HarrisDemocratic27.5%7,496TrumpRepublican71.6%19,484OliverNonpartisan0.5%125
R+44.0- Lead
- 11,988
- Total
- 27,216
- vs nation
- R+42.6
- Turnout
- 62.5%
Akashiccounty
Huron County, OH
Office (updates table and map)
President margin by year
Place winner margin
Boundary by 2024 margin · Precinct returns · VEST · MIT Election Lab
President results by year
2024 turnout 62.5% of 43,977 citizens 18+
BidenDemocratic28.5%7,759TrumpRepublican69.7%18,956JorgensenLibertarian1.4%387
R+41.2- Lead
- 11,197
- Total
- 27,190
- vs nation
- R+45.6
- Turnout
- 62.6%
ClintonDemocratic28.4%7,192TrumpRepublican64.0%16,226JohnsonLibertarian3.6%923
R+35.6- Lead
- 9,034
- Total
- 25,343
- vs nation
- R+37.7
- Turnout
- 58.9%
ObamaDemocratic44.2%11,006RomneyRepublican52.5%13,060JohnsonLibertarian1.0%260
R+8.3- Lead
- 2,054
- Total
- 24,895
- vs nation
- R+12.1
- Turnout
- —
ObamaDemocratic47.2%12,076McCainRepublican50.4%12,884OtherAll other candidates2.4%622
R+3.2- Lead
- 808
- Total
- 25,582
- vs nation
- R+10.4
- Turnout
- —
KerryDemocratic41.3%10,568BushRepublican58.0%14,817OtherAll other candidates0.7%173
R+16.6- Lead
- 4,249
- Total
- 25,558
- vs nation
- R+14.2
- Turnout
- —
GoreDemocratic38.3%8,183BushRepublican57.5%12,286NaderGreen2.6%560
R+19.2- Lead
- 4,103
- Total
- 21,360
- vs nation
- R+19.7
- Turnout
- —
ClintonDemocratic41.9%8,858DoleRepublican41.3%8,750PerotReform15.8%3,338
D+0.5- Lead
- 108
- Total
- 21,161
- vs nation
- R+8.0
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+44.0MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 58,3192024 5-year
- Median household income
- $67,8782024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 87.5%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.8%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 7.4%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+19.4 in 1912MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+46.9 in 1956MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Seneca County, OH · twin score 87.9
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 62.5%27,487 participants ÷ 43,977 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +20.0 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off versus state
- -0.5 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 42.5%–45.4%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 25,343 | 43,051 | 58.9% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 19,389 | 43,371 | 44.7% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 27,397 | 43,758 | 62.6% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 18,806 | 44,143 | 42.6% | A/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 27,487 | 43,977 | 62.5% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
98 precincts · 27,212 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -NORWALK 2-CNORWALK 2-C | 303 | 655 | 4 | 962 | 31.5% | 68.1% | R+36.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -TOWNSEND TWPTOWNSEND TWP | 236 | 646 | 8 | 890 | 26.5% | 72.6% | R+46.1 |
| Precinct -NORWALK 1-BNORWALK 1-B | 367 | 499 | 5 | 871 | 42.1% | 57.3% | R+15.2 |
| Precinct -CLARKSFIELD TWPCLARKSFIELD TWP | 189 | 658 | 11 | 858 | 22.0% | 76.7% | R+54.7 |
| Precinct -GREENFIELD TWPGREENFIELD TWP | 180 | 668 | 5 | 853 | 21.1% | 78.3% | R+57.2 |
| Precinct -NEW HAVEN TWPNEW HAVEN TWP | 148 | 634 | 6 | 788 | 18.8% | 80.5% | R+61.7 |
| Precinct -NORWALK 2-ANORWALK 2-A | 252 | 519 | 10 | 781 | 32.3% | 66.5% | R+34.2 |
| Precinct -WAKEMAN TWPWAKEMAN TWP | 188 | 583 | 4 | 775 | 24.3% | 75.2% | R+51.0 |
| Precinct -BELLEVUE 4BELLEVUE 4 | 271 | 498 | 5 | 774 | 35.0% | 64.3% | R+29.3 |
| Precinct -NORWALK 3-ANORWALK 3-A | 261 | 500 | 11 | 772 | 33.8% | 64.8% | R+31.0 |
| Precinct -BELLEVUE 3BELLEVUE 3 | 238 | 513 | 7 | 758 | 31.4% | 67.7% | R+36.3 |
| Precinct -NORWALK TWP NORTHNORWALK TWP NORTH | 171 | 577 | 5 | 753 | 22.7% | 76.6% | R+53.9 |
