- Lead
- 8,527
- Total
- 16,337
- vs nation
- R+50.7
- Turnout
- 59.3%
Coshocton County, OH
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 59.3% of 27,915 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 8,200
- Total
- 16,739
- vs nation
- R+53.4
- Turnout
- 60.6%
- Lead
- 6,772
- Total
- 15,865
- vs nation
- R+44.8
- Turnout
- 56.8%
- Lead
- 1,450
- Total
- 15,988
- vs nation
- R+12.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 986
- Total
- 16,938
- vs nation
- R+13.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 2,461
- Total
- 17,303
- vs nation
- R+11.8
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 2,649
- Total
- 14,268
- vs nation
- R+19.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 13
- Total
- 14,330
- vs nation
- R+8.6
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+52.2MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 36,7442024 5-year
- Median household income
- $55,5772024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 94.3%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.5%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 1.3%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+20.4 in 1912MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+52.2 in 2024MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Guernsey County, OH · twin score 90.2
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 59.3%16,564 participants ÷ 27,915 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +19.2 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off versus state
- -1.4 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 40.2%–43.2%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 15,865 | 27,936 | 56.8% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 12,201 | 27,887 | 43.8% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 16,900 | 27,900 | 60.6% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 11,536 | 27,850 | 41.4% | A/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 16,564 | 27,915 | 59.3% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
66 precincts · 16,333 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -COSHOCTON 4-BCOSHOCTON 4-B | 354 | 737 | 11 | 1,102 | 32.1% | 66.9% | R+34.8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -JACKSONJACKSON | 186 | 859 | 12 | 1,057 | 17.6% | 81.3% | R+63.7 |
| Precinct -KEENE / MILLCREEKKEENE / MILLCREEK | 225 | 823 | 9 | 1,057 | 21.3% | 77.9% | R+56.6 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSON / NELLIE / NEW CASTLE / WARSAWJEFFERSON / NELLIE / NEW CASTLE / WARSAW | 202 | 780 | 8 | 990 | 20.4% | 78.8% | R+58.4 |
| Precinct -W LAFAYETTEW LAFAYETTE | 251 | 690 | 9 | 950 | 26.4% | 72.6% | R+46.2 |
| Precinct -LAFAYETTELAFAYETTE | 234 | 711 | 4 | 949 | 24.7% | 74.9% | R+50.3 |
| Precinct -WHITE EYES / ADAMSWHITE EYES / ADAMS | 168 | 735 | 8 | 911 | 18.4% | 80.7% | R+62.2 |
| Precinct -FRANKLIN / CONESVILLE / VIRGINIAFRANKLIN / CONESVILLE / VIRGINIA | 170 | 719 | 5 | 894 | 19.0% | 80.4% | R+61.4 |
| Precinct -OXFORDOXFORD | 175 | 646 | 8 | 829 | 21.1% | 77.9% | R+56.8 |
| Precinct -COSHOCTON 3-BCOSHOCTON 3-B | 257 | 556 | 5 | 818 | 31.4% | 68.0% | R+36.6 |
| Precinct -COSHOCTON 3-ACOSHOCTON 3-A | 221 | 456 | 8 | 685 | 32.3% | 66.6% | R+34.3 |
| Precinct -PERRY / PIKEPERRY / PIKE | 96 | 580 | 3 | 679 | 14.1% | 85.4% | R+71.3 |
| Precinct -CLARK / MONROE / TIVERTONCLARK / MONROE / TIVERTON | 101 | 565 | 2 | 668 | 15.1% | 84.6% | R+69.5 |
| Precinct -BEDFORD / WASHINGTONBEDFORD / WASHINGTON | 112 | 543 | 3 | 658 | 17.0% | 82.5% | R+65.5 |
| Precinct -BETHLEHEMBETHLEHEM | 133 | 496 | 3 | 632 | 21.0% | 78.5% | R+57.4 |
| Precinct -TUSCARAWASTUSCARAWAS | 133 | 480 | 3 | 616 | 21.6% | 77.9% | R+56.3 |
| Precinct -COSHOCTON 1-BCOSHOCTON 1-B | 176 | 384 | 13 | 573 | 30.7% | 67.0% | R+36.3 |
| Precinct -COSHOCTON 2-BCOSHOCTON 2-B | 127 | 369 | 5 | 501 | 25.3% | 73.7% | R+48.3 |
| Precinct -COSHOCTON 2-ACOSHOCTON 2-A | 162 | 315 | 5 | 482 | 33.6% | 65.4% | R+31.7 |
| Precinct -COSHOCTON 1-ACOSHOCTON 1-A | 143 | 226 | 3 | 372 | 38.4% | 60.8% | R+22.3 |
| Precinct -COSHOCTON 4-ACOSHOCTON 4-A | 94 | 249 | 3 | 346 | 27.2% | 72.0% | R+44.8 |
| Precinct -LINTON / PLAINFIELDLINTON / PLAINFIELD | 83 | 252 | 5 | 340 | 24.4% | 74.1% | R+49.7 |
| Precinct -CRAWFORDCRAWFORD | 32 | 191 | 1 | 224 | 14.3% | 85.3% | R+71.0 |
| PRECINCT ADAMS39_39031031AAO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT BEDFORD39_39031031AAP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT BETHLEHEM39_39031031AAQ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT CLARK39_39031031AAR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT COSHOCTON 1-A39_39031031AAA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT COSHOCTON 1-B39_39031031AAB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT COSHOCTON 1-C39_39031031AAC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT COSHOCTON 2-A39_39031031AAD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT COSHOCTON 2-B39_39031031AAE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT COSHOCTON 2-C39_39031031AAF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT COSHOCTON 3-A39_39031031AAG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT