HarrisDemocratic24.4%1,060TrumpRepublican74.9%3,258KennedyWe The People0.2%7
R+50.6- Lead
- 2,198
- Total
- 4,348
- vs nation
- R+49.1
- Turnout
- 65.4%
Akashiccounty
Catahoula Parish, LA
Office (updates table and map)
President margin by year
Place winner margin
Boundary by 2024 margin · Precinct returns · VEST · MIT Election Lab
President results by year
2024 turnout 65.4% of 6,676 citizens 18+
BidenDemocratic26.1%1,269TrumpRepublican72.9%3,541JorgensenLibertarian0.5%26
R+46.8- Lead
- 2,272
- Total
- 4,858
- vs nation
- R+51.2
- Turnout
- 65.8%
ClintonDemocratic27.2%1,322TrumpRepublican71.6%3,479JohnsonLibertarian0.4%17
R+44.4- Lead
- 2,157
- Total
- 4,856
- vs nation
- R+46.5
- Turnout
- 62.4%
ObamaDemocratic33.6%1,408RomneyRepublican65.4%2,744LibertarianLibertarian0.4%15
R+31.9- Lead
- 1,336
- Total
- 4,193
- vs nation
- R+35.7
- Turnout
- —
ObamaDemocratic31.8%1,659McCainRepublican66.7%3,486OtherAll other candidates1.5%80
R+35.0- Lead
- 1,827
- Total
- 5,225
- vs nation
- R+42.2
- Turnout
- —
KerryDemocratic33.8%1,673BushRepublican65.0%3,219OtherAll other candidates1.3%62
R+31.2- Lead
- 1,546
- Total
- 4,954
- vs nation
- R+28.7
- Turnout
- —
GoreDemocratic36.1%1,718BushRepublican61.1%2,912NaderGreen0.6%28
R+25.1- Lead
- 1,194
- Total
- 4,765
- vs nation
- R+25.6
- Turnout
- —
ClintonDemocratic52.1%2,692DoleRepublican34.3%1,770PerotReform11.9%615
D+17.8- Lead
- 922
- Total
- 5,166
- vs nation
- D+9.3
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+50.6MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 8,5832024 5-year
- Median household income
- $50,2752024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 62.7%2024 5-year
- Black
- 34.3%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 0.6%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+95.8 in 1932MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+62.0 in 1964MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Dodge County, GA · twin score 95.4
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 65.4%4,367 participants ÷ 6,676 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +6.2 ptsHigh-turnout, durable
- Drop-off versus state
- -15.6 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 54.3%–59.3%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 4,906 | 7,866 | 62.4% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 3,548 | 7,677 | 46.2% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 4,921 | 7,483 | 65.8% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 4,135 | 6,938 | 59.6% | C/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 4,367 | 6,676 | 65.4% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 154/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
28 precincts · 4,347 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -0005-10005-1 | 17 | 521 | 3 | 541 | 3.1% | 96.3% | R+93.2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -0006-10006-1 | 19 | 362 | 1 | 382 | 5.0% | 94.8% | R+89.8 |
| Precinct -0003-20003-2 | 6 | 358 | 0 | 364 | 1.6% | 98.4% | R+96.7 |
| Precinct -0001-10001-1 | 38 | 239 | 1 | 278 | 13.7% | 86.0% | R+72.3 |
| Precinct -0008-10008-1 | 198 | 78 | 1 | 277 | 71.5% | 28.2% | D+43.3 |
| Precinct -0004-20004-2 | 19 | 245 | 3 | 267 | 7.1% | 91.8% | R+84.6 |
| Precinct -0002-20002-2 | 31 | 214 | 0 | 245 | 12.7% | 87.3% | R+74.7 |
| Precinct -0007-10007-1 | 217 | 14 | 5 | 236 | 91.9% | 5.9% | D+86.0 |
| Precinct -0009-20009-2 | 34 | 186 | 0 | 220 | 15.5% | 84.5% | R+69.1 |
| Precinct -0009-30009-3 | 13 | 172 | 0 | 185 | 7.0% | 93.0% | R+85.9 |
| Precinct -0001-20001-2 | 71 | 110 | 1 | 182 | 39.0% | 60.4% | R+21.4 |
| Precinct -0002-10002-1 | 120 | 41 | 3 | 164 | 73.2% | 25.0% | D+48.2 |
| Precinct -0003-10003-1 | 3 | 156 | 0 | 159 | 1.9% | 98.1% | R+96.2 |
| Precinct -0004-10004-1 | 30 | 103 | 7 | 140 | 21.4% | 73.6% | R+52.1 |
| Precinct -0009-40009-4 | 28 | 76 | 1 | 105 | 26.7% | 72.4% | R+45.7 |
| Precinct -0007-30007-3 | 40 | 53 | 0 | 93 | 43.0% | 57.0% | R+14.0 |
| Precinct -0006-20006-2 | 10 | 82 | 0 | 92 | 10.9% | 89.1% | R+78.3 |
| Precinct -0009-10009-1 | 1 | 90 | 1 | 92 | 1.1% | 97.8% | R+96.7 |
| Precinct -0001-40001-4 | 13 | 55 | 0 | 68 | 19.1% | 80.9% | R+61.8 |
| Precinct -7-1A7-1A | 60 | 4 | 0 | 64 | 93.8% | 6.3% | D+87.5 |
| Precinct -6-3A6-3A | 17 | 25 | 1 | 43 | 39.5% | 58.1% | R+18.6 |
| Precinct -0006-30006-3 | 4 | 37 | 0 | 41 | 9.8% | 90.2% | R+80.5 |
| Precinct -0007-50007-5 | 37 | 0 | 0 | 37 | 100.0% | 0.0% | D+100.0 |
| Precinct -0006-50006-5 | 19 | 14 | 0 | 33 | 57.6% | 42.4% | D+15.2 |
| Precinct -2-1A2-1A | 10 | 19 | 1 | 30 | 33.3% | 63.3% | R+30.0 |
