Akashic

county

St. Louis city, MO

Office (updates table and map)

President margin by year

Place winner margin

1892–2024 · D minus R

Full record · 1892 → 2024

2024

Boundary by 2024 margin · Precinct returns · VEST · MIT Election Lab

People and households

Who lives here

Exact values for this place, its state, and the United States.

Race · ethnicity · ancestry

Communities and origins

German16.3%21.3%12.5%

Irish9.8%11.8%9.4%

American7.0%6.8%5.3%

English6.6%11.9%9.5%

Italian4.2%3.2%4.8%

French2.4%2.2%1.6%

Polish1.9%1.3%2.2%

Scottish1.4%1.8%1.3%

African American†40.1%10.0%9.9%

African1.1%0.3%0.5%

Nigerian0.2%—0.2%

Somali0.2%——

Haitian0.2%—0.3%

Mexican3.1%3.2%11.3%

Puerto Rican0.3%0.4%1.8%

Cuban0.3%—0.7%

Honduran0.3%—0.3%

Spanish0.3%——

Spaniard0.2%——

Asian Indian0.8%0.6%1.4%

Chinese0.8%0.4%1.3%

Vietnamese0.5%0.2%0.6%

Filipino0.3%0.2%0.9%

Korean0.3%—0.4%

Hispanic or Latino counts residents of any race; the race groups count only their non-Hispanic residents, so the groups are mutually exclusive and sum to 100%. Expand a row to see ancestries reported within that group.

Age and life stage

Measure	St. Louis city	Missouri	United States
Median age	36.8	39.2	39.1
Age 18–24	8.7%	9.2%	9.2%
Age 65 and older	15.3%	17.9%	17.2%

Household economy

Measure	St. Louis city	Missouri	United States
Median household income	$56,160	$70,702	$84,427
Poverty rate	20.6%	12.6%	12.5%
Bachelor's degree or higher (25+)	41.1%	32.4%	35.6%

Languages at home

Measure	St. Louis city	Missouri	United States
Speaks a non-English language at home	9.4%	6.7%	22.3%
Spanish	3.2%	2.9%	13.6%
Other Indo-European	1.2%	0.6%	2.0%

Religious landscape

Measure	St. Louis city	Missouri	United States
Catholic	16.5%	12.5%	18.6%
Evangelical Protestant	20.9%	24.1%	16.5%
Unclaimed / not counted	20.2%	51.7%	51.5%
Mainline Protestant	5.7%	5.7%	5.2%
Black Protestant	22.8%	2.5%	2.2%
Jewish	5.8%	0.3%	0.6%

American Community Survey 2024 5-year (CVAP, income, age, poverty, education, language, race, ancestry) · 2020 U.S. Religion Census (ASARB) — congregational adherents; unclaimed is the residual not counted by congregations.

President results by year

2024 turnout 52.1% of 225,264 citizens 18+

HarrisDemocratic81.2%94,458TrumpRepublican16.6%19,342SteinIndependent1.2%1,421

D+64.6

Lead: 75,116
Total: 116,271
vs nation: D+66.1
Turnout: 52.1%

BidenDemocratic81.9%110,089TrumpRepublican16.0%21,474JorgensenLibertarian1.1%1,497

D+65.9

Lead: 88,615
Total: 134,372
vs nation: D+61.5
Turnout: 56.7%

ClintonDemocratic78.7%104,235TrumpRepublican15.7%20,832JohnsonLibertarian2.7%3,518

D+63.0

Lead: 83,403
Total: 132,487
vs nation: D+60.9
Turnout: 55.5%

ObamaDemocratic82.4%118,780RomneyRepublican15.9%22,943GrayLibertarian1.2%1,674

D+66.5

Lead: 95,837
Total: 144,066
vs nation: D+62.7
Turnout: —

ObamaDemocratic83.7%132,925McCainRepublican15.5%24,662OtherAll other candidates0.8%1,271

D+68.2

Lead: 108,263
Total: 158,858
vs nation: D+60.9
Turnout: —

KerryDemocratic80.3%116,133BushRepublican19.2%27,793OtherAll other candidates0.5%712

D+61.1

Lead: 88,340
Total: 144,638
vs nation: D+63.5
Turnout: —

GoreDemocratic77.4%96,557BushRepublican19.9%24,799NaderGreen2.1%2,592

D+57.5

Lead: 71,758
Total: 124,752
vs nation: D+57.0
Turnout: —

ClintonDemocratic74.8%91,233DoleRepublican18.1%22,121PerotReform6.0%7,276

D+56.6

Lead: 69,112
Total: 122,003
vs nation: D+48.1
Turnout: —

Key facts

2024 presidential margin: D+64.6MIT Election Lab
Population: 288,5122024 5-year
Median household income: $56,1602024 5-year
White (non-Hispanic): 44.4%2024 5-year
Black: 42.1%2024 5-year
Hispanic / Latino: 5.3%2024 5-year
Peak Democratic margin: D+68.2 in 2008MIT Election Lab
Peak Republican margin: R+20.2 in 1920MIT Election Lab
Most similar: Richmond city, VA · twin score 97.4

Participation

Midterm durability

Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.

2024 total turnout: 52.1%117,354 participants ÷ 225,264 CVAP
2020→2022 drop-off: +20.7 ptsPresidential-dependent
Drop-off versus state: +1.6 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
Mechanical 2026 scenario: 31.4%–38.3%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast

Election	Participants	CVAP	Turnout	Quality
2016 · Presidential	134,066	241,702	55.5%	A/A
2018 · Midterm	116,275	239,606	48.5%	A/A
2020 · Presidential	133,867	236,032	56.7%	C/A
2022 · Midterm	84,096	233,295	36.0%	C/A
2024 · Presidential	117,354	225,264	52.1%	A/A

Sources and methods

2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
2020: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 152/2.
2022: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 154/183.
2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.

Precinct data

Results by precinct

181 precincts · 116,271 votes

Election

Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.