| Precinct -WILLARD 4WILLARD 4 | 208 | 503 | 6 | 717 | 29.0% | 70.2% | R+41.1 |
| Precinct -NORWALK 4-CNORWALK 4-C | 260 | 448 | 8 | 716 | 36.3% | 62.6% | R+26.3 |
| Precinct -NORWALK 1-ANORWALK 1-A | 241 | 452 | 8 | 701 | 34.4% | 64.5% | R+30.1 |
| Precinct -WILLARD 3WILLARD 3 | 184 | 513 | 2 | 699 | 26.3% | 73.4% | R+47.1 |
| Precinct -BRONSON TWP 2BRONSON TWP 2 | 184 | 490 | 6 | 680 | 27.1% | 72.1% | R+45.0 |
| Precinct -NORWALK 3-CNORWALK 3-C | 238 | 415 | 14 | 667 | 35.7% | 62.2% | R+26.5 |
| Precinct -PERU TWPPERU TWP | 135 | 505 | 4 | 644 | 21.0% | 78.4% | R+57.5 |
| Precinct -GREENWICH VILLAGEGREENWICH VILLAGE | 108 | 516 | 3 | 627 | 17.2% | 82.3% | R+65.1 |
| Precinct -NORWICH TWPNORWICH TWP | 111 | 464 | 3 | 578 | 19.2% | 80.3% | R+61.1 |
| Precinct -NORWALK-MILAN TWPNORWALK-MILAN TWP | 188 | 379 | 6 | 573 | 32.8% | 66.1% | R+33.3 |
| Precinct -FAIRFIELD TWPFAIRFIELD TWP | 113 | 455 | 3 | 571 | 19.8% | 79.7% | R+59.9 |
| Precinct -MONROEVILLE VILLAGEMONROEVILLE VILLAGE | 173 | 392 | 3 | 568 | 30.5% | 69.0% | R+38.6 |
| Precinct -BRONSON TWP 1BRONSON TWP 1 | 145 | 421 | 1 | 567 | 25.6% | 74.3% | R+48.7 |
| Precinct -RIDGEFIELD TWPRIDGEFIELD TWP | 97 | 459 | 3 | 559 | 17.4% | 82.1% | R+64.8 |
| Precinct -LYME TWPLYME TWP | 144 | 388 | 2 | 534 | 27.0% | 72.7% | R+45.7 |
| Precinct -NORWALK 3-BNORWALK 3-B | 181 | 346 | 6 | 533 | 34.0% | 64.9% | R+31.0 |
| Precinct -HARTLAND TWPHARTLAND TWP | 102 | 417 | 10 | 529 | 19.3% | 78.8% | R+59.5 |
| Precinct -FITCHVILLE TWPFITCHVILLE TWP | 86 | 424 | 2 | 512 | 16.8% | 82.8% | R+66.0 |
| Precinct -RICHMOND TWPRICHMOND TWP | 86 | 411 | 9 | 506 | 17.0% | 81.2% | R+64.2 |
| Precinct -NEW LONDON TWPNEW LONDON TWP | 123 | 379 | 1 | 503 | 24.5% | 75.3% | R+50.9 |
| Precinct -WAKEMAN VILLAGEWAKEMAN VILLAGE | 177 | 315 | 3 | 495 | 35.8% | 63.6% | R+27.9 |
| Precinct -NORWALK 2-BNORWALK 2-B | 166 | 314 | 1 | 481 | 34.5% | 65.3% | R+30.8 |
| Precinct -NEW LONDON VILL 2NEW LONDON VILL 2 | 109 | 351 | 8 | 468 | 23.3% | 75.0% | R+51.7 |
| Precinct -NEW LONDON VILL 1NEW LONDON VILL 1 | 143 | 304 | 6 | 453 | 31.6% | 67.1% | R+35.5 |
| Precinct -WILLARD 1WILLARD 1 | 107 | 302 | 4 | 413 | 25.9% | 73.1% | R+47.2 |
| Precinct -NORWALK 1-CNORWALK 1-C | 176 | 214 | 9 | 399 | 44.1% | 53.6% | R+9.5 |
| Precinct -NORWALK TWP SOUTHNORWALK TWP SOUTH | 123 | 265 | 1 | 389 | 31.6% | 68.1% | R+36.5 |
| Precinct -GREENWICH TWPGREENWICH TWP | 62 | 320 | 2 | 384 | 16.1% | 83.3% | R+67.2 |
| Precinct -RIPLEY TWPRIPLEY TWP | 58 | 318 | 2 | 378 | 15.3% | 84.1% | R+68.8 |
| Precinct -NORWALK 4-ANORWALK 4-A | 141 | 191 | 5 | 337 | 41.8% | 56.7% | R+14.8 |
| Precinct -NORWALK 4-BNORWALK 4-B | 117 | 208 | 1 | 326 | 35.9% | 63.8% | R+27.9 |
| Precinct -PLYMOUTH VILLAGEPLYMOUTH VILLAGE | 64 | 246 | 5 | 315 | 20.3% | 78.1% | R+57.8 |
| Precinct -WILLARD 2WILLARD 2 | 90 | 187 | 3 | 280 | 32.1% | 66.8% | R+34.6 |
| Precinct -SHERMAN TWPSHERMAN TWP | 52 | 222 | 1 | 275 | 18.9% | 80.7% | R+61.8 |
| BELLEVUE 339_39077077AAA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BELLEVUE 439_39077077AAD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BRONSON TWP 139_39077077ABI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BRONSON TWP 239_39077077ABJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CLARKSFIELD TWP39_39077077ABK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FAIRFIELD TWP39_39077077ABL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FAIRFIELD VILLAGE39_39077077ABM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FITCHVILLE TWP39_39077077ABN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GREENFIELD TWP39_39077077ABO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GREENWICH TWP39_39077077ABP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GREENWICH VILLAGE39_39077077ABQ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HARTLAND