- Lead
- 8,174
- Total
- 15,901
- vs nation
- R+49.9
- Turnout
- 64.3%
Gibson County, IN
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 64.3% of 24,869 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 7,794
- Total
- 16,161
- vs nation
- R+52.7
- Turnout
- 64.4%
- Lead
- 7,359
- Total
- 15,481
- vs nation
- R+49.6
- Turnout
- 62.2%
- Lead
- 4,559
- Total
- 14,721
- vs nation
- R+34.8
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,994
- Total
- 15,095
- vs nation
- R+20.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 3,755
- Total
- 14,614
- vs nation
- R+23.2
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,932
- Total
- 13,772
- vs nation
- R+14.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,096
- Total
- 13,528
- vs nation
- R+0.4
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+51.4MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 33,0002024 5-year
- Median household income
- $67,5732024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 90.1%2024 5-year
- Black
- 1.8%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 2.3%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+28.2 in 1964MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+51.4 in 2024MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Richland County, IL · twin score 89.6
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 64.3%15,980 participants ÷ 24,869 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +22.9 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off versus state
- -2.2 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 41.4%–52.9%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 15,898 | 25,573 | 62.2% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 15,902 | 25,510 | 62.3% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 16,301 | 25,328 | 64.4% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 10,272 | 24,775 | 41.5% | A/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 15,980 | 24,869 | 64.3% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
72 precincts · 15,901 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -JOHNSON 01JOHNSON 01 | 193 | 701 | 20 | 914 | 21.1% | 76.7% | R+55.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -JOHNSON 02JOHNSON 02 | 158 | 720 | 16 | 894 | 17.7% | 80.5% | R+62.9 |
| Precinct -JOHNSON 03JOHNSON 03 | 193 | 676 | 4 | 873 | 22.1% | 77.4% | R+55.3 |
| Precinct -UNION 01UNION 01 | 185 | 583 | 18 | 786 | 23.5% | 74.2% | R+50.6 |
| Precinct -MONTGOMERY 02MONTGOMERY 02 | 133 | 615 | 12 | 760 | 17.5% | 80.9% | R+63.4 |
| Precinct -CENTER 01CENTER 01 | 128 | 562 | 13 | 703 | 18.2% | 79.9% | R+61.7 |
| Precinct -COLUMBIA 05COLUMBIA 05 | 160 | 530 | 7 | 697 | 23.0% | 76.0% | R+53.1 |
| Precinct -MONTGOMERY 01MONTGOMERY 01 | 104 | 575 | 12 | 691 | 15.1% | 83.2% | R+68.2 |
| Precinct -UNION 03UNION 03 | 155 | 441 | 10 | 606 | 25.6% | 72.8% | R+47.2 |
| Precinct -PATOKA 13PATOKA 13 | 108 | 447 | 11 | 566 | 19.1% | 79.0% | R+59.9 |
| Precinct -MONTGOMERY 03MONTGOMERY 03 | 115 | 401 | 11 | 527 | 21.8% | 76.1% | R+54.3 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 01WHITE RIVER 01 | 116 | 389 | 9 | 514 | 22.6% | 75.7% | R+53.1 |
| Precinct -PATOKA 01PATOKA 01 | 144 | 360 | 7 | 511 | 28.2% | 70.5% | R+42.3 |
| Precinct -UNION 02UNION 02 | 128 | 373 | 8 | 509 | 25.1% | 73.3% | R+48.1 |
| Precinct -PATOKA 07PATOKA 07 | 148 | 332 | 12 | 492 | 30.1% | 67.5% | R+37.4 |
| Precinct -PATOKA 09PATOKA 09 | 114 | 368 | 10 | 492 | 23.2% | 74.8% | R+51.6 |
| Precinct -PATOKA 03PATOKA 03 | 155 | 310 | 2 | 467 | 33.2% | 66.4% | R+33.2 |
| Precinct -COLUMBIA 01COLUMBIA 01 | 110 | 329 | 8 | 447 | 24.6% | 73.6% | R+49.0 |
| Precinct -WASHINGTON 01WASHINGTON 01 | 80 | 352 | 9 | 441 | 18.1% | 79.8% | R+61.7 |
| Precinct -BARTON 01BARTON 01 | 112 | 311 | 5 | 428 | 26.2% | 72.7% | R+46.5 |
| Precinct -PATOKA 14PATOKA 14 | 117 | 300 | 6 | 423 | 27.7% | 70.9% | R+43.3 |
| Precinct -PATOKA 11PATOKA 11 | 99 | 313 | 6 | 418 | 23.7% | 74.9% | R+51.2 |
| Precinct -PATOKA 12PATOKA 12 | 109 | 268 | 11 | 388 | 28.1% | 69.1% | R+41.0 |
| Precinct -BARTON 02BARTON 02 | 95 | 273 | 5 | 373 | 25.5% | 73.2% | R+47.7 |
| Precinct -COLUMBIA 02COLUMBIA 02 | 102 | 238 | 5 | 345 | 29.6% | 69.0% | R+39.4 |
| Precinct -UNION 04UNION 04 | 81 | 208 | 11 | 300 | 27.0% | 69.3% | R+42.3 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 02WHITE RIVER 02 | 57 | 160 | 7 | 224 | 25.4% | 71.4% | R+46.0 |
| Precinct -PATOKA 04PATOKA 04 | 62 | 155 | 4 | 221 | 28.1% | 70.1% | R+42.1 |
| Precinct -PATOKA 05PATOKA 05 | 58 | 139 | 2 | 199 | 29.1% | 69.8% | R+40.7 |
| Precinct -PATOKA 08PATOKA 08 | 62 | 112 | 11 | 185 | 33.5% | 60.5% | R+27.0 |
| Precinct -PATOKA 06PATOKA 06 | 50 | 131 | 3 | 184 | 27.2% | 71.2% | R+44.0 |
| Precinct -PATOKA 15PATOKA 15 | 47 | 117 | 2 | 166 | 28.3% | 70.5% | R+42.2 |
| Precinct -PATOKA 02PATOKA 02 | 40 | 99 | 6 | 145 | 27.6% | 68.3% | R+40.7 |
| Precinct -WABASH 01WABASH 01 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 12 | 33.3% | 66.7% | R+33.3 |