St. Louis city precinct-level presidential election results for 2024

Precinct -Ward 06 Precinct 06Ward 06 Precinct 06	2,539	329	78	2,946	86.2%	11.2%	D+75.0
Precinct -Ward 02 Precinct 01Ward 02 Precinct 01	1,902	867	29	2,798	68.0%	31.0%	D+37.0
Precinct -Ward 02 Precinct 05Ward 02 Precinct 05	1,905	789	51	2,745	69.4%	28.7%	D+40.7
Precinct -Ward 05 Precinct 03Ward 05 Precinct 03	2,028	558	47	2,633	77.0%	21.2%	D+55.8
Precinct -Ward 01 Precinct 05Ward 01 Precinct 05	1,603	904	60	2,567	62.4%	35.2%	D+27.2
Precinct -Ward 04 Precinct 09Ward 04 Precinct 09	1,667	643	48	2,358	70.7%	27.3%	D+43.4
Precinct -Ward 09 Precinct 02Ward 09 Precinct 02	1,882	294	42	2,218	84.9%	13.3%	D+71.6
Precinct -Ward 05 Precinct 07Ward 05 Precinct 07	1,618	317	53	1,988	81.4%	15.9%	D+65.4
Precinct -Ward 09 Precinct 04Ward 09 Precinct 04	1,661	267	50	1,978	84.0%	13.5%	D+70.5
Precinct -Ward 06 Precinct 04Ward 06 Precinct 04	1,738	177	56	1,971	88.2%	9.0%	D+79.2
Precinct -Ward 08 Precinct 07Ward 08 Precinct 07	1,643	248	63	1,954	84.1%	12.7%	D+71.4
Precinct -Ward 10 Precinct 02Ward 10 Precinct 02	1,710	161	49	1,920	89.1%	8.4%	D+80.7
Precinct -Ward 10 Precinct 04Ward 10 Precinct 04	1,613	129	29	1,771	91.1%	7.3%	D+83.8
Precinct -Ward 09 Precinct 03Ward 09 Precinct 03	1,452	202	40	1,694	85.7%	11.9%	D+73.8
Precinct -Ward 04 Precinct 07Ward 04 Precinct 07	1,205	430	35	1,670	72.2%	25.7%	D+46.4
Precinct -Ward 08 Precinct 08Ward 08 Precinct 08	1,291	309	29	1,629	79.3%	19.0%	D+60.3
Precinct -Ward 04 Precinct 10Ward 04 Precinct 10	1,170	400	35	1,605	72.9%	24.9%	D+48.0
Precinct -Ward 02 Precinct 02Ward 02 Precinct 02	983	572	27	1,582	62.1%	36.2%	D+26.0
Precinct -Ward 04 Precinct 08Ward 04 Precinct 08	1,102	398	33	1,533	71.9%	26.0%	D+45.9
Precinct -Ward 13 Precinct 10Ward 13 Precinct 10	1,438	76	16	1,530	94.0%	5.0%	D+89.0
Precinct -Ward 10 Precinct 03Ward 10 Precinct 03	1,289	192	38	1,519	84.9%	12.6%	D+72.2
Precinct -Ward 06 Precinct 10Ward 06 Precinct 10	1,338	145	30	1,513	88.4%	9.6%	D+78.8
Precinct -Ward 05 Precinct 16Ward 05 Precinct 16	875	566	14	1,455	60.1%	38.9%	D+21.2
Precinct -Ward 05 Precinct 06Ward 05 Precinct 06	1,044	374	23	1,441	72.4%	26.0%	D+46.5
Precinct -Ward 07 Precinct 15Ward 07 Precinct 15	1,212	147	46	1,405	86.3%	10.5%	D+75.8
Precinct -Ward 08 Precinct 12Ward 08 Precinct 12	1,167	163	17	1,347	86.6%	12.1%	D+74.5
Precinct -Ward 02 Precinct 07Ward 02 Precinct 07	862	454	30	1,346	64.0%	33.7%	D+30.3
Precinct -Ward 04 Precinct 05Ward 04 Precinct 05	1,010	278	18	1,306	77.3%	21.3%	D+56.0
Precinct -Ward 04 Precinct 02Ward 04 Precinct 02	962	306	34	1,302	73.9%	23.5%	D+50.4
Precinct -Ward 06 Precinct 05Ward 06 Precinct 05	1,061	129	24	1,214	87.4%	10.6%	D+76.8
Precinct -Ward 07 Precinct 11Ward 07 Precinct 11	1,072	117	23	1,212	88.4%	9.7%	D+78.8
Precinct -Ward 13 Precinct 11Ward 13 Precinct 11	1,120	79	10	1,209	92.6%	6.5%	D+86.1
Precinct -Ward 09 Precinct 05Ward 09 Precinct 05	994	125	27	1,146	86.7%	10.9%	D+75.8
Precinct -Ward 14 Precinct 02Ward 14 Precinct 02	950	159	19	1,128	84.2%	14.1%	D+70.1
Precinct -Ward 07 Precinct 09Ward 07 Precinct 09	929	108	49	1,086	85.5%	9.9%	D+75.6
Precinct -Ward 05 Precinct 05Ward 05 Precinct 05	831	164	25	1,020	81.5%	16.1%	D+65.4
Precinct -Ward 11 Precinct 04Ward 11 Precinct 04	946	64	10	1,020	92.7%	6.3%	D+86.5
Precinct -Ward 04 Precinct 11Ward 04 Precinct 11	719	237	39	995	72.3%	23.8%	D+48.4
Precinct -Ward 02 Precinct 09Ward 02 Precinct 09	752	214	25	991	75.9%	21.6%	D+54.3
Precinct -Ward 06 Precinct 07Ward 06 Precinct 07	756	131	29	916	82.5%	14.3%	D+68.2
Precinct -Ward 07 Precinct 04Ward 07 Precinct 04	773	109	27	909	85.0%	12.0%	D+73.0
Precinct -Ward 01 Precinct 16Ward 01 Precinct 16	654	216	33	903	72.4%	23.9%	D+48.5
Precinct -Ward 09 Precinct 08Ward 09 Precinct 08	792	82	24	898	88.2%	9.1%	D+79.1
Precinct -Ward 11 Precinct 01Ward 11 Precinct 01	788	90	18	896	87.9%	10.0%	D+77.9
Precinct -Ward 07 Precinct 02Ward 07 Precinct 02	776	89	30	895	86.7%	9.9%	D+76.8
Precinct -Ward 01 Precinct 15Ward 01 Precinct 15	622	235	25	882	70.5%	26.6%	D+43.9
Precinct -Ward 01 Precinct 13Ward 01 Precinct 13	622	219	16	857	72.6%	25.6%	D+47.0
Precinct -Ward 09 Precinct 07Ward 09 Precinct 07	766	72	19	857	89.4%	8.4%	D+81.0
Precinct -Ward 12 Precinct 08Ward 12 Precinct 08	774	50	6	830	93.3%	6.0%	D+87.2
Precinct -Ward 05 Precinct 14Ward 05 Precinct 14	726	78	25	829	87.6%	9.4%	D+78.2
Precinct -Ward 05 Precinct 11Ward 05 Precinct 11	574	226	17	817	70.3%	27.7%	D+42.6
Precinct -Ward 03 Precinct 08Ward 03 Precinct 08	654	136	22	812	80.5%	16.7%	D+63.8
Precinct -Ward 13 Precinct 07Ward 13 Precinct 07	744	43	12	799	93.1%	5.4%	D+87.7
Precinct -Ward 10 Precinct 09Ward 10 Precinct 09	726	51	15	792	91.7%	6.4%	D+85.2
Precinct -Ward 02 Precinct 11Ward 02 Precinct 11	581	191	16	788	73.7%	24.2%	D+49.5
Precinct -Ward 07 Precinct 07Ward 07 Precinct 07	687	82	18	787	87.3%	10.4%	D+76.9
Precinct -Ward 03 Precinct 09Ward 03 Precinct 09	626	121	13	760	82.4%	15.9%	D+66.4
Precinct -Ward 01 Precinct 03Ward 01 Precinct 03	515	215	18	748	68.9%	28.7%	D+40.1
Precinct -Ward 12 Precinct 17Ward 12 Precinct 17	682	37	7	726	93.9%	5.1%	D+88.8
Precinct -Ward 05 Precinct 12Ward 05 Precinct 12	576	130	17	723	79.7%	18.0%	D+61.7
Precinct -Ward 12 Precinct 12Ward 12 Precinct 12	657	46	10	713	92.1%	6.5%	D+85.7
Precinct -Ward 01 Precinct 08Ward 01 Precinct 08	534	146	18	698	76.5%	20.9%	D+55.6
Precinct -Ward 13 Precinct 04Ward 13 Precinct 04	647	38	11	696	93.0%	5.5%	D+87.5
Precinct -Ward 08 Precinct 06Ward 08 Precinct 06	594	83	13	690	86.1%	12.0%	D+74.1
Precinct -Ward 12 Precinct 06Ward 12 Precinct 06	645	25	11	681	94.7%	3.7%	D+91.0
Precinct -Ward 08 Precinct 20Ward 08 Precinct 20	527	138	13	678	77.7%	20.4%	D+57.4
Precinct -Ward 01 Precinct 01Ward 01 Precinct 01	464	180	13	657	70.6%	27.4%	D+43.2
Precinct -Ward 12 Precinct 09Ward 12 Precinct 09	608	36	10	654	93.0%	5.5%	D+87.5
Precinct -Ward 11 Precinct 10Ward 11 Precinct 10	604	40	8	652	92.6%	6.1%	D+86.5
Precinct -Ward 11 Precinct 09Ward 11 Precinct 09	602	39	4	645	93.3%	6.0%	D+87.3
Precinct -Ward 06 Precinct 01Ward 06 Precinct 01	558	61	21	640	87.2%	9.5%	D+77.7
Precinct -Ward 04 Precinct 06Ward 04 Precinct 06	417	198	18	633	65.9%	31.3%	D+34.6
Precinct -Ward 06 Precinct 02Ward 06 Precinct 02	544	66	13	623	87.3%	10.6%	D+76.7
Precinct -Ward 11 Precinct 03Ward 11 Precinct 03	538	65	15	618	87.1%	10.5%	D+76.5
Precinct -Ward 03 Precinct 07Ward 03 Precinct 07	477	123	14	614	77.7%	20.0%	D+57.7
Precinct -Ward 08 Precinct 10Ward 08 Precinct 10	516	81	12	609	84.7%	13.3%	D+71.4
Precinct -Ward 03 Precinct 06Ward 03 Precinct 06	465	121	14	600	77.5%	20.2%	D+57.3
Precinct -Ward 01 Precinct 12Ward 01 Precinct 12	381	201	14	596	63.9%	33.7%	D+30.2
Precinct -Ward 13 Precinct 09Ward 13 Precinct 09	565	24	4	593	95.3%	4.0%	D+91.2
Precinct -Ward 10 Precinct 01Ward 10 Precinct 01	491	87	11	589	83.4%	14.8%	D+68.6
Precinct -Ward 12 Precinct 07Ward 12 Precinct 07	540	37	3	580	93.1%	6.4%	D+86.7
Precinct -Ward 07 Precinct 06Ward 07 Precinct 06	511	51	17	579	88.3%	8.8%	D+79.4
Precinct -Ward 03 Precinct 13Ward 03 Precinct 13	479	81	16	576	83.2%	14.1%	D+69.1
Precinct -Ward 14 Precinct 03Ward 14 Precinct 03	477	82	11	570	83.7%	14.4%	D+69.3
Precinct -Ward 03 Precinct 16Ward 03 Precinct 16	385	109	18	512	75.2%	21.3%	D+53.9
Precinct -Ward 11 Precinct 12Ward 11 Precinct 12	483	22	4	509	94.9%	4.3%	D+90.6
Precinct -Ward 07 Precinct 05Ward 07 Precinct 05	432	49	15	496	87.1%	9.9%	D+77.2
Precinct -Ward 06 Precinct 11Ward 06 Precinct 11	400	75	17	492	81.3%	15.2%	D+66.1
