- Lead
- 13,499
- Total
- 26,713
- vs nation
- R+49.1
- Turnout
- 61.1%
Lawrence County, OH
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 61.1% of 44,362 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 12,817
- Total
- 28,127
- vs nation
- R+50.0
- Turnout
- 61.2%
- Lead
- 11,715
- Total
- 27,239
- vs nation
- R+45.1
- Turnout
- 57.4%
- Lead
- 3,907
- Total
- 26,358
- vs nation
- R+18.7
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 4,153
- Total
- 27,390
- vs nation
- R+22.4
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 3,335
- Total
- 27,710
- vs nation
- R+9.6
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,224
- Total
- 24,452
- vs nation
- R+5.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 2,763
- Total
- 23,926
- vs nation
- D+3.0
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+50.5MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 56,8192024 5-year
- Median household income
- $58,3252024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 93.8%2024 5-year
- Black
- 1.7%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 1.1%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+23.9 in 1964MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+50.5 in 2024MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Jackson County, OH · twin score 94.4
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 61.1%27,098 participants ÷ 44,362 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +22.1 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off versus state
- +1.6 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 39.0%–44.0%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 27,239 | 47,432 | 57.4% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 21,239 | 46,883 | 45.3% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 28,473 | 46,517 | 61.2% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 17,699 | 45,229 | 39.1% | A/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 27,098 | 44,362 | 61.1% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
168 precincts · 26,712 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -PRECINCT LABELLE 2PRECINCT LABELLE 2 | 246 | 639 | 7 | 892 | 27.6% | 71.6% | R+44.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -PRECINCT LABELLE 6PRECINCT LABELLE 6 | 192 | 572 | 9 | 773 | 24.8% | 74.0% | R+49.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MILLERPRECINCT MILLER | 123 | 543 | 6 | 672 | 18.3% | 80.8% | R+62.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT UNION 4PRECINCT UNION 4 | 158 | 505 | 5 | 668 | 23.7% | 75.6% | R+51.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT LABELLE 4PRECINCT LABELLE 4 | 184 | 438 | 7 | 629 | 29.3% | 69.6% | R+40.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT UNION 1PRECINCT UNION 1 | 124 | 503 | 0 | 627 | 19.8% | 80.2% | R+60.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SOUTH POINT 2PRECINCT SOUTH POINT 2 | 143 | 427 | 5 | 575 | 24.9% | 74.3% | R+49.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WINDSOR 2PRECINCT WINDSOR 2 | 90 | 440 | 9 | 539 | 16.7% | 81.6% | R+64.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT BURLINGTON 2PRECINCT BURLINGTON 2 | 165 | 361 | 4 | 530 | 31.1% | 68.1% | R+37.0 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT UNION 3PRECINCT UNION 3 | 123 | 400 | 1 | 524 | 23.5% | 76.3% | R+52.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT ELIZABETH 2PRECINCT ELIZABETH 2 | 68 | 453 | 1 | 522 | 13.0% | 86.8% | R+73.8 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT FAYETTE 1PRECINCT FAYETTE 1 | 102 | 411 | 5 | 518 | 19.7% | 79.3% | R+59.7 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SHERIDAN 1PRECINCT SHERIDAN 1 | 105 | 402 | 4 | 511 | 20.5% | 78.7% | R+58.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT LAWRENCE 3PRECINCT LAWRENCE 3 | 84 | 422 | 4 | 510 | 16.5% | 82.7% | R+66.3 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT PERRY 2PRECINCT PERRY 2 | 96 | 386 | 2 | 484 | 19.8% | 79.8% | R+59.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SHERIDAN 2PRECINCT SHERIDAN 2 | 164 | 304 | 7 | 475 | 34.5% | 64.0% | R+29.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT BURLINGTON 3PRECINCT BURLINGTON 3 | 146 | 316 | 4 | 466 | 31.3% | 67.8% | R+36.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SOUTH POINT 5PRECINCT SOUTH POINT 5 | 136 | 301 | 1 | 438 | 31.1% | 68.7% | R+37.7 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT UPPER 3PRECINCT UPPER 3 | 76 | 359 | 3 | 438 | 17.4% | 82.0% | R+64.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT LAWRENCE 1PRECINCT LAWRENCE 1 | 66 | 357 | 4 | 427 | 15.5% | 83.6% | R+68.