- Lead
- 4,618
- Total
- 164,635
- vs nation
- R+1.3
- Turnout
- 70.8%
Gloucester County, NJ
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 70.8% of 234,926 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 3,362
- Total
- 171,658
- vs nation
- R+2.5
- Turnout
- 78.9%
- Lead
- 674
- Total
- 141,254
- vs nation
- R+2.6
- Turnout
- 65.2%
- Lead
- 14,557
- Total
- 135,570
- vs nation
- D+6.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 16,952
- Total
- 139,430
- vs nation
- D+4.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 6,802
- Total
- 127,964
- vs nation
- D+7.8
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 18,780
- Total
- 107,298
- vs nation
- D+17.0
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 19,799
- Total
- 100,495
- vs nation
- D+11.2
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+2.8MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 306,9542024 5-year
- Median household income
- $105,1152024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 74.3%2024 5-year
- Black
- 10.2%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 8.3%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+25.9 in 1964MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+58.9 in 1928MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Bucks County, PA · twin score 92.9
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 70.8%166,287 participants ÷ 234,926 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +34.9 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off versus state
- +2.2 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 35.9%–47.0%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 142,617 | 218,633 | 65.2% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 116,022 | 221,039 | 52.5% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 175,782 | 222,747 | 78.9% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 102,192 | 232,246 | 44.0% | A/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 166,287 | 234,926 | 70.8% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
229 precincts · 164,635 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -Woolwich District 1Woolwich District 1 | 492 | 483 | 13 | 988 | 49.8% | 48.9% | D+0.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Woolwich District 6Woolwich District 6 | 492 | 482 | 13 | 987 | 49.8% | 48.8% | D+1.0 |
| Precinct -Woolwich District 7Woolwich District 7 | 492 | 482 | 13 | 987 | 49.8% | 48.8% | D+1.0 |
| Precinct -Woolwich District 2Woolwich District 2 | 492 | 482 | 12 | 986 | 49.9% | 48.9% | D+1.0 |
| Precinct -Woolwich District 3Woolwich District 3 | 492 | 482 | 12 | 986 | 49.9% | 48.9% | D+1.0 |
| Precinct -Woolwich District 4Woolwich District 4 | 492 | 482 | 12 | 986 | 49.9% | 48.9% | D+1.0 |
| Precinct -Woolwich District 5Woolwich District 5 | 492 | 482 | 12 | 986 | 49.9% | 48.9% | D+1.0 |
| Precinct -Woolwich District 8Woolwich District 8 | 492 | 482 | 12 | 986 | 49.9% | 48.9% | D+1.0 |
| Precinct -Newfield District 1Newfield District 1 | 368 | 560 | 22 | 950 | 38.7% | 58.9% | R+20.2 |
| Precinct -Harrison District 5Harrison District 5 | 387 | 498 | 15 | 900 | 43.0% | 55.3% | R+12.3 |
| Precinct -Harrison District 6Harrison District 6 | 387 | 497 | 15 | 899 | 43.0% | 55.3% | R+12.2 |
| Precinct -Harrison District 7Harrison District 7 | 387 | 497 | 15 | 899 | 43.0% | 55.3% | R+12.2 |
| Precinct -Harrison District 9Harrison District 9 | 387 | 497 | 15 | 899 | 43.0% | 55.3% | R+12.2 |
| Precinct -Harrison District 8Harrison District 8 | 386 | 497 | 15 | 898 | 43.0% | 55.3% | R+12.4 |
| Precinct -Harrison District 1Harrison District 1 | 386 | 497 | 14 | 897 | 43.0% | 55.4% | R+12.4 |
