 483 | 63.4% | 36.2% | D+27.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WORTH APRECINCT WORTH A | 71 | 404 | 6 | 481 | 14.8% | 84.0% | R+69.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MAN 4 - BPRECINCT MAN 4 - B | 232 | 244 | 4 | 480 | 48.3% | 50.8% | R+2.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MAN 5 - APRECINCT MAN 5 - A | 157 | 304 | 3 | 464 | 33.8% | 65.5% | R+31.7 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MAN 6 - DPRECINCT MAN 6 - D | 240 | 200 | 7 | 447 | 53.7% | 44.7% | D+8.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MAN 4 - DPRECINCT MAN 4 - D | 191 | 214 | 8 | 413 | 46.2% | 51.8% | R+5.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT BLMGPRECINCT BLMG | 58 | 349 | 4 | 411 | 14.1% | 84.9% | R+70.8 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MAN 3 - APRECINCT MAN 3 - A | 180 | 204 | 9 | 393 | 45.8% | 51.9% | R+6.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SHL 3 - BPRECINCT SHL 3 - B | 85 | 282 | 4 | 371 | 22.9% | 76.0% | R+53.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MAN 2 - CPRECINCT MAN 2 - C | 165 | 190 | 5 | 360 | 45.8% | 52.8% | R+6.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MAN 4 - CPRECINCT MAN 4 - C | 238 | 112 | 4 | 354 | 67.2% | 31.6% | D+35.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MAN 6 - APRECINCT MAN 6 - A | 201 | 136 | 4 | 341 | 58.9% | 39.9% | D+19.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT BUTLERPRECINCT BUTLER | 45 | 262 | 2 | 309 | 14.6% | 84.8% | R+70.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MAN 5 - BPRECINCT MAN 5 - B | 178 | 102 | 5 | 285 | 62.5% | 35.8% | D+26.7 |
| BLOOMINGGROVE TOWNSHIP39_39139139ACH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BUTLER TOWNSHIP39_39139139ACI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CASS A39_39139139ACK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP A39_39139139ACL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JACKSON TOWNSHIP A39_39139139ACN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JACKSON TOWNSHIP B39_39139139ACO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSON TOWNSHIP C39_39139139ACQ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSON TOWNSHIP D39_39139139ACR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSON TWP. A (BELLVI39_39139139ACS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSON TWP. B (BELLVI39_39139139ACT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LEXINGTON VILLAGE B39_39139139AEI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LEXINGTON VILLAGE C39_39139139AEJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LEXINGTON VILLAGE D39_39139139AEK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LEXINGTON VILLAGE E39_39139139AEL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MADISON TOWNSHIP A39_39139139ACU | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MADISON TOWNSHIP A-139_39139139ACV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MADISON TOWNSHIP B39_39139139ACW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MADISON TOWNSHIP D39_39139139ACY | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MADISON TOWNSHIP E39_39139139ACZ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MADISON TOWNSHIP F39_39139139ADA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MADISON TOWNSHIP G39_39139139ADB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MADISON TOWNSHIP I39_39139139ADC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MADISON TOWNSHIP J39_39139139ADD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MADISON TOWNSHIP L39_39139139ADE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MADISON TOWNSHIP O39_39139139ADG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MANSFIELD WARD 1 PREC A39_39139139AAA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MANSFIELD WARD 1 PREC D39_39139139AAD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MANSFIELD WARD 1 PREC E39_39139139AAE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MANSFIELD WARD 1 PREC F39_39139139AAF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MANSFIELD WARD 1 PREC H39_39139139AAH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MANSFIELD WARD 1 PREC J39_39139139AAI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MANSFIELD WARD 1 PREC K39_39139139AAJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MANSFIELD WARD 1 PREC L39_39139139AEY | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MANSFIELD WARD 2 PREC A39_39139139AAK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MANSFIELD WARD 2 PREC B39_39139139AAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MANSFIELD WARD 2 PREC D39_39139139AAN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MANSFIELD WARD 2 PREC F39_39139139AAP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MANSFIELD WARD 2 PREC G39_39139139AAQ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MANSFIELD WARD 2 PREC H39_39139139AAR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MANSFIELD WARD 2 PREC I39_39139139AAS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MANSFIELD WARD 3 PREC D39_39139139AAW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MANSFIELD WARD 3 PREC E39_39139139AAX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MANSFIELD WARD 3 PREC F39_39139139AAY | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MANSFIELD WARD 3 PREC H39_39139139ABA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MANSFIELD WARD 3 PREC I39_39139139ABB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MANSFIELD WARD 3 PREC L39_39139139ABD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MANSFIELD WARD 4 PREC A39_39139139ABF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MANSFIELD WARD 4 PREC B39_39139139ABG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MANSFIELD WARD 4 PREC C39_39139139ABH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MANSFIELD WARD 4 PREC D39_39139139ABI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MANSFIELD WARD 4 PREC E39_39139139ABJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MANSFIELD WARD 4 PREC G39_39139139ABL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MANSFIELD WARD 5 PREC B39_39139139ABN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MANSFIELD WARD 5 PREC C39_39139139ABO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MANSFIELD WARD 5 PREC D39_39139139ABP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MANSFIELD WARD 6 PREC A39_39139139ABQ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MANSFIELD