| BARTON 0118_1805100010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BARTON 0218_1805100020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CENTER 0118_1805100030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CENTER 0218_1805100040 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| COLUMBIA 0118_1805100050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| COLUMBIA 0218_1805100060 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| COLUMBIA 0318_1805100070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| COLUMBIA 0418_1805100080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| COLUMBIA 0518_1805100090 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JOHNSON 0118_1805100100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JOHNSON 0218_1805100110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JOHNSON 0318_1805100120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MONTGOMERY 0118_1805100130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MONTGOMERY 0218_1805100140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MONTGOMERY 0318_1805100150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MONTGOMERY 0418_1805100160 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PATOKA 0118_1805100170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PATOKA 0218_1805100180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PATOKA 0318_1805100190 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PATOKA 0418_1805100200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PATOKA 0518_1805100210 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PATOKA 0618_1805100220 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PATOKA 0718_1805100230 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PATOKA 0818_1805100240 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PATOKA 0918_1805100250 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PATOKA 1118_1805100260 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PATOKA 1218_1805100270 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PATOKA 1318_1805100280 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PATOKA 1418_1805100290 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PATOKA 1518_1805100300 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UNION 0118_1805100310 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UNION 0218_1805100320 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UNION 0318_1805100330 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UNION 0418_1805100340 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WABASH18_1805100350 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON18_1805100360 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WHITE RIVER 0118_1805100370 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WHITE RIVER 0218_1805100380 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −4.6% |
| 1896 | +2.1% |
| 1900 | −1.9% |
| 1904 | −8.6% |
| 1908 | −1.3% |
| 1912 | +13.5% |
| 1916 | +2.4% |
| 1920 | −7.6% |
| 1924 | −6.6% |
| 1928 | −15.8% |
| 1932 | +18.4% |
| 1936 | +13.8% |
| 1940 | +2.2% |
| 1944 | −2.8% |
| 1948 | +3.5% |
| 1952 | −9.1% |
| 1956 | −11.6% |
| 1960 | −8.3% |
| 1964 | +28.2% |
| 1968 | −5.4% |
| 1972 | −23.5% |
| 1976 | +8.5% |
| 1980 | −5.3% |
| 1984 | −9.7% |
| 1988 | −3.9% |
| 1992 | +11.7% |
| 1996 | +8.1% |
| 2000 | −14.0% |
| 2004 | −25.7% |
| 2008 | −13.2% |
| 2012 | −31.0% |
| 2016 | −47.5% |
| 2020 | −48.2% |
| 2024 | −51.4% |
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | R | 22.6%3,438 | 77.4%11,743 | 15,181 |
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 24,653 |
| 2018 | 22,784 |
| 2020 | 23,343 |
| 2022 | 24,099 |
| 2024 | 23,623 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+118 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −446 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $52,965 in average income, against $71,482 for residents who stayed — 26% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+29.4 on average — 22 points more Democratic-leaning than Gibson County, IN itself (R+51.4).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Vanderburgh County, IN217R+12.6
- Warrick County, IN61R+30.2
- Pike County, IN48R+54.9
- Knox County, IN46R+50.4
- Posey County, IN35R+43.4
- Wabash County, IL25R+53.8
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Vanderburgh County, IN220
- Warrick County, IN65
- Pike County, IN45
- Knox County, IN39
- Wabash County, IL38
- Posey County, IN38
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −122 |
| 2012 | −70 |
| 2013 | −87 |
| 2014 | +168 |
| 2015 | −123 |
| 2016 | −89 |
| 2017 | −2 |
| 2018 | −192 |
| 2019 | −12 |
| 2021 | −74 |
| 2022 | +58 |
| 2023 | −97 |
| 2024 | +78 |
| 2025 | +118 |
Gibson County's R+51.4 presidential margin in 2024 places it among Indiana's most heavily one-sided rural counties. Its economy centers on agriculture and a major coal-fired power station, anchoring a working-class demographic with little urban counterweight.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 28.2 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 51.4 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 3.2 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 51.4 points.
A population of 33,000, a 90% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $67,573 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Richland County and Knox County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Gibson County, Indiana. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/18051/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.