TWP39_39077077ABS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LYME TWP39_39077077ABT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MONROEVILLE VILLAGE39_39077077ACI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| NEW HAVEN TWP 139_39077077ABU | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| NEW HAVEN TWP 239_39077077ABV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| NEW LONDON TWP39_39077077ABX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| NEW LONDON VILLAGE 139_39077077ABY | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| NEW LONDON VILLAGE 239_39077077ABZ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| NORWALK 1-A39_39077077AAG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| NORWALK 1-B39_39077077AAH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| NORWALK 1-C39_39077077AAI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| NORWALK 2-A39_39077077AAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| NORWALK 2-B39_39077077AAM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| NORWALK 2-C39_39077077AAN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| NORWALK 3-A39_39077077AAQ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| NORWALK 3-B39_39077077AAR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| NORWALK 3-C39_39077077AAS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| NORWALK 4-A39_39077077AAV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| NORWALK 4-B39_39077077AAW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| NORWALK 4-C39_39077077AAX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| NORWALK TWP NORTH39_39077077ACB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| NORWALK TWP SOUTH39_39077077ACD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| NORWALK-MILAN TWP39_39077077ACC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| NORWICH TWP39_39077077ACE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PERU TWP39_39077077ACF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLYMOUTH VILLAGE39_39077077ABW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| RICHMOND TWP39_39077077ACG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| RIDGEFIELD TWP39_39077077ACH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| RIPLEY TWP39_39077077ACK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SHERMAN TWP39_39077077ACL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TOWNSEND TWP NORTH39_39077077ACM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TOWNSEND TWP SOUTH39_39077077ACN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WAKEMAN TWP NORTH39_39077077ACO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WAKEMAN TWP SOUTH39_39077077ACP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WAKEMAN VILLAGE39_39077077ACQ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WILLARD 139_39077077ABA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WILLARD 239_39077077ABC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WILLARD 3-A39_39077077ABE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WILLARD 3-B39_39077077ABF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WILLARD 4-A39_39077077ABG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WILLARD 4-B39_39077077ABH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −8.1% |
| 1896 | −8.9% |
| 1900 | −12.0% |
| 1904 | −35.2% |
| 1908 | −7.1% |
| 1912 | +19.4% |
| 1916 | +1.1% |
| 1920 | −35.6% |
| 1924 | −40.7% |
| 1928 | −34.8% |
| 1932 | +0.5% |
| 1936 | +1.0% |
| 1940 | −27.1% |
| 1944 | −32.1% |
| 1948 | −19.4% |
| 1952 | −43.5% |
| 1956 | −46.9% |
| 1960 | −23.9% |
| 1964 | +17.0% |
| 1968 | −16.6% |
| 1972 | −31.4% |
| 1976 | −9.1% |
| 1980 | −24.2% |
| 1984 | −36.7% |
| 1988 | −23.4% |
| 1992 | −6.3% |
| 1996 | +0.5% |
| 2000 | −19.2% |
| 2004 | −16.6% |
| 2008 | −3.2% |
| 2012 | −8.3% |
| 2016 | −35.6% |
| 2020 | −41.2% |