WARD 6 PREC B39_39139139ABR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MANSFIELD WARD 6 PREC C39_39139139ABS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MANSFIELD WARD 6 PREC D39_39139139ABT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MANSFIELD WARD 6 PREC G39_39139139ABW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MIFFLIN TOWNSHIP A39_39139139ADH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MIFFLIN TOWNSHIP B39_39139139ADI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MIFFLIN TOWNSHIP C39_39139139ADJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MIFFLIN TOWNSHIP D39_39139139ADK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MIFFLIN TOWNSHIP E39_39139139ADL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MIFFLIN TOWNSHIP F39_39139139ADM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MONROE A39_39139139ADP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MONROE TOWNSHIP B39_39139139ADN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ONTARIO WARD 1 PREC A39_39139139AFB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ONTARIO WARD 2 PREC A39_39139139AFD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ONTARIO WARD 3 PREC A39_39139139AFF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ONTARIO WARD 4 PREC A39_39139139AFH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PERRY TOWNSHIP39_39139139ADQ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLYMOUTH TOWNSHIP B39_39139139ADR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLYMOUTH TWP. A (PLYMOUT39_39139139ADS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SANDUSKY TOWNSHIP39_39139139ADT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SHARON TOWNSHIP39_39139139ADU | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SHELBY WARD 1 PREC A39_39139139ABX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SHELBY WARD 1 PREC B39_39139139ABY | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SHELBY WARD 2 PREC A39_39139139ACA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SHELBY WARD 2 PREC B39_39139139ACB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SHELBY WARD 3 PREC A39_39139139ACC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SHELBY WARD 3 PREC B39_39139139ACD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SHELBY WARD 4 PREC A39_39139139ACE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SHELBY WARD 4 PREC B39_39139139ACF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SPRINGFIELD TOWNSHIP A39_39139139ADV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SPRINGFIELD TOWNSHIP B39_39139139ADW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SPRINGFIELD TOWNSHIP C39_39139139ADX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SPRINGFIELD TOWNSHIP D39_39139139ADY | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TROY TOWNSHIP A39_39139139AEF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TROY TOWNSHIP B39_39139139AEG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP A39_39139139AEM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP B39_39139139AEN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP C39_39139139AEO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP D39_39139139AEP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP E39_39139139AEQ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP F39_39139139AER | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP H39_39139139AFA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WELLER TOWNSHIP A39_39139139AET | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WORTHINGTON TWP. A (BUTL39_39139139AEW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WORTHINGTON TWP. B39_39139139AEV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WORTHINGTON TWP. C39_39139139AEX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +14.3% |
| 1896 | +10.0% |
| 1900 | +9.2% |
| 1904 | −1.6% |
| 1908 | +11.4% |
| 1912 | +26.3% |
| 1916 | +17.1% |
| 1920 | −7.7% |
| 1924 | −24.5% |
| 1928 | −43.1% |
| 1932 | +9.5% |
| 1936 | +27.0% |
| 1940 | +4.2% |
| 1944 | −7.9% |
| 1948 | −3.8% |
| 1952 | −27.2% |
| 1956 | −31.6% |
| 1960 | −16.3% |
| 1964 | +13.7% |
| 1968 | −19.4% |
| 1972 | −38.7% |
| 1976 | −2.5% |
| 1980 | −21.6% |
| 1984 | −37.0% |
| 1988 | −20.8% |
| 1992 | −6.9% |
| 1996 | −5.6% |
| 2000 | −18.1% |
| 2004 | −19.8% |
| 2008 | −13.6% |
| 2012 | −19.2% |
| 2016 | −36.5% |
| 2020 | −39.7% |
| 2024 | −42.3% |
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 81,942 |
| 2018 | 83,033 |
| 2020 | 82,754 |
| 2022 | 81,561 |
| 2024 | 80,649 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+24 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −1,881 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $47,555 in average income, against $65,547 for residents who stayed — 27% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+29.1 on average — 13 points more Democratic-leaning than Richland County, OH itself (R+42.3).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Ashland County, OH307R+50.0
- Crawford County, OH280R+52.9
- Franklin County, OH259D+28.4
- Knox County, OH141R+44.9
- Huron County, OH128R+44.0
- Morrow County, OH110R+55.7
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Ashland County, OH267
- Crawford County, OH255
- Franklin County, OH254
- Huron County, OH131
- Knox County, OH94
- Morrow County, OH91
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −1,097 |
| 2012 | −628 |
| 2013 | −356 |
| 2014 | −449 |
| 2015 | −280 |
| 2016 | −503 |
| 2017 | −620 |
| 2018 | +631 |
| 2019 | +240 |
| 2021 | +625 |
| 2022 | +342 |
| 2023 | +29 |
| 2024 | +161 |
| 2025 | +24 |
Richland County, anchored by Mansfield in north-central Ohio, has shifted steadily rightward over the past two decades; its 2024 presidential margin of R+42.3 reflects a broader rural consolidation that has reshaped statewide electoral math.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 27.0 points in 1936 and a Republican high of 43.1 points in 1928. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 2.6 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 42.3 points.
A population of 125,099, a 84% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $59,509 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Muskingum County and Coshocton County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Richland County, Ohio. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/39139/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.