La Crosse-Eau Claire, Wisconsin
Akashic| Donald Trump ✓Republican | 53.2% | 172,709 |
|---|---|---|
| Kamala HarrisDemocratic | 45.3% | 147,116 |
| Robert F. Kennedy Jr.No | 1.6% | 5,037 |
County-level results (14 counties) — table
| County | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|
| Buffalo County, WI | Republican | R+30.2 |
| Chippewa County, WI | Republican | R+22.9 |
| Clark County, WI | Republican | R+38.9 |
| Crawford County, WI | Republican | R+13.8 |
| Eau Claire County, WI | Democratic | D+10.6 |
| Houston County, MN | Republican | R+16.5 |
| Jackson County, WI | Republican | R+19.5 |
| La Crosse County, WI | Democratic | D+9.4 |
| Monroe County, WI | Republican | R+26.0 |
| Pepin County, WI | Republican | R+29.3 |
| Rusk County, WI | Republican | R+38.0 |
| Trempealeau County, WI | Republican | R+21.4 |
| Vernon County, WI | Republican | R+7.8 |
| Winona County, MN | Republican | R+4.9 |
| Year | Won | Democratic | Republican | Other | Margin | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | 45.3%Harris147,116 | 53.2%Trump172,709 | 1.6%Kennedy5,037 | 324,862 | ||
| R | 46.5%Biden143,409 | 51.5%Trump158,817 | 2.0%Jorgensen6,021 | 308,247 | ||
| R | 43.7%Clinton123,701 | 49.2%Trump139,301 | 7.1%Johnson20,076 | 283,078 | ||
| D | 54.1%Obama152,963 | 44.3%Romney125,297 | 1.7%Scattering4,713 | 282,973 | ||
| D | 58.3%Obama165,024 | 40.0%McCain113,268 | 1.8%Nader4,988 | 283,280 | ||
| D | 51.9%Kerry149,338 | 46.9%Bush135,109 | 1.2%Nader3,509 | 287,956 | ||
| D | 48.8%Gore123,489 | 45.6%Bush115,418 | 5.5%Nader13,963 | 252,870 | ||
| D | 48.9%Clinton106,471 | 34.8%Dole75,720 | 16.3%Perot35,510 | 217,701 | ||
| D | 42.6%Clinton107,121 | 33.7%Bush84,794 | 23.7%Perot59,770 | 251,685 | ||
| D | 51.6%Dukakis110,899 | 47.6%Bush102,205 | 0.8%Scattering1,637 | 214,741 | ||
| R | 44.2%Mondale97,353 | 55.1%Reagan121,276 | 0.7%Bergland1,569 | 220,198 | ||
| R | 42.3%Carter96,831 | 49.2%Reagan112,828 | 8.5%Anderson19,482 | 229,141 | ||
| D | 49.2%Carter103,547 | 48.7%Ford102,491 | 2.1%McCarthy4,415 | 210,453 | ||
| R | 40.1%McGovern72,982 | 57.6%Nixon104,930 | 2.3%Schmitz4,264 | 182,176 | ||
| R | 41.0%Humphrey69,405 | 51.4%Nixon87,039 | 7.5%Wallace12,744 | 169,188 | ||
| D | 60.7%Johnson103,062 | 39.1%Goldwater66,449 | 0.1%Hass251 | 169,762 | ||
| R | 45.5%Kennedy82,497 | 54.4%Nixon98,579 | 0.1%Byrd268 | 181,344 | ||
| R | 39.7%Stevenson65,445 | 60.0%Eisenhower99,057 | 0.3%Andrews522 | 165,024 | ||
| R | 35.1%Stevenson61,564 | 64.6%Eisenhower113,400 | 0.3%Hallinan456 | 175,420 | ||
| D | 52.0%Truman74,574 | 46.2%Dewey66,261 | 1.7%Thurmond2,455 | 143,290 | ||
| R | 44.1%Roosevelt66,655 | 55.4%Dewey83,688 | 0.5%Thomas779 | 151,122 | ||
| R | 43.9%Roosevelt74,892 | 55.2%Willkie94,207 | 0.8%Thomas1,447 | 170,546 | ||
| D | 57.2%Roosevelt88,203 | 37.4%Landon57,707 | 5.4%Lemke8,321 | 154,231 | ||
| D | 62.6%Roosevelt84,084 | 35.6%Hoover47,789 | 1.9%Thomas2,501 | 134,374 | ||
| R | 38.0%Smith50,476 | 61.2%Hoover81,259 | 0.9%Thomas1,134 | 132,869 | ||
| O | 6.5%Davis7,558 | 36.7%Coolidge42,844 | 56.8%La Follette66,225 | 116,627 | ||
| R | 14.9%Cox13,972 | 79.7%Harding74,894 | 5.4%Debs5,072 | 93,938 | ||
| R | 41.1%Wilson24,628 | 55.0%Hughes32,972 | 4.0%Benson2,395 | 59,995 | ||
| D | 38.4%Wilson21,785 | 37.4%Taft21,171 | 24.2%Roosevelt13,715 | 56,671 | ||
| R | 34.5%Bryan22,533 | 61.7%Taft40,267 | 3.8%Debs2,458 | 65,258 | ||
| R | 25.7%Parker16,363 | 70.3%Roosevelt44,780 | 4.0%Debs2,522 | 63,665 | ||
| R | 33.0%Bryan21,883 | 64.2%McKinley42,549 | 2.8%Woolley1,852 | 66,284 | ||
| R | 34.0%Bryan23,595 | 63.1%McKinley43,787 | 2.9%Palmer2,037 | 69,419 | ||
| R | 43.1%Cleveland25,504 | 48.4%Harrison28,614 | 8.5%Weaver5,011 | 59,129 |
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −5.3% |
| 1896 | −29.1% |
| 1900 | −31.2% |
| 1904 | −44.6% |
| 1908 | −27.2% |
| 1912 | +1.1% |
| 1916 | −13.9% |
| 1920 | −64.9% |
| 1924 | −30.3% |
| 1928 | −23.2% |
| 1932 | +27.0% |
| 1936 | +19.8% |
| 1940 | −11.3% |
| 1944 | −11.3% |
| 1948 | +5.8% |
| 1952 | −29.5% |
| 1956 | −20.4% |
| 1960 | −8.9% |
| 1964 | +21.6% |
| 1968 | −10.4% |
| 1972 | −17.5% |
| 1976 | +0.5% |
| 1980 | −7.0% |
| 1984 | −10.9% |
| 1988 | +4.0% |
| 1992 | +8.9% |
| 1996 | +14.1% |
| 2000 | +3.2% |
| 2004 | +4.9% |
| 2008 | +18.3% |
| 2012 | +9.8% |
| 2016 | −5.5% |
| 2020 | −5.0% |
| 2024 | −7.9% |
Spanning western Wisconsin from the Minnesota border inland, this media market blends mid-size river cities with rural agricultural counties, producing a competitive mix that has tracked closely with statewide margins in recent election cycles.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 27.0 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 64.9 points in 1920. Between 2020 and 2024 the market moved 2.9 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 7.9 points.
A population of 577,696, a 89% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $72,233 describe the market. The market's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Rochester-Mason City-Austin and Cedar Rapids-Waterloo-Iowa City & Dubuque.
The media markets whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
La Crosse-Eau Claire, Wisconsin. Akashic. https://akashic.app/dma/702/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.