- Lead
- 187,382
- Total
- 3,390,161
- vs nation
- R+4.1
- Turnout
- 65.3%
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+5.5MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 7,378,8382024 5-year
- Population density
- 65 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 113,656 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $79,9642024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 52.6%2024 5-year
- Black
- 4.3%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 31.4%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+42.9 in 1936MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+33.9 in 1984MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Texas, TX · twin score 65.8
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 65.3%3,477,975 participants ÷ 5,324,116 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +17.1 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off versus state
- 0.0 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 48.2%–52.3%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 2,722,660 | 4,613,575 | 59.0% | B/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 2,409,906 | 4,812,764 | 50.1% | B/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 3,420,481 | 5,049,926 | 67.7% | B/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 2,592,375 | 5,118,553 | 50.6% | B/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 3,477,975 | 5,324,116 | 65.3% | B/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-state-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 276/110.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-state-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 279/137.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-state-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 282/1.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-state-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 285/182.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-state-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 288/227.
presidential history
Party record book
Arizona · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1912–2024 · 29 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1936
69.8%
86,722 votes · D+42.9
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1932 · 67.0%
Republican
Ronald Reagan1984
66.4%
681,416 votes · R+33.9
Runner-up · Richard Nixon, 1972 · 61.6%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Joe Biden2020
1,672,143votes
49.4% of the vote · D+0.3
Runner-up · Kamala Harris, 2024 · 1,582,860 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
1,770,242votes
52.2% of the vote · R+5.5
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 1,661,686 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
John W. Davis1924
+19.4pts D vs U.S.
Place R+5.8 · U.S. R+25.2
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1932 · +18.7 pts
Republican
Barry Goldwater1964
+23.4pts R vs U.S.
Place R+0.8 · U.S. D+22.6
Runner-up · Ronald Reagan, 1980 · +22.6 pts
On the ballot
Hobbs unopposed; Rep. Andy Biggs won the GOP primary with 74.0% over David Schweikert (AP call July 22). First AZ governor race with running mates: Hobbs-Giles vs Biggs-Kerr.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
| Year | Seats won | D % | R % | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D 3 · R 6 | 47.7% | 51.7% | 3,253,920 | |
| D 3 · R 6 | 43.1% | 56.1% | 2,360,078 | |
| D 5 · R 4 | 49.9% | 50.1% | 3,268,249 | |
| D 5 · R 4 | 50.4% | 48.7% | 2,341,270 |
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration and the presidential vote track closely here — within 1.7 points.
4,306,554 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net domestic migration over time
+31,107 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +703,363 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +11,062 |
| 2012 | +29,844 |
| 2013 | +24,050 |
| 2014 | +39,948 |
| 2015 | +45,561 |
| 2016 | +62,320 |
| 2017 | +62,686 |
| 2018 | +84,113 |
| 2019 | +91,017 |
| 2021 | +84,233 |
| 2022 | +68,315 |
| 2023 | +34,804 |
| 2024 | +34,303 |
| 2025 | +31,107 |
Five Arizonans — Goldwater, McCain, Flake, Sinema, and Gallego — each broke with their own party.
- Swing-state arc
- R+3.5 (2016) → D+0.3 (2020) → R+5.5 (2024), among the nation’s closest margins · MIT Election Lab
- Goldwater’s home state, 1964
- R+0.8 — Arizona held for its native son as he lost 44 of 50 states · MIT Election Lab
- Hispanic or Latino
- 31.4% of residents (26.9% Mexican origin) · ACS 2024 5-year
- American Indian
- 3.2% statewide; Apache County 71% — Navajo Nation, Hopi, Tohono O’odham · ACS 2024 5-year (B03002)
- Latter-day Saints
- 6.1% — the 4th-largest share of any state · 2020 U.S. Religion Census
- A senator switches sides
- Sinema, elected Democratic in 2018, left the party in 2022; Gallego won the seat in 2024 · U.S. Senate records
The states whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Arizona. Akashic. https://akashic.app/state/AZ/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.