- Lead
- 4,060
- Total
- 6,796
- vs nation
- R+58.3
- Turnout
- 65.7%
Monroe County, OH
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 65.7% of 10,506 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 3,858
- Total
- 7,148
- vs nation
- R+58.4
- Turnout
- 66.1%
- Lead
- 3,206
- Total
- 7,040
- vs nation
- R+47.6
- Turnout
- 61.7%
- Lead
- 513
- Total
- 6,967
- vs nation
- R+11.2
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 639
- Total
- 6,982
- vs nation
- D+1.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 819
- Total
- 7,729
- vs nation
- D+13.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 460
- Total
- 7,115
- vs nation
- D+5.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 2,058
- Total
- 6,967
- vs nation
- D+21.0
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+59.7MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 13,2272024 5-year
- Median household income
- $60,1342024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 95.3%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.4%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 0.1%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+44.3 in 1912MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+59.7 in 2024MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Clark County, MO · twin score 91.9
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 65.7%6,903 participants ÷ 10,506 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +19.0 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off versus state
- -1.5 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 46.7%–49.9%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 7,040 | 11,415 | 61.7% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 5,463 | 11,133 | 49.1% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 7,249 | 10,964 | 66.1% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 4,986 | 10,593 | 47.1% | A/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 6,903 | 10,506 | 65.7% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
48 precincts · 6,794 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -PRECINCT CENTERPRECINCT CENTER | 147 | 493 | 7 | 647 | 22.7% | 76.2% | R+53.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -PRECINCT SUNSBURYPRECINCT SUNSBURY | 88 | 532 | 5 | 625 | 14.1% | 85.1% | R+71.0 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WOODSFIELD SOUTHPRECINCT WOODSFIELD SOUTH | 143 | 412 | 2 | 557 | 25.7% | 74.0% | R+48.3 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MALAGAPRECINCT MALAGA | 93 | 402 | 2 | 497 | 18.7% | 80.9% | R+62.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT OHIOPRECINCT OHIO | 126 | 349 | 6 | 481 | 26.2% | 72.6% | R+46.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT LEEPRECINCT LEE | 97 | 372 | 6 | 475 | 20.4% | 78.3% | R+57.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SALEMPRECINCT SALEM | 78 | 370 | 4 | 452 | 17.3% | 81.9% | R+64.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WOODSFIELD NORTHPRECINCT WOODSFIELD NORTH | 102 | 330 | 4 | 436 | 23.4% | 75.7% | R+52.3 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SUMMITPRECINCT SUMMIT | 66 | 297 | 1 | 364 | 18.1% | 81.6% | R+63.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT ADAMSPRECINCT ADAMS | 53 | 260 | 1 | 314 | 16.9% | 82.8% | R+65.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SWITZERLANDPRECINCT SWITZERLAND | 53 | 206 | 2 | 261 | 20.3% | 78.9% | R+58.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WASHINGTONPRECINCT WASHINGTON | 46 | 179 | 3 | 228 | 20.2% | 78.5% | R+58.3 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT JACKSONPRECINCT JACKSON | 52 | 169 | 5 | 226 | 23.0% | 74.8% | R+51.8 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT GREENPRECINCT GREEN | 42 | 166 | 4 | 212 | 19.8% | 78.3% | R+58.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT PERRYPRECINCT PERRY | 39 | 160 | 2 | 201 | 19.4% | 79.6% | R+60.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT FRANKLINPRECINCT FRANKLIN | 25 | 160 | 1 | 186 | 13.4% | 86.0% | R+72.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WAYNEPRECINCT WAYNE | 27 | 143 | 0 | 170 | 15.9% | 84.1% | R+68.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT BENTONPRECINCT BENTON | 19 | 146 | 1 | 166 | 11.4% | 88.0% | R+76.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT BETHELPRECINCT BETHEL | 23 | 134 | 3 | 160 | 14.4% | 83.8% | R+69.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SENECAPRECINCT SENECA | 17 | 116 | 3 | 136 | 12.5% | 85.3% | R+72.8 |
| PRECINCT ADAMS39_39111111AAA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT BEALLSVILLE39_39111111AAY | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT BENTON39_39111111AAB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT BETHEL39_39111111AAC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT CENTER NORTH39_39111111AAD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT CENTER SOUTH39_39111111AAE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT CLARINGTON39_39111111AAU | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT FRANKLIN39_39111111AAK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT GREEN39_39111111AAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT JACKSON39_39111111AAM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT LEE NORTH39_39111111AAN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT LEE SOUTH39_39111111AAO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT MALAGA EAST39_39111111AAP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT MALAGA WEST39_39111111AAQ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT OHIO NORTH39_39111111AAR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT OHIO SOUTH39_39111111AAS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT PERRY39_39111111AAT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT SALEM39_39111111AAV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT SENECA39_39111111AAW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT SOUTH A39_39111111AAH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT SOUTH B39_39111111AAI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT SOUTH C39_39111111AAJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT SUMMIT39_39111111AAX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT SUNSBURY39_39111111AAZ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT SWITZERLAND39_39111111ABA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT WASHINGTON39_39111111ABB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT WAYNE39_39111111ABC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT WOODSFIELD NORTH39_39111111AAG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +39.4% |
| 1896 | +34.9% |
| 1900 | +32.3% |
| 1904 | +17.1% |
| 1908 | +33.0% |
| 1912 | +44.3% |
| 1916 | +37.0% |
| 1920 | +15.4% |
| 1924 | +16.2% |
| 1928 | −22.1% |
| 1932 | +30.6% |
| 1936 | +24.8% |
| 1940 | −4.6% |
| 1944 | −0.6% |
| 1948 | +20.1% |
| 1952 | −4.2% |
| 1956 | −18.4% |
| 1960 | −13.3% |
| 1964 | +42.1% |
| 1968 | +6.6% |
| 1972 | −19.7% |
| 1976 | +22.0% |
| 1980 | +4.6% |
| 1984 | +4.4% |
| 1988 | +24.9% |
| 1992 | +31.8% |
| 1996 | +29.5% |
| 2000 | +6.5% |
| 2004 | +10.6% |
| 2008 | +9.2% |
| 2012 | −7.4% |
| 2016 | −45.5% |
| 2020 | −54.0% |
| 2024 | −59.7% |
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 9,641 |
| 2018 | 9,781 |
| 2020 | 9,572 |
| 2022 | 9,266 |
| 2024 | 9,326 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+16 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −568 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $54,709 in average income, against $84,856 for residents who stayed — 36% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+46.1 on average — 14 points more Democratic-leaning than Monroe County, OH itself (R+59.7).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Belmont County, OH53R+47.3
- Washington County, OH27R+43.7
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Belmont County, OH46
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +15 |
| 2012 | −91 |
| 2013 | +33 |
| 2014 | −132 |
| 2015 | −79 |
| 2016 | −127 |
| 2017 | −95 |
| 2018 | −90 |
| 2019 | −50 |
| 2021 | +33 |
| 2022 | +1 |
| 2023 | +30 |
| 2024 | −32 |
| 2025 | +16 |
Monroe County, tucked into Ohio's southeastern hill country, recorded an R+59.7 margin in 2024 — among the widest in the state. Its sparse, rural population and dwindling economic base track closely with regional realignment patterns seen across Appalachian Ohio.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 44.3 points in 1912 and a Republican high of 59.7 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 5.8 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 59.7 points.
A population of 13,227, a 95% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $60,134 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Clark County and Alleghany County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Monroe County, Ohio. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/39111/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.