- Lead
- 13,155
- Total
- 23,406
- vs nation
- R+54.7
- Turnout
- 67.5%
Logan County, OH
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 67.5% of 35,232 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 12,909
- Total
- 23,368
- vs nation
- R+59.7
- Turnout
- 68.6%
- Lead
- 11,310
- Total
- 22,019
- vs nation
- R+53.5
- Turnout
- 64.3%
- Lead
- 6,571
- Total
- 21,462
- vs nation
- R+34.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 5,912
- Total
- 22,283
- vs nation
- R+33.8
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 7,646
- Total
- 21,398
- vs nation
- R+33.3
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 5,904
- Total
- 18,455
- vs nation
- R+32.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,928
- Total
- 17,145
- vs nation
- R+19.8
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+56.2MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 46,0892024 5-year
- Median household income
- $71,5512024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 91.5%2024 5-year
- Black
- 1.7%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 2.4%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+11.9 in 1964MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+56.2 in 2024MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Highland County, OH · twin score 94.5
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 67.5%23,796 participants ÷ 35,232 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +21.1 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off versus state
- +0.6 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 46.4%–49.3%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 22,019 | 34,240 | 64.3% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 16,836 | 34,354 | 49.0% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 23,706 | 34,566 | 68.6% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 16,737 | 35,267 | 47.5% | A/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 23,796 | 35,232 | 67.5% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
73 precincts · 23,403 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -PRECINCT RUSHCREEKPRECINCT RUSHCREEK | 180 | 924 | 14 | 1,118 | 16.1% | 82.6% | R+66.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -PRECINCT RICHLANDPRECINCT RICHLAND | 226 | 846 | 6 | 1,078 | 21.0% | 78.5% | R+57.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT STOKES NPRECINCT STOKES N | 214 | 834 | 7 | 1,055 | 20.3% | 79.1% | R+58.8 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MONROEPRECINCT MONROE | 199 | 788 | 12 | 999 | 19.9% | 78.9% | R+59.0 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WEST LIBERTYPRECINCT WEST LIBERTY | 251 | 728 | 6 | 985 | 25.5% | 73.9% | R+48.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT HARRISONPRECINCT HARRISON | 190 | 747 | 16 | 953 | 19.9% | 78.4% | R+58.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SECOND WARD BPRECINCT SECOND WARD B | 250 | 639 | 7 | 896 | 27.9% | 71.3% | R+43.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SECOND WARD APRECINCT SECOND WARD A | 263 | 616 | 7 | 886 | 29.7% | 69.5% | R+39.8 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT McARTHURPRECINCT McARTHUR | 152 | 727 | 6 | 885 | 17.2% | 82.1% | R+65.0 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT FIRST WARD BPRECINCT FIRST WARD B | 252 | 585 | 3 | 840 | 30.0% | 69.6% | R+39.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT JEFFERSON NPRECINCT JEFFERSON N | 130 | 696 | 11 | 837 | 15.5% | 83.2% | R+67.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT LIBERTYPRECINCT LIBERTY | 150 | 655 | 3 | 808 | 18.6% | 81.1% | R+62.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT ZANEPRECINCT ZANE | 128 | 576 | 5 | 709 | 18.1% | 81.2% | R+63.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT JEFFERSON SPRECINCT JEFFERSON S | 175 | 522 | 8 | 705 | 24.8% | 74.0% | R+49.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT FIRST WARD APRECINCT FIRST WARD A | 209 | 486 | 8 | 703 | 29.7% | 69.1% | R+39.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT FOURTH WARD APRECINCT FOURTH WARD A | 170 | 508 | 5 | 683 | 24.9% | 74.4% | R+49.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WASHINGTON NPRECINCT WASHINGTON N | 155 | 510 | 6 | 671 | 23.1% | 76.0% | R+52.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT FOURTH WARD BPRECINCT FOURTH WARD B | 209 | 414 | 5 | 628 | 33.3% | 65.9% | R+32.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT DeGRAFFPRECINCT DeGRAFF | 74 | 529 | 5 | 608 | 12.2% | 87.0% | R+74.8 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT PERRYPRECINCT PERRY | 99 | 462 | 4 | 565 | 17.5% | 81.8% | R+64.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MIAMI / QUINCYPRECINCT MIAMI / QUINCY | 76 | 484 | 3 | 563 | 13.5% | 86.0% | R+72.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT RUSSELLS POINTPRECINCT RUSSELLS POINT | 143 | 398 | 3 | 544 | 26.3% | 73.2% | R+46.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT STOKES WPRECINCT STOKES W | 64 | 437 | 4 | 505 | 12.7% | 86.5% | R+73.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT LAKEVIEWPRECINCT LAKEVIEW | 104 | 386 | 1 | 491 | 21.2% | 78.6% | R+57.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT UNIONPRECINCT UNION | 80 | 397 | 7 | 484 | 16.5% | 82.0% | R+65.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT THIRD WARD BPRECINCT THIRD WARD B | 133 | 331 | 3 | 467 | 28.5% | 70.9% | R+42.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT THIRD WARD APRECINCT THIRD WARD A | 151 | 303 | 4 | 458 | 33.0% | 66.2% | R+33.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT BELLE CENTERPRECINCT BELLE CENTER | 87 | 347 | 3 | 437 | 19.9% | 79.4% | R+59.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT PLEASANTPRECINCT PLEASANT | 52 | 375 | 3 | 430 | 12.1% | 87.2% | R+75.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WASHINGTON SPRECINCT WASHINGTON S | 59 | 355 | 3 | 417 | 14.1% | 85.1% | R+71.0 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT STOKES SEPRECINCT STOKES SE | 117 | 292 | 2 | 411 | 28.5% | 71.0% | R+42.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT LAKEPRECINCT LAKE | 79 | 322 | 3 | 404 | 19.6% | 79.7% | R+60.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT BOKESCREEKPRECINCT BOKESCREEK | 54 | 306 | 3 | 363 | 14.9% | 84.3% | R+69.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WEST MANSFIELDPRECINCT WEST MANSFIELD | 67 | 277 | 6 | 350 | 19.1% | 79.1% | R+60.0 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT BLOOMFIELDPRECINCT BLOOMFIELD | 47 | 207 | 1 | 255 | 18.4% | 81.2% | R+62.7 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT HUNTSVILLEPRECINCT HUNTSVILLE | 38 | 173 | 1 | 212 | 17.9% | 81.6% | R+63.7 |