Precinct -Ward 12 Precinct 19Ward 12 Precinct 19	444	31	4	479	92.7%	6.5%	D+86.2
Precinct -Ward 14 Precinct 14Ward 14 Precinct 14	429	40	3	472	90.9%	8.5%	D+82.4
Precinct -Ward 12 Precinct 02Ward 12 Precinct 02	425	27	10	462	92.0%	5.8%	D+86.1
Precinct -Ward 04 Precinct 03Ward 04 Precinct 03	341	90	15	446	76.5%	20.2%	D+56.3
Precinct -Ward 14 Precinct 10Ward 14 Precinct 10	402	29	5	436	92.2%	6.7%	D+85.6
Precinct -Ward 08 Precinct 15Ward 08 Precinct 15	364	48	4	416	87.5%	11.5%	D+76.0
Precinct -Ward 13 Precinct 02Ward 13 Precinct 02	392	17	4	413	94.9%	4.1%	D+90.8
Precinct -Ward 14 Precinct 01Ward 14 Precinct 01	322	44	10	376	85.6%	11.7%	D+73.9
Precinct -Ward 14 Precinct 04Ward 14 Precinct 04	342	14	2	358	95.5%	3.9%	D+91.6
Precinct -Ward 03 Precinct 17Ward 03 Precinct 17	292	55	9	356	82.0%	15.4%	D+66.6
Precinct -Ward 14 Precinct 20Ward 14 Precinct 20	299	41	5	345	86.7%	11.9%	D+74.8
Precinct -Ward 07 Precinct 14Ward 07 Precinct 14	302	29	9	340	88.8%	8.5%	D+80.3
Precinct -Ward 05 Precinct 01Ward 05 Precinct 01	252	74	6	332	75.9%	22.3%	D+53.6
Precinct -Ward 07 Precinct 12Ward 07 Precinct 12	287	31	8	326	88.0%	9.5%	D+78.5
Precinct -Ward 14 Precinct 17Ward 14 Precinct 17	289	25	5	319	90.6%	7.8%	D+82.8
Precinct -Ward 05 Precinct 08Ward 05 Precinct 08	229	76	12	317	72.2%	24.0%	D+48.3
Precinct -Ward 12 Precinct 13Ward 12 Precinct 13	298	15	2	315	94.6%	4.8%	D+89.8
Precinct -Ward 03 Precinct 02Ward 03 Precinct 02	245	61	4	310	79.0%	19.7%	D+59.4
Precinct -Ward 14 Precinct 07Ward 14 Precinct 07	276	28	5	309	89.3%	9.1%	D+80.3
Precinct -Ward 12 Precinct 04Ward 12 Precinct 04	286	19	2	307	93.2%	6.2%	D+87.0
Precinct -Ward 06 Precinct 13Ward 06 Precinct 13	199	84	6	289	68.9%	29.1%	D+39.8
Precinct -Ward 10 Precinct 11Ward 10 Precinct 11	263	15	2	280	93.9%	5.4%	D+88.6
Precinct -Ward 02 Precinct 10Ward 02 Precinct 10	199	68	10	277	71.8%	24.5%	D+47.3
Precinct -Ward 08 Precinct 16Ward 08 Precinct 16	230	40	4	274	83.9%	14.6%	D+69.3
Precinct -Ward 13 Precinct 06Ward 13 Precinct 06	244	20	1	265	92.1%	7.5%	D+84.5
Precinct -Ward 07 Precinct 13Ward 07 Precinct 13	231	26	4	261	88.5%	10.0%	D+78.5
Precinct -Ward 13 Precinct 05Ward 13 Precinct 05	242	13	3	258	93.8%	5.0%	D+88.8
Precinct -Ward 02 Precinct 03Ward 02 Precinct 03	142	107	5	254	55.9%	42.1%	D+13.8
Precinct -Ward 10 Precinct 10Ward 10 Precinct 10	224	13	5	242	92.6%	5.4%	D+87.2
Precinct -Ward 03 Precinct 15Ward 03 Precinct 15	200	28	11	239	83.7%	11.7%	D+72.0
Precinct -Ward 14 Precinct 18Ward 14 Precinct 18	200	30	6	236	84.7%	12.7%	D+72.0
Precinct -Ward 02 Precinct 08Ward 02 Precinct 08	160	55	11	226	70.8%	24.3%	D+46.5
Precinct -Ward 08 Precinct 21Ward 08 Precinct 21	178	39	8	225	79.1%	17.3%	D+61.8
Precinct -Ward 06 Precinct 03Ward 06 Precinct 03	176	41	7	224	78.6%	18.3%	D+60.3
Precinct -Ward 12 Precinct 10Ward 12 Precinct 10	202	15	5	222	91.0%	6.8%	D+84.2
Precinct -Ward 13 Precinct 08Ward 13 Precinct 08	204	7	1	212	96.2%	3.3%	D+92.9
Precinct -Ward 05 Precinct 10Ward 05 Precinct 10	142	61	5	208	68.3%	29.3%	D+38.9
Precinct -Ward 13 Precinct 01Ward 13 Precinct 01	191	12	3	206	92.7%	5.8%	D+86.9
Precinct -Ward 10 Precinct 06Ward 10 Precinct 06	185	11	7	203	91.1%	5.4%	D+85.7
Precinct -Ward 02 Precinct 12Ward 02 Precinct 12	140	42	7	189	74.1%	22.2%	D+51.9
Precinct -Ward 01 Precinct 11Ward 01 Precinct 11	124	49	5	178	69.7%	27.5%	D+42.1
Precinct -Ward 07 Precinct 10Ward 07 Precinct 10	142	23	8	173	82.1%	13.3%	D+68.8
Precinct -Ward 01 Precinct 07Ward 01 Precinct 07	96	66	7	169	56.8%	39.1%	D+17.8
Precinct -Ward 03 Precinct 10Ward 03 Precinct 10	142	25	2	169	84.0%	14.8%	D+69.2
Precinct -Ward 14 Precinct 09Ward 14 Precinct 09	150	14	3	167	89.8%	8.4%	D+81.4
Precinct -Ward 04 Precinct 01Ward 04 Precinct 01	133	29	4	166	80.1%	17.5%	D+62.7
Precinct -Ward 03 Precinct 12Ward 03 Precinct 12	113	41	8	162	69.8%	25.3%	D+44.4
Precinct -Ward 12 Precinct 03Ward 12 Precinct 03	145	10	2	157	92.4%	6.4%	D+86.0
Precinct -Ward 08 Precinct 02Ward 08 Precinct 02	116	31	7	154	75.3%	20.1%	D+55.2
Precinct -Ward 01 Precinct 06Ward 01 Precinct 06	98	44	3	145	67.6%	30.3%	D+37.2
Precinct -Ward 14 Precinct 15Ward 14 Precinct 15	133	10	1	144	92.4%	6.9%	D+85.4
Precinct -Ward 10 Precinct 07Ward 10 Precinct 07	127	8	0	135	94.1%	5.9%	D+88.1
Precinct -Ward 11 Precinct 13Ward 11 Precinct 13	123	6	1	130	94.6%	4.6%	D+90.0
Precinct -Ward 14 Precinct 12Ward 14 Precinct 12	113	12	4	129	87.6%	9.3%	D+78.3
Precinct -Ward 11 Precinct 07Ward 11 Precinct 07	112	13	1	126	88.9%	10.3%	D+78.6
Precinct -Ward 03 Precinct 01Ward 03 Precinct 01	90	29	4	123	73.2%	23.6%	D+49.6
Precinct -Ward 08 Precinct 11Ward 08 Precinct 11	102	16	3	121	84.3%	13.2%	D+71.1
Precinct -Ward 06 Precinct 08Ward 06 Precinct 08	75	30	4	109	68.8%	27.5%	D+41.3
Precinct -Ward 08 Precinct 17Ward 08 Precinct 17	97	8	0	105	92.4%	7.6%	D+84.8
Precinct -Ward 03 Precinct 11Ward 03 Precinct 11	91	11	2	104	87.5%	10.6%	D+76.9
Precinct -Ward 05 Precinct 13Ward 05 Precinct 13	76	19	3	98	77.6%	19.4%	D+58.2
Precinct -Ward 01 Precinct 14Ward 01 Precinct 14	58	32	5	95	61.1%	33.7%	D+27.4
Precinct -Ward 01 Precinct 02Ward 01 Precinct 02	66	20	5	91	72.5%	22.0%	D+50.5
Precinct -Ward 13 Precinct 12Ward 13 Precinct 12	69	18	0	87	79.3%	20.7%	D+58.6
Precinct -Ward 09 Precinct 06Ward 09 Precinct 06	68	13	5	86	79.1%	15.1%	D+64.0
Precinct -Ward 10 Precinct 05Ward 10 Precinct 05	77	9	0	86	89.5%	10.5%	D+79.1
Precinct -Ward 08 Precinct 14Ward 08 Precinct 14	65	12	2	79	82.3%	15.2%	D+67.1
Precinct -Ward 12 Precinct 01Ward 12 Precinct 01	75	1	1	77	97.4%	1.3%	D+96.1
Precinct -Ward 03 Precinct 03Ward 03 Precinct 03	54	20	2	76	71.1%	26.3%	D+44.7
Precinct -Ward 05 Precinct 04Ward 05 Precinct 04	56	17	2	75	74.7%	22.7%	D+52.0
Precinct -Ward 02 Precinct 06Ward 02 Precinct 06	52	20	2	74	70.3%	27.0%	D+43.2
Precinct -Ward 07 Precinct 01Ward 07 Precinct 01	58	13	3	74	78.4%	17.6%	D+60.8
Precinct -Ward 08 Precinct 03Ward 08 Precinct 03	55	16	1	72	76.4%	22.2%	D+54.2
Precinct -Ward 12 Precinct 05Ward 12 Precinct 05	63	7	2	72	87.5%	9.7%	D+77.8
Precinct -Ward 09 Precinct 01Ward 09 Precinct 01	53	10	1	64	82.8%	15.6%	D+67.2
Precinct -Ward 03 Precinct 05Ward 03 Precinct 05	53	9	1	63	84.1%	14.3%	D+69.8
Precinct -Ward 05 Precinct 17Ward 05 Precinct 17	43	18	1	62	69.4%	29.0%	D+40.3
Precinct -Ward 05 Precinct 15Ward 05 Precinct 15	39	21	0	60	65.0%	35.0%	D+30.0
Precinct -Ward 05 Precinct 02Ward 05 Precinct 02	43	9	0	52	82.7%	17.3%	D+65.4
Precinct -Ward 13 Precinct 03Ward 13 Precinct 03	48	3	1	52	92.3%	5.8%	D+86.5
Precinct -Ward 03 Precinct 14Ward 03 Precinct 14	42	7	0	49	85.7%	14.3%	D+71.4
Precinct -Ward 14 Precinct 08Ward 14 Precinct 08	39	7	1	47	83.0%	14.9%	D+68.1
Precinct -Ward 01 Precinct 04Ward 01 Precinct 04	26	12	2	40	65.0%	30.0%	D+35.0
Precinct -Ward 11 Precinct 08Ward 11 Precinct 08	35	3	0	38	92.1%	7.9%	D+84.2
Precinct -Ward 08 Precinct 13Ward 08 Precinct 13	26	6	0	32	81.3%	18.8%	D+62.5
Precinct -Ward 08 Precinct 05Ward 08 Precinct 05	19	6	0	25	76.0%	24.0%	D+52.0
Precinct -Ward 14 Precinct 19Ward 14 Precinct 19	18	7	0	25	72.0%	28.0%	D+44.0
Precinct -Ward 06 Precinct 14Ward 06 Precinct 14	16	6	1	23	69.6%	26.1%	D+43.5
Precinct -Ward 14 Precinct 13Ward 14 Precinct 13	17	0	0	17	100.0%	0.0%	D+100.0
Precinct -Ward 08 Precinct 01Ward 08 Precinct 01	13	3	0	16	81.3%	18.8%	D+62.5
Precinct -Ward 11 Precinct 02Ward 11 Precinct 02	7	0	0	7	100.0%	0.0%	D+100.0
Precinct -Ward 04 Precinct 04Ward 04 Precinct 04	0	3	0	3	0.0%	100.0%	R+100.0
Precinct -Ward 03 Precinct 04Ward 03 Precinct 04	1	1	0	2	50.0%	50.0%	Exact tie