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT UNION 2PRECINCT UNION 2 | 120 | 306 | 1 | 427 | 28.1% | 71.7% | R+43.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT LABELLE 1PRECINCT LABELLE 1 | 103 | 317 | 3 | 423 | 24.3% | 74.9% | R+50.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT PERRY 1PRECINCT PERRY 1 | 77 | 341 | 3 | 421 | 18.3% | 81.0% | R+62.7 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT UNION 5PRECINCT UNION 5 | 130 | 285 | 3 | 418 | 31.1% | 68.2% | R+37.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT LABELLE 3PRECINCT LABELLE 3 | 96 | 307 | 4 | 407 | 23.6% | 75.4% | R+51.8 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT FAYETTE 3PRECINCT FAYETTE 3 | 87 | 318 | 0 | 405 | 21.5% | 78.5% | R+57.0 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WINDSOR 1PRECINCT WINDSOR 1 | 57 | 328 | 1 | 386 | 14.8% | 85.0% | R+70.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT LABELLE 5PRECINCT LABELLE 5 | 100 | 274 | 2 | 376 | 26.6% | 72.9% | R+46.3 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT COAL GROVE BPRECINCT COAL GROVE B | 71 | 302 | 0 | 373 | 19.0% | 81.0% | R+61.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT LAWRENCE 2PRECINCT LAWRENCE 2 | 77 | 291 | 0 | 368 | 20.9% | 79.1% | R+58.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT UPPER 2PRECINCT UPPER 2 | 79 | 284 | 3 | 366 | 21.6% | 77.6% | R+56.0 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT IRONTON 1FPRECINCT IRONTON 1F | 126 | 225 | 4 | 355 | 35.5% | 63.4% | R+27.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT BURLINGTON 1PRECINCT BURLINGTON 1 | 94 | 255 | 2 | 351 | 26.8% | 72.6% | R+45.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT ELIZABETH 1PRECINCT ELIZABETH 1 | 67 | 282 | 1 | 350 | 19.1% | 80.6% | R+61.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT IRONTON 1EPRECINCT IRONTON 1E | 112 | 221 | 4 | 337 | 33.2% | 65.6% | R+32.3 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT LABELLE 7PRECINCT LABELLE 7 | 84 | 251 | 2 | 337 | 24.9% | 74.5% | R+49.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SOUTH POINT 3PRECINCT SOUTH POINT 3 | 84 | 241 | 1 | 326 | 25.8% | 73.9% | R+48.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT COAL GROVE CPRECINCT COAL GROVE C | 58 | 260 | 1 | 319 | 18.2% | 81.5% | R+63.3 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT BRADRICK 1PRECINCT BRADRICK 1 | 65 | 250 | 3 | 318 | 20.4% | 78.6% | R+58.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT BRADRICK 2PRECINCT BRADRICK 2 | 62 | 238 | 1 | 301 | 20.6% | 79.1% | R+58.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT IRONTON 4FPRECINCT IRONTON 4F | 92 | 198 | 4 | 294 | 31.3% | 67.3% | R+36.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT DECATURPRECINCT DECATUR | 26 | 266 | 0 | 292 | 8.9% | 91.1% | R+82.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MASON 1PRECINCT MASON 1 | 39 | 251 | 2 | 292 | 13.4% | 86.0% | R+72.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SOUTH POINT 1PRECINCT SOUTH POINT 1 | 82 | 205 | 1 | 288 | 28.5% | 71.2% | R+42.7 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT AID 1PRECINCT AID 1 | 33 | 253 | 1 | 287 | 11.5% | 88.2% | R+76.7 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT FAYETTE 2PRECINCT FAYETTE 2 | 46 | 237 | 3 | 286 | 16.1% | 82.9% | R+66.8 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT PERRY 3PRECINCT PERRY 3 | 33 | 251 | 0 | 284 | 11.6% | 88.4% | R+76.8 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT IRONTON 1APRECINCT IRONTON 1A | 94 | 179 | 1 | 274 | 34.3% | 65.3% | R+31.0 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT ELIZABETH 3PRECINCT ELIZABETH 3 | 59 | 204 | 3 | 266 | 22.2% | 76.7% | R+54.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT UPPER 4PRECINCT UPPER 4 | 64 | 200 | 0 | 264 | 24.2% | 75.8% | R+51.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT IRONTON 4EPRECINCT IRONTON 4E | 66 | 186 | 1 | 253 | 26.1% | 73.5% | R+47.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT HAMILTONPRECINCT HAMILTON | 63 | 187 | 0 | 250 | 25.2% | 74.8% | R+49.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT IRONTON 5APRECINCT IRONTON 5A | 72 | 174 | 3 | 249 | 28.9% | 69.9% | R+41.0 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT IRONTON 4GPRECINCT IRONTON 4G | 88 | 146 | 4 | 238 | 37.0% | 61.3% | R+24.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SOUTH POINT 4PRECINCT SOUTH POINT 4 | 56 | 175 | 2 | 233 | 24.0% | 75.1% | R+51.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT IRONTON 4IPRECINCT IRONTON 4I | 97 | 127 | 1 | 225 | 43.1% | 56.4% | R+13.3 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT PROCTORVILLEPRECINCT PROCTORVILLE | 66 | 137 | 2 | 205 | 32.2% | 66.8% | R+34.