- Lead
- 2,701
- Total
- 24,003
- vs nation
- D+12.7
- Turnout
- 81.5%
Lincoln County, ME
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 81.5% of 29,836 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 2,428
- Total
- 23,857
- vs nation
- D+5.7
- Turnout
- 84.3%
- Lead
- 514
- Total
- 21,503
- vs nation
- D+0.3
- Turnout
- 80.0%
- Lead
- 2,416
- Total
- 20,757
- vs nation
- D+7.8
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 2,599
- Total
- 21,584
- vs nation
- D+4.8
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 981
- Total
- 22,142
- vs nation
- D+6.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 823
- Total
- 19,671
- vs nation
- R+4.7
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,758
- Total
- 18,173
- vs nation
- D+1.2
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- D+11.3MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 36,0992024 5-year
- Median household income
- $76,8752024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 93.1%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.8%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 1.4%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+31.6 in 1912MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+72.1 in 1956MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Sagadahoc County, ME · twin score 97.6
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 81.5%24,330 participants ÷ 29,836 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +12.5 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off versus state
- -2.2 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 69.1%–70.0%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 22,237 | 27,783 | 80.0% | B/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 19,429 | 28,008 | 69.4% | B/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 23,857 | 28,298 | 84.3% | B/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 21,053 | 29,313 | 71.8% | B/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 24,330 | 29,836 | 81.5% | B/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 292/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 296/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 300/2.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 305/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 310/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
19 precincts · 24,003 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct 151602301515160 | 1,366 | 1,598 | 59 | 3,023 | 45.2% | 52.9% | R+7.7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct 151902301515190 | 1,181 | 1,113 | 61 | 2,355 | 50.1% | 47.3% | D+2.9 |
| Precinct 150202301515020 | 1,252 | 919 | 32 | 2,203 | 56.8% | 41.7% | D+15.1 |
| Precinct 150502301515050 | 1,326 | 807 | 30 | 2,163 | 61.3% | 37.3% | D+24.0 |
| Precinct 150902301515090 | 751 | 972 | 41 | 1,764 | 42.6% | 55.1% | R+12.5 |
| Precinct 150602301515060 | 1,004 | 469 | 23 | 1,496 | 67.1% | 31.4% | D+35.8 |
| Precinct 151802301515180 | 677 | 758 | 43 | 1,478 | 45.8% | 51.3% | R+5.5 |
| Precinct 150302301515030 | 854 | 527 | 17 | 1,398 | 61.1% | 37.7% | D+23.4 |
| Precinct 151102301515110 | 942 | 394 | 34 | 1,370 | 68.8% | 28.8% | D+40.0 |
| Precinct 151202301515120 | 718 | 612 | 19 | 1,349 | 53.2% | 45.4% | D+7.9 |
| Precinct 150702301515070 | 556 | 643 | 21 | 1,220 | 45.6% | 52.7% | R+7.1 |
| Precinct 150802301515080 | 526 | 336 | 15 | 877 | 60.0% | 38.3% | D+21.7 |
| Precinct 151402301515140 | 447 | 251 | 27 | 725 | 61.7% | 34.6% | D+27.0 |
| Precinct 150402301515040 | 399 | 192 | 10 | 601 | 66.4% | 31.9% | D+34.4 |
| Precinct 151702301515170 | 313 | 236 | 11 | 560 | 55.9% | 42.1% | D+13.8 |
| Precinct 150102301515010 | 324 | 192 | 17 | 533 | 60.8% | 36.0% | D+24.8 |
| Precinct 151502301515150 | 299 | 159 | 4 | 462 | 64.7% | 34.4% | D+30.3 |
| Precinct 151302301515130 | 124 | 224 | 14 | 362 | 34.3% | 61.9% | R+27.6 |
| Precinct 151002301515100 | 51 | 7 | 6 | 64 | 79.7% | 10.9% | D+68.8 |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −11.5% |
| 1896 | −35.5% |
| 1900 | −21.5% |
| 1904 | −24.6% |
| 1908 | −16.6% |
| 1912 | +31.6% |
| 1916 | −1.8% |
| 1920 | −48.4% |
| 1924 | −56.8% |
| 1928 | −58.0% |
| 1932 | −28.2% |
| 1936 | −47.0% |
| 1940 | −36.9% |
| 1944 | −40.1% |
| 1948 | −61.9% |
| 1952 | −67.7% |
| 1956 | −72.1% |
| 1960 | −52.8% |
| 1964 | +12.3% |
| 1968 | −24.6% |
| 1972 | −44.6% |
| 1976 | −21.4% |
| 1980 | −18.6% |
| 1984 | −35.7% |
| 1988 | −24.5% |
| 1992 | +1.6% |
| 1996 | +9.7% |
| 2000 | −4.2% |
| 2004 | +4.4% |
| 2008 | +12.0% |
| 2012 | +11.6% |
| 2016 | +2.4% |
| 2020 | +10.2% |
| 2024 | +11.3% |
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | D | 58.1%10,409 | 41.9%7,506 | 17,915 |
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Democratic; the presidential vote runs 7.9 points more Republican.
29,742 registered voters · 2025
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+232 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +3,667 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $82,590 in average income, against $78,645 for residents who stayed — 5% higher. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+15.9 on average — 4.6 points more Democratic-leaning than Lincoln County, ME itself (D+11.3).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Kennebec County, ME133R+2.7
- Cumberland County, ME115D+35.3
- Knox County, ME114D+18.6
- Sagadahoc County, ME79D+16.6
- York County, ME35D+10.5
- Middlesex County, MA33D+39.2
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Kennebec County, ME152
- Cumberland County, ME122
- Knox County, ME95
- Sagadahoc County, ME83
- Androscoggin County, ME24
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −46 |
| 2012 | +13 |
| 2013 | +81 |
| 2014 | +82 |
| 2015 | −101 |
| 2016 | +297 |
| 2017 | +340 |
| 2018 | +296 |
| 2019 | +341 |
| 2021 | +1,009 |
| 2022 | +452 |
| 2023 | +415 |
| 2024 | +256 |
| 2025 | +232 |
Lincoln County hugs Midcoast Maine's peninsula-studded shoreline, drawing seasonal residents and retirees who have tilted the electorate consistently toward Democratic presidential candidates by double-digit margins across recent cycles.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 31.6 points in 1912 and a Republican high of 72.1 points in 1956. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.1 points toward the Democratic candidate; the 2024 margin was 11.3 points.
A population of 36,099, a 93% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $76,875 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Sagadahoc County and Hancock County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Lincoln County, Maine. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/23015/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.