presidential history

Presidential margin, 1892–2024

Democratic minus Republican, by election

Presidential margin over time
Year	Margin (D minus R)
1892	−1.2%
1896	−13.3%
1900	−0.5%
1904	−4.9%
1908	−9.4%
1912	+8.8%
1916	−6.0%
1920	−20.2%
1924	−16.5%
1928	+4.3%
1932	+28.8%
1936	+33.3%
1940	+16.2%
1944	+20.7%
1948	+29.1%
1952	+23.9%
1956	+21.7%
1960	+33.3%
1964	+55.4%
1968	+38.4%
1972	+24.7%
1976	+33.6%
1980	+37.1%
1984	+29.6%
1988	+45.6%
1992	+52.2%
1996	+56.6%
2000	+57.5%
2004	+61.1%
2008	+68.2%
2012	+66.5%
2016	+63.0%
2020	+65.9%
2024	+64.6%

DemocraticRepublican

38 presidential elections

Third column names the leading third-party or independent finisher. Source · MIT Election Lab · ICPSR · VEST (precinct-level 2024). Swing · margin change from the prior cycle; not shown when either cycle is estimated or under source review. vs U.S. · margin relative to the national result that year.
Year	Won	Democratic	Republican	Other	Margin	Swing	vs U.S.	Total
2024	D	81.2%Harris94,458	16.6%Trump19,342	1.2%Stein1,421 +3	D+64.6	R+1.3	D+66.1	116,271
All 6 candidates in 2024 · 4 minor / independent Kamala D HarrisDemocratic81.2%94,458 Donald J TrumpRepublican16.6%19,342 Jill SteinIndependent1.2%1,421 Chase OliverLibertarian0.7%861 Claudia De La CruzIndependent0.1%123 Peter SonskiIndependent0.1%66
2020	D	81.9%Biden110,089	16.0%Trump21,474	1.1%Jorgensen1,497	D+65.9	D+3.0	D+61.5	134,372
2016	D	78.7%Clinton104,235	15.7%Trump20,832	2.7%Johnson3,518	D+63.0	R+3.6	D+60.9	132,487
2012	D	82.4%Obama118,780	15.9%Romney22,943	1.2%Gray1,674	D+66.5	R+1.6	D+62.7	144,066
2008	D	83.7%Obama132,925	15.5%McCain24,662	0.8%	D+68.2	D+7.1	D+60.9	158,858
2004	D	80.3%Kerry116,133	19.2%Bush27,793	0.5%	D+61.1	D+3.6	D+63.5	144,638
2000	D	77.4%Gore96,557	19.9%Bush24,799	2.1%Nader2,592	D+57.5	D+0.9	D+57.0	124,752
1996	D	74.8%Clinton91,233	18.1%Dole22,121	6.0%Perot7,276	D+56.6	D+4.5	D+48.1	122,003
1992	D	69.4%Clinton102,356	17.3%Bush25,441	12.8%Perot18,864	D+52.2	D+6.6	D+46.6	147,404
1988	D	72.6%Dukakis110,076	27.0%Bush40,906	0.5%	D+45.6	D+16.0	D+53.3	151,714
1984	D	64.8%Mondale112,318	35.2%Reagan61,020	0.0%	D+29.6	R+7.5	D+47.8	173,338
1980	D	66.6%Carter113,697	29.5%Reagan50,333	3.9%	D+37.1	D+3.5	D+46.8	170,751
1976	D	66.0%Carter118,703	32.5%Ford58,367	1.5%	D+33.6	D+8.9	D+31.5	179,784
1972	D	62.3%McGovern119,817	37.7%Nixon72,402	0.0%	D+24.7	R+13.7	D+47.8	192,219
1968	D	64.7%Humphrey143,010	26.4%Nixon58,252	8.9%	D+38.4	R+17.1	D+39.1	220,914
1964	D	77.7%Johnson207,958	22.3%Goldwater59,604	0.0%	D+55.4	D+22.2	D+32.9	267,562
1960	D	66.6%Kennedy202,319	33.4%Nixon101,331	0.0%	D+33.3	D+11.5	D+33.1	303,650
1956	D	60.9%Stevenson202,210	39.1%Eisenhower130,045	0.0%	D+21.7	R+2.2	D+37.1	332,255
1952	D	61.9%Stevenson235,893	38.0%Eisenhower144,828	0.1%	D+23.9	R+5.2	D+34.6	381,148
1948	D	64.2%Truman220,654	35.1%Dewey120,656	0.7%	D+29.1	D+8.4	D+24.6	343,770
1944	D	60.2%Roosevelt204,687	39.5%Dewey134,411	0.2%	D+20.7	D+4.5	D+13.2	339,919
1940	D	58.0%Roosevelt233,338	41.8%Willkie168,165	0.2%	D+16.2	R+17.1	D+6.2	402,451
1936	D	65.5%Roosevelt260,063	32.2%Landon127,887	2.2%	D+33.3	D+4.5	D+9.0	396,830
1932	D	63.4%Roosevelt226,338	34.6%Hoover123,448	2.0%	D+28.8	D+24.5	D+11.0	357,105
1928	D	52.0%Smith176,428	47.7%Hoover161,701	0.3%	D+4.3	D+20.8	D+21.8	339,194
1924	R	36.2%Davis95,888	52.7%Coolidge139,433	10.9%La Follette28,856	R+16.5	D+3.8	D+8.7	264,597
1920	R	37.5%Cox106,047	57.8%Harding163,280	4.7%	R+20.2	R+14.2	D+5.9	282,652
1916	R	45.7%Wilson74,059	51.7%Hughes83,798	2.6%	R+6.0	R+14.8	R+9.2	162,032
1912	D	41.9%Wilson58,845	33.1%Taft46,509	24.9%	D+8.8	D+18.2	R+10.8	140,327
1908	R	43.3%Bryan60,917	52.8%Taft74,160	3.9%	R+9.4	R+4.5	D+0.1	140,550
1904	R	44.8%Parker51,858	49.7%Roosevelt57,547	5.5%	R+4.9	R+4.4	D+14.8	115,792
1900	R	48.1%Bryan59,931	48.6%McKinley60,597	3.2%	R+0.5	D+12.8	D+7.0	124,574
1896	R	42.8%Bryan50,091	56.2%McKinley65,708	1.0%	R+13.3	R+12.1	R+7.3	116,996
1892	R	48.7%Cleveland34,669	49.9%Harrison35,528	1.3%	R+1.2	—	R+2.9	71,139
1888	—	—	—	—	No data	—	—	—
1884	—	—	—	—	No data	—	—	—
1880	—	—	—	—	No data	—	—	—
1876	—	—	—	—	No data	—	—	—

Federal and statewide elections · 3 House · 37 Senate · 3 Senate special · 13 governor

U.S. House

Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.

Source · Akashic actual-race rollup from certified returns, House; geographic aggregation.
Year	Vote lead	Democratic	Republican	Total
2024	D	83.8%87,015	16.2%16,856	103,871
2020	D	81.9%104,767	18.1%23,179	127,946
2018	D	85.0%92,718	15.0%16,391	109,109

U.S. Senate

Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.

Sources · MIT Election Data and Science Lab (MEDSL); Amlani & Algara 2021 (Harvard Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/DGUMFI); upstream CQ Press + ICPSR · CC BY 4.0 / CC0 1.0.
Year	Vote lead	Democratic	Republican	Total
2024	D	81.2%93,919	15.6%18,068	115,672
2022	D	83.0%69,839	15.3%12,835	84,096
2018Class I	D	84.1%Claire McCaskill96,828	13.8%Josh Hawley15,937	115,146
2016Class III	D	81.8%Jason Kander107,070	15.0%Roy Blunt19,586	130,972
2012Class I	D	86.3%Claire McCaskill123,000	10.8%Todd Akin15,385	142,468
2010Class III	D	79.3%Robin Carnahan71,938	18.0%Roy Blunt16,353	90,732
2006Class I	D	79.1%Claire McCaskill75,183	19.1%Jim Talent18,135	95,046
2004Class III	D	76.8%Nancy Farmer109,228	22.1%Kit Bond31,468	142,268
2000Class I	D	78.7%Mel Carnahan98,048	20.0%John Ashcroft24,851	124,528
1998Class III	D	65.1%Jeremiah Nixon50,475	30.7%Kit Bond23,799	77,540
1994Class I	D	63.2%Alan Wheat61,705	33.9%John Ashcroft33,030	97,569
1992Class III	D	67.0%Geri Rothman-Serot97,257	30.2%Kit Bond43,869	145,054
1988Class I	D	57.6%Jay Nixon87,252	41.5%John C. Danforth62,826	151,359
1986Class III	D	69.8%Harriett Woods77,231	30.2%Kit Bond33,362	110,593
1982Class I	D	67.3%Harriett Woods86,011	32.7%John C. Danforth41,731	127,742
1980Class III	D	71.1%Thomas Eagleton121,383	28.4%Gene McNary48,490	170,631
1976Class I	D	60.0%Warren E. Hearnes103,526	39.6%John C. Danforth68,287	172,451
1974Class III	D	74.8%Thomas Eagleton100,755	24.7%Thomas B. Curtis33,290	134,743
1970Class I	D	68.2%Stuart Symington98,783	30.8%John C. Danforth44,571	144,877
1968Class III	D	69.6%Thomas Eagleton147,841	30.4%Thomas B. Curtis64,541	212,382
1964Class I	D	80.0%Stuart Symington209,121	20.0%Jean P. Bradshaw52,122	261,243
1962Class III	D	69.8%Edward Long119,816	30.2%Crosby Kemper51,753	171,569
1958Class I	D	77.6%Stuart Symington150,973	22.4%Hazel Palmer43,556	194,529
1956Class III	D	68.1%Thomas Hennings Jr.222,439	31.9%Herbert Douglas103,978	326,417
1952Class I	D	66.7%Stuart Symington250,827	33.2%James P. Kem124,717	375,879
1950Class III	D	63.1%Thomas Hennings Jr.168,513	36.7%Forrest C. Donnell98,012	266,991
1946Class I	R	48.4%Frank Briggs112,943	51.3%James P. Kem119,816	233,470
1944Class III	D	57.5%Roy McKittrick192,886	42.4%Forrest C. Donnell142,250	335,715
1940Class I	D	55.7%Harry S. Truman222,847	44.1%Manvel H. Davis176,575	400,039
1938Class III	D	63.0%J. Bennett Clark167,477	36.7%Henry S. Caulfield97,420	265,775
1934Class I	D	58.5%Harry S. Truman160,410	40.3%Roscoe Patterson110,573	274,253
1932Class III	D	60.1%J. Bennett Clark215,034	38.4%Henry W. Kiel137,325	357,575
1928Class I	R	49.3%Charles M. Hay166,771	50.4%Roscoe Patterson170,645	338,556
1926Class III	R	49.2%Harry B. Hawes88,790	50.4%George H. Williams90,956	180,399
1922Class I	D	62.1%James A. Reed104,680	36.1%R.R. Brewster60,878	168,640
1920Class III	R	41.6%Breckinridge Long116,593	53.8%Selden Spencer150,746	280,268
1916Class I	R	46.2%James A. Reed74,723	51.5%Walter S. Dickey83,172	161,651

U.S. Senate special elections

Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.

Source · Amlani & Algara 2021 (Harvard Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/DGUMFI); upstream CQ Press + ICPSR · CC0 1.0.
Year	Vote lead	Democratic	Republican	Total
2002Special · Class I	D	77.6%Jean Carnahan73,822	20.6%Jim Talent19,546	95,103
1960Special · Class III	D	66.2%Edward V. Long196,146	33.8%Lon Hocker100,256	296,402
1918Special · Class III	R	33.6%Joseph Folk40,276	63.4%Selden Spencer76,066	119,931

Governor

Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.

