HarrisDemocratic36.5%6,627TrumpRepublican61.9%11,248KennedyWe The People0.3%50
R+25.5- Lead
- 4,621
- Total
- 18,157
- vs nation
- R+24.0
- Turnout
- 48.0%
Akashiccounty
Lincoln Parish, LA
Office (updates table and map)
President margin by year
Place winner margin
Boundary by 2024 margin · Precinct returns · VEST · MIT Election Lab
President results by year
2024 turnout 48.0% of 37,985 citizens 18+
BidenDemocratic39.2%7,559TrumpRepublican58.7%11,311JorgensenLibertarian1.4%276
R+19.5- Lead
- 3,752
- Total
- 19,275
- vs nation
- R+23.9
- Turnout
- 53.1%
ClintonDemocratic38.1%7,107TrumpRepublican57.6%10,761JohnsonLibertarian2.4%440
R+19.6- Lead
- 3,654
- Total
- 18,669
- vs nation
- R+21.7
- Turnout
- 51.6%
ObamaDemocratic41.9%7,956RomneyRepublican56.5%10,739LibertarianLibertarian1.0%187
R+14.7- Lead
- 2,783
- Total
- 18,993
- vs nation
- R+18.5
- Turnout
- —
ObamaDemocratic43.2%8,292McCainRepublican55.7%10,680OtherAll other candidates1.1%207
R+12.5- Lead
- 2,388
- Total
- 19,179
- vs nation
- R+19.7
- Turnout
- —
KerryDemocratic39.8%7,242BushRepublican59.2%10,791OtherAll other candidates1.0%185
R+19.5- Lead
- 3,549
- Total
- 18,218
- vs nation
- R+17.0
- Turnout
- —
GoreDemocratic41.4%6,851BushRepublican55.9%9,246NaderGreen0.7%124
R+14.5- Lead
- 2,395
- Total
- 16,551
- vs nation
- R+15.0
- Turnout
- —
ClintonDemocratic49.8%7,903DoleRepublican44.0%6,973PerotReform4.8%761
D+5.9- Lead
- 930
- Total
- 15,855
- vs nation
- R+2.7
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+25.5MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 48,1742024 5-year
- Median household income
- $39,1722024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 52.7%2024 5-year
- Black
- 36.9%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 3.7%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+92.0 in 1896MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+54.2 in 1964MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Forrest County, MS · twin score 90.0
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 48.0%18,251 participants ÷ 37,985 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +13.2 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off versus state
- -8.5 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 34.4%–34.8%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 18,836 | 36,511 | 51.6% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 13,638 | 36,318 | 37.6% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 19,437 | 36,617 | 53.1% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 15,142 | 38,010 | 39.8% | C/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 18,251 | 37,985 | 48.0% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 154/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
49 precincts · 18,165 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -0007-20007-2 | 385 | 971 | 43 | 1,399 | 27.5% | 69.4% | R+41.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -0008-20008-2 | 234 | 972 | 30 | 1,236 | 18.9% | 78.6% | R+59.7 |
| Precinct -0006-10006-1 | 378 | 634 | 20 | 1,032 | 36.6% | 61.4% | R+24.8 |
| Precinct -0005-20005-2 | 54 | 895 | 12 | 961 | 5.6% | 93.1% | R+87.5 |
| Precinct -0004-30004-3 | 43 | 847 | 8 | 898 | 4.8% | 94.3% | R+89.5 |
| Precinct -0009-10009-1 | 606 | 97 | 8 | 711 | 85.2% | 13.6% | D+71.6 |
| Precinct -0005-10005-1 | 95 | 578 | 9 | 682 | 13.9% | 84.8% | R+70.8 |
| Precinct -0005-40005-4 | 97 | 568 | 15 | 680 | 14.3% | 83.5% | R+69.3 |
| Precinct -0005-30005-3 | 41 | 578 | 15 | 634 | 6.5% | 91.2% | R+84.7 |
| Precinct -0003-20003-2 | 128 | 489 | 5 | 622 | 20.6% | 78.6% | R+58.0 |
| Precinct -0003-10003-1 | 267 | 302 | 9 | 578 | 46.2% | 52.2% | R+6.1 |
| Precinct -0001-10001-1 | 538 | 27 | 9 | 574 | 93.7% | 4.7% | D+89.0 |