| Precinct -Harrison District 2Harrison District 2 | 386 | 497 | 14 | 897 | 43.0% | 55.4% | R+12.4 |
| Precinct -Harrison District 3Harrison District 3 | 386 | 497 | 14 | 897 | 43.0% | 55.4% | R+12.4 |
| Precinct -Harrison District 4Harrison District 4 | 386 | 497 | 14 | 897 | 43.0% | 55.4% | R+12.4 |
| Precinct -East Greenwich District 2East Greenwich District 2 | 393 | 468 | 12 | 873 | 45.0% | 53.6% | R+8.6 |
| Precinct -East Greenwich District 5East Greenwich District 5 | 393 | 468 | 12 | 873 | 45.0% | 53.6% | R+8.6 |
| Precinct -East Greenwich District 6East Greenwich District 6 | 393 | 468 | 12 | 873 | 45.0% | 53.6% | R+8.6 |
| Precinct -East Greenwich District 1East Greenwich District 1 | 392 | 467 | 12 | 871 | 45.0% | 53.6% | R+8.6 |
| Precinct -East Greenwich District 3East Greenwich District 3 | 392 | 467 | 12 | 871 | 45.0% | 53.6% | R+8.6 |
| Precinct -East Greenwich District 4East Greenwich District 4 | 392 | 467 | 12 | 871 | 45.0% | 53.6% | R+8.6 |
| Precinct -East Greenwich District 8East Greenwich District 8 | 392 | 467 | 12 | 871 | 45.0% | 53.6% | R+8.6 |
| Precinct -East Greenwich District 7East Greenwich District 7 | 392 | 467 | 11 | 870 | 45.1% | 53.7% | R+8.6 |
| Precinct -Franklin District 5Franklin District 5 | 292 | 546 | 13 | 851 | 34.3% | 64.2% | R+29.8 |
| Precinct -Franklin District 11Franklin District 11 | 291 | 546 | 13 | 850 | 34.2% | 64.2% | R+30.0 |
| Precinct -Franklin District 7Franklin District 7 | 291 | 546 | 13 | 850 | 34.2% | 64.2% | R+30.0 |
| Precinct -Franklin District 9Franklin District 9 | 291 | 546 | 13 | 850 | 34.2% | 64.2% | R+30.0 |
| Precinct -Franklin District 1Franklin District 1 | 291 | 545 | 13 | 849 | 34.3% | 64.2% | R+29.9 |
| Precinct -Franklin District 10Franklin District 10 | 291 | 545 | 13 | 849 | 34.3% | 64.2% | R+29.9 |
| Precinct -Franklin District 2Franklin District 2 | 291 | 545 | 13 | 849 | 34.3% | 64.2% | R+29.9 |
| Precinct -Franklin District 4Franklin District 4 | 291 | 545 | 13 | 849 | 34.3% | 64.2% | R+29.9 |
| Precinct -Franklin District 8Franklin District 8 | 291 | 545 | 13 | 849 | 34.3% | 64.2% | R+29.9 |
| Precinct -Franklin District 3Franklin District 3 | 291 | 545 | 12 | 848 | 34.3% | 64.3% | R+30.0 |
| Precinct -Franklin District 6Franklin District 6 | 291 | 545 | 12 | 848 | 34.3% | 64.3% | R+30.0 |
| Precinct -Logan District 1Logan District 1 | 420 | 399 | 16 | 835 | 50.3% | 47.8% | D+2.5 |
| Precinct -Logan District 4Logan District 4 | 420 | 399 | 16 | 835 | 50.3% | 47.8% | D+2.5 |
| Precinct -Logan District 2Logan District 2 | 420 | 398 | 16 | 834 | 50.4% | 47.7% | D+2.6 |
| Precinct -Logan District 3Logan District 3 | 420 | 398 | 16 | 834 | 50.4% | 47.7% | D+2.6 |
| Precinct -Monroe Ward 2 District 1Monroe Ward 2 District 1 | 385 | 405 | 12 | 802 | 48.0% | 50.5% | R+2.5 |
| Precinct -Monroe Ward 2 District 10Monroe Ward 2 District 10 | 385 | 405 | 12 | 802 | 48.0% | 50.5% | R+2.5 |
| Precinct -Monroe Ward 1 District 17Monroe Ward 1 District 17 | 384 | 405 | 12 | 801 | 47.9% | 50.6% | R+2.6 |
| Precinct -Monroe Ward 1 District 22Monroe Ward 1 District 22 | 384 | 405 | 12 | 801 | 47.9% | 50.6% | R+2.6 |
| Precinct -Monroe Ward 1 District 23Monroe Ward 1 District 23 | 384 | 405 | 12 | 801 | 47.9% | 50.6% | R+2.6 |
| Precinct -Monroe Ward 1 District 24Monroe Ward 1 District 24 | 384 | 405 | 12 | 801 | 47.9% | 50.6% | R+2.6 |
| Precinct -Monroe Ward 2 District 13Monroe Ward 2 District 13 | 384 | 405 | 12 | 801 | 47.9% | 50.6% | R+2.6 |
| Precinct -Monroe Ward 2 District 14Monroe Ward 2 District 14 | 384 | 405 | 12 | 801 | 47.9% | 50.6% | R+2.6 |
