- Lead
- 5,757
- Total
- 10,166
- vs nation
- R+55.2
- Turnout
- 61.8%
Logan County, CO
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 61.8% of 16,637 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 5,869
- Total
- 10,532
- vs nation
- R+60.2
- Turnout
- 60.5%
- Lead
- 5,431
- Total
- 9,722
- vs nation
- R+58.0
- Turnout
- 59.0%
- Lead
- 3,467
- Total
- 9,124
- vs nation
- R+41.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 3,156
- Total
- 8,977
- vs nation
- R+42.4
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 3,677
- Total
- 8,766
- vs nation
- R+39.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 3,235
- Total
- 8,096
- vs nation
- R+40.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,267
- Total
- 7,586
- vs nation
- R+25.2
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+56.6MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 20,8922024 5-year
- Median household income
- $51,8292024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 75.5%2024 5-year
- Black
- 3.6%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 17.2%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+42.7 in 1896MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+56.6 in 2024MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Morrill County, NE · twin score 86.8
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 61.8%10,274 participants ÷ 16,637 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +9.4 ptsHigh-turnout, durable
- Drop-off versus state
- -11.1 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 52.4%–54.5%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 9,960 | 16,876 | 59.0% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 8,813 | 16,331 | 54.0% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 10,652 | 17,618 | 60.5% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 8,592 | 16,813 | 51.1% | C/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 10,274 | 16,637 | 61.8% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 154/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
32 precincts · 10,166 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -40163380094016338009 | 167 | 822 | 12 | 1,001 | 16.7% | 82.1% | R+65.4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -40163380074016338007 | 263 | 694 | 18 | 975 | 27.0% | 71.2% | R+44.2 |
| Precinct -40163380084016338008 | 134 | 806 | 14 | 954 | 14.0% | 84.5% | R+70.4 |
| Precinct -40163380014016338001 | 216 | 598 | 16 | 830 | 26.0% | 72.0% | R+46.0 |
| Precinct -40163380104016338010 | 106 | 703 | 14 | 823 | 12.9% | 85.4% | R+72.5 |
| Precinct -40163380044016338004 | 220 | 536 | 15 | 771 | 28.5% | 69.5% | R+41.0 |
| Precinct -40163380024016338002 | 189 | 481 | 27 | 697 | 27.1% | 69.0% | R+41.9 |
| Precinct -40163380064016338006 | 201 | 427 | 16 | 644 | 31.2% | 66.3% | R+35.1 |
| Precinct -40163380054016338005 | 180 | 397 | 17 | 594 | 30.3% | 66.8% | R+36.5 |
| Precinct -40163380134016338013 | 54 | 489 | 8 | 551 | 9.8% | 88.7% | R+78.9 |
| Precinct -40163380114016338011 | 51 | 457 | 17 | 525 | 9.7% | 87.0% | R+77.3 |
| Precinct -40163380034016338003 | 132 | 339 | 7 | 478 | 27.6% | 70.9% | R+43.3 |
| Precinct -40163380154016338015 | 91 | 346 | 14 | 451 | 20.2% | 76.7% | R+56.5 |
| Precinct -40163380144016338014 | 34 | 296 | 1 | 331 | 10.3% | 89.4% | R+79.2 |
| Precinct -40163380124016338012 | 36 | 266 | 12 | 314 | 11.5% | 84.7% | R+73.2 |
| Precinct -40163380164016338016 | 24 | 198 | 5 | 227 | 10.6% | 87.2% | R+76.7 |
| Logan 108_0807538001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Logan 1008_0807538010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Logan 1108_0807538011 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Logan 1208_0807538012 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Logan 1308_0807538013 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Logan 1408_0807538014 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Logan 1508_0807538015 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Logan 1608_0807538016 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Logan 208_0807538002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Logan 308_0807538003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Logan 408_0807538004 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Logan 508_0807538005 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Logan 608_0807538006 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Logan 708_0807538007 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Logan 808_0807538008 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Logan 908_0807538009 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
Presidential margin, 1888–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1888 | −21.6% |
| 1892 | −56.0% |
| 1896 | +42.7% |
| 1900 | −0.9% |
| 1904 | −23.3% |
| 1908 | −4.9% |
| 1912 | +20.5% |
| 1916 | +29.6% |
| 1920 | −23.5% |
| 1924 | −38.6% |
| 1928 | −45.3% |
| 1932 | +7.0% |
| 1936 | +12.7% |
| 1940 | −23.9% |
| 1944 | −23.5% |
| 1948 | −0.7% |
| 1952 | −35.9% |
| 1956 | −29.3% |
| 1960 | −20.0% |
| 1964 | +9.4% |
| 1968 | −23.7% |
| 1972 | −36.8% |
| 1976 | −8.9% |
| 1980 | −35.0% |
| 1984 | −45.8% |
| 1988 | −13.8% |
| 1992 | −8.4% |
| 1996 | −16.7% |
| 2000 | −40.0% |
| 2004 | −41.9% |
| 2008 | −35.2% |
| 2012 | −38.0% |
| 2016 | −55.9% |
| 2020 | −55.7% |
| 2024 | −56.6% |
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 20 points more Democratic.
| Year | Total registered | Democratic | Republican | Unaffiliated | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 13,279 | 2,191 | 6,559 | 4,356 | 173 |
| 2018 | 13,169 | 1,949 | 6,519 | 4,525 | 176 |
| 2020 | 13,434 | 1,765 | 6,725 | 4,752 | 192 |
| 2022 | 13,615 | 1,624 | 6,531 | 5,243 | 217 |
| 2024 | 14,183 | 1,475 | 6,613 | 5,820 | 275 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+10 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −856 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $49,300 in average income, against $73,613 for residents who stayed — 33% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+4.5 on average — 52 points more Democratic-leaning than Logan County, CO itself (R+56.6).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Weld County, CO55R+21.0
- Morgan County, CO36R+48.6
- Larimer County, CO22D+17.6
- Adams County, CO21D+9.0
- Arapahoe County, CO21D+20.1
- Denver County, CO20D+56.1
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Weld County, CO44
- Larimer County, CO31
- Morgan County, CO31
- Cheyenne County, NE26
- Adams County, CO25
- Arapahoe County, CO21
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −186 |
| 2012 | −256 |
| 2013 | −260 |
| 2014 | +245 |
| 2015 | −24 |
| 2016 | −19 |
| 2017 | −118 |
| 2018 | −88 |
| 2019 | +115 |
| 2021 | −107 |
| 2022 | −168 |
| 2023 | −122 |
| 2024 | +122 |
| 2025 | +10 |
Logan County's wheat-farming economy and sparse, rural population have produced some of Colorado's widest presidential margins, with the Republican nominee clearing 56 points over the Democrat in 2024.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 42.7 points in 1896 and a Republican high of 56.6 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 0.9 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 56.6 points.
A population of 20,892, a 76% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $51,829 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Morrill County and Cheyenne County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Logan County, Colorado. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/08075/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.