HarrisDemocratic16.3%758TrumpRepublican81.6%3,807KennedyIndependent1.3%61
R+65.4- Lead
- 3,049
- Total
- 4,663
- vs nation
- R+63.9
- Turnout
- 76.1%
Akashiccounty
Yuma County, CO
Office (updates table and map)
President margin by year
Place winner margin
Boundary by 2024 margin · Precinct returns · VEST · MIT Election Lab
President results by year
2024 turnout 76.1% of 6,201 citizens 18+
BidenDemocratic15.8%785TrumpRepublican82.5%4,107JorgensenLibertarian1.0%52
R+66.7- Lead
- 3,322
- Total
- 4,981
- vs nation
- R+71.1
- Turnout
- 77.5%
ClintonDemocratic15.2%726TrumpRepublican80.4%3,850JohnsonLibertarian2.5%118
R+65.2- Lead
- 3,124
- Total
- 4,791
- vs nation
- R+67.3
- Turnout
- 73.2%
ObamaDemocratic21.6%987RomneyRepublican76.3%3,490OtherAll other candidates2.2%100
R+54.7- Lead
- 2,503
- Total
- 4,577
- vs nation
- R+58.5
- Turnout
- —
ObamaDemocratic24.9%1,117McCainRepublican73.3%3,286OtherAll other candidates1.8%80
R+48.4- Lead
- 2,169
- Total
- 4,483
- vs nation
- R+55.7
- Turnout
- —
KerryDemocratic23.3%1,064BushRepublican75.8%3,456OtherAll other candidates0.9%39
R+52.5- Lead
- 2,392
- Total
- 4,559
- vs nation
- R+50.0
- Turnout
- —
GoreDemocratic24.8%1,082BushRepublican72.4%3,156NaderGreen1.4%60
R+47.6- Lead
- 2,074
- Total
- 4,358
- vs nation
- R+48.1
- Turnout
- —
ClintonDemocratic32.6%1,439DoleRepublican58.7%2,589PerotReform7.2%319
R+26.1- Lead
- 1,150
- Total
- 4,409
- vs nation
- R+34.6
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+65.4MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 9,9792024 5-year
- Median household income
- $60,5452024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 66.9%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.3%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 30.3%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+41.4 in 1896MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+66.7 in 2020MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- McCulloch County, TX · twin score 95.7
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 76.1%4,719 participants ÷ 6,201 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +12.6 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off versus state
- -7.8 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 63.5%–65.6%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 4,945 | 6,751 | 73.2% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 4,257 | 6,571 | 64.8% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 5,039 | 6,503 | 77.5% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 4,108 | 6,331 | 64.9% | C/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 4,719 | 6,201 | 76.1% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 154/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
28 precincts · 4,663 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -40163630044016363004 | 113 | 497 | 14 | 624 | 18.1% | 79.6% | R+61.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -40163630064016363006 | 95 | 405 | 7 | 507 | 18.7% | 79.9% | R+61.1 |
| Precinct -40163630124016363012 | 74 | 361 | 10 | 445 | 16.6% | 81.1% | R+64.5 |
| Precinct -40163630134016363013 | 101 | 315 | 14 | 430 | 23.5% | 73.3% | R+49.8 |
| Precinct -40163630024016363002 | 70 | 316 | 12 | 398 | 17.6% | 79.4% | R+61.8 |
| Precinct -40163630114016363011 | 70 | 296 | 9 | 375 | 18.7% | 78.9% | R+60.3 |
| Precinct -40163630144016363014 | 61 | 293 | 5 | 359 | 17.0% | 81.6% | R+64.6 |
| Precinct -40163630014016363001 | 48 | 300 | 7 | 355 | 13.5% | 84.5% | R+71.0 |
| Precinct -40163630094016363009 | 24 | 259 | 6 | 289 | 8.3% | 89.6% | R+81.3 |
| Precinct -40163630104016363010 | 30 | 222 | 5 | 257 | 11.7% | 86.4% | R+74.7 |
| Precinct -40163630034016363003 | 26 | 165 | 4 | 195 | 13.3% | 84.6% | R+71.3 |
| Precinct -40163630084016363008 | 23 | 145 | 3 | 171 | 13.5% | 84.8% | R+71.3 |
| Precinct -40163630054016363005 | 11 | 138 | 1 | 150 | 7.3% | 92.0% | R+84.7 |
| Precinct -40163630074016363007 | 12 | 95 | 1 | 108 | 11.1% | 88.0% | R+76.9 |
| Yuma 108_0812563001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Yuma 1008_0812563010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Yuma 1108_0812563011 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Yuma 1208_0812563012 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Yuma 1308_0812563013 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Yuma 1408_0812563014 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Yuma 208_0812563002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Yuma 308_0812563003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Yuma 408_0812563004 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Yuma 508_0812563005 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Yuma 608_0812563006 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Yuma 708_0812563007 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Yuma 808_0812563008 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Yuma 908_0812563009 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −35.3% |