| Precinct -Monroe Ward 2 District 16Monroe Ward 2 District 16 | 384 | 405 | 12 | 801 | 47.9% | 50.6% | R+2.6 |
| Precinct -Monroe Ward 2 District 9Monroe Ward 2 District 9 | 384 | 405 | 12 | 801 | 47.9% | 50.6% | R+2.6 |
| Precinct -Monroe Ward 3 District 18Monroe Ward 3 District 18 | 384 | 405 | 12 | 801 | 47.9% | 50.6% | R+2.6 |
| Precinct -Monroe Ward 3 District 19Monroe Ward 3 District 19 | 384 | 405 | 12 | 801 | 47.9% | 50.6% | R+2.6 |
| Precinct -Monroe Ward 3 District 2Monroe Ward 3 District 2 | 384 | 405 | 12 | 801 | 47.9% | 50.6% | R+2.6 |
| Precinct -Monroe Ward 3 District 26Monroe Ward 3 District 26 | 384 | 405 | 12 | 801 | 47.9% | 50.6% | R+2.6 |
| Precinct -Monroe Ward 3 District 6Monroe Ward 3 District 6 | 384 | 405 | 12 | 801 | 47.9% | 50.6% | R+2.6 |
| Precinct -Monroe Ward 4 District 11Monroe Ward 4 District 11 | 384 | 405 | 12 | 801 | 47.9% | 50.6% | R+2.6 |
| Precinct -Monroe Ward 4 District 21Monroe Ward 4 District 21 | 384 | 405 | 12 | 801 | 47.9% | 50.6% | R+2.6 |
| Precinct -Monroe Ward 4 District 25Monroe Ward 4 District 25 | 384 | 405 | 12 | 801 | 47.9% | 50.6% | R+2.6 |
| Precinct -Monroe Ward 4 District 3Monroe Ward 4 District 3 | 384 | 405 | 12 | 801 | 47.9% | 50.6% | R+2.6 |
| Precinct -Monroe Ward 4 District 5Monroe Ward 4 District 5 | 384 | 405 | 12 | 801 | 47.9% | 50.6% | R+2.6 |
| Precinct -Monroe Ward 4 District 8Monroe Ward 4 District 8 | 384 | 405 | 12 | 801 | 47.9% | 50.6% | R+2.6 |
| Precinct -Monroe Ward 2 District 20Monroe Ward 2 District 20 | 384 | 405 | 11 | 800 | 48.0% | 50.6% | R+2.6 |
| Precinct -Monroe Ward 4 District 4Monroe Ward 4 District 4 | 384 | 405 | 11 | 800 | 48.0% | 50.6% | R+2.6 |
| Precinct -Monroe Ward 1 District 7Monroe Ward 1 District 7 | 384 | 404 | 11 | 799 | 48.1% | 50.6% | R+2.5 |
| Precinct -Monroe Ward 3 District 12Monroe Ward 3 District 12 | 384 | 404 | 11 | 799 | 48.1% | 50.6% | R+2.5 |
| Precinct -Monroe Ward 4 District 15Monroe Ward 4 District 15 | 384 | 404 | 11 | 799 | 48.1% | 50.6% | R+2.5 |
| Precinct -Mantua District 8Mantua District 8 | 343 | 429 | 14 | 786 | 43.6% | 54.6% | R+10.9 |
| Precinct -Mantua District 1Mantua District 1 | 343 | 428 | 13 | 784 | 43.8% | 54.6% | R+10.8 |
| Precinct -Mantua District 10Mantua District 10 | 343 | 428 | 13 | 784 | 43.8% | 54.6% | R+10.8 |
| Precinct -Mantua District 12Mantua District 12 | 343 | 428 | 13 | 784 | 43.8% | 54.6% | R+10.8 |
| Precinct -Mantua District 4Mantua District 4 | 343 | 428 | 13 | 784 | 43.8% | 54.6% | R+10.8 |
| Precinct -Mantua District 5Mantua District 5 | 343 | 428 | 13 | 784 | 43.8% | 54.6% | R+10.8 |
| Precinct -Mantua District 6Mantua District 6 | 343 | 428 | 13 | 784 | 43.8% | 54.6% | R+10.8 |
| Precinct -Mantua District 7Mantua District 7 | 343 | 428 | 13 | 784 | 43.8% | 54.6% | R+10.8 |
| Precinct -Mantua District 9Mantua District 9 | 343 | 428 | 13 | 784 | 43.8% | 54.6% | R+10.8 |
| Precinct -Mantua District 11Mantua District 11 | 342 | 428 | 13 | 783 | 43.7% | 54.7% | R+11.0 |
| Precinct -Mantua District 2Mantua District 2 | 342 | 428 | 13 | 783 | 43.7% | 54.7% | R+11.0 |
| Precinct -Mantua District 3Mantua District 3 | 342 | 428 | 13 | 783 | 43.7% | 54.7% | R+11.0 |
| Precinct -Deptford District 12Deptford District 12 | 395 | 351 | 14 | 760 | 52.0% | 46.2% | D+5.8 |
| Precinct -Deptford District 13Deptford District 13 | 395 | 351 | 14 | 760 | 52.0% | 46.2% | D+5.8 |
| Precinct -Deptford District 14Deptford District 14 | 395 | 351 | 14 | 760 | 52.0% | 46.2% | D+5.8 |
| Precinct -Deptford District 16Deptford District 16 | 395 | 351 | 14 | 760 | 52.0% | 46.2% | D+5.8 |
| Precinct -Deptford District 18Deptford District 18 | 395 | 351 | 14 | 760 | 52.0% | 46.2% | D+5.8 |
