HarrisDemocratic41.0%16,426TrumpRepublican56.9%22,840OliverLibertarian1.0%406
R+16.0- Lead
- 6,414
- Total
- 40,109
- vs nation
- R+14.5
- Turnout
- 75.6%
Akashiccounty
Boone County, IN
Office (updates table and map)
President margin by year
Place winner margin
Boundary by 2024 margin · Precinct returns · VEST · MIT Election Lab
President results by year
2024 turnout 75.6% of 54,201 citizens 18+
BidenDemocratic39.6%15,244TrumpRepublican58.0%22,351JorgensenLibertarian2.3%905
R+18.5- Lead
- 7,107
- Total
- 38,520
- vs nation
- R+22.9
- Turnout
- 82.4%
ClintonDemocratic31.3%10,181TrumpRepublican60.4%19,654JohnsonLibertarian6.8%2,226
R+29.1- Lead
- 9,473
- Total
- 32,537
- vs nation
- R+31.2
- Turnout
- 75.3%
ObamaDemocratic30.0%8,328RomneyRepublican67.7%18,808JohnsonLibertarian2.1%593
R+37.7- Lead
- 10,480
- Total
- 27,782
- vs nation
- R+41.6
- Turnout
- —
ObamaDemocratic36.6%9,752McCainRepublican62.4%16,622OtherAll other candidates1.0%273
R+25.8- Lead
- 6,870
- Total
- 26,647
- vs nation
- R+33.1
- Turnout
- —
KerryDemocratic24.6%5,636BushRepublican74.5%17,055OtherAll other candidates0.9%207
R+49.9- Lead
- 11,419
- Total
- 22,898
- vs nation
- R+47.4
- Turnout
- —
GoreDemocratic25.9%4,763BushRepublican71.5%13,161OtherAll other candidates2.6%472
R+45.7- Lead
- 8,398
- Total
- 18,396
- vs nation
- R+46.2
- Turnout
- —
ClintonDemocratic26.3%4,625DoleRepublican64.4%11,338PerotReform8.5%1,498
R+38.2- Lead
- 6,713
- Total
- 17,596
- vs nation
- R+46.7
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+16.0MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 74,7182024 5-year
- Median household income
- $111,2502024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 86.2%2024 5-year
- Black
- 3.0%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 4.3%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+31.2 in 1912MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+50.5 in 1972MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Hendricks County, IN · twin score 96.4
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 75.6%40,986 participants ÷ 54,201 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +33.5 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off versus state
- +8.4 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 42.1%–66.4%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 33,214 | 44,083 | 75.3% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 41,484 | 45,838 | 90.5% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 39,365 | 47,767 | 82.4% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 25,280 | 51,738 | 48.9% | A/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 40,986 | 54,201 | 75.6% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
107 precincts · 40,283 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -WORTH 01WORTH 01 | 812 | 1,002 | 56 | 1,870 | 43.4% | 53.6% | R+10.2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -EAGLE 06EAGLE 06 | 831 | 934 | 45 | 1,810 | 45.9% | 51.6% | R+5.7 |
| Precinct -WORTH 02WORTH 02 | 712 | 952 | 38 | 1,702 | 41.8% | 55.9% | R+14.1 |
| Precinct -EAGLE 20EAGLE 20 | 758 | 637 | 38 | 1,433 | 52.9% | 44.5% | D+8.4 |
| Precinct -EAGLE 19EAGLE 19 | 697 | 621 | 44 | 1,362 | 51.2% | 45.6% | D+5.6 |
| Precinct -EAGLE 09EAGLE 09 | 658 | 637 | 56 | 1,351 | 48.7% | 47.2% | D+1.6 |
| Precinct -PERRYPERRY | 474 | 767 | 30 | 1,271 | 37.3% | 60.3% | R+23.1 |
| Precinct -EAGLE 10EAGLE 10 | 584 | 591 | 42 | 1,217 | 48.0% | 48.6% | R+0.6 |
| Precinct -EAGLE 13EAGLE 13 | 618 | 559 | 33 | 1,210 | 51.1% | 46.2% | D+4.9 |
| Precinct -UNION 01UNION 01 | 438 | 577 | 27 | 1,042 | 42.0% | 55.4% | R+13.3 |
| Precinct -EAGLE 07EAGLE 07 | 465 | 506 | 31 | 1,002 | 46.4% | 50.5% | R+4.1 |
| Precinct -UNION 02UNION 02 | 346 | 591 | 13 | 950 | 36.4% | 62.2% | R+25.8 |
| Precinct -EAGLE 14EAGLE 14 | 478 | 410 | 28 | 916 | 52.2% | 44.8% | D+7.4 |
| Precinct -EAGLE 04EAGLE 04 | 523 | 362 | 17 | 902 | 58.0% | 40.1% | D+17.8 |
