- Lead
- 12,259
- Total
- 23,156
- vs nation
- R+51.5
- Turnout
- 64.8%
Huntingdon County, PA
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 64.8% of 35,735 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 11,616
- Total
- 22,792
- vs nation
- R+55.4
- Turnout
- 62.8%
- Lead
- 9,955
- Total
- 19,866
- vs nation
- R+52.2
- Turnout
- 54.0%
- Lead
- 6,570
- Total
- 17,692
- vs nation
- R+41.0
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 5,124
- Total
- 18,632
- vs nation
- R+34.8
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 6,247
- Total
- 18,058
- vs nation
- R+32.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 5,335
- Total
- 15,961
- vs nation
- R+33.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 2,039
- Total
- 14,495
- vs nation
- R+22.6
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+52.9MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 43,6532024 5-year
- Median household income
- $65,5572024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 89.3%2024 5-year
- Black
- 4.5%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 2.1%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+10.1 in 1912MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+73.5 in 1928MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Perry County, PA · twin score 92.3
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 64.8%23,156 participants ÷ 35,735 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +11.3 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off versus state
- -5.6 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 53.5%–53.9%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 19,908 | 36,870 | 54.0% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 15,916 | 36,606 | 43.5% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 22,926 | 36,519 | 62.8% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 18,530 | 36,026 | 51.4% | A/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 23,156 | 35,735 | 64.8% | C/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2024: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 156/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
116 precincts · 23,156 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct 0550420610550 | 300 | 973 | 9 | 1,282 | 23.4% | 75.9% | R+52.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct 0560420610560 | 265 | 965 | 4 | 1,234 | 21.5% | 78.2% | R+56.7 |
| Precinct 0400420610400 | 235 | 909 | 11 | 1,155 | 20.3% | 78.7% | R+58.4 |
| Precinct 0230420610230 | 493 | 563 | 13 | 1,069 | 46.1% | 52.7% | R+6.5 |
| Precinct 0110420610110 | 105 | 786 | 1 | 892 | 11.8% | 88.1% | R+76.3 |
| Precinct 0220420610220 | 462 | 314 | 2 | 778 | 59.4% | 40.4% | D+19.0 |
| Precinct 0440420610440 | 152 | 610 | 1 | 763 | 19.9% | 79.9% | R+60.0 |
| Precinct 0480420610480 | 198 | 546 | 6 | 750 | 26.4% | 72.8% | R+46.4 |
| Precinct 0380420610380 | 131 | 590 | 6 | 727 | 18.0% | 81.2% | R+63.1 |
| Precinct 0120420610120 | 71 | 634 | 5 | 710 | 10.0% | 89.3% | R+79.3 |
| Precinct 0360420610360 | 202 | 411 | 6 | 619 | 32.6% | 66.4% | R+33.8 |
| Precinct 0070420610070 | 76 | 531 | 2 | 609 | 12.5% | 87.2% | R+74.7 |
| Precinct 0150420610150 | 125 | 463 | 6 | 594 | 21.0% | 77.9% | R+56.9 |
| Precinct 0540420610540 | 97 | 493 | 2 | 592 | 16.4% | 83.3% | R+66.9 |
| Precinct 0240420610240 | 119 | 427 | 5 | 551 | 21.6% | 77.5% | R+55.9 |
| Precinct 0530420610530 | 72 | 449 | 2 | 523 | 13.8% | 85.9% | R+72.1 |
| Precinct 0090420610090 | 62 | 418 | 3 | 483 | 12.8% | 86.5% | R+73.7 |
| Precinct 0210420610210 | 194 | 269 | 5 | 468 | 41.5% | 57.5% | R+16.0 |
| Precinct 0450420610450 | 57 | 374 | 1 | 432 | 13.2% | 86.6% | R+73.4 |
| Precinct 0200420610200 | 172 | 252 | 6 | 430 | 40.0% | 58.6% | R+18.6 |
| Precinct 0040420610040 | 44 | 381 | 3 | 428 | 10.3% | 89.0% | R+78.7 |
| Precinct 0490420610490 | 67 | 339 | 1 | 407 | 16.5% | 83.3% | R+66.8 |
| Precinct 0270420610270 | 56 | 338 | 1 | 395 | 14.2% | 85.6% | R+71.4 |
| Precinct 0340420610340 | 78 | 287 | 3 | 368 | 21.2% | 78.0% | R+56.8 |
| Precinct 0350420610350 | 74 | 290 | 3 | 367 | 20.2% | 79.0% | R+58.9 |
| Precinct 0510420610510 | 70 | 283 | 2 | 355 | 19.7% | 79.7% | R+60.0 |
| Precinct 0320420610320 | 85 | 256 | 6 | 347 | 24.5% | 73.8% | R+49.3 |
| Precinct 0190420610190 | 114 | 222 | 5 | 341 | 33.4% | 65.1% | R+31.7 |
| Precinct 0570420610570 | 66 | 261 | 1 | 328 | 20.1% | 79.6% | R+59.5 |
| Precinct 0250420610250 | 65 | 238 | 4 | 307 | 21.2% | 77.5% | R+56.4 |
| Precinct 0580420610580 | 57 | 250 | 0 | 307 | 18.6% | 81.4% | R+62.9 |
| Precinct 0310420610310 | 70 | 218 | 6 | 294 | 23.8% | 74.1% | R+50.3 |
| Precinct 0140420610140 | 70 | 212 | 1 | 283 | 24.7% | 74.9% | R+50.2 |
| Precinct 0330420610330 | 125 | 156 | 2 | 283 | 44.2% | 55.1% | R+11.0 |