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT CHESAPEAKE BPRECINCT CHESAPEAKE B | 44 | 143 | 3 | 190 | 23.2% | 75.3% | R+52.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SYMMESPRECINCT SYMMES | 19 | 166 | 5 | 190 | 10.0% | 87.4% | R+77.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MASON 2PRECINCT MASON 2 | 22 | 161 | 2 | 185 | 11.9% | 87.0% | R+75.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT IRONTON 3EPRECINCT IRONTON 3E | 74 | 109 | 1 | 184 | 40.2% | 59.2% | R+19.0 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT UPPER 1PRECINCT UPPER 1 | 58 | 124 | 1 | 183 | 31.7% | 67.8% | R+36.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT IRONTON 4DPRECINCT IRONTON 4D | 66 | 112 | 2 | 180 | 36.7% | 62.2% | R+25.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT IRONTON 4CPRECINCT IRONTON 4C | 51 | 115 | 1 | 167 | 30.5% | 68.9% | R+38.3 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT IRONTON 2DPRECINCT IRONTON 2D | 68 | 87 | 2 | 157 | 43.3% | 55.4% | R+12.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT COAL GROVE APRECINCT COAL GROVE A | 34 | 115 | 2 | 151 | 22.5% | 76.2% | R+53.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT IRONTON 4APRECINCT IRONTON 4A | 46 | 101 | 0 | 147 | 31.3% | 68.7% | R+37.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT IRONTON 4BPRECINCT IRONTON 4B | 45 | 98 | 0 | 143 | 31.5% | 68.5% | R+37.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT IRONTON 4HPRECINCT IRONTON 4H | 51 | 86 | 3 | 140 | 36.4% | 61.4% | R+25.0 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT IRONTON 1BPRECINCT IRONTON 1B | 48 | 90 | 0 | 138 | 34.8% | 65.2% | R+30.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT IRONTON 3BPRECINCT IRONTON 3B | 72 | 59 | 0 | 131 | 55.0% | 45.0% | D+9.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT HANGING ROCKPRECINCT HANGING ROCK | 26 | 102 | 1 | 129 | 20.2% | 79.1% | R+58.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT IRONTON 2CPRECINCT IRONTON 2C | 38 | 87 | 1 | 126 | 30.2% | 69.0% | R+38.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT CHESAPEAKE APRECINCT CHESAPEAKE A | 30 | 91 | 2 | 123 | 24.4% | 74.0% | R+49.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT ATHALIAPRECINCT ATHALIA | 30 | 91 | 0 | 121 | 24.8% | 75.2% | R+50.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT AID 2PRECINCT AID 2 | 21 | 96 | 0 | 117 | 17.9% | 82.1% | R+64.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT IRONTON 3APRECINCT IRONTON 3A | 42 | 72 | 1 | 115 | 36.5% | 62.6% | R+26.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT IRONTON 1CPRECINCT IRONTON 1C | 42 | 69 | 0 | 111 | 37.8% | 62.2% | R+24.3 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT IRONTON 1DPRECINCT IRONTON 1D | 43 | 63 | 1 | 107 | 40.2% | 58.9% | R+18.7 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT IRONTON 3DPRECINCT IRONTON 3D | 44 | 62 | 0 | 106 | 41.5% | 58.5% | R+17.0 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT IRONTON 2APRECINCT IRONTON 2A | 36 | 63 | 0 | 99 | 36.4% | 63.6% | R+27.3 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WASHINGTONPRECINCT WASHINGTON | 19 | 63 | 1 | 83 | 22.9% | 75.9% | R+53.0 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT IRONTON 2BPRECINCT IRONTON 2B | 16 | 62 | 1 | 79 | 20.3% | 78.5% | R+58.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT IRONTON 3CPRECINCT IRONTON 3C | 13 | 35 | 0 | 48 | 27.1% | 72.9% | R+45.8 |
| AID 1 Voting District39_39087087AAZ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| AID 2 Voting District39_39087087ABA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ATHALIA Voting District39_39087087ACC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BRADRICK 1 Voting District39_39087087ACM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BRADRICK 2 Voting District39_39087087ACN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BURLINGTON 1 Voting District39_39087087ABL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BURLINGTON 2 Voting District39_39087087ABM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BURLINGTON 3 Voting District39_39087087ABN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CHESAPEAKE A Voting District39_39087087ACU | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CHESAPEAKE B Voting District39_39087087ACV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| COAL GROVE A Voting District39_39087087ADA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| COAL GROVE B Voting District39_39087087ADB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| COAL