| 1896 | +41.4% |
| 1900 | +10.2% |
| 1904 | −33.5% |
| 1908 | +3.7% |
| 1912 | +21.8% |
| 1916 | +24.8% |
| 1920 | −33.7% |
| 1924 | −40.0% |
| 1928 | −41.0% |
| 1932 | +19.1% |
| 1936 | +7.6% |
| 1940 | −29.3% |
| 1944 | −34.9% |
| 1948 | −8.8% |
| 1952 | −44.6% |
| 1956 | −28.6% |
| 1960 | −30.6% |
| 1964 | +3.3% |
| 1968 | −33.6% |
| 1972 | −44.7% |
| 1976 | −7.2% |
| 1980 | −46.6% |
| 1984 | −49.8% |
| 1988 | −15.4% |
| 1992 | −16.6% |
| 1996 | −26.1% |
| 2000 | −47.6% |
| 2004 | −52.5% |
| 2008 | −48.4% |
| 2012 | −54.7% |
| 2016 | −65.2% |
| 2020 | −66.7% |
| 2024 | −65.4% |
DemocraticRepublican
Federal and statewide elections · 3 House · 37 Senate · 3 Senate special · 12 governor
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
voter registration
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Party registration · 2024R+40.6
Presidential vote · 2024R+65.4
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 25 points more Democratic.
DemocraticRepublicanUnaffiliatedOther parties
| Year | Total registered | Democratic | Republican | Unaffiliated | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 6,244 | 940 | 3,383 | 1,862 | 59 |
| 2018 | 6,177 | 807 | 3,290 | 2,011 | 69 |
| 2020 | 6,271 | 690 | 3,328 | 2,183 | 70 |
| 2022 | 6,355 | 619 | 3,222 | 2,438 | 76 |
| 2024 | 6,507 | 563 | 3,208 | 2,641 | 95 |
domestic migration
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−74 net domestic migration · 2025
20112025
Net −1,364 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $44,432 in average income, against $75,569 for residents who stayed — 41% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −9 |
| 2012 | −84 |
| 2013 | −38 |
| 2014 | −37 |
| 2015 | −204 |
| 2016 | −45 |
| 2017 | −151 |
| 2018 | −102 |
| 2019 | −17 |
| 2021 | −89 |
| 2022 | −172 |
| 2023 | −183 |
| 2024 | −159 |
| 2025 | −74 |
Yuma County sits in Colorado's northeastern plains, where wheat and corn agriculture dominate both the landscape and the electorate. In 2024 it delivered a 65-point Republican presidential margin, among the widest in the state.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 41.4 points in 1896 and a Republican high of 66.7 points in 2020. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.3 points toward the Democratic candidate; the 2024 margin was 65.4 points.
A population of 9,979, a 67% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $60,545 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of McCulloch County and Beaver County.
Political twins — counties
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
McCulloch County
Texas
95.7twin score
2000–2016 trajectory
Beaver County
Oklahoma
94.3twin score
2004–2020 trajectory≠ 2008 margin
Hemphill County
Texas
92.6twin score
2000–2020 trajectory≠ % unaffiliated
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Cite this page
All citations released under CC BY 4.0. Attribution: Akashic Intelligence.
Yuma County, Colorado. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/08125/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.
License: CC BY 4.0
Embed this page
A live widget for your site — no API key, attribution built in, CC BY 4.0. All widgets & sizes →
Cities & towns in Yuma County
Colorado at the ballot boxAll elections →
Frequently asked questions
How did Yuma County, Colorado vote in 2024?
In 2024, Yuma County, Colorado voted Republican by 65.4 points (R+65.4), carried by the Republican candidate. Out of 4,663 votes cast, 758 went Democratic and 3,807 went Republican.
When did Yuma County, Colorado last vote Democratic?
The most recent presidential election in which Yuma County, Colorado voted Democratic was 1964.
How many people live in Yuma County, Colorado?
Yuma County, Colorado has a population of 9,979 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.
What is the median household income in Yuma County, Colorado?
Median household income in Yuma County, Colorado is $60,545 — below the national median of $80,734. The Colorado state median is $95,470.
What is the political history of Yuma County, Colorado?
Akashic tracks 38 presidential elections in Yuma County, Colorado from 1876 to 2024. Of those, 7 went Democratic and 25 went Republican.