| Precinct -Deptford District 21Deptford District 21 | 395 | 351 | 14 | 760 | 52.0% | 46.2% | D+5.8 |
| Precinct -Deptford District 7Deptford District 7 | 395 | 351 | 14 | 760 | 52.0% | 46.2% | D+5.8 |
| Precinct -Deptford District 11Deptford District 11 | 395 | 351 | 13 | 759 | 52.0% | 46.2% | D+5.8 |
| Precinct -Deptford District 15Deptford District 15 | 395 | 351 | 13 | 759 | 52.0% | 46.2% | D+5.8 |
| Precinct -Deptford District 20Deptford District 20 | 395 | 351 | 13 | 759 | 52.0% | 46.2% | D+5.8 |
| Precinct -Deptford District 22Deptford District 22 | 395 | 351 | 13 | 759 | 52.0% | 46.2% | D+5.8 |
| Precinct -Deptford District 6Deptford District 6 | 395 | 351 | 13 | 759 | 52.0% | 46.2% | D+5.8 |
| Precinct -Deptford District 8Deptford District 8 | 395 | 351 | 13 | 759 | 52.0% | 46.2% | D+5.8 |
| Precinct -Deptford District 1Deptford District 1 | 394 | 351 | 13 | 758 | 52.0% | 46.3% | D+5.7 |
| Precinct -Deptford District 10Deptford District 10 | 394 | 351 | 13 | 758 | 52.0% | 46.3% | D+5.7 |
| Precinct -Deptford District 17Deptford District 17 | 394 | 351 | 13 | 758 | 52.0% | 46.3% | D+5.7 |
| Precinct -Deptford District 19Deptford District 19 | 394 | 351 | 13 | 758 | 52.0% | 46.3% | D+5.7 |
| Precinct -Deptford District 3Deptford District 3 | 394 | 351 | 13 | 758 | 52.0% | 46.3% | D+5.7 |
| Precinct -Deptford District 4Deptford District 4 | 394 | 351 | 13 | 758 | 52.0% | 46.3% | D+5.7 |
| Precinct -Deptford District 5Deptford District 5 | 394 | 351 | 13 | 758 | 52.0% | 46.3% | D+5.7 |
| Precinct -Deptford District 9Deptford District 9 | 394 | 351 | 13 | 758 | 52.0% | 46.3% | D+5.7 |
| Precinct -Pitman District 4Pitman District 4 | 396 | 344 | 18 | 758 | 52.2% | 45.4% | D+6.9 |
| Precinct -Deptford District 2Deptford District 2 | 394 | 350 | 13 | 757 | 52.0% | 46.2% | D+5.8 |
| Precinct -Pitman District 1Pitman District 1 | 396 | 344 | 17 | 757 | 52.3% | 45.4% | D+6.9 |
| Precinct -Pitman District 3Pitman District 3 | 396 | 344 | 17 | 757 | 52.3% | 45.4% | D+6.9 |
| Precinct -Pitman District 5Pitman District 5 | 396 | 344 | 17 | 757 | 52.3% | 45.4% | D+6.9 |
| Precinct -Pitman District 7Pitman District 7 | 396 | 344 | 17 | 757 | 52.3% | 45.4% | D+6.9 |
| Precinct -Pitman District 6Pitman District 6 | 396 | 344 | 16 | 756 | 52.4% | 45.5% | D+6.9 |
| Precinct -Pitman District 2Pitman District 2 | 395 | 344 | 16 | 755 | 52.3% | 45.6% | D+6.8 |
| Precinct -Clayton District 2Clayton District 2 | 395 | 338 | 14 | 747 | 52.9% | 45.2% | D+7.6 |
| Precinct -Clayton District 6Clayton District 6 | 395 | 338 | 14 | 747 | 52.9% | 45.2% | D+7.6 |
| Precinct -Clayton District 4Clayton District 4 | 395 | 337 | 14 | 746 | 52.9% | 45.2% | D+7.8 |
| Precinct -Clayton District 5Clayton District 5 | 395 | 337 | 14 | 746 | 52.9% | 45.2% | D+7.8 |
| Precinct -Clayton District 3Clayton District 3 | 395 | 337 | 13 | 745 | 53.0% | 45.2% | D+7.8 |
| Precinct -Clayton District 1Clayton District 1 | 394 | 337 | 13 | 744 | 53.0% | 45.3% | D+7.7 |
| Precinct -Washington District 1Washington District 1 | 328 | 402 | 10 | 740 | 44.3% | 54.3% | R+10.0 |
| Precinct -Washington District 16Washington District 16 | 328 | 402 | 10 | 740 | 44.3% | 54.3% | R+10.0 |
| Precinct -Washington District 29Washington District 29 | 328 | 402 | 10 | 740 | 44.3% | 54.3% | R+10.0 |
| Precinct -Washington District 3Washington District 3 | 328 | 402 | 10 | 740 | 44.3% | 54.3% | R+10.0 |
| Precinct -Washington District 31Washington District 31 | 328 | 402 | 10 | 740 | 44.3% | 54.3% | R+10.0 |
| Precinct -Washington District 32Washington District 32 | 328 | 402 | 10 | 740 | 44.3% | 54.3% | R+10.0 |