GROVE C Voting District39_39087087ADC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| DECATUR Voting District39_39087087ABB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ELIZABETH 1 Voting District39_39087087ABC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ELIZABETH 2 Voting District39_39087087ABD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ELIZABETH 3 Voting District39_39087087ABE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FAYETTE 1 Voting District39_39087087ABF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FAYETTE 2 Voting District39_39087087ABG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FAYETTE 3 Voting District39_39087087ABH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HAMILTON Voting District39_39087087ABO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HANGING ROCK Voting District39_39087087ABP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| IRONTON 1A Voting District39_39087087AAA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| IRONTON 1B Voting District39_39087087AAB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| IRONTON 1C Voting District39_39087087AAC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| IRONTON 1D Voting District39_39087087AAD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| IRONTON 1E Voting District39_39087087AAE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| IRONTON 1F Voting District39_39087087AAF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| IRONTON 2A Voting District39_39087087AAG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| IRONTON 2B Voting District39_39087087AAH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| IRONTON 2C Voting District39_39087087AAI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| IRONTON 2D Voting District39_39087087AAJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| IRONTON 3A Voting District39_39087087AAK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| IRONTON 3B Voting District39_39087087AAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| IRONTON 3C Voting District39_39087087AAM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| IRONTON 3D Voting District39_39087087AAN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| IRONTON 3E Voting District39_39087087AAO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| IRONTON 4A Voting District39_39087087AAP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| IRONTON 4B Voting District39_39087087AAQ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| IRONTON 4C Voting District39_39087087AAR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| IRONTON 4D Voting District39_39087087AAS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| IRONTON 4E Voting District39_39087087AAT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| IRONTON 4F Voting District39_39087087AAU | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| IRONTON 4G Voting District39_39087087AAV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| IRONTON 4H Voting District39_39087087AAW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| IRONTON 4I Voting District39_39087087AAX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| IRONTON 5A Voting District39_39087087AAY | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LABELLE 1 Voting District39_39087087ACD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LABELLE 2 Voting District39_39087087ACE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LABELLE 3 Voting District39_39087087ACF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LABELLE 4 Voting District39_39087087ACG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LABELLE 5 Voting District39_39087087ACH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LABELLE 6 Voting District39_39087087ACI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LABELLE 7 Voting District39_39087087ACJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LAWRENCE 1 Voting District39_39087087ABQ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LAWRENCE 2 Voting District39_39087087ABR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LAWRENCE 3 Voting District39_39087087ABS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MASON 1 Voting District39_39087087ABT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MASON 2 Voting District39_39087087ABU | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MILLER Voting District39_39087087ACK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PERRY 1 Voting District39_39087087ABV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PERRY 2 Voting