HarrisDemocratic35.5%1,321TrumpRepublican62.7%2,337KennedyWe The People0.3%11
R+27.3- Lead
- 1,016
- Total
- 3,725
- vs nation
- R+25.8
- Turnout
- 66.5%
Akashiccounty
Red River Parish, LA
Office (updates table and map)
President margin by year
Place winner margin
Boundary by 2024 margin · Precinct returns · VEST · MIT Election Lab
President results by year
2024 turnout 66.5% of 5,699 citizens 18+
BidenDemocratic39.8%1,644TrumpRepublican58.4%2,413OTHO0.8%34
R+18.6- Lead
- 769
- Total
- 4,132
- vs nation
- R+23.1
- Turnout
- 64.9%
ClintonDemocratic43.8%1,938TrumpRepublican54.1%2,391JohnsonLibertarian1.1%47
R+10.2- Lead
- 453
- Total
- 4,422
- vs nation
- R+12.3
- Turnout
- 68.4%
ObamaDemocratic46.9%2,253RomneyRepublican51.7%2,483LibertarianLibertarian0.8%38
R+4.8- Lead
- 230
- Total
- 4,807
- vs nation
- R+8.6
- Turnout
- —
ObamaDemocratic44.9%2,080McCainRepublican53.7%2,484OtherAll other candidates1.4%65
R+8.7- Lead
- 404
- Total
- 4,629
- vs nation
- R+16.0
- Turnout
- —
KerryDemocratic45.4%2,140BushRepublican53.1%2,507OtherAll other candidates1.5%70
R+7.8- Lead
- 367
- Total
- 4,717
- vs nation
- R+5.3
- Turnout
- —
GoreDemocratic48.1%2,177BushRepublican48.7%2,200NaderGreen0.8%35
R+0.5- Lead
- 23
- Total
- 4,522
- vs nation
- R+1.0
- Turnout
- —
ClintonDemocratic61.5%2,641DoleRepublican31.3%1,344PerotReform6.2%268
D+30.2- Lead
- 1,297
- Total
- 4,296
- vs nation
- D+21.7
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+27.3MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 7,4432024 5-year
- Median household income
- $49,1672024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 55.5%2024 5-year
- Black
- 40.3%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 1.9%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+98.6 in 1916MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+74.0 in 1964MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Claiborne Parish, LA · twin score 93.1
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 66.5%3,790 participants ÷ 5,699 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +15.4 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off versus state
- -6.3 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 49.3%–51.1%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 4,485 | 6,558 | 68.4% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 3,195 | 6,477 | 49.3% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 4,193 | 6,457 | 64.9% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 2,883 | 5,824 | 49.5% | C/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 3,790 | 5,699 | 66.5% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 154/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
18 precincts · 3,725 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -0001-10001-1 | 31 | 361 | 2 | 394 | 7.9% | 91.6% | R+83.8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -0002-30002-3 | 5 | 358 | 2 | 365 | 1.4% | 98.1% | R+96.7 |
| Precinct -0002-10002-1 | 33 | 284 | 4 | 321 | 10.3% | 88.5% | R+78.2 |
| Precinct -0005-20005-2 | 227 | 72 | 16 | 315 | 72.1% | 22.9% | D+49.2 |
| Precinct -0003-10003-1 | 33 | 217 | 4 | 254 | 13.0% | 85.4% | R+72.4 |
| Precinct -0007-30007-3 | 125 | 118 | 5 | 248 | 50.4% | 47.6% | D+2.8 |
| Precinct -0001-20001-2 | 12 | 218 | 0 | 230 | 5.2% | 94.8% | R+89.6 |
| Precinct -0003-20003-2 | 15 | 183 | 2 | 200 | 7.5% | 91.5% | R+84.0 |
| Precinct -0006-10006-1 | 155 | 30 | 5 | 190 | 81.6% | 15.8% | D+65.8 |
| Precinct -0004-20004-2 | 82 | 102 | 2 | 186 | 44.1% | 54.8% | R+10.8 |
| Precinct -0004-10004-1 | 127 | 50 | 2 | 179 | 70.9% | 27.9% | D+43.0 |
| Precinct -0004-30004-3 | 143 | 27 | 5 | 175 | 81.7% | 15.4% | D+66.3 |
| Precinct -0006-20006-2 | 149 | 18 | 7 | 174 | 85.6% | 10.3% | D+75.3 |
| Precinct -0003-30003-3 | 26 | 118 | 0 | 144 | 18.1% | 81.9% | R+63.9 |
| Precinct -0005-10005-1 | 77 | 35 | 7 | 119 | 64.7% | 29.4% | D+35.3 |
| Precinct -0007-20007-2 | 27 | 77 | 0 | 104 | 26.0% | 74.0% | R+48.1 |
| Precinct -0007-10007-1 | 29 | 60 | 4 | 93 | 31.2% | 64.5% | R+33.3 |
| Precinct -0004-50004-5 | 24 | 8 | 2 | 34 | 70.6% | 23.5% | D+47.1 |
presidential history
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +48.7% |
| 1896 | +93.4% |
| 1900 | +97.4% |
| 1904 | +91.6% |
| 1908 | +81.9% |
| 1912 | +75.3% |
| 1916 | +98.6% |
| 1920 | +60.8% |
| 1924 | +84.2% |
| 1928 | +47.1% |
| 1932 | +96.9% |
| 1936 | +85.1% |
| 1940 | +78.2% |