Sources · MIT Election Data and Science Lab (MEDSL); Amlani & Algara 2021 (Harvard Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/DGUMFI); upstream CQ Press + ICPSR · CC BY 4.0 / CC0 1.0.
Year	Vote lead	Democratic	Republican	Total
2024	D	79.0%Crystal Quade91,034	18.6%Mike Kehoe21,393	115,241
2020	D	80.4%Nicole Galloway107,296	17.5%Mike Parson23,380	133,391
2016	D	80.4%Chris Koster105,242	16.3%Eric Greitens21,385	130,910
2012	D	83.6%Jay Nixon117,979	13.8%Dave Spence19,478	141,123
2008	D	84.9%Jay Nixon131,900	13.0%Kenny Hulshof20,205	155,363
2004	D	77.8%Claire McCaskill111,940	20.6%Matt Blunt29,667	143,828
2000	D	72.4%Bob Holden89,680	20.8%Jim Talent25,710	123,841
1996	D	74.4%Mel Carnahan88,515	23.6%Margaret B. Kelly28,056	118,963
1992	D	77.2%Mel Carnahan111,362	22.8%William L. Webster32,878	144,240
1988	D	58.7%Betty Hearnes88,813	39.0%John Ashcroft59,083	151,329
1984	D	67.5%Ken Rothman116,458	32.5%John Ashcroft56,169	172,627
1980	D	66.5%Joseph Teasdale113,908	33.0%Kit Bond56,454	171,171
1976	D	67.1%Joseph Teasdale117,304	32.7%Kit Bond57,177	174,764

voter registration

Registered voters

Total registered voters, over time

Registered voters

Voter registration in St. Louis city, MO
Year	Total registered
2016	221,905
2018	211,758
2020	220,774
2022	205,425
2024	220,512

domestic migration

Who moves in and out

Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote

−3,749 net domestic migration · 2025

20112025

Net −70,251 over 2011–2025 · gain loss

Arrivals reported $52,846 in average income, against $70,586 for residents who stayed — 25% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)

The places arrivals came from lean D+14.4 on average — 50 points more Republican-leaning than St. Louis city, MO itself (D+64.6).

Where arrivals came from lean of each source

St. Louis County, MO5,157D+23.4
St. Charles County, MO559R+17.0
St. Clair County, IL387D+7.8
Jefferson County, MO351R+36.7
Madison County, IL295R+13.2
Cook County, IL269D+41.6

Where departures went households, 2022–23

St. Louis County, MO6,585
St. Charles County, MO602
Jefferson County, MO508
St. Clair County, IL411
Cook County, IL313
Madison County, IL273

Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.

Domestic migration in St. Louis city, MO in St. Louis city, MO: net domestic migration by year
Year	Net domestic migration
2011	−2,957
2012	−2,659
2013	−3,218
2014	−3,552
2015	−3,974
2016	−5,562
2017	−6,485
2018	−6,701
2019	−4,414
2021	−7,170
2022	−8,564
2023	−5,611
2024	−5,635
2025	−3,749

St. Louis City, independent of any county since 1876, delivered a 64-point Democratic presidential margin in 2024 — among the widest in Missouri — anchored by a dense, majority-minority population concentrated in a compact 66 square miles.

Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 68.2 points in 2008 and a Republican high of 20.2 points in 1920. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.3 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 64.6 points.

A population of 288,512, a 44% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $56,160 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Richmond city and Baltimore city.

Political twins — counties

The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.

2000–2024 trajectory≠ % unaffiliated

Orleans Parish

Louisiana

97.3twin score

2004–2024 trajectory≠ % unaffiliated

Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.

Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →

Compare two places, side by side

Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →

Cite this page

All citations released under CC BY 4.0. Attribution: Akashic Intelligence.

St. Louis city, Missouri. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/29510/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.

License: CC BY 4.0

Embed this page

A live widget for your site — no API key, attribution built in, CC BY 4.0. All widgets & sizes →

<iframe src="https://akashic.app/embed/county/29510/stat-card/" width="100%" height="200" style="border:0;border-radius:12px;max-width:560px" title="St. Louis city, MO — Akashic" loading="lazy"></iframe>

Cities & towns in St. Louis city

St. Louis

D+65

288.5K residents

Missouri at the ballot boxAll elections →

Presidentcounty detail2024 US Senatestatewide2024 Governorstate + county2024 US Houseall districts2024

Frequently asked questions

How did St. Louis city, Missouri vote in 2024?

In 2024, St. Louis city, Missouri voted Democratic by 64.6 points (D+64.6), carried by the Democratic candidate. Out of 116,271 votes cast, 94,458 went Democratic and 19,342 went Republican.

When did St. Louis city, Missouri last vote Republican?

The most recent presidential election in which St. Louis city, Missouri voted Republican was 1924.

How many people live in St. Louis city, Missouri?

St. Louis city, Missouri has a population of 288,512 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.

What is the median household income in St. Louis city, Missouri?

Median household income in St. Louis city, Missouri is $56,160 — below the national median of $80,734. The Missouri state median is $70,702.

What is the political history of St. Louis city, Missouri?

Akashic tracks 38 presidential elections in St. Louis city, Missouri from 1876 to 2024. Of those, 26 went Democratic and 8 went Republican.

Measure

St. Louis city

Missouri

United States

Median age

36.8

39.2

39.1

Age 18–24

8.7%

9.2%

Age 65 and older

15.3%

17.9%

17.2%

Measure

St. Louis city

Missouri

United States

Median household income

$56,160

$70,702

$84,427

Poverty rate

20.6%

12.6%

12.5%

Bachelor's degree or higher (25+)

41.1%

32.4%

35.6%

Measure

St. Louis city

Missouri

United States

Speaks a non-English language at home

9.4%

6.7%

22.3%

Spanish

3.2%

2.9%

13.6%

Other Indo-European

1.2%

0.6%

2.0%

Measure

St. Louis city

Missouri

United States

Catholic

16.5%

12.5%

18.6%

Evangelical Protestant

20.9%

24.1%

16.5%

Unclaimed / not counted

20.2%

51.7%

51.5%

Mainline Protestant

5.7%

5.2%

Black Protestant

22.8%

2.5%

2.2%

Jewish

5.8%

0.3%

0.6%

Key facts

2024 presidential margin

D+64.6MIT Election Lab

Population

288,5122024 5-year

Median household income

$56,1602024 5-year

White (non-Hispanic)

