HarrisDemocratic36.3%8,476TrumpRepublican62.3%14,563KennedyNonpartisan0.6%130
R+26.0- Lead
- 6,087
- Total
- 23,369
- vs nation
- R+24.6
- Turnout
- 69.2%
Akashiccounty
Monroe County, WI
Office (updates table and map)
President margin by year
Place winner margin
Boundary by 2024 margin · Precinct returns · VEST · MIT Election Lab
President results by year
2024 turnout 69.2% of 33,909 citizens 18+
BidenDemocratic37.3%8,433TrumpRepublican60.9%13,775JorgensenLibertarian1.2%263
R+23.6- Lead
- 5,342
- Total
- 22,611
- vs nation
- R+28.1
- Turnout
- 66.8%
ClintonDemocratic35.8%7,052TrumpRepublican57.6%11,356JohnsonLibertarian3.6%707
R+21.8- Lead
- 4,304
- Total
- 19,699
- vs nation
- R+23.9
- Turnout
- 59.5%
ObamaDemocratic48.8%9,515RomneyRepublican49.7%9,675GrayIndependent0.7%132
R+0.8- Lead
- 160
- Total
- 19,485
- vs nation
- R+4.7
- Turnout
- —
ObamaDemocratic53.2%10,198McCainRepublican45.2%8,666OtherAll other candidates1.5%288
D+8.0- Lead
- 1,532
- Total
- 19,152
- vs nation
- D+0.7
- Turnout
- —
KerryDemocratic45.9%8,973BushRepublican53.1%10,375OtherAll other candidates1.1%206
R+7.2- Lead
- 1,402
- Total
- 19,554
- vs nation
- R+4.7
- Turnout
- —
GoreDemocratic45.7%7,460BushRepublican50.3%8,217NaderGreen3.0%489
R+4.6- Lead
- 757
- Total
- 16,335
- vs nation
- R+5.2
- Turnout
- —
ClintonDemocratic47.4%6,924DoleRepublican36.3%5,299PerotReform14.3%2,081
D+11.1- Lead
- 1,625
- Total
- 14,600
- vs nation
- D+2.6
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+26.0MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 46,2082024 5-year
- Median household income
- $69,4672024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 88.1%2024 5-year
- Black
- 1.5%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 5.8%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+37.5 in 1932MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+71.3 in 1920MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Chippewa County, WI · twin score 89.3
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 69.2%23,459 participants ÷ 33,909 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +15.5 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off versus state
- -0.1 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 53.7%–56.9%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 19,828 | 33,299 | 59.5% | B/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 16,891 | 33,427 | 50.5% | B/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 22,686 | 33,983 | 66.8% | B/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 17,436 | 34,011 | 51.3% | B/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 23,459 | 33,909 | 69.2% | B/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 292/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 296/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 300/2.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 305/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 310/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
37 precincts · 23,369 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -CITY OF TOMAH WARDS 1-5,6-16,20CITY OF TOMAH WARDS 1-5,6-16,20 | 1,732 | 2,514 | 69 | 4,315 | 40.1% | 58.3% | R+18.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -CITY OF SPARTA WARDS 1-5CITY OF SPARTA WARDS 1-5 | 1,189 | 1,327 | 35 | 2,551 | 46.6% | 52.0% | R+5.4 |
| Precinct -CITY OF SPARTA WARDS 6-14CITY OF SPARTA WARDS 6-14 | 936 | 998 | 33 | 1,967 | 47.6% | 50.7% | R+3.2 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF SPARTA WARDS 1-5TOWN OF SPARTA WARDS 1-5 | 755 | 1,178 | 24 | 1,957 | 38.6% | 60.2% | R+21.6 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF LA GRANGE WARDS 1-2TOWN OF LA GRANGE WARDS 1-2 | 374 | 771 | 14 | 1,159 | 32.3% | 66.5% | R+34.3 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF LITTLE FALLS WARDS 1-2TOWN OF LITTLE FALLS WARDS 1-2 | 298 | 573 | 17 | 888 | 33.6% | 64.5% | R+31.0 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF TOMAH WARDS 1-3TOWN OF TOMAH WARDS 1-3 | 266 | 591 | 10 | 867 | 30.7% | 68.2% | R+37.5 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF ANGELO WARDS 1-2TOWN OF ANGELO WARDS 1-2 | 252 | 565 | 11 | 828 | 30.4% | 