- Lead
- 12,341
- Total
- 30,213
- vs nation
- R+39.4
- Turnout
- 58.4%
Laurens County, SC
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 58.4% of 51,973 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 9,845
- Total
- 30,488
- vs nation
- R+36.7
- Turnout
- 59.8%
- Lead
- 7,927
- Total
- 26,566
- vs nation
- R+31.9
- Turnout
- 53.6%
- Lead
- 4,428
- Total
- 25,416
- vs nation
- R+21.3
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 4,756
- Total
- 26,282
- vs nation
- R+25.4
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 5,261
- Total
- 23,829
- vs nation
- R+19.6
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 4,182
- Total
- 20,410
- vs nation
- R+21.0
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,002
- Total
- 16,547
- vs nation
- R+14.6
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+40.8MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 68,6662024 5-year
- Median household income
- $57,6232024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 65.8%2024 5-year
- Black
- 22.9%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 6.7%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+99.6 in 1936MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+50.2 in 1972MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Talladega County, AL · twin score 90.2
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 58.4%30,367 participants ÷ 51,973 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +20.9 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off versus state
- -0.7 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 37.6%–41.5%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 26,962 | 50,290 | 53.6% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 20,693 | 50,913 | 40.6% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 30,648 | 51,218 | 59.8% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 20,000 | 51,316 | 39.0% | A/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 30,367 | 51,973 | 58.4% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
33 precincts · 30,213 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -JonesJones | 885 | 1,588 | 30 | 2,503 | 35.4% | 63.4% | R+28.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Hickory TavernHickory Tavern | 276 | 1,587 | 17 | 1,880 | 14.7% | 84.4% | R+69.7 |
| Precinct -CooksCooks | 332 | 970 | 19 | 1,321 | 25.1% | 73.4% | R+48.3 |
| Precinct -Cross HillCross Hill | 378 | 910 | 10 | 1,298 | 29.1% | 70.1% | R+41.0 |
| Precinct -WaterlooWaterloo | 370 | 916 | 11 | 1,297 | 28.5% | 70.6% | R+42.1 |
| Precinct -GreenpondGreenpond | 219 | 1,043 | 9 | 1,271 | 17.2% | 82.1% | R+64.8 |
| Precinct -JoannaJoanna | 229 | 951 | 13 | 1,193 | 19.2% | 79.7% | R+60.5 |
| Precinct -Clinton 3Clinton 3 | 297 | 848 | 9 | 1,154 | 25.7% | 73.5% | R+47.7 |
| Precinct -Laurens 5Laurens 5 | 416 | 681 | 19 | 1,116 | 37.3% | 61.0% | R+23.7 |
| Precinct -Trinity RidgeTrinity Ridge | 344 | 734 | 7 | 1,085 | 31.7% | 67.6% | R+35.9 |
| Precinct -YoungsYoungs | 159 | 799 | 5 | 963 | 16.5% | 83.0% | R+66.5 |
| Precinct -Gray CourtGray Court | 295 | 645 | 13 | 953 | 31.0% | 67.7% | R+36.7 |
| Precinct -Long BranchLong Branch | 156 | 778 | 11 | 945 | 16.5% | 82.3% | R+65.8 |
| Precinct -Clinton 2Clinton 2 | 381 | 506 | 18 | 905 | 42.1% | 55.9% | R+13.8 |
| Precinct -MaddensMaddens | 212 | 684 | 7 | 903 | 23.5% | 75.7% | R+52.3 |
| Precinct -Laurens 6Laurens 6 | 258 | 632 | 9 | 899 | 28.7% | 70.3% | R+41.6 |
| Precinct -Clinton 1Clinton 1 | 333 | 548 | 9 | 890 | 37.4% | 61.6% | R+24.2 |
| Precinct -WattsvilleWattsville | 219 | 619 | 10 | 848 | 25.8% | 73.0% | R+47.2 |
| Precinct -Mount OliveMount Olive | 91 | 732 | 10 | 833 | 10.9% | 87.9% | R+77.0 |
| Precinct -Lydia MillLydia Mill | 425 | 362 | 7 | 794 | 53.5% | 45.6% | D+7.9 |