44.4%2024 5-year

Black

42.1%2024 5-year

Hispanic / Latino

5.3%2024 5-year

Peak Democratic margin

D+68.2 in 2008MIT Election Lab

Peak Republican margin

R+20.2 in 1920MIT Election Lab

Most similar

Richmond city, VA · twin score 97.4

Election

Participants

CVAP

Turnout

Quality

2016 · Presidential

134,066

241,702

55.5%

A/A

2018 · Midterm

116,275

239,606

48.5%

A/A

2020 · Presidential

133,867

236,032

56.7%

C/A

2022 · Midterm

84,096

233,295

36.0%

C/A

2024 · Presidential

117,354

225,264

52.1%

A/A

St. Louis city precinct-level presidential election results for 2024

Precinct -Ward 06 Precinct 06Ward 06 Precinct 06

2,539

329

2,946

86.2%

11.2%

D+75.0

Precinct -Ward 02 Precinct 01Ward 02 Precinct 01

1,902

867

2,798

68.0%

31.0%

D+37.0

Precinct -Ward 02 Precinct 05Ward 02 Precinct 05

1,905

789

2,745

69.4%

28.7%

D+40.7

Precinct -Ward 05 Precinct 03Ward 05 Precinct 03

2,028

558

2,633

77.0%

21.2%

D+55.8

Precinct -Ward 01 Precinct 05Ward 01 Precinct 05

1,603

904

2,567

62.4%

35.2%

D+27.2

Precinct -Ward 04 Precinct 09Ward 04 Precinct 09

1,667

643

2,358

70.7%

27.3%

D+43.4

Precinct -Ward 09 Precinct 02Ward 09 Precinct 02

1,882

294

2,218

84.9%

13.3%

D+71.6

Precinct -Ward 05 Precinct 07Ward 05 Precinct 07

1,618

317

1,988

81.4%

15.9%

D+65.4

Precinct -Ward 09 Precinct 04Ward 09 Precinct 04

1,661

267

1,978

84.0%

13.5%

D+70.5

Precinct -Ward 06 Precinct 04Ward 06 Precinct 04

1,738

177

1,971

88.2%

9.0%

D+79.2

Precinct -Ward 08 Precinct 07Ward 08 Precinct 07

1,643

248

1,954

84.1%

12.7%

D+71.4

Precinct -Ward 10 Precinct 02Ward 10 Precinct 02

1,710

161

1,920

89.1%

8.4%

D+80.7

Precinct -Ward 10 Precinct 04Ward 10 Precinct 04

1,613

129

1,771

91.1%

7.3%

D+83.8

Precinct -Ward 09 Precinct 03Ward 09 Precinct 03

1,452

202

1,694

85.7%

11.9%

D+73.8

Precinct -Ward 04 Precinct 07Ward 04 Precinct 07

1,205

430

1,670

72.2%

25.7%

D+46.4

Precinct -Ward 08 Precinct 08Ward 08 Precinct 08

1,291

309

1,629

79.3%

19.0%

D+60.3

Precinct -Ward 04 Precinct 10Ward 04 Precinct 10

1,170

400

1,605

72.9%

24.9%

D+48.0

Precinct -Ward 02 Precinct 02Ward 02 Precinct 02

983

572

1,582

62.1%

36.2%

D+26.0

Precinct -Ward 04 Precinct 08Ward 04 Precinct 08

1,102

398

1,533

71.9%

26.0%

D+45.9

Precinct -Ward 13 Precinct 10Ward 13 Precinct 10

1,438

1,530

94.0%

5.0%

D+89.0

Precinct -Ward 10 Precinct 03Ward 10 Precinct 03

1,289

192

1,519

84.9%

12.6%

D+72.2

Precinct -Ward 06 Precinct 10Ward 06 Precinct 10

1,338

145

1,513

88.4%

9.6%

D+78.8

Precinct -Ward 05 Precinct 16Ward 05 Precinct 16

875

566

1,455

60.1%

38.9%

D+21.2

Precinct -Ward 05 Precinct 06Ward 05 Precinct 06

1,044

374

1,441

72.4%

26.0%

D+46.5

Precinct -Ward 07 Precinct 15Ward 07 Precinct 15

1,212

147

1,405

86.3%

10.5%

D+75.8

Precinct -Ward 08 Precinct 12Ward 08 Precinct 12

1,167

163

1,347

86.6%

12.1%

D+74.5

Precinct -Ward 02 Precinct 07Ward 02 Precinct 07

862

454

1,346

64.0%

33.7%

D+30.3

Precinct -Ward 04 Precinct 05Ward 04 Precinct 05

1,010

278

1,306

77.3%

21.3%

D+56.0

Precinct -Ward 04 Precinct 02Ward 04 Precinct 02

962

306

1,302

73.9%

23.5%

D+50.4

Precinct -Ward 06 Precinct 05Ward 06 Precinct 05

1,061

129

1,214

87.4%

10.6%

D+76.8

Precinct -Ward 07 Precinct 11Ward 07 Precinct 11

1,072

117

1,212

88.4%

9.7%

D+78.8

Precinct -Ward 13 Precinct 11Ward 13 Precinct 11

1,120

1,209

92.6%

6.5%

D+86.1

Precinct -Ward 09 Precinct 05Ward 09 Precinct 05

994

125

1,146

86.7%

10.9%

D+75.8

Precinct -Ward 14 Precinct 02Ward 14 Precinct 02

950

159

1,128

84.2%

14.1%

D+70.1

Precinct -Ward 07 Precinct 09Ward 07 Precinct 09

929

108

1,086

85.5%

9.9%

D+75.6

Precinct -Ward 05 Precinct 05Ward 05 Precinct 05

831

164

1,020

81.5%

16.1%

D+65.4

Precinct -Ward 11 Precinct 04Ward 11 Precinct 04

946

1,020

92.7%

6.3%

D+86.5

Precinct -Ward 04 Precinct 11Ward 04 Precinct 11

719

237

995

72.3%

23.8%

D+48.4

Precinct -Ward 02 Precinct 09Ward 02 Precinct 09

752

214

991

75.9%

21.6%

D+54.3

Precinct -Ward 06 Precinct 07Ward 06 Precinct 07

756

131

916

82.5%

14.3%

D+68.2

Precinct -Ward 07 Precinct 04Ward 07 Precinct 04

773

109

909

85.0%

12.0%

D+73.0

Precinct -Ward 01 Precinct 16Ward 01 Precinct 16

654

216

903

72.4%

23.9%

D+48.5

Precinct -Ward 09 Precinct 08Ward 09 Precinct 08

792

898

88.2%

9.1%

D+79.1

Precinct -Ward 11 Precinct 01Ward 11 Precinct 01

788

896

87.9%

10.0%

D+77.9

Precinct -Ward 07 Precinct 02Ward 07 Precinct 02

776

895

86.7%

9.9%

D+76.8

Precinct -Ward 01 Precinct 15Ward 01 Precinct 15

622

235

882

70.5%

26.6%

D+43.9

Precinct -Ward 01 Precinct 13Ward 01 Precinct 13

622

219

857

72.6%

25.6%

D+47.0

Precinct -Ward 09 Precinct 07Ward 09 Precinct 07

766

857

89.4%

8.4%

D+81.0

Precinct -Ward 12 Precinct 08Ward 12 Precinct 08

774

830

93.3%

6.0%

D+87.2

Precinct -Ward 05 Precinct 14Ward 05 Precinct 14

726

829

87.6%

9.4%

D+78.2

Precinct -Ward 05 Precinct 11Ward 05 Precinct 11

574

226

817

70.3%

27.7%

D+42.6

Precinct -Ward 03 Precinct 08Ward 03 Precinct 08

654

136

812

80.5%

16.7%

D+63.8

Precinct -Ward 13 Precinct 07Ward 13 Precinct 07

744

799

93.1%

5.4%

D+87.7

Precinct -Ward 10 Precinct 09Ward 10 Precinct 09

726

792

91.7%

6.4%

D+85.2

Precinct -Ward 02 Precinct 11Ward 02 Precinct 11

581

191

788

73.7%

24.2%

D+49.5

Precinct -Ward 07 Precinct 07Ward 07 Precinct 07

687

787

87.3%

10.4%

D+76.9

Precinct -Ward 03 Precinct 09Ward 03 Precinct 09

626

121

760

82.4%

15.9%

D+66.4

Precinct -Ward 01 Precinct 03Ward 01 Precinct 03

515

215

748

68.9%

28.7%

D+40.1

Precinct -Ward 12 Precinct 17Ward 12 Precinct 17

682

726

93.9%

5.1%

D+88.8

Precinct -Ward 05 Precinct 12Ward 05 Precinct 12

576

130

723

79.7%

18.0%

D+61.7

Precinct -Ward 12 Precinct 12Ward 12 Precinct 12

657

713

92.1%

6.5%

D+85.7

Precinct -Ward 01 Precinct 08Ward 01 Precinct 08

534

146

698

76.5%

20.9%

D+55.6

Precinct -Ward 13 Precinct 04Ward 13 Precinct 04

647

696

93.0%

5.5%

D+87.5

Precinct -Ward 08 Precinct 06Ward 08 Precinct 06

594

690

86.1%

12.0%

D+74.1

Precinct -Ward 12 Precinct 06Ward 12 Precinct 06

645

681

94.7%

3.7%

D+91.0

Precinct -Ward 08 Precinct 20Ward 08 Precinct 20

527

138

678

77.7%

20.4%

D+57.4

Precinct -Ward 01 Precinct 01Ward 01 Precinct 01

464

180

657

70.6%

27.4%

D+43.2

Precinct -Ward 12 Precinct 09Ward 12 Precinct 09

608

654

93.0%

5.5%

D+87.5

Precinct -Ward 11 Precinct 10Ward 11 Precinct 10

604

652

92.6%

6.1%

D+86.5

Precinct -Ward 11 Precinct 09Ward 11 Precinct 09

602

645

93.3%

6.0%

D+87.3

Precinct -Ward 06 Precinct 01Ward 06 Precinct 01

558

640

87.2%

9.5%

D+77.7

Precinct -Ward 04 Precinct 06Ward 04 Precinct 06

417

198

633

65.9%

31.3%

D+34.6

Precinct -Ward 06 Precinct 02Ward 06 Precinct 02

544

623

87.3%

10.6%

D+76.7

Precinct -Ward 11 Precinct 03Ward 11 Precinct 03

538

618

87.1%

10.5%

D+76.5

Precinct -Ward 03 Precinct 07Ward 03 Precinct 07

477

123

614

77.7%

20.0%

D+57.7

Precinct -Ward 08 Precinct 10Ward 08 Precinct 10

516

609

84.7%

13.3%

D+71.4

Precinct -Ward 03 Precinct 06Ward 03 Precinct 06

465

121

600

77.5%

20.2%

D+57.3

Precinct -Ward 01 Precinct 12Ward 01 Precinct 12

381

201

596

63.9%

33.7%

D+30.2

Precinct -Ward 13 Precinct 09Ward 13 Precinct 09

565

593

95.3%

4.0%

D+91.2

Precinct -Ward 10 Precinct 01Ward 10 Precinct 01

491

589

83.4%

14.8%

D+68.6

Precinct -Ward 12 Precinct 07Ward 12 Precinct 07

540

580

93.1%

6.4%

D+86.7

Precinct -Ward 07 Precinct 06Ward 07 Precinct 06

511

579

88.3%

8.8%

D+79.4

Precinct -Ward 03 Precinct 13Ward 03 Precinct 13

479

576

83.2%

14.1%

D+69.1

Precinct -Ward 14 Precinct 03Ward 14 Precinct 03

477

570

83.7%

14.4%

D+69.3

Precinct -Ward 03 Precinct 16Ward 03 Precinct 16

385

109

512

75.2%

21.3%

D+53.9

Precinct -Ward 11 Precinct 12Ward 11 Precinct 12

483

509

94.9%

4.3%

D+90.6

Precinct -Ward 07 Precinct 05Ward 07 Precinct 05

432

496

87.1%

9.9%

D+77.2

Precinct -Ward 06 Precinct 11Ward 06 Precinct 11

400

492

81.3%

15.2%

D+66.1

Precinct -Ward 12 Precinct 19Ward 12 Precinct 19

444

479

92.7%

6.5%

D+86.2

Precinct -Ward 14 Precinct 14Ward 14 Precinct 14

429

472

90.9%

8.5%

D+82.4