District39_39087087ABW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PERRY 3 Voting District39_39087087ABX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PROCTORVILLE Voting District39_39087087ACT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SHERIDAN 1 Voting District39_39087087ABY | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SHERIDAN 2 Voting District39_39087087ABZ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SOUTH POINT 1 Voting District39_39087087ABI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SOUTH POINT 2 Voting District39_39087087ABJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SOUTH POINT 3 Voting District39_39087087ABK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SOUTH POINT 4 Voting District39_39087087ACA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SOUTH POINT 5 Voting District39_39087087ACB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SYMMES Voting District39_39087087ACL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UNION 1 Voting District39_39087087ACO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UNION 2 Voting District39_39087087ACP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UNION 3 Voting District39_39087087ACQ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UNION 4 Voting District39_39087087ACR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UNION 5 Voting District39_39087087ACS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UPPER 1 Voting District39_39087087ACW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UPPER 2 Voting District39_39087087ACX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UPPER 3 Voting District39_39087087ACY | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UPPER 4 Voting District39_39087087ACZ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON Voting District39_39087087ADD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WINDSOR 1 Voting District39_39087087ADE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WINDSOR 2 Voting District39_39087087ADF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −16.3% |
| 1896 | −27.7% |
| 1900 | −31.0% |
| 1904 | −47.7% |
| 1908 | −35.7% |
| 1912 | −8.6% |
| 1916 | −20.9% |
| 1920 | −31.3% |
| 1924 | −38.3% |
| 1928 | −49.5% |
| 1932 | −2.6% |
| 1936 | +14.8% |
| 1940 | +1.8% |
| 1944 | −7.8% |
| 1948 | +7.8% |
| 1952 | −12.4% |
| 1956 | −25.4% |
| 1960 | −20.6% |
| 1964 | +23.9% |
| 1968 | −5.3% |
| 1972 | −35.5% |
| 1976 | +6.1% |
| 1980 | −9.3% |
| 1984 | −12.7% |
| 1988 | −5.3% |
| 1992 | +8.4% |
| 1996 | +11.5% |
| 2000 | −5.0% |
| 2004 | −12.0% |
| 2008 | −15.2% |
| 2012 | −14.8% |
| 2016 | −43.0% |
| 2020 | −45.6% |
| 2024 | −50.5% |
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 44,143 |
| 2018 | 45,881 |
| 2020 | 44,119 |
| 2022 | 42,613 |
| 2024 | 43,020 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+162 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −2,230 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $52,141 in average income, against $62,843 for residents who stayed — 17% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+34.1 on average — 16 points more Democratic-leaning than Lawrence County, OH itself (R+50.5).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Cabell County, WV228R+21.9
- Boyd County, KY116R+38.5
- Scioto County, OH85R+48.0
- Wayne County, WV56R+53.4
- Greenup County, KY55R+50.5
- Gallia County, OH33R+59.4
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Cabell County, WV225
- Boyd County, KY121
- Scioto County, OH82
- Greenup County, KY70
- Wayne County, WV52
- Franklin County, OH43
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −19 |
| 2012 | −274 |
| 2013 | −176 |
| 2014 | −256 |
| 2015 | −489 |
| 2016 | −79 |
| 2017 | −392 |
| 2018 | −65 |
| 2019 | −95 |
| 2021 | −394 |
| 2022 | −302 |
| 2023 | +7 |
| 2024 | +142 |
| 2025 | +162 |
Lawrence County, wedged between the Ohio River and West Virginia, has shifted toward Republican presidential candidates over the past two decades, posting a 50-point margin in 2024 — among the widest in the state.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 23.9 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 50.5 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 5.0 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 50.5 points.
A population of 56,819, a 94% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $58,325 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Jackson County and Scioto County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Lawrence County, Ohio. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/39087/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.