68.2% | R+37.8 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF BYRON WARDS 1-2TOWN OF BYRON WARDS 1-2 | 223 | 474 | 9 | 706 | 31.6% | 67.1% | R+35.6 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF LEON WARDS 1-2TOWN OF LEON WARDS 1-2 | 200 | 485 | 10 | 695 | 28.8% | 69.8% | R+41.0 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF CASHTON WARDS 1-2VILLAGE OF CASHTON WARDS 1-2 | 200 | 352 | 7 | 559 | 35.8% | 63.0% | R+27.2 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF ADRIAN WARDS 1-2TOWN OF ADRIAN WARDS 1-2 | 131 | 365 | 5 | 501 | 26.1% | 72.9% | R+46.7 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF LINCOLN WARD 1TOWN OF LINCOLN WARD 1 | 111 | 378 | 10 | 499 | 22.2% | 75.8% | R+53.5 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF PORTLAND WARD 1TOWN OF PORTLAND WARD 1 | 162 | 303 | 11 | 476 | 34.0% | 63.7% | R+29.6 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF GREENFIELD WARDS 1-2TOWN OF GREENFIELD WARDS 1-2 | 115 | 326 | 2 | 443 | 26.0% | 73.6% | R+47.6 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF OAKDALE WARD 1TOWN OF OAKDALE WARD 1 | 107 | 327 | 4 | 438 | 24.4% | 74.7% | R+50.2 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF GLENDALE WARD 1TOWN OF GLENDALE WARD 1 | 114 | 283 | 3 | 400 | 28.5% | 70.8% | R+42.3 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF WELLS WARD 1TOWN OF WELLS WARD 1 | 100 | 226 | 3 | 329 | 30.4% | 68.7% | R+38.3 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF JEFFERSON WARD 1TOWN OF JEFFERSON WARD 1 | 115 | 206 | 7 | 328 | 35.1% | 62.8% | R+27.7 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF WILTON WARD 1TOWN OF WILTON WARD 1 | 95 | 210 | 1 | 306 | 31.0% | 68.6% | R+37.6 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF WELLINGTON WARD 1TOWN OF WELLINGTON WARD 1 | 114 | 181 | 3 | 298 | 38.3% | 60.7% | R+22.5 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF GRANT WARD 1TOWN OF GRANT WARD 1 | 61 | 222 | 7 | 290 | 21.0% | 76.6% | R+55.5 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF RIDGEVILLE WARD 1TOWN OF RIDGEVILLE WARD 1 | 101 | 179 | 8 | 288 | 35.1% | 62.2% | R+27.1 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF SHELDON WARDS 1-2TOWN OF SHELDON WARDS 1-2 | 60 | 223 | 4 | 287 | 20.9% | 77.7% | R+56.8 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF WARRENS WARD 1VILLAGE OF WARRENS WARD 1 | 85 | 178 | 4 | 267 | 31.8% | 66.7% | R+34.8 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF CLIFTON WARD 1TOWN OF CLIFTON WARD 1 | 88 | 161 | 5 | 254 | 34.6% | 63.4% | R+28.7 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF WILTON WARD 1VILLAGE OF WILTON WARD 1 | 108 | 143 | 0 | 251 | 43.0% | 57.0% | R+13.9 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF KENDALL WARD 1VILLAGE OF KENDALL WARD 1 | 87 | 144 | 5 | 236 | 36.9% | 61.0% | R+24.2 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF LAFAYETTE WARD 1TOWN OF LAFAYETTE WARD 1 | 66 | 151 | 2 | 219 | 30.1% | 68.9% | R+38.8 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF NORWALK WARD 1VILLAGE OF NORWALK WARD 1 | 83 | 132 | 1 | 216 | 38.4% | 61.1% | R+22.7 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF OAKDALE WARD 1VILLAGE OF OAKDALE WARD 1 | 43 | 105 | 4 | 152 | 28.3% | 69.1% | R+40.8 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF NEW LYME WARD 1TOWN OF NEW LYME WARD 1 | 24 | 85 | 1 | 110 | 21.8% | 77.3% | R+55.5 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF LA GRANGE WARDS 3-4TOWN OF LA GRANGE WARDS 3-4 | 22 | 66 | 0 | 88 | 25.0% | 75.0% | R+50.0 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF WYEVILLE WARD 1VILLAGE OF WYEVILLE WARD 1 | 23 | 49 | 1 | 73 | 31.5% | 67.1% | R+35.6 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF SCOTT WARD 1TOWN OF SCOTT WARD 1 | 12 | 41 | 0 | 53 | 22.6% | 77.4% | R+54.7 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF MELVINA WARD 1VILLAGE OF MELVINA WARD 1 | 11 | 41 | 0 | 52 | 21.2% | 78.8% | R+57.7 |
| Precinct -CITY OF TOMAH WARDS 17-19,21CITY OF TOMAH WARDS 17-19,21 | 13 | 10 | 0 | 23 | 56.5% | 43.5% | D+13.0 |
presidential history
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −1.3% |
| 1896 | −21.3% |
| 1900 | −23.8% |
| 1904 | −36.8% |