| PRECINCT BELLE CENTER39_39091091ABK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT BLOOMFIELD39_39091091AAQ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT BOKESCREEK39_39091091AAR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT DEGRAFF39_39091091ABG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT FIRST WARD B39_39091091AAB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT FOURTH WARD B39_39091091AAN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT HARRISON39_39091091AAT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT HUNTSVILLE39_39091091ABC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT JEFFERSON NORTH39_39091091AAV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT JEFFERSON SOUTH39_39091091AAW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT LAKE39_39091091AAY | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT LAKEVIEW39_39091091ABP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT LIBERTY39_39091091AAZ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT MCARTHUR39_39091091ABD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT MIAMI39_39091091ABE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT MONROE39_39091091ABH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT PERRY39_39091091ABI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT PLEASANT39_39091091ABJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT QUINCY39_39091091ABF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT RICHLAND39_39091091ABL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT RUSHCREEK39_39091091ABM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT RUSHSYLVANIA39_39091091ABN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT RUSSELLS POINT39_39091091ABX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT SECOND WARD B39_39091091AAG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT STOKES NORTH39_39091091ABR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT STOKES NORTH-EAST39_39091091ABQ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT STOKES SOUTH-EAST39_39091091ABS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT STOKES WEST39_39091091ABT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT THIRD WARD B39_39091091AAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT UNION39_39091091ABU | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT WASHINGTON NORTH39_39091091ABV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT WASHINGTON SOUTH39_39091091ABW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT WEST LIBERTY EAST39_39091091ABA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT WEST LIBERTY WEST39_39091091ABB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT WEST MANSFIELD39_39091091AAS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT ZANE39_39091091ABZ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT ZANESFIELD-VALLEY HI39_39091091AAX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −22.3% |
| 1896 | −20.1% |
| 1900 | −23.3% |
| 1904 | −42.3% |
| 1908 | −19.3% |
| 1912 | +10.3% |
| 1916 | −10.9% |
| 1920 | −26.8% |
| 1924 | −34.1% |
| 1928 | −53.8% |
| 1932 | −5.5% |
| 1936 | −6.4% |
| 1940 | −21.7% |
| 1944 | −33.3% |
| 1948 | −22.3% |
| 1952 | −39.6% |
| 1956 | −45.3% |
| 1960 | −36.4% |
| 1964 | +11.9% |
| 1968 | −23.3% |
| 1972 | −46.5% |
| 1976 | −20.4% |
| 1980 | −36.1% |
| 1984 | −53.7% |
| 1988 | −42.1% |
| 1992 | −23.8% |
| 1996 | −11.2% |
| 2000 | −32.0% |
| 2004 | −35.7% |
| 2008 | −26.5% |
| 2012 | −30.6% |
| 2016 | −51.4% |
| 2020 | −55.2% |
| 2024 | −56.2% |
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 30,684 |
| 2018 | 31,666 |
| 2020 | 32,218 |
| 2022 | 32,163 |
| 2024 | 32,330 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+243 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −390 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $57,337 in average income, against $69,839 for residents who stayed — 18% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+29.7 on average — 27 points more Democratic-leaning than Logan County, OH itself (R+56.2).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Union County, OH159R+29.6
- Franklin County, OH121D+28.4
- Champaign County, OH112R+50.7
- Hardin County, OH67R+54.7
- Shelby County, OH60R+64.8
- Allen County, OH55R+44.1
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Champaign County, OH141
- Franklin County, OH141
- Union County, OH124
- Hardin County, OH93
- Shelby County, OH84
- Auglaize County, OH42
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −264 |
| 2012 | −309 |
| 2013 | −128 |
| 2014 | −11 |
| 2015 | −246 |
| 2016 | −176 |
| 2017 | +83 |
| 2018 | +55 |
| 2019 | +294 |
| 2021 | +69 |
| 2022 | +19 |
| 2023 | −20 |
| 2024 | +1 |
| 2025 | +243 |
Logan County delivered a 56-point Republican presidential margin in 2024, reflecting the deep rural consolidation that has reshaped Ohio's small-county map over the past decade. Its population of roughly 46,000 is anchored by the small city of Bellefontaine.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 11.9 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 56.2 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.0 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 56.2 points.
A population of 46,089, a 92% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $71,551 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Highland County and Clinton County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Logan County, Ohio. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/39091/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.