| Precinct -Washington District 37Washington District 37 | 328 | 402 | 10 | 740 | 44.3% | 54.3% | R+10.0 |
| Precinct -Washington District 39Washington District 39 | 328 | 402 | 10 | 740 | 44.3% | 54.3% | R+10.0 |
| Precinct -Washington District 4Washington District 4 | 328 | 402 | 10 | 740 | 44.3% | 54.3% | R+10.0 |
| Precinct -Washington District 9Washington District 9 | 328 | 402 | 10 | 740 | 44.3% | 54.3% | R+10.0 |
| Precinct -Washington District 13Washington District 13 | 327 | 402 | 10 | 739 | 44.2% | 54.4% | R+10.1 |
| Precinct -Washington District 14Washington District 14 | 327 | 402 | 10 | 739 | 44.2% | 54.4% | R+10.1 |
| Precinct -Washington District 21Washington District 21 | 327 | 402 | 10 | 739 | 44.2% | 54.4% | R+10.1 |
| Precinct -Washington District 24Washington District 24 | 327 | 402 | 10 | 739 | 44.2% | 54.4% | R+10.1 |
| Precinct -Washington District 25Washington District 25 | 327 | 402 | 10 | 739 | 44.2% | 54.4% | R+10.1 |
| Precinct -Washington District 27Washington District 27 | 327 | 402 | 10 | 739 | 44.2% | 54.4% | R+10.1 |
| Precinct -Washington District 5Washington District 5 | 327 | 402 | 10 | 739 | 44.2% | 54.4% | R+10.1 |
| Precinct -Washington District 6Washington District 6 | 327 | 402 | 10 | 739 | 44.2% | 54.4% | R+10.1 |
| Precinct -Washington District 7Washington District 7 | 327 | 402 | 10 | 739 | 44.2% | 54.4% | R+10.1 |
| Precinct -Washington District 8Washington District 8 | 327 | 402 | 10 | 739 | 44.2% | 54.4% | R+10.1 |
| Precinct -Washington District 19Washington District 19 | 327 | 402 | 9 | 738 | 44.3% | 54.5% | R+10.2 |
| Precinct -Washington District 20Washington District 20 | 327 | 402 | 9 | 738 | 44.3% | 54.5% | R+10.2 |
| Precinct -Washington District 35Washington District 35 | 327 | 402 | 9 | 738 | 44.3% | 54.5% | R+10.2 |
| Precinct -Washington District 10Washington District 10 | 326 | 402 | 9 | 737 | 44.2% | 54.5% | R+10.3 |
| Precinct -Washington District 11Washington District 11 | 326 | 402 | 9 | 737 | 44.2% | 54.5% | R+10.3 |
| Precinct -Washington District 12Washington District 12 | 326 | 402 | 9 | 737 | 44.2% | 54.5% | R+10.3 |
| Precinct -Washington District 15Washington District 15 | 326 | 402 | 9 | 737 | 44.2% | 54.5% | R+10.3 |
| Precinct -Washington District 2Washington District 2 | 326 | 402 | 9 | 737 | 44.2% | 54.5% | R+10.3 |
| Precinct -Washington District 22Washington District 22 | 326 | 402 | 9 | 737 | 44.2% | 54.5% | R+10.3 |
| Precinct -Washington District 23Washington District 23 | 326 | 402 | 9 | 737 | 44.2% | 54.5% | R+10.3 |
| Precinct -Washington District 26Washington District 26 | 326 | 402 | 9 | 737 | 44.2% | 54.5% | R+10.3 |
| Precinct -Washington District 30Washington District 30 | 326 | 402 | 9 | 737 | 44.2% | 54.5% | R+10.3 |
| Precinct -Washington District 33Washington District 33 | 326 | 402 | 9 | 737 | 44.2% | 54.5% | R+10.3 |
| Precinct -Washington District 34Washington District 34 | 326 | 402 | 9 | 737 | 44.2% | 54.5% | R+10.3 |
| Precinct -Washington District 38Washington District 38 | 326 | 402 | 9 | 737 | 44.2% | 54.5% | R+10.3 |
| Precinct -Washington District 17Washington District 17 | 326 | 401 | 9 | 736 | 44.3% | 54.5% | R+10.2 |
| Precinct -Washington District 18Washington District 18 | 326 | 401 | 9 | 736 | 44.3% | 54.5% | R+10.2 |
| Precinct -Washington District 28Washington District 28 | 326 | 401 | 9 | 736 | 44.3% | 54.5% | R+10.2 |
| Precinct -Washington District 36Washington District 36 | 326 | 401 | 9 | 736 | 44.3% | 54.5% | R+10.2 |
| Precinct -South Harrison District 1South Harrison District 1 | 259 | 426 | 8 | 693 | 37.4% | 61.5% | R+24.1 |
| Precinct -South Harrison District 2South Harrison District 2 | 259 | 426 | 7 | 692 | 37.4% | 61.6% | R+24.1 |