| 1908 | −20.2% |
| 1912 | +5.0% |
| 1916 | −19.5% |
| 1920 | −71.3% |
| 1924 | −22.4% |
| 1928 | −22.8% |
| 1932 | +37.5% |
| 1936 | +15.0% |
| 1940 | −26.2% |
| 1944 | −28.7% |
| 1948 | −3.6% |
| 1952 | −40.2% |
| 1956 | −26.7% |
| 1960 | −17.9% |
| 1964 | +10.9% |
| 1968 | −24.4% |
| 1972 | −34.8% |
| 1976 | −5.6% |
| 1980 | −10.3% |
| 1984 | −19.2% |
| 1988 | −4.7% |
| 1992 | +1.8% |
| 1996 | +11.1% |
| 2000 | −4.6% |
| 2004 | −7.2% |
| 2008 | +8.0% |
| 2012 | −0.8% |
| 2016 | −21.8% |
| 2020 | −23.6% |
| 2024 | −26.0% |
DemocraticRepublican
Federal and statewide elections · 3 House · 38 Senate · 3 Senate special · 12 governor
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
domestic migration
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−35 net domestic migration · 2025
20112025
Net −691 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $53,245 in average income, against $70,395 for residents who stayed — 24% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+3.6 on average — 22 points more Democratic-leaning than Monroe County, WI itself (R+26.0).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- La Crosse County, WI205D+9.4
- Juneau County, WI121R+32.1
- Vernon County, WI58R+7.8
- Jackson County, WI42R+19.5
- Dane County, WI31D+51.5
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- La Crosse County, WI254
- Juneau County, WI115
- Vernon County, WI66
- Jackson County, WI48
- Dane County, WI44
- Sauk County, WI26
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +38 |
| 2012 | −322 |
| 2013 | −29 |
| 2014 | −189 |
| 2015 | −102 |
| 2016 | −140 |
| 2017 | +71 |
| 2018 | +289 |
| 2019 | −21 |
| 2021 | −151 |
| 2022 | −235 |
| 2023 | +74 |
| 2024 | +61 |
| 2025 | −35 |
Monroe County's economy is anchored by dairy farming and timber, and its largely non-Hispanic white, rural population has shifted toward the Republican column by double digits over the past four presidential elections.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 37.5 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 71.3 points in 1920. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 2.4 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 26.0 points.
A population of 46,208, a 88% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $69,467 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Chippewa County and Richland County.
Political twins — counties
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Chippewa County
Wisconsin
89.3twin score
2008–2012 trajectory12-yr trendNorwegian ancestry≠ Swedish ancestry
Richland County
Wisconsin
89.0twin score
12-yr trendelasticity2004–2008 trajectory≠ median age
Lafayette County
Wisconsin
88.4twin score
elasticity2008–2012 trajectory12-yr trend≠ Irish ancestry
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Cite this page
All citations released under CC BY 4.0. Attribution: Akashic Intelligence.
Monroe County, Wisconsin. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/55081/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.
License: CC BY 4.0
Embed this page
A live widget for your site — no API key, attribution built in, CC BY 4.0. All widgets & sizes →
Wisconsin at the ballot boxAll elections →
Frequently asked questions
How did Monroe County, Wisconsin vote in 2024?
In 2024, Monroe County, Wisconsin voted Republican by 26.0 points (R+26.0), carried by the Republican candidate. Out of 23,369 votes cast, 8,476 went Democratic and 14,563 went Republican.
When did Monroe County, Wisconsin last vote Democratic?
The most recent presidential election in which Monroe County, Wisconsin voted Democratic was 2008.
How many people live in Monroe County, Wisconsin?
Monroe County, Wisconsin has a population of 46,208 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.
What is the median household income in Monroe County, Wisconsin?
Median household income in Monroe County, Wisconsin is $69,467 — below the national median of $80,734. The Wisconsin state median is $77,485.
What is the political history of Monroe County, Wisconsin?
Akashic tracks 38 presidential elections in Monroe County, Wisconsin from 1876 to 2024. Of those, 7 went Democratic and 26 went Republican.