- Lead
- 13,355
- Total
- 46,848
- vs nation
- D+30.0
- Turnout
- 83.0%
Broomfield County, CO
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 83.0% of 57,261 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 12,782
- Total
- 46,632
- vs nation
- D+23.0
- Turnout
- 92.9%
- Lead
- 5,364
- Total
- 37,690
- vs nation
- D+12.1
- Turnout
- 86.9%
- Lead
- 1,958
- Total
- 32,865
- vs nation
- D+2.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 3,411
- Total
- 29,453
- vs nation
- D+4.3
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,072
- Total
- 23,235
- vs nation
- R+2.2
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- D+28.5MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 76,3042024 5-year
- Median household income
- $123,8742024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 72.4%2024 5-year
- Black
- 1.1%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 14.1%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+28.5 in 2024MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+4.6 in 2004MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Albemarle County, VA · twin score 93.5
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 83.0%47,545 participants ÷ 57,261 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +22.6 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off versus state
- +2.2 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 60.4%–67.0%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 39,041 | 44,906 | 86.9% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 36,943 | 47,748 | 77.4% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 47,421 | 51,028 | 92.9% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 38,494 | 54,722 | 70.3% | C/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 47,545 | 57,261 | 83.0% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 154/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
96 precincts · 46,848 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -72533643107253364310 | 793 | 401 | 20 | 1,214 | 65.3% | 33.0% | D+32.3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -72533644117253364411 | 691 | 459 | 43 | 1,193 | 57.9% | 38.5% | D+19.4 |
| Precinct -72533642037253364203 | 820 | 322 | 42 | 1,184 | 69.3% | 27.2% | D+42.1 |
| Precinct -72533641087253364108 | 693 | 408 | 28 | 1,129 | 61.4% | 36.1% | D+25.2 |
| Precinct -72533641077253364107 | 670 | 385 | 43 | 1,098 | 61.0% | 35.1% | D+26.0 |
| Precinct -72533643087253364308 | 629 | 439 | 28 | 1,096 | 57.4% | 40.1% | D+17.3 |
| Precinct -72533645017253364501 | 622 | 422 | 37 | 1,081 | 57.5% | 39.0% | D+18.5 |
| Precinct -72533644087253364408 | 751 | 304 | 13 | 1,068 | 70.3% | 28.5% | D+41.9 |
| Precinct -72533643077253364307 | 644 | 394 | 25 | 1,063 | 60.6% | 37.1% | D+23.5 |
| Precinct -72533643047253364304 | 655 | 351 | 37 | 1,043 | 62.8% | 33.7% | D+29.1 |
| Precinct -72533644027253364402 | 615 | 370 | 45 | 1,030 | 59.7% | 35.9% | D+23.8 |
| Precinct -72533643067253364306 | 643 | 354 | 21 | 1,018 | 63.2% | 34.8% | D+28.4 |
| Precinct -72533644097253364409 | 734 | 272 | 12 | 1,018 | 72.1% | 26.7% | D+45.4 |
| Precinct -72533645057253364505 | 646 | 343 | 29 | 1,018 | 63.5% | 33.7% | D+29.8 |
| Precinct -72533643117253364311 | 635 | 366 | 14 | 1,015 | 62.6% | 36.1% | D+26.5 |
| Precinct -72533641067253364106 | 640 | 347 | 23 | 1,010 | 63.4% | 34.4% | D+29.0 |
| Precinct -72533641057253364105 | 615 | 338 | 47 | 1,000 | 61.5% | 33.8% | D+27.7 |
| Precinct -72533641107253364110 | 651 | 300 | 32 | 983 | 66.2% | 30.5% | D+35.7 |
| Precinct -72533644047253364404 | 637 | 310 | 23 | 970 | 65.7% | 32.0% | D+33.7 |
| Precinct -72533644067253364406 | 563 | 379 | 25 | 967 | 58.2% | 39.2% | D+19.0 |
| Precinct -72533644107253364410 | 589 | 346 | 23 | 958 | 61.5% | 36.1% | D+25.4 |
| Precinct -72533645037253364503 | 543 | 351 | 34 | 928 | 58.5% | 37.8% | D+20.7 |
| Precinct -72533645117253364511 | 517 | 358 | 25 | 900 | 57.4% | 39.8% | D+17.7 |
| Precinct -72533642117253364211 | 533 | 310 | 37 | 880 | 60.6% | 35.2% | D+25.3 |
| Precinct -72533645107253364510 | 397 | 464 | 18 | 879 | 45.2% | 52.8% | R+7.6 |
| Precinct -72533642067253364206 | 651 | 192 | 31 | 874 | 74.5% | 22.0% | D+52.5 |