| Precinct -BaileyBailey | 240 | 526 | 13 | 779 | 30.8% | 67.5% | R+36.7 |
| Precinct -Barksdale-NarnieBarksdale-Narnie | 201 | 550 | 10 | 761 | 26.4% | 72.3% | R+45.9 |
| Precinct -Ora-LanfordOra-Lanford | 216 | 489 | 5 | 710 | 30.4% | 68.9% | R+38.5 |
| Precinct -Clinton MillClinton Mill | 422 | 269 | 12 | 703 | 60.0% | 38.3% | D+21.8 |
| Precinct -Brewerton-PrincetonBrewerton-Princeton | 47 | 536 | 2 | 585 | 8.0% | 91.6% | R+83.6 |
| Precinct -OwingsOwings | 139 | 413 | 8 | 560 | 24.8% | 73.8% | R+48.9 |
| Precinct -Martins-Poplar SpringsMartins-Poplar Springs | 80 | 459 | 8 | 547 | 14.6% | 83.9% | R+69.3 |
| Precinct -EkomEkom | 75 | 438 | 2 | 515 | 14.6% | 85.0% | R+70.5 |
| Precinct -Laurens 3Laurens 3 | 236 | 244 | 8 | 488 | 48.4% | 50.0% | R+1.6 |
| Precinct -Laurens 4Laurens 4 | 319 | 120 | 10 | 449 | 71.0% | 26.7% | D+44.3 |
| Precinct -MountvilleMountville | 139 | 302 | 4 | 445 | 31.2% | 67.9% | R+36.6 |
| Precinct -Laurens 1Laurens 1 | 223 | 162 | 5 | 390 | 57.2% | 41.5% | D+15.6 |
| Precinct -Laurens 2Laurens 2 | 157 | 69 | 4 | 230 | 68.3% | 30.0% | D+38.3 |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +81.8% |
| 1896 | +89.2% |
| 1900 | +96.2% |
| 1904 | +94.5% |
| 1908 | +94.5% |
| 1912 | +98.5% |
| 1916 | +97.9% |
| 1920 | +97.0% |
| 1924 | +99.2% |
| 1928 | +95.5% |
| 1932 | +99.4% |
| 1936 | +99.6% |
| 1940 | +97.1% |
| 1944 | +91.6% |
| 1948 | +16.9% |
| 1952 | +4.2% |
| 1956 | +35.3% |
| 1960 | +15.9% |
| 1964 | −7.6% |
| 1968 | −14.8% |
| 1972 | −50.2% |
| 1976 | +16.7% |
| 1980 | +12.9% |
| 1984 | −29.3% |
| 1988 | −24.2% |
| 1992 | −9.9% |
| 1996 | −6.1% |
| 2000 | −20.5% |
| 2004 | −22.1% |
| 2008 | −18.1% |
| 2012 | −17.4% |
| 2016 | −29.8% |
| 2020 | −32.3% |
| 2024 | −40.8% |
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 39,809 |
| 2018 | 42,976 |
| 2020 | 46,560 |
| 2022 | 43,502 |
| 2024 | 45,596 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+1,567 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +6,191 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $54,164 in average income, against $56,419 for residents who stayed — 4% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+26.1 on average — 15 points more Democratic-leaning than Laurens County, SC itself (R+40.8).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Greenville County, SC706R+22.2
- Spartanburg County, SC186R+33.6
- Greenwood County, SC117R+29.0
- Anderson County, SC84R+47.4
- Newberry County, SC52R+34.3
- Lexington County, SC34R+33.5
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Greenville County, SC502
- Spartanburg County, SC167
- Greenwood County, SC129
- Anderson County, SC79
- Newberry County, SC44
- Pickens County, SC32
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −150 |
| 2012 | −236 |
| 2013 | +59 |
| 2014 | +306 |
| 2015 | +23 |
| 2016 | +165 |
| 2017 | +273 |
| 2018 | +95 |
| 2019 | +621 |
| 2021 | +536 |
| 2022 | +450 |
| 2023 | +1,107 |
| 2024 | +1,375 |
| 2025 | +1,567 |
Laurens County sits in South Carolina's Upstate Piedmont, where a predominantly rural, textile-era economy has given way to manufacturing and agriculture. Its R+40.9 margin in 2024 reflects a long-running shift away from the competitive statewide races it once hosted.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 99.6 points in 1936 and a Republican high of 50.2 points in 1972. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 8.6 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 40.8 points.
A population of 68,666, a 66% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $57,623 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Talladega County and Monroe County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Laurens County, South Carolina. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/45059/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.