| Precinct -0012-10012-1 | 281 | 251 | 9 | 541 | 51.9% | 46.4% | D+5.5 |
| Precinct -0003-40003-4 | 108 | 414 | 3 | 525 | 20.6% | 78.9% | R+58.3 |
| Precinct -0004-20004-2 | 217 | 257 | 8 | 482 | 45.0% | 53.3% | R+8.3 |
| Precinct -0004-40004-4 | 54 | 412 | 2 | 468 | 11.5% | 88.0% | R+76.5 |
| Precinct -0002-10002-1 | 399 | 50 | 3 | 452 | 88.3% | 11.1% | D+77.2 |
| Precinct -0011-10011-1 | 366 | 64 | 5 | 435 | 84.1% | 14.7% | D+69.4 |
| Precinct -0010-10010-1 | 370 | 23 | 2 | 395 | 93.7% | 5.8% | D+87.8 |
| Precinct -0003-30003-3 | 116 | 255 | 8 | 379 | 30.6% | 67.3% | R+36.7 |
| Precinct -0008-10008-1 | 168 | 203 | 2 | 373 | 45.0% | 54.4% | R+9.4 |
| Precinct -0004-50004-5 | 58 | 290 | 5 | 353 | 16.4% | 82.2% | R+65.7 |
| Precinct -0010-40010-4 | 321 | 25 | 2 | 348 | 92.2% | 7.2% | D+85.1 |
| Precinct -0003-50003-5 | 35 | 296 | 9 | 340 | 10.3% | 87.1% | R+76.8 |
| Precinct -0004-10004-1 | 43 | 292 | 3 | 338 | 12.7% | 86.4% | R+73.7 |
| Precinct -0001-20001-2 | 197 | 108 | 5 | 310 | 63.5% | 34.8% | D+28.7 |
| Precinct -0011-40011-4 | 163 | 85 | 11 | 259 | 62.9% | 32.8% | D+30.1 |
| Precinct -0007-10007-1 | 41 | 186 | 3 | 230 | 17.8% | 80.9% | R+63.0 |
| Precinct -0006-30006-3 | 64 | 139 | 2 | 205 | 31.2% | 67.8% | R+36.6 |
| Precinct -0010-30010-3 | 33 | 135 | 0 | 168 | 19.6% | 80.4% | R+60.7 |
| Precinct -0001-30001-3 | 120 | 35 | 5 | 160 | 75.0% | 21.9% | D+53.1 |
| Precinct -0004-60004-6 | 19 | 133 | 3 | 155 | 12.3% | 85.8% | R+73.5 |
| Precinct -0009-40009-4 | 97 | 50 | 6 | 153 | 63.4% | 32.7% | D+30.7 |
| Precinct -10-610-6 | 29 | 102 | 0 | 131 | 22.1% | 77.9% | R+55.7 |
| Precinct -11-511-5 | 54 | 73 | 0 | 127 | 42.5% | 57.5% | R+15.0 |
| Precinct -0012-60012-6 | 85 | 39 | 0 | 124 | 68.5% | 31.5% | D+37.1 |
| Precinct -0003-60003-6 | 6 | 102 | 0 | 108 | 5.6% | 94.4% | R+88.9 |
| Precinct -0006-20006-2 | 17 | 81 | 2 | 100 | 17.0% | 81.0% | R+64.0 |
| Precinct -6-46-4 | 62 | 25 | 0 | 87 | 71.3% | 28.7% | D+42.5 |
| Precinct -0010-50010-5 | 70 | 10 | 0 | 80 | 87.5% | 12.5% | D+75.0 |
| Precinct -0011-30011-3 | 68 | 12 | 0 | 80 | 85.0% | 15.0% | D+70.0 |
| Precinct -0010-20010-2 | 12 | 60 | 0 | 72 | 16.7% | 83.3% | R+66.7 |
| Precinct -6-56-5 | 29 | 14 | 0 | 43 | 67.4% | 32.6% | D+34.9 |
| Precinct -6-66-6 | 12 | 27 | 0 | 39 | 30.8% | 69.2% | R+38.5 |
| Precinct -8-38-3 | 17 | 17 | 2 | 36 | 47.2% | 47.2% | Exact tie |
| Precinct -0009-20009-2 | 10 | 14 | 2 | 26 | 38.5% | 53.8% | R+15.4 |
| Precinct -0012-20012-2 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 20 | 50.0% | 40.0% | D+10.0 |
| Precinct -9-39-3 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 80.0% | 20.0% | D+60.0 |
| Precinct -0012-40012-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 0.0% | D+66.7 |
presidential history
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −21.4% |
| 1896 | +92.0% |
| 1900 | +78.9% |
| 1904 | +90.0% |
| 1908 | +81.7% |
| 1912 | +84.1% |
| 1916 | +91.0% |
| 1920 | +68.8% |
| 1924 | +72.7% |
| 1928 | +21.7% |
| 1932 | +84.3% |
| 1936 | +82.9% |
| 1940 | +73.7% |
| 1944 | +24.6% |
| 1948 | +8.5% |
| 1952 | −21.0% |
| 1956 | −36.8% |
| 1960 | −33.6% |
| 1964 | −54.2% |
| 1968 | −7.1% |
| 1972 | −42.6% |
| 1976 | −15.5% |
| 1980 | −14.2% |
| 1984 | −24.9% |
| 1988 | −23.4% |
| 1992 | −0.1% |
| 1996 | +5.9% |
| 2000 | −14.5% |
| 2004 | −19.5% |
| 2008 | −12.5% |
| 2012 | −14.7% |
| 2016 | −19.6% |
| 2020 | −19.5% |
| 2024 | −25.5% |
DemocraticRepublican
Federal and statewide elections · 1 House · 35 Senate · 2 Senate special · 5 governor
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | R | 35.1%4,459 | 64.9%8,256 | 12,715 |
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
voter registration