| Precinct -72533641097253364109 | 538 | 309 | 19 | 866 | 62.1% | 35.7% | D+26.4 |
| Precinct -72533645047253364504 | 493 | 345 | 22 | 860 | 57.3% | 40.1% | D+17.2 |
| Precinct -72533645127253364512 | 506 | 323 | 26 | 855 | 59.2% | 37.8% | D+21.4 |
| Precinct -72533642097253364209 | 543 | 267 | 26 | 836 | 65.0% | 31.9% | D+33.0 |
| Precinct -72533643027253364302 | 551 | 249 | 33 | 833 | 66.1% | 29.9% | D+36.3 |
| Precinct -72533644037253364403 | 519 | 285 | 25 | 829 | 62.6% | 34.4% | D+28.2 |
| Precinct -72533642017253364201 | 553 | 265 | 10 | 828 | 66.8% | 32.0% | D+34.8 |
| Precinct -72533642077253364207 | 525 | 256 | 28 | 809 | 64.9% | 31.6% | D+33.3 |
| Precinct -72533641037253364103 | 529 | 246 | 17 | 792 | 66.8% | 31.1% | D+35.7 |
| Precinct -72533643057253364305 | 511 | 214 | 23 | 748 | 68.3% | 28.6% | D+39.7 |
| Precinct -72533644017253364401 | 412 | 311 | 25 | 748 | 55.1% | 41.6% | D+13.5 |
| Precinct -72533641047253364104 | 487 | 235 | 25 | 747 | 65.2% | 31.5% | D+33.7 |
| Precinct -72533644137253364413 | 451 | 269 | 17 | 737 | 61.2% | 36.5% | D+24.7 |
| Precinct -72533645067253364506 | 468 | 250 | 19 | 737 | 63.5% | 33.9% | D+29.6 |
| Precinct -72533641017253364101 | 550 | 150 | 16 | 716 | 76.8% | 20.9% | D+55.9 |
| Precinct -72533643017253364301 | 451 | 248 | 14 | 713 | 63.3% | 34.8% | D+28.5 |
| Precinct -72533642107253364210 | 469 | 214 | 25 | 708 | 66.2% | 30.2% | D+36.0 |
| Precinct -72533644127253364412 | 429 | 261 | 15 | 705 | 60.9% | 37.0% | D+23.8 |
| Precinct -72533645087253364508 | 445 | 197 | 26 | 668 | 66.6% | 29.5% | D+37.1 |
| Precinct -72533645077253364507 | 379 | 242 | 20 | 641 | 59.1% | 37.8% | D+21.4 |
| Precinct -72533643097253364309 | 366 | 234 | 15 | 615 | 59.5% | 38.0% | D+21.5 |
| Precinct -72533642027253364202 | 412 | 176 | 24 | 612 | 67.3% | 28.8% | D+38.6 |
| Precinct -72533644057253364405 | 309 | 241 | 12 | 562 | 55.0% | 42.9% | D+12.1 |
| Precinct -72533643037253364303 | 340 | 195 | 19 | 554 | 61.4% | 35.2% | D+26.2 |
| Precinct -72533645097253364509 | 340 | 166 | 21 | 527 | 64.5% | 31.5% | D+33.0 |
| Precinct -72533642047253364204 | 358 | 124 | 17 | 499 | 71.7% | 24.8% | D+46.9 |
| Precinct -72533641027253364102 | 271 | 134 | 23 | 428 | 63.3% | 31.3% | D+32.0 |
| Precinct -72533645027253364502 | 198 | 175 | 8 | 381 | 52.0% | 45.9% | D+6.0 |
| Precinct -72533642087253364208 | 245 | 94 | 14 | 353 | 69.4% | 26.6% | D+42.8 |
| Precinct -72533642057253364205 | 124 | 45 | 11 | 180 | 68.9% | 25.0% | D+43.9 |
| Precinct -72533644077253364407 | 74 | 58 | 1 | 133 | 55.6% | 43.6% | D+12.0 |
| Precinct -72533645137253364513 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 11 | 27.3% | 72.7% | R+45.5 |
| Broomfield 108_0801464001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Broomfield 1008_0801464010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Broomfield 1108_0801464011 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Broomfield 1208_0801464012 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Broomfield 1308_0801464013 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Broomfield 1408_0801464014 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Broomfield 1508_0801464015 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Broomfield 1608_0801464016 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Broomfield 1708_0801464017 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Broomfield 1808_0801464018 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Broomfield 1908_0801464019 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Broomfield 208_0801464002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Broomfield 2008_0801464020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Broomfield 2108_0801464021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Broomfield 2208_0801464022 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Broomfield 2308_0801464023 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Broomfield 2408_0801464024 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Broomfield 2508_0801464025 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Broomfield 