| Precinct -South Harrison District 3South Harrison District 3 | 258 | 426 | 7 | 691 | 37.3% | 61.6% | R+24.3 |
| Precinct -Westville District 3Westville District 3 | 323 | 326 | 15 | 664 | 48.6% | 49.1% | R+0.5 |
| Precinct -Westville District 1Westville District 1 | 323 | 325 | 14 | 662 | 48.8% | 49.1% | R+0.3 |
| Precinct -Westville District 2Westville District 2 | 322 | 325 | 14 | 661 | 48.7% | 49.2% | R+0.5 |
| Precinct -Elk District 3Elk District 3 | 253 | 377 | 11 | 641 | 39.5% | 58.8% | R+19.3 |
| Precinct -Elk District 4Elk District 4 | 253 | 377 | 11 | 641 | 39.5% | 58.8% | R+19.3 |
| Precinct -Elk District 1Elk District 1 | 252 | 376 | 11 | 639 | 39.4% | 58.8% | R+19.4 |
| Precinct -Elk District 2Elk District 2 | 252 | 376 | 11 | 639 | 39.4% | 58.8% | R+19.4 |
| Precinct -West Deptford District 15West Deptford District 15 | 320 | 309 | 10 | 639 | 50.1% | 48.4% | D+1.7 |
| Precinct -West Deptford District 16West Deptford District 16 | 320 | 309 | 10 | 639 | 50.1% | 48.4% | D+1.7 |
| Precinct -West Deptford District 18West Deptford District 18 | 320 | 309 | 10 | 639 | 50.1% | 48.4% | D+1.7 |
| Precinct -West Deptford District 19West Deptford District 19 | 320 | 309 | 10 | 639 | 50.1% | 48.4% | D+1.7 |
| Precinct -West Deptford District 4West Deptford District 4 | 320 | 309 | 10 | 639 | 50.1% | 48.4% | D+1.7 |
| Precinct -West Deptford District 7West Deptford District 7 | 320 | 309 | 10 | 639 | 50.1% | 48.4% | D+1.7 |
| Precinct -West Deptford District 17West Deptford District 17 | 319 | 309 | 10 | 638 | 50.0% | 48.4% | D+1.6 |
| Precinct -West Deptford District 5West Deptford District 5 | 319 | 309 | 10 | 638 | 50.0% | 48.4% | D+1.6 |
| Precinct -West Deptford District 1West Deptford District 1 | 319 | 309 | 9 | 637 | 50.1% | 48.5% | D+1.6 |
| Precinct -West Deptford District 10West Deptford District 10 | 319 | 309 | 9 | 637 | 50.1% | 48.5% | D+1.6 |
| Precinct -West Deptford District 11West Deptford District 11 | 319 | 309 | 9 | 637 | 50.1% | 48.5% | D+1.6 |
| Precinct -West Deptford District 12West Deptford District 12 | 319 | 309 | 9 | 637 | 50.1% | 48.5% | D+1.6 |
| Precinct -West Deptford District 13West Deptford District 13 | 319 | 309 | 9 | 637 | 50.1% | 48.5% | D+1.6 |
| Precinct -West Deptford District 14West Deptford District 14 | 319 | 309 | 9 | 637 | 50.1% | 48.5% | D+1.6 |
| Precinct -West Deptford District 2West Deptford District 2 | 319 | 309 | 9 | 637 | 50.1% | 48.5% | D+1.6 |
| Precinct -West Deptford District 3West Deptford District 3 | 319 | 309 | 9 | 637 | 50.1% | 48.5% | D+1.6 |
| Precinct -West Deptford District 6West Deptford District 6 | 319 | 309 | 9 | 637 | 50.1% | 48.5% | D+1.6 |
| Precinct -West Deptford District 8West Deptford District 8 | 319 | 309 | 9 | 637 | 50.1% | 48.5% | D+1.6 |
| Precinct -West Deptford District 9West Deptford District 9 | 319 | 309 | 9 | 637 | 50.1% | 48.5% | D+1.6 |
| Precinct -Glassboro District 1Glassboro District 1 | 358 | 258 | 12 | 628 | 57.0% | 41.1% | D+15.9 |
| Precinct -Glassboro District 11Glassboro District 11 | 358 | 258 | 12 | 628 | 57.0% | 41.1% | D+15.9 |
| Precinct -Glassboro District 12Glassboro District 12 | 358 | 258 | 12 | 628 | 57.0% | 41.1% | D+15.9 |
| Precinct -Glassboro District 13Glassboro District 13 | 358 | 258 | 12 | 628 | 57.0% | 41.1% | D+15.9 |
| Precinct -Glassboro District 2Glassboro District 2 | 358 | 258 | 12 | 628 | 57.0% | 41.1% | D+15.9 |
| Precinct -Glassboro District 8Glassboro District 8 | 358 | 258 | 12 | 628 | 57.0% | 41.1% | D+15.9 |
| Precinct -Glassboro District 4Glassboro District 4 | 358 | 258 | 11 | 627 | 57.1% | 41.1% | D+15.9 |