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Party registration · 2024R+3.3
Presidential vote · 2024R+25.5
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 22 points more Democratic.
27,976 registered voters · 2024
domestic migration
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+55 net domestic migration · 2025
20112025
Net −3,246 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $42,558 in average income, against $82,296 for residents who stayed — 48% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+27.5 on average — 2.0 points more Republican-leaning than Lincoln Parish, LA itself (R+25.5).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Ouachita Parish, LA185R+27.9
- Union Parish, LA85R+57.0
- Jackson Parish, LA74R+47.6
- Caddo Parish, LA61D+4.6
- Bossier Parish, LA46R+43.3
- Claiborne Parish, LA44R+22.1
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Ouachita Parish, LA182
- Jackson Parish, LA76
- Union Parish, LA64
- Dallas County, TX63
- Bossier Parish, LA60
- Caddo Parish, LA60
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −232 |
| 2012 | −407 |
| 2013 | −124 |
| 2014 | −334 |
| 2015 | −108 |
| 2016 | −370 |
| 2017 | −276 |
| 2018 | −525 |
| 2019 | −556 |
| 2021 | −205 |
| 2022 | −108 |
| 2023 | −56 |
| 2024 | 0 |
| 2025 | +55 |
Lincoln Parish's two university campuses inject a younger, more transient population into a north Louisiana landscape that still votes heavily Republican, producing a college-town layer beneath a durable conservative baseline.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 92.0 points in 1896 and a Republican high of 54.2 points in 1964. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 6.0 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 25.5 points.
A population of 48,174, a 53% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $39,172 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Forrest County and Pike County.
Political twins — counties
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Forrest County
Mississippi
90.0twin score
% Blackmedian age% White≠ % unaffiliated
Pike County
Alabama
89.5twin score
% Blackmedian age% White≠ French ancestry
Lowndes County
Georgia
87.5twin score
% Blackmedian age% White≠ median income
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Cite this page
All citations released under CC BY 4.0. Attribution: Akashic Intelligence.
Lincoln Parish, Louisiana. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/22061/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.
License: CC BY 4.0
Embed this page
A live widget for your site — no API key, attribution built in, CC BY 4.0. All widgets & sizes →
Cities & towns in Lincoln Parish
Louisiana at the ballot boxAll elections →
Frequently asked questions
How did Lincoln Parish, Louisiana vote in 2024?
In 2024, Lincoln Parish, Louisiana voted Republican by 25.5 points (R+25.5), carried by the Republican candidate. Out of 18,157 votes cast, 6,627 went Democratic and 11,248 went Republican.
When did Lincoln Parish, Louisiana last vote Democratic?
The most recent presidential election in which Lincoln Parish, Louisiana voted Democratic was 1996.
How many people live in Lincoln Parish, Louisiana?
Lincoln Parish, Louisiana has a population of 48,174 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.
What is the median household income in Lincoln Parish, Louisiana?
Median household income in Lincoln Parish, Louisiana is $39,172 — below the national median of $80,734. The Louisiana state median is $60,756.
What is the political history of Lincoln Parish, Louisiana?
Akashic tracks 38 presidential elections in Lincoln Parish, Louisiana from 1876 to 2024. Of those, 14 went Democratic and 18 went Republican.