| Precinct -EAGLE 01EAGLE 01 | 460 | 408 | 31 | 899 | 51.2% | 45.4% | D+5.8 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONJEFFERSON | 172 | 705 | 14 | 891 | 19.3% | 79.1% | R+59.8 |
| Precinct -EAGLE 08EAGLE 08 | 439 | 420 | 26 | 885 | 49.6% | 47.5% | D+2.1 |
| Precinct -EAGLE 16EAGLE 16 | 478 | 371 | 12 | 861 | 55.5% | 43.1% | D+12.4 |
| Precinct -WASHINGTONWASHINGTON | 157 | 624 | 14 | 795 | 19.7% | 78.5% | R+58.7 |
| Precinct -CENTER 05CENTER 05 | 187 | 576 | 18 | 781 | 23.9% | 73.8% | R+49.8 |
| Precinct -CENTER 12CENTER 12 | 239 | 507 | 13 | 759 | 31.5% | 66.8% | R+35.3 |
| Precinct -EAGLE 18EAGLE 18 | 344 | 348 | 29 | 721 | 47.7% | 48.3% | R+0.6 |
| Precinct -EAGLE 05EAGLE 05 | 369 | 326 | 20 | 715 | 51.6% | 45.6% | D+6.0 |
| Precinct -EAGLE 12EAGLE 12 | 408 | 279 | 15 | 702 | 58.1% | 39.7% | D+18.4 |
| Precinct -CENTER 14CENTER 14 | 166 | 523 | 11 | 700 | 23.7% | 74.7% | R+51.0 |
| Precinct -EAGLE 03EAGLE 03 | 402 | 240 | 17 | 659 | 61.0% | 36.4% | D+24.6 |
| Precinct -EAGLE 17EAGLE 17 | 334 | 311 | 14 | 659 | 50.7% | 47.2% | D+3.5 |
| Precinct -EAGLE 02EAGLE 02 | 322 | 310 | 19 | 651 | 49.5% | 47.6% | D+1.8 |
| Precinct -CENTER 09CENTER 09 | 221 | 385 | 17 | 623 | 35.5% | 61.8% | R+26.3 |
| Precinct -EAGLE 11EAGLE 11 | 305 | 305 | 13 | 623 | 49.0% | 49.0% | Exact tie |
| Precinct -CENTER 07CENTER 07 | 216 | 393 | 13 | 622 | 34.7% | 63.2% | R+28.5 |
| Precinct -CENTER 06CENTER 06 | 189 | 398 | 13 | 600 | 31.5% | 66.3% | R+34.8 |
| Precinct -CENTER 17CENTER 17 | 162 | 397 | 10 | 569 | 28.5% | 69.8% | R+41.3 |
| Precinct -SUGAR CREEK 02SUGAR CREEK 02 | 121 | 426 | 8 | 555 | 21.8% | 76.8% | R+55.0 |
| Precinct -CENTER 11CENTER 11 | 167 | 364 | 18 | 549 | 30.4% | 66.3% | R+35.9 |
| Precinct -CLINTONCLINTON | 137 | 379 | 18 | 534 | 25.7% | 71.0% | R+45.3 |
| Precinct -CENTER 02CENTER 02 | 170 | 335 | 16 | 521 | 32.6% | 64.3% | R+31.7 |
| Precinct -JACKSON 01JACKSON 01 | 90 | 410 | 15 | 515 | 17.5% | 79.6% | R+62.1 |
| Precinct -CENTER 10CENTER 10 | 187 | 311 | 15 | 513 | 36.5% | 60.6% | R+24.2 |
| Precinct -SUGAR CREEK 01SUGAR CREEK 01 | 117 | 375 | 12 | 504 | 23.2% | 74.4% | R+51.2 |
| Precinct -EAGLE 15EAGLE 15 | 243 | 242 | 11 | 496 | 49.0% | 48.8% | D+0.2 |
| Precinct -CENTER 03CENTER 03 | 139 | 343 | 10 | 492 | 28.3% | 69.7% | R+41.5 |
| Precinct -CENTER 01CENTER 01 | 180 | 297 | 13 | 490 | 36.7% | 60.6% | R+23.9 |
| Precinct -JACKSON 02JACKSON 02 | 126 | 356 | 5 | 487 | 25.9% | 73.1% | R+47.2 |
| Precinct -CENTER 13CENTER 13 | 212 | 234 | 14 | 460 | 46.1% | 50.9% | R+4.8 |
| Precinct -CENTER 04CENTER 04 | 124 | 260 | 11 | 395 | 31.4% | 65.8% | R+34.4 |
| Precinct -HARRISONHARRISON | 76 | 315 | 4 | 395 | 19.2% | 79.7% | R+60.5 |
| Precinct -MARION 02MARION 02 | 70 | 311 | 6 | 387 | 18.1% | 80.4% | R+62.3 |
| Precinct -JACKSON 03JACKSON 03 | 60 | 301 | 9 | 370 | 16.2% | 81.4% | R+65.1 |
| Precinct -MARION 01MARION 01 | 66 | 280 | 7 | 353 | 18.7% | 79.3% | R+60.6 |
| Precinct -CENTER 08CENTER 08 | 104 | 194 | 3 | 301 | 34.6% | 64.5% | R+29.9 |
| Precinct -CENTER 15CENTER 15 | 54 | 62 | 3 | 119 | 45.4% | 52.1% | R+6.7 |
| Precinct -CENTER 16CENTER 16 | 19 | 73 | 2 | 94 | 20.2% | 77.7% | R+57.4 |
| CENTER 0318_1801100030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CENTER 118_1801100010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CENTER 1018_1801100100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CENTER 1118_1801100110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CENTER 1218_1801100120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CENTER 1318_1801100130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CENTER 1418_1801100140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CENTER 1518_1801100150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CENTER 1618_1801100155 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CENTER 218_1801100020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CENTER 418_1801100040 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CENTER 