HarrisDemocratic32.5%11,553TrumpRepublican65.4%23,237OtherAll other candidates1.6%558
R+32.9- Lead
- 11,684
- Total
- 35,556
- vs nation
- R+31.4
- Turnout
- 86.4%
Akashiccounty
Douglas County, NV
Office (updates table and map)
President margin by year
Place winner margin
Boundary by 2024 margin · Precinct returns · VEST · MIT Election Lab
President results by year
2024 turnout 86.4% of 41,241 citizens 18+
BidenDemocratic33.9%11,571TrumpRepublican63.4%21,630NONO1.3%449
R+29.5- Lead
- 10,059
- Total
- 34,125
- vs nation
- R+33.9
- Turnout
- 87.2%
ClintonDemocratic30.3%8,454TrumpRepublican62.5%17,415JohnsonLibertarian3.6%1,004
R+32.1- Lead
- 8,961
- Total
- 27,885
- vs nation
- R+34.2
- Turnout
- 75.4%
ObamaDemocratic35.7%9,297RomneyRepublican62.4%16,276JohnsonIndependent1.1%275
R+26.8- Lead
- 6,979
- Total
- 26,075
- vs nation
- R+30.6
- Turnout
- —
ObamaDemocratic41.5%10,672McCainRepublican56.9%14,648OtherAll other candidates1.6%407
R+15.5- Lead
- 3,976
- Total
- 25,727
- vs nation
- R+22.7
- Turnout
- —
KerryDemocratic34.6%8,275BushRepublican63.6%15,192OtherAll other candidates1.8%431
R+28.9- Lead
- 6,917
- Total
- 23,898
- vs nation
- R+26.5
- Turnout
- —
GoreDemocratic32.5%5,837BushRepublican62.3%11,193NaderGreen3.3%593
R+29.8- Lead
- 5,356
- Total
- 17,974
- vs nation
- R+30.3
- Turnout
- —
ClintonDemocratic31.7%5,109DoleRepublican54.8%8,828PerotReform9.2%1,486
R+23.1- Lead
- 3,719
- Total
- 16,100
- vs nation
- R+31.6
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+32.9MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 49,6232024 5-year
- Median household income
- $90,7542024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 77.2%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.3%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 13.0%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+20.5 in 1896MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+68.5 in 1952MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Amador County, CA · twin score 80.9
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 86.4%35,616 participants ÷ 41,241 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +15.1 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off versus state
- -5.4 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 71.3%–75.7%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 27,989 | 37,133 | 75.4% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 26,142 | 37,798 | 69.2% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 34,163 | 39,185 | 87.2% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 29,256 | 40,571 | 72.1% | A/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 35,616 | 41,241 | 86.4% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
82 precincts · 34,993 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -66 | 561 | 958 | 8 | 1,527 | 36.7% | 62.7% | R+26.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -1717 | 372 | 1,093 | 2 | 1,467 | 25.4% | 74.5% | R+49.1 |
| Precinct -1313 | 514 | 919 | 15 | 1,448 | 35.5% | 63.5% | R+28.0 |
| Precinct -2525 | 448 | 983 | 5 | 1,436 | 31.2% | 68.5% | R+37.3 |
| Precinct -22 | 372 | 1,053 | 4 | 1,429 | 26.0% | 73.7% | R+47.7 |
| Precinct -2222 | 405 | 822 | 5 | 1,232 | 32.9% | 66.7% | R+33.8 |
| Precinct -88 | 346 | 855 | 6 | 1,207 | 28.7% | 70.8% | R+42.2 |
| Precinct -1111 | 300 | 878 | 6 | 1,184 | 25.3% | 74.2% | R+48.8 |
| Precinct -1010 | 285 | 866 | 20 | 1,171 | 24.3% | 74.0% | R+49.6 |
| Precinct -2121 | 294 | 815 | 5 | 1,114 | 26.4% | 73.2% | R+46.8 |
| Precinct -2323 | 416 | 665 | 4 | 1,085 | 38.3% | 61.3% | R+22.9 |
| Precinct -33 | 427 | 640 | 6 | 1,073 | 39.8% | 59.6% | R+19.9 |
| Precinct -2020 | 360 | 696 | 1 | 1,057 | 34.1% | 65.8% | R+31.8 |
| Precinct -11 | 278 | 720 | 6 | 1,004 | 27.7% | 71.7% | R+44.0 |
| Precinct -1414 | 219 | 774 | 6 | 999 | 21.9% | 77.5% | R+55.6 |
| Precinct -99 | 334 | 657 | 1 | 992 | 33.7% | 66.2% | R+32.6 |
| Precinct -2828 | 257 | 728 | 4 | 989 | 26.0% | 73.6% | R+47.6 |
| Precinct -1919 | 332 | 620 | 7 | 959 | 34.6% | 64.7% | R+30.0 |
| Precinct -55 | 277 | 638 | 8 | 923 | 30.0% | 69.1% | R+39.1 |
| Precinct -77 | 337 | 557 | 7 | 901 | 37.4% | 61.8% | R+24.4 |
| Precinct -4141 | 472 | 404 | 13 | 889 | 53.1% | 45.4% | D+7.6 |
| Precinct -4040 | 429 | 436 | 6 | 871 | 49.3% | 50.1% | R+0.8 |
| Precinct -2727 | 306 | 522 | 3 | 831 | 36.8% | 62.8% | R+26.0 |
| Precinct -44 | 289 | 509 | 9 | 807 | 35.8% | 63.1% | R+27.3 |