| Precinct -6-5A6-5A | 4 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 66.7% | 33.3% | D+33.3 |
| Precinct -0001-30001-3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 33.3% | 66.7% | R+33.3 |
| Precinct -1-1A1-1A | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +42.2% |
| 1896 | +83.0% |
| 1900 | +57.0% |
| 1904 | +60.2% |
| 1908 | +66.3% |
| 1912 | +71.0% |
| 1916 | +91.5% |
| 1920 | +49.2% |
| 1924 | +47.3% |
| 1928 | +35.1% |
| 1932 | +95.8% |
| 1936 | +86.6% |
| 1940 | +83.7% |
| 1944 | +61.2% |
| 1948 | +25.8% |
| 1952 | +20.4% |
| 1956 | −7.7% |
| 1960 | −19.4% |
| 1964 | −62.0% |
| 1968 | +0.3% |
| 1972 | −50.7% |
| 1976 | +9.7% |
| 1980 | −9.5% |
| 1984 | −36.9% |
| 1988 | −19.1% |
| 1992 | +10.9% |
| 1996 | +17.8% |
| 2000 | −25.1% |
| 2004 | −31.2% |
| 2008 | −35.0% |
| 2012 | −31.9% |
| 2016 | −44.4% |
| 2020 | −46.8% |
| 2024 | −50.6% |
DemocraticRepublican
Federal and statewide elections · 1 House · 35 Senate · 2 Senate special · 5 governor
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | R | 25.7%816 | 74.3%2,365 | 3,181 |
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
voter registration
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Party registration · 2024R+3.5
Presidential vote · 2024R+50.6
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 47 points more Democratic.
6,318 registered voters · 2024
domestic migration
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−67 net domestic migration · 2025
20112025
Net −1,260 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $43,909 in average income, against $54,270 for residents who stayed — 19% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+50.3 on average — about the same lean as Catahoula Parish, LA (R+50.6).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Concordia Parish, LA45R+29.3
- LaSalle Parish, LA29R+82.7
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Concordia Parish, LA37
- LaSalle Parish, LA33
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −104 |
| 2012 | −46 |
| 2013 | +4 |
| 2014 | −121 |
| 2015 | −84 |
| 2016 | −156 |
| 2017 | −54 |
| 2018 | −233 |
| 2019 | −114 |
| 2021 | −58 |
| 2022 | −45 |
| 2023 | −129 |
| 2024 | −53 |
| 2025 | −67 |
Catahoula Parish sits along the Ouachita River basin with a population under 11,000, and its presidential margins have grown steadily more one-sided over the past two decades as rural realignment reshaped north-central Louisiana.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 95.8 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 62.0 points in 1964. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 3.8 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 50.6 points.
A population of 8,583, a 63% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $50,275 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Dodge County and Winn Parish.
Political twins — counties
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Dodge County
Georgia
95.4twin score
elasticity% Black2008 margin≠ % Evangelical
Winn Parish
Louisiana
95.1twin score
% Evangelical% unaffiliatedelasticity≠ Irish ancestry
Franklin Parish
Louisiana
92.7twin score
% Evangelical% unaffiliated2008 margin≠ Irish ancestry
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Cite this page
All citations released under CC BY 4.0. Attribution: Akashic Intelligence.
Catahoula Parish, Louisiana. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/22025/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.
License: CC BY 4.0
Embed this page
A live widget for your site — no API key, attribution built in, CC BY 4.0. All widgets & sizes →
Louisiana at the ballot boxAll elections →
Frequently asked questions
How did Catahoula Parish, Louisiana vote in 2024?
In 2024, Catahoula Parish, Louisiana voted Republican by 50.6 points (R+50.6), carried by the Republican candidate. Out of 4,348 votes cast, 1,060 went Democratic and 3,258 went Republican.
When did Catahoula Parish, Louisiana last vote Democratic?
The most recent presidential election in which Catahoula Parish, Louisiana voted Democratic was 1996.
How many people live in Catahoula Parish, Louisiana?
Catahoula Parish, Louisiana has a population of 8,583 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.
What is the median household income in Catahoula Parish, Louisiana?
Median household income in Catahoula Parish, Louisiana is $50,275 — below the national median of $80,734. The Louisiana state median is $60,756.
What is the political history of Catahoula Parish, Louisiana?
Akashic tracks 38 presidential elections in Catahoula Parish, Louisiana from 1876 to 2024. Of those, 18 went Democratic and 14 went Republican.