Precinct -Ward 12 Precinct 02Ward 12 Precinct 02

425

462

92.0%

5.8%

D+86.1

Precinct -Ward 04 Precinct 03Ward 04 Precinct 03

341

446

76.5%

20.2%

D+56.3

Precinct -Ward 14 Precinct 10Ward 14 Precinct 10

402

436

92.2%

6.7%

D+85.6

Precinct -Ward 08 Precinct 15Ward 08 Precinct 15

364

416

87.5%

11.5%

D+76.0

Precinct -Ward 13 Precinct 02Ward 13 Precinct 02

392

413

94.9%

4.1%

D+90.8

Precinct -Ward 14 Precinct 01Ward 14 Precinct 01

322

376

85.6%

11.7%

D+73.9

Precinct -Ward 14 Precinct 04Ward 14 Precinct 04

342

358

95.5%

3.9%

D+91.6

Precinct -Ward 03 Precinct 17Ward 03 Precinct 17

292

356

82.0%

15.4%

D+66.6

Precinct -Ward 14 Precinct 20Ward 14 Precinct 20

299

345

86.7%

11.9%

D+74.8

Precinct -Ward 07 Precinct 14Ward 07 Precinct 14

302

340

88.8%

8.5%

D+80.3

Precinct -Ward 05 Precinct 01Ward 05 Precinct 01

252

332

75.9%

22.3%

D+53.6

Precinct -Ward 07 Precinct 12Ward 07 Precinct 12

287

326

88.0%

9.5%

D+78.5

Precinct -Ward 14 Precinct 17Ward 14 Precinct 17

289

319

90.6%

7.8%

D+82.8

Precinct -Ward 05 Precinct 08Ward 05 Precinct 08

229

317

72.2%

24.0%

D+48.3

Precinct -Ward 12 Precinct 13Ward 12 Precinct 13

298

315

94.6%

4.8%

D+89.8

Precinct -Ward 03 Precinct 02Ward 03 Precinct 02

245

310

79.0%

19.7%

D+59.4

Precinct -Ward 14 Precinct 07Ward 14 Precinct 07

276

309

89.3%

9.1%

D+80.3

Precinct -Ward 12 Precinct 04Ward 12 Precinct 04

286

307

93.2%

6.2%

D+87.0

Precinct -Ward 06 Precinct 13Ward 06 Precinct 13

199

289

68.9%

29.1%

D+39.8

Precinct -Ward 10 Precinct 11Ward 10 Precinct 11

263

280

93.9%

5.4%

D+88.6

Precinct -Ward 02 Precinct 10Ward 02 Precinct 10

199

277

71.8%

24.5%

D+47.3

Precinct -Ward 08 Precinct 16Ward 08 Precinct 16

230

274

83.9%

14.6%

D+69.3

Precinct -Ward 13 Precinct 06Ward 13 Precinct 06

244

265

92.1%

7.5%

D+84.5

Precinct -Ward 07 Precinct 13Ward 07 Precinct 13

231

261

88.5%

10.0%

D+78.5

Precinct -Ward 13 Precinct 05Ward 13 Precinct 05

242

258

93.8%

5.0%

D+88.8

Precinct -Ward 02 Precinct 03Ward 02 Precinct 03

142

107

254

55.9%

42.1%

D+13.8

Precinct -Ward 10 Precinct 10Ward 10 Precinct 10

224

242

92.6%

5.4%

D+87.2

Precinct -Ward 03 Precinct 15Ward 03 Precinct 15

200

239

83.7%

11.7%

D+72.0

Precinct -Ward 14 Precinct 18Ward 14 Precinct 18

200

236

84.7%

12.7%

D+72.0

Precinct -Ward 02 Precinct 08Ward 02 Precinct 08

160

226

70.8%

24.3%

D+46.5

Precinct -Ward 08 Precinct 21Ward 08 Precinct 21

178

225

79.1%

17.3%

D+61.8

Precinct -Ward 06 Precinct 03Ward 06 Precinct 03

176

224

78.6%

18.3%

D+60.3

Precinct -Ward 12 Precinct 10Ward 12 Precinct 10

202

222

91.0%

6.8%

D+84.2

Precinct -Ward 13 Precinct 08Ward 13 Precinct 08

204

212

96.2%

3.3%

D+92.9

Precinct -Ward 05 Precinct 10Ward 05 Precinct 10

142

208

68.3%

29.3%

D+38.9

Precinct -Ward 13 Precinct 01Ward 13 Precinct 01

191

206

92.7%

5.8%

D+86.9

Precinct -Ward 10 Precinct 06Ward 10 Precinct 06

185

203

91.1%

5.4%

D+85.7

Precinct -Ward 02 Precinct 12Ward 02 Precinct 12

140

189

74.1%

22.2%

D+51.9

Precinct -Ward 01 Precinct 11Ward 01 Precinct 11

124

178

69.7%

27.5%

D+42.1

Precinct -Ward 07 Precinct 10Ward 07 Precinct 10

142

173

82.1%

13.3%

D+68.8

Precinct -Ward 01 Precinct 07Ward 01 Precinct 07

169

56.8%

39.1%

D+17.8

Precinct -Ward 03 Precinct 10Ward 03 Precinct 10

142

169

84.0%

14.8%

D+69.2

Precinct -Ward 14 Precinct 09Ward 14 Precinct 09

150

167

89.8%

8.4%

D+81.4

Precinct -Ward 04 Precinct 01Ward 04 Precinct 01

133

166

80.1%

17.5%

D+62.7

Precinct -Ward 03 Precinct 12Ward 03 Precinct 12

113

162

69.8%

25.3%

D+44.4

Precinct -Ward 12 Precinct 03Ward 12 Precinct 03

145

157

92.4%

6.4%

D+86.0

Precinct -Ward 08 Precinct 02Ward 08 Precinct 02

116

154

75.3%

20.1%

D+55.2

Precinct -Ward 01 Precinct 06Ward 01 Precinct 06

145

67.6%

30.3%

D+37.2

Precinct -Ward 14 Precinct 15Ward 14 Precinct 15

133

144

92.4%

6.9%

D+85.4

Precinct -Ward 10 Precinct 07Ward 10 Precinct 07

127

135

94.1%

5.9%

D+88.1

Precinct -Ward 11 Precinct 13Ward 11 Precinct 13

123

130

94.6%

4.6%

D+90.0

Precinct -Ward 14 Precinct 12Ward 14 Precinct 12

113

129

87.6%

9.3%

D+78.3

Precinct -Ward 11 Precinct 07Ward 11 Precinct 07

112

126

88.9%

10.3%

D+78.6

Precinct -Ward 03 Precinct 01Ward 03 Precinct 01

123

73.2%

23.6%

D+49.6

Precinct -Ward 08 Precinct 11Ward 08 Precinct 11

102

121

84.3%

13.2%

D+71.1

Precinct -Ward 06 Precinct 08Ward 06 Precinct 08

109

68.8%

27.5%

D+41.3

Precinct -Ward 08 Precinct 17Ward 08 Precinct 17

105

92.4%

7.6%

D+84.8

Precinct -Ward 03 Precinct 11Ward 03 Precinct 11

104

87.5%

10.6%

D+76.9

Precinct -Ward 05 Precinct 13Ward 05 Precinct 13

77.6%

19.4%

D+58.2

Precinct -Ward 01 Precinct 14Ward 01 Precinct 14

61.1%

33.7%

D+27.4

Precinct -Ward 01 Precinct 02Ward 01 Precinct 02

72.5%

22.0%

D+50.5

Precinct -Ward 13 Precinct 12Ward 13 Precinct 12

79.3%

20.7%

D+58.6

Precinct -Ward 09 Precinct 06Ward 09 Precinct 06

79.1%

15.1%

D+64.0

Precinct -Ward 10 Precinct 05Ward 10 Precinct 05

89.5%

10.5%

D+79.1

Precinct -Ward 08 Precinct 14Ward 08 Precinct 14

82.3%

15.2%

D+67.1

Precinct -Ward 12 Precinct 01Ward 12 Precinct 01

97.4%

1.3%

D+96.1

Precinct -Ward 03 Precinct 03Ward 03 Precinct 03

71.1%

26.3%

D+44.7

Precinct -Ward 05 Precinct 04Ward 05 Precinct 04

74.7%

22.7%

D+52.0

Precinct -Ward 02 Precinct 06Ward 02 Precinct 06

70.3%

27.0%

D+43.2

Precinct -Ward 07 Precinct 01Ward 07 Precinct 01

78.4%

17.6%

D+60.8

Precinct -Ward 08 Precinct 03Ward 08 Precinct 03

76.4%

22.2%

D+54.2

Precinct -Ward 12 Precinct 05Ward 12 Precinct 05

87.5%

9.7%

D+77.8

Precinct -Ward 09 Precinct 01Ward 09 Precinct 01

82.8%

15.6%

D+67.2

Precinct -Ward 03 Precinct 05Ward 03 Precinct 05

84.1%

14.3%

D+69.8

Precinct -Ward 05 Precinct 17Ward 05 Precinct 17

69.4%

29.0%

D+40.3

Precinct -Ward 05 Precinct 15Ward 05 Precinct 15

65.0%

35.0%

D+30.0

Precinct -Ward 05 Precinct 02Ward 05 Precinct 02

82.7%

17.3%

D+65.4

Precinct -Ward 13 Precinct 03Ward 13 Precinct 03

92.3%

5.8%

D+86.5

Precinct -Ward 03 Precinct 14Ward 03 Precinct 14

85.7%

14.3%

D+71.4

Precinct -Ward 14 Precinct 08Ward 14 Precinct 08

83.0%

14.9%

D+68.1

Precinct -Ward 01 Precinct 04Ward 01 Precinct 04

65.0%

30.0%

D+35.0

Precinct -Ward 11 Precinct 08Ward 11 Precinct 08

92.1%

7.9%

D+84.2

Precinct -Ward 08 Precinct 13Ward 08 Precinct 13

81.3%

18.8%

D+62.5

Precinct -Ward 08 Precinct 05Ward 08 Precinct 05

76.0%

24.0%

D+52.0

Precinct -Ward 14 Precinct 19Ward 14 Precinct 19

72.0%

28.0%

D+44.0

Precinct -Ward 06 Precinct 14Ward 06 Precinct 14

69.6%

26.1%

D+43.5

Precinct -Ward 14 Precinct 13Ward 14 Precinct 13

100.0%

0.0%

D+100.0

Precinct -Ward 08 Precinct 01Ward 08 Precinct 01

81.3%

18.8%

D+62.5

Precinct -Ward 11 Precinct 02Ward 11 Precinct 02

100.0%

0.0%

D+100.0

Precinct -Ward 04 Precinct 04Ward 04 Precinct 04

0.0%

100.0%

R+100.0

Precinct -Ward 03 Precinct 04Ward 03 Precinct 04

50.0%

Exact tie

Presidential margin, 1892–2024

Democratic minus Republican, by election

Presidential margin over time
Year	Margin (D minus R)
1892	−1.2%
1896	−13.3%
1900	−0.5%
1904	−4.9%
1908	−9.4%
1912	+8.8%
1916	−6.0%
1920	−20.2%
1924	−16.5%
1928	+4.3%
1932	+28.8%
1936	+33.3%
1940	+16.2%
1944	+20.7%
1948	+29.1%
1952	+23.9%
1956	+21.7%
1960	+33.3%
1964	+55.4%
1968	+38.4%
1972	+24.7%
1976	+33.6%
1980	+37.1%
1984	+29.6%
1988	+45.6%
1992	+52.2%
1996	+56.6%
2000	+57.5%
2004	+61.1%
2008	+68.2%
2012	+66.5%
2016	+63.0%
2020	+65.9%
2024	+64.6%

DemocraticRepublican

Third column names the leading third-party or independent finisher. Source · MIT Election Lab · ICPSR · VEST (precinct-level 2024). Swing · margin change from the prior cycle; not shown when either cycle is estimated or under source review. vs U.S. · margin relative to the national result that year.

Year

Won

Democratic

Republican

Other

Margin

Swing

vs U.S.

Total

2024

81.2%Harris94,458

16.6%Trump19,342

1.2%Stein1,421 +3

D+64.6

R+1.3

D+66.1

116,271

All 6 candidates in 2024 · 4 minor / independent

Kamala D HarrisDemocratic81.2%94,458
Donald J TrumpRepublican16.6%19,342
Jill SteinIndependent1.2%1,421
Chase OliverLibertarian0.7%861
Claudia De La CruzIndependent0.1%123
Peter SonskiIndependent0.1%66