| Precinct -1616 | 234 | 522 | 5 | 761 | 30.7% | 68.6% | R+37.8 |
| Precinct -2929 | 216 | 503 | 7 | 726 | 29.8% | 69.3% | R+39.5 |
| Precinct -3131 | 271 | 453 | 2 | 726 | 37.3% | 62.4% | R+25.1 |
| Precinct -1818 | 227 | 458 | 1 | 686 | 33.1% | 66.8% | R+33.7 |
| Precinct -3838 | 317 | 315 | 3 | 635 | 49.9% | 49.6% | D+0.3 |
| Precinct -2626 | 182 | 377 | 3 | 562 | 32.4% | 67.1% | R+34.7 |
| Precinct -3333 | 175 | 353 | 4 | 532 | 32.9% | 66.4% | R+33.5 |
| Precinct -3232 | 151 | 378 | 1 | 530 | 28.5% | 71.3% | R+42.8 |
| Precinct -3737 | 234 | 284 | 4 | 522 | 44.8% | 54.4% | R+9.6 |
| Precinct -2424 | 118 | 396 | 1 | 515 | 22.9% | 76.9% | R+54.0 |
| Precinct -3434 | 158 | 332 | 2 | 492 | 32.1% | 67.5% | R+35.4 |
| Precinct -1515 | 101 | 332 | 4 | 437 | 23.1% | 76.0% | R+52.9 |
| Precinct -3636 | 163 | 269 | 4 | 436 | 37.4% | 61.7% | R+24.3 |
| Precinct -3535 | 144 | 283 | 4 | 431 | 33.4% | 65.7% | R+32.3 |
| Precinct -3939 | 134 | 136 | 4 | 274 | 48.9% | 49.6% | R+0.7 |
| Precinct -1212 | 97 | 34 | 2 | 133 | 72.9% | 25.6% | D+47.4 |
| Precinct 1 - Centerville32_3200501 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 10 - Topaz Ranch Estates32_3200510 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 11 - Johnson Lane32_3200511 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 12 - Dresslerville32_3200512 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 13 - Indian Hills West32_3200513 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 14 - Pinenut32_3200514 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 15 - Valley32_3200515 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 16 - Mottsville32_3200516 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 17 - Ruhenstroth32_3200517 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 18 - Ranchos III32_3200518 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 19 - Ranchos IV32_3200519 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 2 - Fish Springs32_3200502 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 20 - Birch/Ranchos32_3200520 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 21 - Wildhorse32_3200521 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 22 - Saratoga32_3200522 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 23 - Indian Hills East32_3200523 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 24 - Topaz Lake32_3200524 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 25 - Pleasantview32_3200525 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 26 - Westwood32_3200526 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 27 - Winhaven32_3200527 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 28 - Orchard Road32_3200528 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 29 - Autumn Hills32_3200529 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 3 - Gardnerville32_3200503 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 30 - East Fork32_3200530 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 31 - Chichester32_3200531 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 32 - East Valley32_3200532 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 33 - Hot Springs32_3200533 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 34 - Sunridge32_3200534 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 35 - Glenbrook32_3200535 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 36 - Skyland32_3200536 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 37 - Zephyr Cove32_3200537 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 38 - Round Hill32_3200538 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 39 - Edgewood32_3200539 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 4 - Carson Valley Estates32_3200504 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 40 - Kingsbury32_3200540 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 41 - Daggett32_3200541 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 5 - Genoa32_3200505 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 6 - Jacks Valley32_3200506 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 7 - Minden32_3200507 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 8 - Ranchos I32_3200508 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 9 - Ranchos II32_3200509 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting Districts not defined32_32005ZZZZZZ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −40.5% |
| 1896 | +20.5% |
| 1900 | +1.6% |
| 1904 | −39.3% |