| Precinct 0520420610520 | 29 | 243 | 1 | 273 | 10.6% | 89.0% | R+78.4 |
| Precinct 0020420610020 | 50 | 219 | 2 | 271 | 18.5% | 80.8% | R+62.4 |
| Precinct 0180420610180 | 130 | 133 | 2 | 265 | 49.1% | 50.2% | R+1.1 |
| Precinct 0050420610050 | 41 | 175 | 3 | 219 | 18.7% | 79.9% | R+61.2 |
| Precinct 0370420610370 | 31 | 185 | 2 | 218 | 14.2% | 84.9% | R+70.6 |
| Precinct 0160420610160 | 31 | 178 | 1 | 210 | 14.8% | 84.8% | R+70.0 |
| Precinct 0010420610010 | 75 | 132 | 2 | 209 | 35.9% | 63.2% | R+27.3 |
| Precinct 0410420610410 | 34 | 166 | 0 | 200 | 17.0% | 83.0% | R+66.0 |
| Precinct 0260420610260 | 20 | 171 | 1 | 192 | 10.4% | 89.1% | R+78.6 |
| Precinct 0390420610390 | 37 | 148 | 2 | 187 | 19.8% | 79.1% | R+59.4 |
| Precinct 0280420610280 | 36 | 140 | 3 | 179 | 20.1% | 78.2% | R+58.1 |
| Precinct 0060420610060 | 24 | 151 | 1 | 176 | 13.6% | 85.8% | R+72.2 |
| Precinct 0420420610420 | 16 | 150 | 1 | 167 | 9.6% | 89.8% | R+80.2 |
| Precinct 0500420610500 | 44 | 102 | 4 | 150 | 29.3% | 68.0% | R+38.7 |
| Precinct 0300420610300 | 22 | 123 | 0 | 145 | 15.2% | 84.8% | R+69.7 |
| Precinct 0290420610290 | 33 | 88 | 1 | 122 | 27.0% | 72.1% | R+45.1 |
| Precinct 0130420610130 | 16 | 77 | 1 | 94 | 17.0% | 81.9% | R+64.9 |
| Precinct 0460420610460 | 8 | 67 | 0 | 75 | 10.7% | 89.3% | R+78.7 |
| Precinct 0080420610080 | 12 | 62 | 0 | 74 | 16.2% | 83.8% | R+67.6 |
| Precinct 0170420610170 | 18 | 50 | 0 | 68 | 26.5% | 73.5% | R+47.1 |
| Precinct 0030420610030 | 20 | 36 | 0 | 56 | 35.7% | 64.3% | R+28.6 |
| Precinct 0470420610470 | 3 | 51 | 0 | 54 | 5.6% | 94.4% | R+88.9 |
| Precinct 0100420610100 | 5 | 40 | 0 | 45 | 11.1% | 88.9% | R+77.8 |
| Precinct 0430420610430 | 4 | 32 | 0 | 36 | 11.1% | 88.9% | R+77.8 |
| ALEXANDRIA Voting District42_4206110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BARREE TWP Voting District42_4206120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BIRMINGHAM Voting District42_4206130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BRADY TWP Voting District42_4206140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BROAD TOP CITY Voting District42_4206150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CARBON TWP Voting District42_4206160 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CASS TWP Voting District42_4206170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CASSVILLE Voting District42_4206180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CLAY TWP Voting District42_4206190 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| COALMONT Voting District42_42061100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CROMWELL TWP Voting District42_42061110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| DUBLIN TWP Voting District42_42061120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| DUDLEY Voting District42_42061130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FRANKLIN TWP Voting District42_42061140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HENDERSON TWP Voting District42_42061150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HOPEWELL TWP DIST HOPEWELL42_42061160 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HOPEWELL TWP DIST PUTTSTOWN42_42061170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HUNTINGDON WD 0142_42061180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HUNTINGDON WD 0242_42061190 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HUNTINGDON WD 0342_42061200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HUNTINGDON WD 0442_42061210 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HUNTINGDON WD 0542_42061220 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HUNTINGDON WD 0642_42061230 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JACKSON TWP Voting District42_42061240 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JUNIATA TWP Voting District42_42061250 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LINCOLN TWP Voting District42_42061260 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LOGAN TWP Voting District42_42061270 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MAPLETON Voting District42_42061280 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MARKLESBURG Voting District42_42061290 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MILL CREEK Voting District42_42061300 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MILLER TWP Voting District42_42061310 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MORRIS TWP Voting District42_42061320 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MT. UNION WD 0142_42061330 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MT. UNION WD 0242_42061340 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MT. UNION WD 