| 1944 | +40.9% |
| 1948 | +16.1% |
| 1952 | +40.4% |
| 1956 | +7.9% |
| 1960 | −1.5% |
| 1964 | −74.0% |
| 1968 | +14.2% |
| 1972 | −37.8% |
| 1976 | +4.8% |
| 1980 | +12.6% |
| 1984 | −21.7% |
| 1988 | −0.3% |
| 1992 | +15.2% |
| 1996 | +30.2% |
| 2000 | −0.5% |
| 2004 | −7.8% |
| 2008 | −8.7% |
| 2012 | −4.8% |
| 2016 | −10.2% |
| 2020 | −18.6% |
| 2024 | −27.3% |
DemocraticRepublican
Federal and statewide elections · 1 House · 35 Senate · 2 Senate special · 5 governor
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | R | 39.1%1,110 | 60.9%1,731 | 2,841 |
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
voter registration
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Party registration · 2024D+12.1
Presidential vote · 2024R+27.3
Red River Parish, LA registers Democratic but votes Republican — a 39-point gap between how voters register and how they vote, the signature of ancestral registration that trails realignment.
5,622 registered voters · 2024
domestic migration
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−69 net domestic migration · 2025
20112025
Net −1,111 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $44,808 in average income, against $89,140 for residents who stayed — 50% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+11.7 on average — 16 points more Democratic-leaning than Red River Parish, LA itself (R+27.3).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Natchitoches Parish, LA37R+22.3
- Caddo Parish, LA24D+4.6
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Natchitoches Parish, LA51
- Caddo Parish, LA31
- Bossier Parish, LA22
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −61 |
| 2012 | −56 |
| 2013 | −134 |
| 2014 | −225 |
| 2015 | −57 |
| 2016 | −93 |
| 2017 | −102 |
| 2018 | −11 |
| 2019 | −79 |
| 2021 | −36 |
| 2022 | +3 |
| 2023 | −77 |
| 2024 | −114 |
| 2025 | −69 |
Red River Parish sits along its namesake waterway in northwest Louisiana, with a population under 10,000 that has trended sharply toward Republican presidential candidates over the past four election cycles, mirroring shifts across rural, majority-Black-plurality parishes in the region.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 98.6 points in 1916 and a Republican high of 74.0 points in 1964. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 8.7 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 27.3 points.
A population of 7,443, a 56% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $49,167 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Claiborne Parish and Jasper County.
Political twins — counties
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Claiborne Parish
Louisiana
93.1twin score
% Blackelasticity2016 margin≠ American ancestry
Jasper County
Mississippi
92.1twin score
% Blackmedian income2000 margin≠ American ancestry
Wilkinson County
Georgia
91.6twin score
% Blackelasticity2000–2016 trajectory≠ American ancestry
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Cite this page
All citations released under CC BY 4.0. Attribution: Akashic Intelligence.
Red River Parish, Louisiana. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/22081/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.
License: CC BY 4.0
Embed this page
A live widget for your site — no API key, attribution built in, CC BY 4.0. All widgets & sizes →
Louisiana at the ballot boxAll elections →
Frequently asked questions
How did Red River Parish, Louisiana vote in 2024?
In 2024, Red River Parish, Louisiana voted Republican by 27.3 points (R+27.3), carried by the Republican candidate. Out of 3,725 votes cast, 1,321 went Democratic and 2,337 went Republican.
When did Red River Parish, Louisiana last vote Democratic?
The most recent presidential election in which Red River Parish, Louisiana voted Democratic was 1996.
How many people live in Red River Parish, Louisiana?
Red River Parish, Louisiana has a population of 7,443 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.
What is the median household income in Red River Parish, Louisiana?
Median household income in Red River Parish, Louisiana is $49,167 — below the national median of $80,734. The Louisiana state median is $60,756.
What is the political history of Red River Parish, Louisiana?
Akashic tracks 38 presidential elections in Red River Parish, Louisiana from 1876 to 2024. Of those, 20 went Democratic and 11 went Republican.