518_1801100050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CENTER 618_1801100060 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CENTER 718_1801100070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CENTER 818_1801100080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CENTER 918_1801100090 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CLINTON18_1801100160 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| EAGLE 0118_1801100170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| EAGLE 0218_1801100180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| EAGLE 0318_1801100190 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| EAGLE 0418_1801100200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| EAGLE 0718_1801100230 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| EAGLE 0818_1801100240 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| EAGLE 1018_1801100260 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| EAGLE 10 WHITESTOWN18_1801100265 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| EAGLE 1118_1801100270 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| EAGLE 1218_1801100280 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| EAGLE 1318_1801100290 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| EAGLE 13 WHITESTOWN18_1801100295 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| EAGLE 1418_1801100300 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| EAGLE 1518_1801100310 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| EAGLE 1618_1801100320 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| EAGLE 1718_1801100330 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| EAGLE 1818_1801100340 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| EAGLE 1918_1801100341 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| EAGLE 19 WHITESTOWN18_1801100342 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| EAGLE 518_1801100210 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| EAGLE 618_1801100220 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| EAGLE 918_1801100250 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HARRISON18_1801100350 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JACKSON 0118_1801100360 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JACKSON 0218_1801100370 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JACKSON 0318_1801100380 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSON18_1801100390 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MARION 0118_1801100400 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MARION 0218_1801100410 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PERRY18_1801100420 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SUGAR CREEK 0118_1801100430 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SUGAR CREEK 0218_1801100440 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UNION 0118_1801100450 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UNION 0218_1801100460 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON18_1801100470 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WORTH18_1801100480 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WORTH 0218_1801100490 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −0.5% |
| 1896 | +4.8% |
| 1900 | +5.0% |
| 1904 | −5.1% |
| 1908 | +0.8% |
| 1912 | +31.2% |
| 1916 | +2.5% |
| 1920 | −3.6% |
| 1924 | −6.6% |
| 1928 | −18.4% |
| 1932 | +12.8% |
| 1936 | +8.2% |
| 1940 | −6.9% |
| 1944 | −12.6% |
| 1948 | −12.2% |
| 1952 | −26.6% |
| 1956 | −23.4% |
| 1960 | −25.0% |
| 1964 | −5.0% |
| 1968 | −28.2% |
| 1972 | −50.5% |
| 1976 | −23.5% |
| 1980 | −37.5% |
| 1984 | −49.3% |
| 1988 | −47.1% |
| 1992 | −31.7% |
| 1996 | −38.2% |
| 2000 | −45.7% |
| 2004 | −49.9% |
| 2008 | −25.8% |
| 2012 | −37.7% |
| 2016 | −29.1% |
| 2020 | −18.5% |
| 2024 | −16.0% |
DemocraticRepublican
Federal and statewide elections · 1 House · 36 Senate · 3 Senate special · 13 governor