| 2024 | −44.0% |
DemocraticRepublican
Federal and statewide elections · 3 House · 38 Senate · 2 Senate special · 12 governor
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
voter registration
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
Registered voters
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 35,732 |
| 2018 | 36,408 |
| 2020 | 36,886 |
| 2022 | 36,581 |
| 2024 | 36,967 |
domestic migration
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−19 net domestic migration · 2025
20112025
Net −3,055 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $47,190 in average income, against $64,582 for residents who stayed — 27% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+20.0 on average — 24 points more Democratic-leaning than Huron County, OH itself (R+44.0).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Erie County, OH301R+14.1
- Lorain County, OH145R+5.7
- Richland County, OH131R+42.3
- Sandusky County, OH107R+30.9
- Ashland County, OH49R+50.0
- Cuyahoga County, OH43D+31.4
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Erie County, OH264
- Lorain County, OH142
- Richland County, OH128
- Sandusky County, OH121
- Cuyahoga County, OH67
- Seneca County, OH61
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −403 |
| 2012 | −350 |
| 2013 | −584 |
| 2014 | −372 |
| 2015 | −465 |
| 2016 | −150 |
| 2017 | −132 |
| 2018 | −137 |
| 2019 | −202 |
| 2021 | +13 |
| 2022 | −144 |
| 2023 | −8 |
| 2024 | −102 |
| 2025 | −19 |
Huron County's economy blends agriculture with small manufacturing, and its largely rural, non-college white electorate has shifted decisively toward Republican presidential candidates over the past decade, producing margins that now exceed 40 points.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 19.4 points in 1912 and a Republican high of 46.9 points in 1956. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 2.9 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 44.0 points.
A population of 58,319, a 88% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $67,878 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Seneca County and Starke County.
Political twins — counties
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Seneca County
Ohio
87.9twin score
12-yr trendelasticity% Evangelical
Starke County
Indiana
84.6twin score
12-yr trendcollege share% White≠ English ancestry
Muskingum County
Ohio
83.6twin score
12-yr trend2012 margin% unaffiliated≠ % Catholic
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Cite this page
All citations released under CC BY 4.0. Attribution: Akashic Intelligence.
Huron County, Ohio. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/39077/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.
License: CC BY 4.0
Embed this page
A live widget for your site — no API key, attribution built in, CC BY 4.0. All widgets & sizes →
Cities & towns in Huron County
Ohio at the ballot boxAll elections →
Frequently asked questions
How did Huron County, Ohio vote in 2024?
In 2024, Huron County, Ohio voted Republican by 44.0 points (R+44.0), carried by the Republican candidate. Out of 27,216 votes cast, 7,496 went Democratic and 19,484 went Republican.
When did Huron County, Ohio last vote Democratic?
The most recent presidential election in which Huron County, Ohio voted Democratic was 1996.
How many people live in Huron County, Ohio?
Huron County, Ohio has a population of 58,319 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.
What is the median household income in Huron County, Ohio?
Median household income in Huron County, Ohio is $67,878 — below the national median of $80,734. The Ohio state median is $71,389.
What is the political history of Huron County, Ohio?
Akashic tracks 38 presidential elections in Huron County, Ohio from 1876 to 2024. Of those, 6 went Democratic and 28 went Republican.