COSHOCTON 3-B39_39031031AAH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT COSHOCTON 3-C39_39031031AAI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT COSHOCTON 3-D39_39031031AAJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT COSHOCTON 4-A39_39031031AAK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT COSHOCTON 4-B39_39031031AAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT COSHOCTON 4-C39_39031031AAM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT COSHOCTON 4-D39_39031031AAN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT CRAWFORD39_39031031AAS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT FRANKLIN39_39031031AAT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT JACKSON NORTH39_39031031AAU | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT JACKSON SOUTH39_39031031AAV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT JEFFERSON39_39031031AAW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT KEENE NORTH39_39031031AAY | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT KEENE SOUTH39_39031031AAZ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT LAFAYETTE EAST39_39031031ABA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT LAFAYETTE WEST39_39031031ABB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT LINTON39_39031031ABE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT MILLCREEK39_39031031ABF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT MONROE39_39031031ABG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT NEW CASTLE39_39031031ABH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT OXFORD39_39031031ABI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT PERRY39_39031031ABJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT PIKE39_39031031ABK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT TIVERTON39_39031031ABL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT TUSCARAWAS A39_39031031ABM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT TUSCARAWAS B39_39031031ABN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT VIRGINIA39_39031031ABO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT WARSAW39_39031031AAX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT WASHINGTON39_39031031ABP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT WEST LAFAYETTE NORTH39_39031031ABC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT WEST LAFAYETTE SOUTH39_39031031ABD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT WHITE EYES39_39031031ABQ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +12.7% |
| 1896 | +8.7% |
| 1900 | +4.5% |
| 1904 | −2.3% |
| 1908 | +6.2% |
| 1912 | +20.4% |
| 1916 | +19.1% |
| 1920 | −4.5% |
| 1924 | −12.1% |
| 1928 | −41.7% |
| 1932 | +14.8% |
| 1936 | +18.1% |
| 1940 | −4.4% |
| 1944 | −12.8% |
| 1948 | −4.7% |
| 1952 | −25.8% |
| 1956 | −33.2% |
| 1960 | −29.5% |
| 1964 | +16.8% |
| 1968 | −16.6% |
| 1972 | −35.2% |
| 1976 | −4.3% |
| 1980 | −26.2% |
| 1984 | −38.1% |
| 1988 | −15.6% |
| 1992 | +3.1% |
| 1996 | −0.1% |
| 2000 | −18.6% |
| 2004 | −14.2% |
| 2008 | −5.8% |
| 2012 | −9.1% |
| 2016 | −42.7% |
| 2020 | −49.0% |
| 2024 | −52.2% |
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 22,905 |
| 2018 | 23,119 |
| 2020 | 22,730 |
| 2022 | 22,382 |
| 2024 | 22,494 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+150 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −138 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $47,556 in average income, against $59,239 for residents who stayed — 20% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+36.5 on average — 16 points more Democratic-leaning than Coshocton County, OH itself (R+52.2).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Tuscarawas County, OH112R+43.3
- Muskingum County, OH89R+43.9
- Holmes County, OH59R+69.2
- Franklin County, OH48D+28.4
- Licking County, OH42R+30.0
- Knox County, OH39R+44.9
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Tuscarawas County, OH110
- Muskingum County, OH78
- Holmes County, OH50
- Licking County, OH44
- Franklin County, OH40
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −49 |
| 2012 | −153 |
| 2013 | −153 |
| 2014 | −184 |
| 2015 | −52 |
| 2016 | −51 |
| 2017 | −195 |
| 2018 | +37 |
| 2019 | −50 |
| 2021 | +70 |
| 2022 | +65 |
| 2023 | +309 |
| 2024 | +118 |
| 2025 | +150 |
Coshocton sits where Ohio's till plains give way to the Appalachian foothills, and its small-town, working-class electorate has shifted steadily rightward over two decades — producing a 52-point Republican presidential margin in 2024.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 20.4 points in 1912 and a Republican high of 52.2 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 3.2 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 52.2 points.
A population of 36,744, a 94% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $55,577 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Guernsey County and Muskingum County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Coshocton County, Ohio. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/39031/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.