- Lead
- 441,635
- Total
- 2,006,975
- vs nation
- R+20.5
- Turnout
- 59.2%
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+22.0MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 4,611,9612024 5-year
- Population density
- 107 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 43,213 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $60,7562024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 55.7%2024 5-year
- Black
- 30.5%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 7.2%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+85.8 in 1932MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+37.0 in 1972MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Arkansas, AR · twin score 71.6
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 59.2%2,021,588 participants ÷ 3,413,946 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +21.8 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off versus state
- 0.0 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 37.4%–40.5%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 2,049,802 | 3,432,034 | 59.7% | B/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 1,519,552 | 3,452,767 | 44.0% | B/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 2,169,354 | 3,467,869 | 62.6% | B/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 1,410,597 | 3,458,799 | 40.8% | B/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 2,021,588 | 3,413,946 | 59.2% | B/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-state-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 276/110.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-state-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 279/137.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-state-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 282/1.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-state-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 285/182.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-state-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 288/227.
presidential history
Party record book
Louisiana · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1932
92.8%
249,418 votes · D+85.8
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1936 · 88.8%
Republican
Richard Nixon1972
65.3%
686,852 votes · R+37.0
Runner-up · Ronald Reagan, 1984 · 60.8%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Bill Clinton1996
927,837votes
52.0% of the vote · D+12.1
Runner-up · Joe Biden, 2020 · 856,034 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2020
1,255,776votes
58.5% of the vote · R+18.6
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2024 · 1,208,505 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Alton B. Parker1904
+98.5pts D vs U.S.
Place D+78.9 · U.S. R+19.7
Runner-up · William J. Bryan, 1908 · +82.2 pts
Republican
Barry Goldwater1964
+36.2pts R vs U.S.
Place R+13.6 · U.S. D+22.6
Runner-up · John McCain, 2008 · +25.9 pts
On the ballot
Louisiana switched from the top-two jungle primary to closed/semi-closed partisan primaries for federal races in 2026 (HB 17, first change since 1978). First-round party primaries were held May 16, 2026; no candidate hit 50% in either party, so June 27, 2026 runoffs (after this audit date) will set the nominees: GOP Letlow (44.8%) vs Fleming (28.3%); Dem Crockett vs Davis. Incumbent Bill Cassidy (R) finished 3rd (24.8%) and was eliminated, making this effectively an open seat for the GOP nomination; the four listed are contested runoff candidates, not yet nominees.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
| Year | Seats won | D % | R % | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D 2 · R 4 | 34.2% | 65.5% | 1,905,718 | |
| D 1 · R 5 | 28.1% | 68.3% | 1,133,125 | |
| D 1 · R 5 | 33.9% | 63.8% | 2,147,135 | |
| D 1 · R 5 | 37.9% | 57.2% | 1,460,593 |
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Louisiana registers Democratic but votes Republican — a 25-point gap between how voters register and how they vote, the signature of ancestral registration that trails realignment.
3,044,473 registered voters · 2024
Who moves in and out
Net domestic migration over time
−14,387 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −244,954 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +2,728 |
| 2012 | −591 |
| 2013 | −1,614 |
| 2014 | −5,764 |
| 2015 | −5,865 |
| 2016 | −13,144 |
| 2017 | −28,239 |
| 2018 | −27,776 |
| 2019 | −26,045 |
| 2021 | −27,184 |
| 2022 | −48,131 |
| 2023 | −31,283 |
| 2024 | −17,659 |
| 2025 | −14,387 |
Of Louisiana’s 64 parishes, seven voted Democratic in 2024 — New Orleans, Baton Rouge, and the majority-Black parishes of the river and the Delta.
- Republican, and widening
- R+18.6 (2020) → R+22.0 (2024) — a 3.4-pt move toward Trump · MIT Election Lab
- A concentrated Democratic vote
- 7 of 64 parishes voted Democratic; Orleans + East Baton Rouge alone cast 31% of the statewide Democratic vote · MIT Election Lab
- Bluest and reddest parish
- Orleans (New Orleans) D+67.0; Cameron, on the southwest marsh, R+86.3 · MIT Election Lab 2024
- One of the largest Black shares
- 30.5% of residents — concentrated in New Orleans, Baton Rouge, and the river and Delta parishes · ACS 2024 5-year (B03002)
- Among the poorest
- Median household income $60,756 — 48th of 50; poverty rate 19%, 2nd-highest in the nation · ACS 2024 5-year
- Catholic where the South is not
- 26.8% Catholic vs 25.0% Evangelical — 7th in the nation in Catholic share, the French and Acadian legacy · 2020 U.S. Religion Census
The states whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Louisiana. Akashic. https://akashic.app/state/LA/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.