| Precinct -Glassboro District 6Glassboro District 6 | 358 | 258 | 11 | 627 | 57.1% | 41.1% | D+15.9 |
| Precinct -Glassboro District 7Glassboro District 7 | 358 | 258 | 11 | 627 | 57.1% | 41.1% | D+15.9 |
| Precinct -Glassboro District 10Glassboro District 10 | 357 | 258 | 11 | 626 | 57.0% | 41.2% | D+15.8 |
| Precinct -Glassboro District 3Glassboro District 3 | 357 | 258 | 11 | 626 | 57.0% | 41.2% | D+15.8 |
| Precinct -Glassboro District 5Glassboro District 5 | 357 | 258 | 11 | 626 | 57.0% | 41.2% | D+15.8 |
| Precinct -Glassboro District 9Glassboro District 9 | 357 | 257 | 11 | 625 | 57.1% | 41.1% | D+16.0 |
| Precinct -Swedesboro District 2Swedesboro District 2 | 333 | 249 | 17 | 599 | 55.6% | 41.6% | D+14.0 |
| Precinct -Swedesboro District 1Swedesboro District 1 | 332 | 249 | 16 | 597 | 55.6% | 41.7% | D+13.9 |
| Precinct -Wenonah District 1Wenonah District 1 | 310 | 179 | 11 | 500 | 62.0% | 35.8% | D+26.2 |
| Precinct -Wenonah District 3Wenonah District 3 | 310 | 179 | 11 | 500 | 62.0% | 35.8% | D+26.2 |
| Precinct -Wenonah District 2Wenonah District 2 | 310 | 178 | 11 | 499 | 62.1% | 35.7% | D+26.5 |
| Precinct -Greenwich District 5Greenwich District 5 | 199 | 283 | 8 | 490 | 40.6% | 57.8% | R+17.1 |
| Precinct -Greenwich District 1Greenwich District 1 | 199 | 283 | 7 | 489 | 40.7% | 57.9% | R+17.2 |
| Precinct -Greenwich District 4Greenwich District 4 | 198 | 283 | 7 | 488 | 40.6% | 58.0% | R+17.4 |
| Precinct -Greenwich District 2Greenwich District 2 | 198 | 282 | 7 | 487 | 40.7% | 57.9% | R+17.2 |
| Precinct -Greenwich District 3Greenwich District 3 | 198 | 282 | 7 | 487 | 40.7% | 57.9% | R+17.2 |
| Precinct -Greenwich District 6Greenwich District 6 | 198 | 282 | 7 | 487 | 40.7% | 57.9% | R+17.2 |
| Precinct -Woodbury Heights District 1Woodbury Heights District 1 | 235 | 216 | 9 | 460 | 51.1% | 47.0% | D+4.1 |
| Precinct -Woodbury Heights District 4Woodbury Heights District 4 | 235 | 216 | 9 | 460 | 51.1% | 47.0% | D+4.1 |
| Precinct -Woodbury Heights District 2Woodbury Heights District 2 | 235 | 215 | 9 | 459 | 51.2% | 46.8% | D+4.4 |
| Precinct -Woodbury Heights District 3Woodbury Heights District 3 | 234 | 215 | 9 | 458 | 51.1% | 46.9% | D+4.1 |
| Precinct -Paulsboro District 2Paulsboro District 2 | 286 | 157 | 6 | 449 | 63.7% | 35.0% | D+28.7 |
| Precinct -Paulsboro District 4Paulsboro District 4 | 286 | 157 | 6 | 449 | 63.7% | 35.0% | D+28.7 |
| Precinct -Paulsboro District 5Paulsboro District 5 | 286 | 157 | 6 | 449 | 63.7% | 35.0% | D+28.7 |
| Precinct -Woodbury Ward 3 District 2Woodbury Ward 3 District 2 | 297 | 142 | 9 | 448 | 66.3% | 31.7% | D+34.6 |
| Precinct -Paulsboro District 1Paulsboro District 1 | 285 | 157 | 5 | 447 | 63.8% | 35.1% | D+28.6 |
| Precinct -Paulsboro District 3Paulsboro District 3 | 285 | 157 | 5 | 447 | 63.8% | 35.1% | D+28.6 |
| Precinct -Woodbury Ward 2 District 3Woodbury Ward 2 District 3 | 297 | 141 | 9 | 447 | 66.4% | 31.5% | D+34.9 |
| Precinct -Woodbury Ward 3 District 1Woodbury Ward 3 District 1 | 297 | 141 | 8 | 446 | 66.6% | 31.6% | D+35.0 |
| Precinct -Woodbury Ward 3 District 3Woodbury Ward 3 District 3 | 297 | 141 | 8 | 446 | 66.6% | 31.6% | D+35.0 |
| Precinct -Woodbury Ward 3 District 4Woodbury Ward 3 District 4 | 297 | 141 | 8 | 446 | 66.6% | 31.6% | D+35.0 |
| Precinct -Woodbury Ward 1 District 1Woodbury Ward 1 District 1 | 296 | 141 | 8 | 445 | 66.5% | 31.7% | D+34.8 |
| Precinct -Woodbury Ward 1 District 2Woodbury Ward 1 District 2 | 296 | 141 | 8 | 445 | 66.5% | 31.7% | D+34.8 |
| Precinct -Woodbury Ward 1 District 3Woodbury Ward 1 District 3 | 296 | 141 | 8 | 445 | 66.5% | 31.7% | D+34.8 |