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | R | 34.9%9,535 | 65.1%17,768 | 27,303 |
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
voter registration
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
Registered voters
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 49,505 |
| 2018 | 48,736 |
| 2020 | 53,429 |
| 2022 | 56,847 |
| 2024 | 62,050 |
domestic migration
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+1,837 net domestic migration · 2025
20112025
Net +16,221 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $110,649 in average income, against $158,917 for residents who stayed — 30% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+1.8 on average — 18 points more Democratic-leaning than Boone County, IN itself (R+16.0).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Marion County, IN876D+27.6
- Hamilton County, IN533R+6.1
- Hendricks County, IN329R+21.5
- Tippecanoe County, IN127R+0.1
- Clinton County, IN92R+48.0
- Johnson County, IN54R+34.3
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Marion County, IN501
- Hamilton County, IN411
- Hendricks County, IN213
- Tippecanoe County, IN95
- Clinton County, IN73
- Montgomery County, IN65
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +691 |
| 2012 | +831 |
| 2013 | +1,056 |
| 2014 | +977 |
| 2015 | +1,136 |
| 2016 | +824 |
| 2017 | +1,241 |
| 2018 | +810 |
| 2019 | +546 |
| 2021 | +1,714 |
| 2022 | +1,013 |
| 2023 | +1,405 |
| 2024 | +2,140 |
| 2025 | +1,837 |
Boone County has absorbed significant suburban spillover from Indianapolis, yet its 2024 presidential margin held at R+16 — suggesting that rapid population growth here has not meaningfully shifted its partisan center of gravity.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 31.2 points in 1912 and a Republican high of 50.5 points in 1972. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 2.5 points toward the Democratic candidate; the 2024 margin was 16.0 points.
A population of 74,718, a 86% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $111,250 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Hendricks County and Hamilton County.
Political twins — counties
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Hendricks County
Indiana
96.4twin score
12-yr trendelasticity2000–2004 trajectory≠ college share
Hamilton County
Indiana
95.3twin score
12-yr trendelasticitymedian income≠ % Asian
Hancock County
Indiana
88.6twin score
elasticity2000–2012 trajectory≠ 12-yr trend
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Cite this page
All citations released under CC BY 4.0. Attribution: Akashic Intelligence.
Boone County, Indiana. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/18011/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.
License: CC BY 4.0
Embed this page
A live widget for your site — no API key, attribution built in, CC BY 4.0. All widgets & sizes →
Cities & towns in Boone County
Indiana at the ballot boxAll elections →
Frequently asked questions
How did Boone County, Indiana vote in 2024?
In 2024, Boone County, Indiana voted Republican by 16.0 points (R+16.0), carried by the Republican candidate. Out of 40,109 votes cast, 16,426 went Democratic and 22,840 went Republican.
When did Boone County, Indiana last vote Democratic?
The most recent presidential election in which Boone County, Indiana voted Democratic was 1936.
How many people live in Boone County, Indiana?
Boone County, Indiana has a population of 74,718 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.
What is the median household income in Boone County, Indiana?
Median household income in Boone County, Indiana is $111,250 — above the national median of $80,734. The Indiana state median is $71,957.
What is the political history of Boone County, Indiana?
Akashic tracks 38 presidential elections in Boone County, Indiana from 1876 to 2024. Of those, 7 went Democratic and 27 went Republican.