2020

81.9%Biden110,089

16.0%Trump21,474

1.1%Jorgensen1,497

D+65.9

D+3.0

D+61.5

134,372

2016

78.7%Clinton104,235

15.7%Trump20,832

2.7%Johnson3,518

D+63.0

R+3.6

D+60.9

132,487

2012

82.4%Obama118,780

15.9%Romney22,943

1.2%Gray1,674

D+66.5

R+1.6

D+62.7

144,066

2008

83.7%Obama132,925

15.5%McCain24,662

0.8%

D+68.2

D+7.1

D+60.9

158,858

2004

80.3%Kerry116,133

19.2%Bush27,793

0.5%

D+61.1

D+3.6

D+63.5

144,638

2000

77.4%Gore96,557

19.9%Bush24,799

2.1%Nader2,592

D+57.5

D+0.9

D+57.0

124,752

1996

74.8%Clinton91,233

18.1%Dole22,121

6.0%Perot7,276

D+56.6

D+4.5

D+48.1

122,003

1992

69.4%Clinton102,356

17.3%Bush25,441

12.8%Perot18,864

D+52.2

D+6.6

D+46.6

147,404

1988

72.6%Dukakis110,076

27.0%Bush40,906

0.5%

D+45.6

D+16.0

D+53.3

151,714

1984

64.8%Mondale112,318

35.2%Reagan61,020

0.0%

D+29.6

R+7.5

D+47.8

173,338

1980

66.6%Carter113,697

29.5%Reagan50,333

3.9%

D+37.1

D+3.5

D+46.8

170,751

1976

66.0%Carter118,703

32.5%Ford58,367

1.5%

D+33.6

D+8.9

D+31.5

179,784

1972

62.3%McGovern119,817

37.7%Nixon72,402

0.0%

D+24.7

R+13.7

D+47.8

192,219

1968

64.7%Humphrey143,010

26.4%Nixon58,252

8.9%

D+38.4

R+17.1

D+39.1

220,914

1964

77.7%Johnson207,958

22.3%Goldwater59,604

0.0%

D+55.4

D+22.2

D+32.9

267,562

1960

66.6%Kennedy202,319

33.4%Nixon101,331

0.0%

D+33.3

D+11.5

D+33.1

303,650

1956

60.9%Stevenson202,210

39.1%Eisenhower130,045

0.0%

D+21.7

R+2.2

D+37.1

332,255

1952

61.9%Stevenson235,893

38.0%Eisenhower144,828

0.1%

D+23.9

R+5.2

D+34.6

381,148

1948

64.2%Truman220,654

35.1%Dewey120,656

0.7%

D+29.1

D+8.4

D+24.6

343,770

1944

60.2%Roosevelt204,687

39.5%Dewey134,411

0.2%

D+20.7

D+4.5

D+13.2

339,919

1940

58.0%Roosevelt233,338

41.8%Willkie168,165

0.2%

D+16.2

R+17.1

D+6.2

402,451

1936

65.5%Roosevelt260,063

32.2%Landon127,887

2.2%

D+33.3

D+4.5

D+9.0

396,830

1932

63.4%Roosevelt226,338

34.6%Hoover123,448

2.0%

D+28.8

D+24.5

D+11.0

357,105

1928

52.0%Smith176,428

47.7%Hoover161,701

0.3%

D+4.3

D+20.8

D+21.8

339,194

1924

36.2%Davis95,888

52.7%Coolidge139,433

10.9%La Follette28,856

R+16.5

D+3.8

D+8.7

264,597

1920

37.5%Cox106,047

57.8%Harding163,280

4.7%

R+20.2

R+14.2

D+5.9

282,652

1916

45.7%Wilson74,059

51.7%Hughes83,798

2.6%

R+6.0

R+14.8

R+9.2

162,032

1912

41.9%Wilson58,845

33.1%Taft46,509

24.9%

D+8.8

D+18.2

R+10.8

140,327

1908

43.3%Bryan60,917

52.8%Taft74,160

3.9%

R+9.4

R+4.5

D+0.1

140,550

1904

44.8%Parker51,858

49.7%Roosevelt57,547

5.5%

R+4.9

R+4.4

D+14.8

115,792

1900

48.1%Bryan59,931

48.6%McKinley60,597

3.2%

R+0.5

D+12.8

D+7.0

124,574

1896

42.8%Bryan50,091

56.2%McKinley65,708

1.0%

R+13.3

R+12.1

R+7.3

116,996

1892

48.7%Cleveland34,669

49.9%Harrison35,528

1.3%

R+1.2

—

R+2.9

71,139

1888

—

No data

—

1884

—

No data

—

1880

—

No data

—

1876

—

No data

—

Source · Akashic actual-race rollup from certified returns, House; geographic aggregation.

Year

Vote lead

Democratic

Republican

Total

2024

83.8%87,015

16.2%16,856

103,871

2020

81.9%104,767

18.1%23,179

127,946

2018

85.0%92,718

15.0%16,391

109,109

Sources · MIT Election Data and Science Lab (MEDSL); Amlani & Algara 2021 (Harvard Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/DGUMFI); upstream CQ Press + ICPSR · CC BY 4.0 / CC0 1.0.

Year

Vote lead

Democratic

Republican

Total

2024

81.2%93,919

15.6%18,068

115,672

2022

83.0%69,839

15.3%12,835

84,096

2018Class I

84.1%Claire McCaskill96,828

13.8%Josh Hawley15,937

115,146

2016Class III

81.8%Jason Kander107,070

15.0%Roy Blunt19,586

130,972

2012Class I

86.3%Claire McCaskill123,000

10.8%Todd Akin15,385

142,468

2010Class III

79.3%Robin Carnahan71,938

18.0%Roy Blunt16,353

90,732

2006Class I

79.1%Claire McCaskill75,183

19.1%Jim Talent18,135

95,046

2004Class III

76.8%Nancy Farmer109,228

22.1%Kit Bond31,468

142,268

2000Class I

78.7%Mel Carnahan98,048

20.0%John Ashcroft24,851

124,528

1998Class III

65.1%Jeremiah Nixon50,475

30.7%Kit Bond23,799

77,540

1994Class I

63.2%Alan Wheat61,705

33.9%John Ashcroft33,030

97,569

1992Class III

67.0%Geri Rothman-Serot97,257

30.2%Kit Bond43,869

145,054

1988Class I

57.6%Jay Nixon87,252

41.5%John C. Danforth62,826

151,359

1986Class III

69.8%Harriett Woods77,231

30.2%Kit Bond33,362

110,593

1982Class I

67.3%Harriett Woods86,011

32.7%John C. Danforth41,731

127,742

1980Class III

71.1%Thomas Eagleton121,383

28.4%Gene McNary48,490

170,631

1976Class I

60.0%Warren E. Hearnes103,526

39.6%John C. Danforth68,287

172,451

1974Class III

74.8%Thomas Eagleton100,755

24.7%Thomas B. Curtis33,290

134,743

1970Class I

68.2%Stuart Symington98,783

30.8%John C. Danforth44,571

144,877

1968Class III

69.6%Thomas Eagleton147,841

30.4%Thomas B. Curtis64,541

212,382

1964Class I

80.0%Stuart Symington209,121

20.0%Jean P. Bradshaw52,122

261,243

1962Class III

69.8%Edward Long119,816

30.2%Crosby Kemper51,753

171,569

1958Class I

77.6%Stuart Symington150,973

22.4%Hazel Palmer43,556

194,529

1956Class III

68.1%Thomas Hennings Jr.222,439

31.9%Herbert Douglas103,978

326,417

1952Class I

66.7%Stuart Symington250,827

33.2%James P. Kem124,717

375,879

1950Class III

63.1%Thomas Hennings Jr.168,513

36.7%Forrest C. Donnell98,012

266,991

1946Class I

48.4%Frank Briggs112,943

51.3%James P. Kem119,816

233,470

1944Class III

57.5%Roy McKittrick192,886

42.4%Forrest C. Donnell142,250

335,715

1940Class I

55.7%Harry S. Truman222,847

44.1%Manvel H. Davis176,575

400,039

1938Class III

63.0%J. Bennett Clark167,477

36.7%Henry S. Caulfield97,420

265,775

1934Class I

58.5%Harry S. Truman160,410

40.3%Roscoe Patterson110,573

274,253

1932Class III

60.1%J. Bennett Clark215,034

38.4%Henry W. Kiel137,325

357,575

1928Class I

49.3%Charles M. Hay166,771

50.4%Roscoe Patterson170,645

338,556

1926Class III

49.2%Harry B. Hawes88,790

50.4%George H. Williams90,956

180,399

1922Class I

62.1%James A. Reed104,680

36.1%R.R. Brewster60,878

168,640

1920Class III

41.6%Breckinridge Long116,593

53.8%Selden Spencer150,746

280,268

1916Class I

46.2%James A. Reed74,723

51.5%Walter S. Dickey83,172

161,651

Source · Amlani & Algara 2021 (Harvard Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/DGUMFI); upstream CQ Press + ICPSR · CC0 1.0.

Year

Vote lead

Democratic

Republican

Total

2002Special · Class I

77.6%Jean Carnahan73,822

20.6%Jim Talent19,546

95,103

1960Special · Class III

66.2%Edward V. Long196,146

33.8%Lon Hocker100,256

296,402

1918Special · Class III

33.6%Joseph Folk40,276

63.4%Selden Spencer76,066

119,931

Sources · MIT Election Data and Science Lab (MEDSL); Amlani & Algara 2021 (Harvard Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/DGUMFI); upstream CQ Press + ICPSR · CC BY 4.0 / CC0 1.0.

Year

Vote lead

Democratic

Republican

Total

2024

79.0%Crystal Quade91,034

18.6%Mike Kehoe21,393

115,241

2020

80.4%Nicole Galloway107,296

17.5%Mike Parson23,380

133,391

2016

80.4%Chris Koster105,242

16.3%Eric Greitens21,385

130,910

2012

83.6%Jay Nixon117,979

13.8%Dave Spence19,478

141,123

2008

84.9%Jay Nixon131,900

13.0%Kenny Hulshof20,205

155,363

2004

77.8%Claire McCaskill111,940

20.6%Matt Blunt29,667

143,828

2000

72.4%Bob Holden89,680

20.8%Jim Talent25,710

123,841

1996

74.4%Mel Carnahan88,515

23.6%Margaret B. Kelly28,056

118,963

1992

77.2%Mel Carnahan111,362

22.8%William L. Webster32,878

144,240

1988

58.7%Betty Hearnes88,813

39.0%John Ashcroft59,083

151,329

1984

67.5%Ken Rothman116,458

32.5%John Ashcroft56,169

172,627

1980

66.5%Joseph Teasdale113,908

33.0%Kit Bond56,454

171,171

1976

67.1%Joseph Teasdale117,304

32.7%Kit Bond57,177

174,764

Frequently asked questions

Voter registration in St. Louis city, MO
Year	Total registered
2016	221,905
2018	211,758
2020	220,774
2022	205,425
2024	220,512

How did St. Louis city, Missouri vote in 2024?

In 2024, St. Louis city, Missouri voted Democratic by 64.6 points (D+64.6), carried by the Democratic candidate. Out of 116,271 votes cast, 94,458 went Democratic and 19,342 went Republican.

When did St. Louis city, Missouri last vote Republican?

The most recent presidential election in which St. Louis city, Missouri voted Republican was 1924.

How many people live in St. Louis city, Missouri?

St. Louis city, Missouri has a population of 288,512 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.

What is the median household income in St. Louis city, Missouri?

Median household income in St. Louis city, Missouri is $56,160 — below the national median of $80,734. The Missouri state median is $70,702.

What is the political history of St. Louis city, Missouri?

Akashic tracks 38 presidential elections in St. Louis city, Missouri from 1876 to 2024. Of those, 26 went Democratic and 8 went Republican.