| Precinct -Woodbury Ward 2 District 1Woodbury Ward 2 District 1 | 296 | 141 | 8 | 445 | 66.5% | 31.7% | D+34.8 |
| Precinct -Woodbury Ward 2 District 2Woodbury Ward 2 District 2 | 296 | 141 | 8 | 445 | 66.5% | 31.7% | D+34.8 |
| Precinct -National Park District 4National Park District 4 | 163 | 211 | 8 | 382 | 42.7% | 55.2% | R+12.6 |
| Precinct -National Park District 3National Park District 3 | 163 | 210 | 7 | 380 | 42.9% | 55.3% | R+12.4 |
| Precinct -National Park District 1National Park District 1 | 162 | 210 | 7 | 379 | 42.7% | 55.4% | R+12.7 |
| Precinct -National Park District 2National Park District 2 | 162 | 210 | 7 | 379 | 42.7% | 55.4% | R+12.7 |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −2.9% |
| 1896 | −21.8% |
| 1900 | −21.2% |
| 1904 | −24.7% |
| 1908 | −17.1% |
| 1912 | +17.2% |
| 1916 | −16.5% |
| 1920 | −38.9% |
| 1924 | −53.2% |
| 1928 | −58.9% |
| 1932 | −14.8% |
| 1936 | +12.8% |
| 1940 | +6.8% |
| 1944 | +3.1% |
| 1948 | −10.3% |
| 1952 | −10.0% |
| 1956 | −21.0% |
| 1960 | −4.4% |
| 1964 | +25.9% |
| 1968 | −4.6% |
| 1972 | −27.1% |
| 1976 | +5.1% |
| 1980 | −13.3% |
| 1984 | −24.5% |
| 1988 | −18.4% |
| 1992 | +4.9% |
| 1996 | +19.7% |
| 2000 | +17.5% |
| 2004 | +5.3% |
| 2008 | +12.2% |
| 2012 | +10.7% |
| 2016 | −0.5% |
| 2020 | +2.0% |
| 2024 | −2.8% |
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | D | 51.2%86,281 | 48.8%82,271 | 168,552 |
| 2018 | D | 55.3%60,266 | 44.7%48,754 | 109,020 |
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Gloucester County, NJ registers Democratic but votes Republican — a 11-point gap between how voters register and how they vote, the signature of ancestral registration that trails realignment.
231,839 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+957 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +5,632 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $69,509 in average income, against $99,775 for residents who stayed — 30% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+21.6 on average — 24 points more Democratic-leaning than Gloucester County, NJ itself (R+2.8).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Camden County, NJ2,505D+27.4
- Philadelphia County, PA769D+58.8
- Burlington County, NJ563D+16.6
- Cumberland County, NJ340R+3.7
- Atlantic County, NJ313R+3.0
- Salem County, NJ285R+19.2
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Camden County, NJ1,951
- Philadelphia County, PA464
- Burlington County, NJ441
- Salem County, NJ398
- Cumberland County, NJ348
- Atlantic County, NJ281
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −398 |
| 2012 | −795 |
| 2013 | −494 |
| 2014 | +197 |
| 2015 | −399 |
| 2016 | −710 |
| 2017 | −160 |
| 2018 | +239 |
| 2019 | −86 |
| 2021 | +2,267 |
| 2022 | +1,870 |
| 2023 | +1,290 |
| 2024 | +1,854 |
| 2025 | +957 |
Gloucester County sits in Philadelphia's outer orbit, where a mix of working-class townships and newer residential developments has shifted its presidential margins from double-digit Democratic leads to narrow Republican ones over the past decade.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 25.9 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 58.9 points in 1928. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 4.8 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 2.8 points.
A population of 306,954, a 74% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $105,115 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Bucks County and Dutchess County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Gloucester County, New Jersey. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/34015/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.