| 1908 | −13.4% |
| 1912 | +15.1% |
| 1916 | −5.2% |
| 1920 | −54.3% |
| 1924 | −42.7% |
| 1928 | −42.1% |
| 1932 | +9.2% |
| 1936 | +14.8% |
| 1940 | −28.4% |
| 1944 | −32.7% |
| 1948 | −40.8% |
| 1952 | −68.5% |
| 1956 | −61.2% |
| 1960 | −33.0% |
| 1964 | −5.5% |
| 1968 | −40.4% |
| 1972 | −49.3% |
| 1976 | −22.0% |
| 1980 | −53.1% |
| 1984 | −53.4% |
| 1988 | −37.6% |
| 1992 | −14.9% |
| 1996 | −23.1% |
| 2000 | −29.8% |
| 2004 | −28.9% |
| 2008 | −15.5% |
| 2012 | −26.8% |
| 2016 | −32.1% |
| 2020 | −29.5% |
| 2024 | −32.9% |
DemocraticRepublican
Federal and statewide elections · 3 House · 40 Senate · 4 Senate special · 12 governor
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
voter registration
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Party registration · 2026R+31.5
Presidential vote · 2024R+32.9
Registration and the presidential vote track closely here — within 1.4 points.
47,760 registered voters · 2026
domestic migration
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+814 net domestic migration · 2025
20112025
Net +5,536 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $144,692 in average income, against $143,620 for residents who stayed — 1% higher. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+1.6 on average — 34 points more Democratic-leaning than Douglas County, NV itself (R+32.9).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Carson City, NV256R+11.3
- Washoe County, NV209D+1.0
- El Dorado County, CA201R+12.0
- Lyon County, NV86R+44.4
- Clark County, NV70D+2.6
- Los Angeles County, CA61D+32.9
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Washoe County, NV292
- Carson City, NV272
- El Dorado County, CA137
- Lyon County, NV110
- Clark County, NV49
- Los Angeles County, CA29
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −13 |
| 2012 | +53 |
| 2013 | +125 |
| 2014 | +533 |
| 2015 | +187 |
| 2016 | +531 |
| 2017 | +469 |
| 2018 | +728 |
| 2019 | +691 |
| 2021 | +807 |
| 2022 | +15 |
| 2023 | +154 |
| 2024 | +442 |
| 2025 | +814 |
Nestled between the Sierra Nevada and the Carson Valley, Douglas County delivers some of Nevada's widest Republican margins, with its low-density, high-income rural character setting it apart from the urban corridors that define statewide outcomes.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 20.5 points in 1896 and a Republican high of 68.5 points in 1952. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 3.4 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 32.9 points.
A population of 49,623, a 77% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $90,754 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Amador County and Teller County.
Political twins — counties
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Amador County
California
80.9twin score
median incomemedian age12-yr trend
Teller County
Colorado
80.0twin score
median agemedian income12-yr trend≠ Swedish ancestry
Indian River County
Florida
76.6twin score
median age12-yr trendcollege share≠ Polish ancestry
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Cite this page
All citations released under CC BY 4.0. Attribution: Akashic Intelligence.
Douglas County, Nevada. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/32005/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.
License: CC BY 4.0
Embed this page
A live widget for your site — no API key, attribution built in, CC BY 4.0. All widgets & sizes →
Cities & towns in Douglas County
Nevada at the ballot boxAll elections →
Frequently asked questions
How did Douglas County, Nevada vote in 2024?
In 2024, Douglas County, Nevada voted Republican by 32.9 points (R+32.9), carried by the Republican candidate. Out of 35,556 votes cast, 11,553 went Democratic and 23,237 went Republican.
When did Douglas County, Nevada last vote Democratic?
The most recent presidential election in which Douglas County, Nevada voted Democratic was 1936.
How many people live in Douglas County, Nevada?
Douglas County, Nevada has a population of 49,623 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.
What is the median household income in Douglas County, Nevada?
Median household income in Douglas County, Nevada is $90,754 — above the national median of $80,734. The Nevada state median is $78,260.
What is the political history of Douglas County, Nevada?
Akashic tracks 38 presidential elections in Douglas County, Nevada from 1876 to 2024. Of those, 4 went Democratic and 29 went Republican.