Boundary by 2024 margin · Precinct returns · VEST · MIT Election Lab
The precinct map shows the 2024 presidential vote; the timeline scrubs the city’s overall result across 2004–2024, on current city boundaries.
President results by year
Vote totals, margins, and source status
HarrisDemocratic19.9%290TrumpRepublican79.1%1,151OtherAll other candidates1.0%14
R+59.2
Lead
861
Total
1,455
vs nation
R+57.7
BidenDemocratic21.2%289TrumpRepublican76.9%1,048OtherAll other candidates1.9%26
R+55.7
Lead
759
Total
1,363
vs nation
R+60.1
ClintonDemocratic20.2%236TrumpRepublican74.7%872OtherAll other candidates5.1%59
R+54.5
Lead
636
Total
1,167
vs nation
R+56.6
ObamaDemocratic28.9%355RomneyRepublican69.2%849OtherAll other candidates1.9%23
R+40.3
Lead
494
Total
1,227
vs nation
R+44.1
ObamaDemocratic30.7%390McCainRepublican67.2%855OtherAll other candidates2.1%27
R+36.6
Lead
465
Total
1,272
vs nation
R+43.8
KerryDemocratic35.7%445BushRepublican64.2%800OtherAll other candidates<0.1%1
R+28.5
Lead
355
Total
1,246
vs nation
R+26.0
Key facts
2024 presidential margin
R+59.2MIT Election Lab
Population
3,2812024 5-year
Population density
566 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
Land area
5.8 sq miTIGER/Line
Median household income
$51,1832024 5-year
White (non-Hispanic)
93.5%2024 5-year
Black
0.0%2024 5-year
Hispanic / Latino
0.4%2024 5-year
Peak Republican margin
R+59.2 in 2024MIT Election Lab
Participation
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
2004–20248 cycles · 5 audited
2024 turnout
57.2%1,466 participants ÷ 2,562 CVAP
2020→2022 drop-off
+16.7 ptsPersistently low turnout
Drop-off vs state
-10.1 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
Mechanical 2026
40.6%–44.8%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Participation by cycle
Presidential Midterm Derived, pre-2016
0%20%40%60%80%
31.9%
28.9%
20042008201220162018202020222024
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
Cycle
Participants
CVAP
Turnout
Series
Quality
1,466
2,562 ± 431
57.2%
Audited
E/D
2022Mid
828
2,869 ± 448
28.9%
Audited
E/D
1,370
3,010 ± 425
45.5%
Audited
E/D
2018Mid
1,033
3,236 ± 449
31.9%
Audited
E/D
1,190
2,965 ± 428
40.1%
Audited
E/D
1,227
2,288
53.6%
Derived
—
1,272
2,294
55.4%
Derived
—
1,246
2,300 extrapolated
54.2%
Derived
—
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
2024: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 323/229.
2022: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 322/184.
2020: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 321/4.
2018: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 320/139.
2016: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 319/133.
2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
presidential history
Party record book
Oliver Springs, TN · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
2004–2024 · 6 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
John Kerry2004
35.7%
445 votes · R+28.5
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2008 · 30.7%
Republican
Donald Trump2024
79.1%
1,151 votes · R+59.2
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 76.9%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
John Kerry2004
445votes
35.7% of the vote · R+28.5
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2008 · 390 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
1,151votes
79.1% of the vote · R+59.2
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 1,048 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
John Kerry2004
−26.0pts D vs U.S.
Place R+28.5 · U.S. R+2.5
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2008 · −43.8 pts
Republican
Donald Trump2020
+60.1pts R vs U.S.
Place R+55.7 · U.S. D+4.5
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2024 · +57.7 pts
U.S. House elections · 2 House
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Oliver Springs · how this place’s counties split between candidates in each party’s presidential nominating contest, cycle by cycle. A primary is a contest inside one party, so it has no Democratic–Republican margin and is not part of the general-election record above.
Akashic reports votes cast, not delegates awarded. The two can disagree: Clinton led the 2008 national primary popular vote by less than half a point and did not win the nomination.
Primary returns are published at county grain and there is no roll-up above it. Each cell counts how many of this place’s counties a candidate led — a count of records, not a vote total. Who led the place as a whole is not knowable from these returns, because county rows carry a leader and a lead but no per-candidate votes.
Presidential nominating contests in Oliver Springs, by party and cycle.
○no contest record — Akashic holds no result for that party and cycle here. It is not a claim that no contest was held. Telling apart a contest that was cancelled, one that went uncontested, and one simply not yet ingested needs a nominating-contest calendar, which is a separate ingest from results and does not exist yet.
Republican presidential primaries are not yet ingested — the Republican series runs from 1856 and is in scope. The row is kept so its absence is visible: a Democratic-only panel would otherwise read as though no one else held a contest.
Akashic carries 10 states for 2012 and 3 states for 2024. Cycles in which an incumbent president seeks renomination are thin by nature — few states run a contested primary — so a sparse column is politics, not a hole in the record.
County returns carry a leader and a lead over the runner-up, and nothing more. The full candidate field with vote shares is published at state grain — follow a cycle above to the state contest for it.
Oliver Springs straddles three counties — Anderson, Morgan, and Roane — a rare tri-county split that complicates precinct-level analysis and reflects the town's position at the edge of Tennessee's historically unionized coal country.
Across the recorded series it reached a Republican high of 59.2 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the city moved 3.5 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 59.2 points.
A population of 3,281, a 94% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $51,183 describe the city.
In 2024, Oliver Springs, Tennessee voted Republican by 59.2 points (R+59.2), carried by the Republican candidate. Out of 1,455 votes cast, 290 went Democratic and 1,151 went Republican.
How many people live in Oliver Springs, Tennessee?
Oliver Springs, Tennessee has a population of 3,281 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.
What is the median household income in Oliver Springs, Tennessee?
Median household income in Oliver Springs, Tennessee is $51,183 — below the national median of $80,734. The Tennessee state median is $69,595.
What is the political history of Oliver Springs, Tennessee?
Akashic tracks 6 presidential elections in Oliver Springs, Tennessee from 2004 to 2024. Of those, 0 went Democratic and 6 went Republican.