0342_42061350 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ONEIDA TWP Voting District42_42061360 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ORBISONIA Voting District42_42061370 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PENN TWP Voting District42_42061380 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PETERSBURG Voting District42_42061390 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PORTER TWP Voting District42_42061400 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ROCKHILL Voting District42_42061410 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SALTILLO Voting District42_42061420 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SHADE GAP Voting District42_42061430 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SHIRLEY TWP DIST MT. UNION42_42061440 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SHIRLEY TWP DIST SHIRLEY42_42061450 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SHIRLEY TWP DIST VALLEY PT.42_42061460 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SHIRLEYSBURG Voting District42_42061470 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SMITHFIELD TWP Voting District42_42061480 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SPRINGFIELD TWP Voting District42_42061490 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SPRUCE CREEK TWP Voting District42_42061500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TELL TWP Voting District42_42061510 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| THREE SPRINGS Voting District42_42061520 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TODD TWP Voting District42_42061530 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UNION TWP Voting District42_42061540 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WALKER TWP Voting District42_42061550 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WARRIORS MARK TWP Voting District42_42061560 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WEST TWP Voting District42_42061570 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WOOD TWP Voting District42_42061580 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −19.0% |
| 1896 | −35.4% |
| 1900 | −38.8% |
| 1904 | −52.0% |
| 1908 | −38.1% |
| 1912 | +10.1% |
| 1916 | −25.7% |
| 1920 | −44.6% |
| 1924 | −57.2% |
| 1928 | −73.5% |
| 1932 | −35.5% |
| 1936 | −13.7% |
| 1940 | −23.7% |
| 1944 | −32.3% |
| 1948 | −35.5% |
| 1952 | −37.7% |
| 1956 | −35.4% |
| 1960 | −40.4% |
| 1964 | +6.2% |
| 1968 | −31.0% |
| 1972 | −47.0% |
| 1976 | −18.1% |
| 1980 | −21.9% |
| 1984 | −39.4% |
| 1988 | −29.7% |
| 1992 | −13.4% |
| 1996 | −14.1% |
| 2000 | −33.4% |
| 2004 | −34.6% |
| 2008 | −27.5% |
| 2012 | −37.1% |
| 2016 | −50.1% |
| 2020 | −51.0% |
| 2024 | −52.9% |
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 6.7 points more Democratic.
27,886 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−281 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −865 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $57,279 in average income, against $66,309 for residents who stayed — 14% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+42.6 on average — 10 points more Democratic-leaning than Huntingdon County, PA itself (R+52.9).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Mifflin County, PA97R+56.4
- Blair County, PA86R+43.5
- Centre County, PA64D+2.8
- Bedford County, PA51R+68.6
- Fulton County, PA22R+72.6
- Franklin County, PA21R+43.0
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Blair County, PA107
- Mifflin County, PA98
- Centre County, PA66
- Bedford County, PA33
- Franklin County, PA32
- Cumberland County, PA28
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +14 |
| 2012 | −48 |
| 2013 | −70 |
| 2014 | −89 |
| 2015 | −230 |
| 2016 | −87 |
| 2017 | +121 |
| 2018 | +72 |
| 2019 | −107 |
| 2021 | +59 |
| 2022 | −522 |
| 2023 | +348 |
| 2024 | −45 |
| 2025 | −281 |
Huntingdon's rugged Ridge-and-Valley terrain anchors a sparse, predominantly white working-class population that has shifted decisively rightward over the past two decades, delivering some of the widest presidential margins in the state.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 10.1 points in 1912 and a Republican high of 73.5 points in 1928. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 2.0 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 52.9 points.
A population of 43,653, a 89% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $65,557 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Perry County and Bedford County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Huntingdon County, Pennsylvania. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/42061/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.