- Lead
- 350,718
- Total
- 3,192,745
- vs nation
- D+12.5
- Turnout
- 74.4%
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- D+11.0MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 5,862,1892024 5-year
- Population density
- 57 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 103,637 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $95,4702024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 64.8%2024 5-year
- Black
- 3.8%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 22.5%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+70.6 in 1896MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+41.1 in 1892MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Oregon, OR · twin score 70.0
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 74.4%3,240,754 participants ÷ 4,355,175 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +20.4 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off versus state
- 0.0 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 54.0%–59.0%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 2,884,199 | 3,824,440 | 75.4% | B/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 2,586,432 | 3,979,325 | 65.0% | B/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 3,320,607 | 4,153,976 | 79.9% | B/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 2,539,897 | 4,267,287 | 59.5% | B/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 3,240,754 | 4,355,175 | 74.4% | B/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-state-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 276/110.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-state-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 279/137.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-state-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 282/1.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-state-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 285/182.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-state-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 288/227.
presidential history
Party record book
Colorado · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
William J. Bryan1896
84.7%
158,821 votes · D+70.6
Runner-up · Lyndon B. Johnson, 1964 · 61.3%
Republican
Herbert Hoover1928
64.7%
253,872 votes · R+30.8
Runner-up · Ronald Reagan, 1984 · 63.4%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Joe Biden2020
1,804,352votes
55.4% of the vote · D+13.5
Runner-up · Kamala Harris, 2024 · 1,728,159 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
1,377,441votes
43.1% of the vote · D+11.0
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 1,364,607 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
William J. Bryan1896
+76.7pts D vs U.S.
Place D+70.6 · U.S. R+6.1
Runner-up · Woodrow Wilson, 1916 · +22.8 pts
Republican
Benjamin Harrison1892
+42.8pts R vs U.S.
Place R+41.1 · U.S. D+1.7 · a third-party candidate carried the Place
Runner-up · Thomas E. Dewey, 1944 · +14.3 pts
On the ballot
Open seat (Polis term-limited). AG Phil Weiser upset Sen. Michael Bennet 56.9%-43.1%; ministry leader Victor Marx won the GOP primary 39.9%-39.4% over Barbara Kirkmeyer (~2,465 votes; Kirkmeyer conceded July 9). Former Rep. Greg Lopez qualified as an unaffiliated candidate.
Hickenlooper survived progressive challenger Julie Gonzales 52.8%-47.2%; state Sen. Mark Baisley was unopposed in the GOP primary.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
| Year | Seats won | D % | R % | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D 4 · R 4 | 54.2% | 42.5% | 3,073,391 | |
| D 5 · R 3 | 55.2% | 42.5% | 2,472,074 | |
| D 4 · R 3 | 53.1% | 43.5% | 3,164,950 | |
| D 4 · R 3 | 53.4% | 43.0% | 2,513,546 |
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Democratic; the presidential vote runs 8.4 points more Democratic than the rolls.
| Year | Total registered | Democratic | Republican | Unaffiliated | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 3,875,266 | 1,208,891 | 1,186,441 | 1,407,556 | 72,378 |
| 2018 | 3,999,053 | 1,200,711 | 1,148,145 | 1,574,813 | 75,384 |
| 2020 | 4,261,765 | 1,249,506 | 1,145,859 | 1,784,493 | 81,907 |
| 2022 | 4,424,211 | 1,203,798 | 1,069,757 | 2,065,931 | 84,725 |
| 2024 | 4,651,146 | 1,178,377 | 1,060,349 | 2,303,820 | 108,600 |
Who moves in and out
Net domestic migration over time
−12,100 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +356,280 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +27,250 |
| 2012 | +27,722 |
| 2013 | +35,709 |
| 2014 | +38,947 |
| 2015 | +56,554 |
| 2016 | +49,084 |
| 2017 | +36,612 |
| 2018 | +42,539 |
| 2019 | +31,335 |
| 2021 | +6,200 |
| 2022 | +5,425 |
| 2023 | +6,008 |
| 2024 | +4,995 |
| 2025 | −12,100 |
While the country moved six points toward Trump and California nine, Colorado’s Democratic margin slipped two and a half.
- Held against the tide
- D+13.5 (2020) → D+11.0 (2024) — a 2.5-pt slip as the nation moved ~6 pts to Trump · MIT Election Lab
- The educated suburbs
- Jefferson D+19.5, Arapahoe D+20.1, Broomfield D+28.5, Larimer D+17.6 — once Republican or competitive · MIT Election Lab 2024
- 2nd-most-educated state
- 45.5% hold a bachelor’s degree — 2nd of 50; Boulder is the bluest metro in America (D+55.7) · ACS 2024; MIT Election Lab
- Even the red is softening
- The city of Colorado Springs: R+16 (2016) → R+3.5 (2020) → R+2 (2024), toward the Democrats as the nation moved away; El Paso County still R+9.8 · MIT Election Lab
- Colorado’s Latino mirror
- Pueblo County voted R+5.1 in 2024 after generations Democratic — though the city of Pueblo held D · MIT Election Lab
- Open governor in 2026
- Polis term-limited; Sen. Bennet (D) leaves his seat to run vs AG Weiser — June 30 primary; Hickenlooper (D) seeks a 2nd term · Akashic 2026 forecast
The states whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Colorado. Akashic. https://akashic.app/state/CO/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.