2608_0801464026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Broomfield 2708_0801464027 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Broomfield 2808_0801464028 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Broomfield 2908_0801464029 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Broomfield 308_0801464003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Broomfield 3008_0801464030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Broomfield 3108_0801464031 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Broomfield 3208_0801464032 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Broomfield 3308_0801464033 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Broomfield 3408_0801464034 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Broomfield 3508_0801464035 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Broomfield 3608_0801464036 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Broomfield 3708_0801464037 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Broomfield 3808_0801464038 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Broomfield 408_0801464004 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Broomfield 508_0801464005 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Broomfield 608_0801464006 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Broomfield 708_0801464007 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Broomfield 808_0801464008 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Broomfield 908_0801464009 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
Presidential margin, 2004–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | −4.6% |
| 2008 | +11.6% |
| 2012 | +6.0% |
| 2016 | +14.2% |
| 2020 | +27.4% |
| 2024 | +28.5% |
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Democratic; the presidential vote runs 21 points more Republican.
| Year | Total registered | Democratic | Republican | Unaffiliated | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 49,959 | 15,022 | 14,471 | 19,578 | 888 |
| 2018 | 52,823 | 15,690 | 13,756 | 22,476 | 901 |
| 2020 | 57,774 | 17,300 | 13,434 | 26,067 | 973 |
| 2022 | 60,063 | 16,977 | 12,243 | 29,879 | 964 |
| 2024 | 63,809 | 17,069 | 11,962 | 33,513 | 1,265 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+286 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +12,744 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $87,976 in average income, against $135,655 for residents who stayed — 35% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+25.6 on average — 2.9 points more Republican-leaning than Broomfield County, CO itself (D+28.5).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Adams County, CO969D+9.0
- Boulder County, CO791D+55.7
- Jefferson County, CO679D+19.5
- Denver County, CO444D+56.1
- Arapahoe County, CO169D+20.1
- Weld County, CO157R+21.0
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Adams County, CO1,031
- Boulder County, CO671
- Jefferson County, CO632
- Denver County, CO433
- Weld County, CO372
- Arapahoe County, CO162
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +779 |
| 2012 | +1,002 |
| 2013 | +733 |
| 2014 | +1,153 |
| 2015 | +2,623 |
| 2016 | +1,207 |
| 2017 | +1,329 |
| 2018 | +667 |
| 2019 | +791 |
| 2021 | +663 |
| 2022 | +465 |
| 2023 | +326 |
| 2024 | +720 |
| 2025 | +286 |
Broomfield, carved out as its own city-county in 2001, sits at the Denver metro's northern edge and has trended consistently toward Democratic margins, reflecting the college-educated suburban shift that reshaped Colorado's Front Range over the past decade.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 28.5 points in 2024 and a Republican high of 4.6 points in 2004. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.1 points toward the Democratic candidate; the 2024 margin was 28.5 points.
A population of 76,304, a 72% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $123,874 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Albemarle County and Frederick County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Broomfield County, Colorado. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/08014/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.