- Lead
- 2,279
- Total
- 7,218
- vs nation
- R+30.1
- Turnout
- 80.9%
Pope County, MN
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 80.9% of 8,964 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 1,940
- Total
- 7,022
- vs nation
- R+32.1
- Turnout
- 80.3%
- Lead
- 1,687
- Total
- 6,319
- vs nation
- R+28.8
- Turnout
- 74.2%
- Lead
- 161
- Total
- 6,246
- vs nation
- R+6.4
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 248
- Total
- 6,536
- vs nation
- R+3.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 2
- Total
- 6,700
- vs nation
- D+2.4
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 37
- Total
- 5,987
- vs nation
- R+1.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 811
- Total
- 5,529
- vs nation
- D+6.1
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+31.6MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 11,4182024 5-year
- Median household income
- $76,2202024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 93.7%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.6%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 2.1%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+35.1 in 1932MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+80.1 in 1904MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Swift County, MN · twin score 91.3
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 80.9%7,256 participants ÷ 8,964 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +16.5 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off versus state
- -3.5 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 64.5%–67.6%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 6,382 | 8,603 | 74.2% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 5,506 | 8,608 | 64.0% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 7,041 | 8,769 | 80.3% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 5,690 | 8,914 | 63.8% | A/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 7,256 | 8,964 | 80.9% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
61 precincts · 7,218 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -GLENWOOD P-1GLENWOOD P-1 | 577 | 721 | 29 | 1,327 | 43.5% | 54.3% | R+10.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -GLENWOOD TWPGLENWOOD TWP | 273 | 541 | 13 | 827 | 33.0% | 65.4% | R+32.4 |
| Precinct -STARBUCKSTARBUCK | 289 | 484 | 15 | 788 | 36.7% | 61.4% | R+24.7 |
| Precinct -LEVEN TWPLEVEN TWP | 118 | 249 | 13 | 380 | 31.1% | 65.5% | R+34.5 |
| Precinct -MINNEWASKA TWPMINNEWASKA TWP | 157 | 213 | 6 | 376 | 41.8% | 56.6% | R+14.9 |
| Precinct -WHITE BEAR LAKE TWPWHITE BEAR LAKE TWP | 90 | 239 | 5 | 334 | 26.9% | 71.6% | R+44.6 |
| Precinct -RENO TWPRENO TWP | 81 | 238 | 7 | 326 | 24.8% | 73.0% | R+48.2 |
| Precinct -LONG BEACHLONG BEACH | 132 | 148 | 5 | 285 | 46.3% | 51.9% | R+5.6 |
| Precinct -GLENWOOD P-2GLENWOOD P-2 | 80 | 127 | 4 | 211 | 37.9% | 60.2% | R+22.3 |
| Precinct -GROVE LAKE TWPGROVE LAKE TWP | 38 | 145 | 4 | 187 | 20.3% | 77.5% | R+57.2 |
| Precinct -LOWRYLOWRY | 46 | 128 | 5 | 179 | 25.7% | 71.5% | R+45.8 |
| Precinct -BEN WADE TWPBEN WADE TWP | 39 | 129 | 5 | 173 | 22.5% | 74.6% | R+52.0 |
| Precinct -WESTPORT TWPWESTPORT TWP | 33 | 120 | 1 | 154 | 21.4% | 77.9% | R+56.5 |
| Precinct -CYRUSCYRUS | 38 | 113 | 2 | 153 | 24.8% | 73.9% | R+49.0 |
| Precinct -CHIPPEWA FALLS TWPCHIPPEWA FALLS TWP | 67 | 81 | 4 | 152 | 44.1% | 53.3% | R+9.2 |
| Precinct -GILCHRIST TWPGILCHRIST TWP | 42 | 102 | 1 | 145 | 29.0% | 70.3% | R+41.4 |
| Precinct -VILLARDVILLARD | 32 | 107 | 5 | 144 | 22.2% | 74.3% | R+52.1 |
| Precinct -BLUE MOUNDS TWPBLUE MOUNDS TWP | 33 | 88 | 2 | 123 | 26.8% | 71.5% | R+44.7 |
| Precinct -NORA TWPNORA TWP | 31 | 88 | 2 | 121 | 25.6% | 72.7% | R+47.1 |
| Precinct -LANGHEI TWPLANGHEI TWP | 46 | 69 | 2 | 117 | 39.3% | 59.0% | R+19.7 |
| Precinct -BARSNESS TWPBARSNESS TWP | 34 | 67 | 3 | 104 | 32.7% | 64.4% | R+31.7 |
| Precinct -BANGOR TWPBANGOR TWP | 16 | 85 | 1 | 102 | 15.7% | 83.3% | R+67.6 |
| Precinct -NEW PRAIRIE TWPNEW PRAIRIE TWP | 22 | 78 | 1 | 101 | 21.8% | 77.2% | R+55.4 |
| Precinct -WALDEN TWPWALDEN TWP | 14 | 76 | 1 | 91 | 15.4% | 83.5% | R+68.1 |
| Precinct -HOFF TWPHOFF TWP | 16 | 71 | 0 | 87 | 18.4% | 81.6% | R+63.2 |
| Precinct -ROLLING FORKS TWPROLLING FORKS TWP | 19 | 62 | 5 | 86 | 22.1% | 72.1% | R+50.0 |
| Precinct -LAKE JOHANNA TWPLAKE JOHANNA TWP | 21 | 49 | 1 | 71 | 29.6% | 69.0% | R+39.4 |
| Precinct -FARWELLFARWELL | 5 | 30 | 0 | 35 | 14.3% | 85.7% | R+71.4 |
| Precinct -WESTPORTWESTPORT | 3 | 20 | 0 | 23 | 13.0% | 87.0% | R+73.9 |
| Precinct -SEDANSEDAN | 6 | 9 | 1 | 16 | 37.5% | 56.3% | R+18.8 |
| Bangor Twp. Voting District27_271210005 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Barsness Twp. Voting District27_271210010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Ben Wade Twp. Voting District27_271210015 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Blue Mounds Twp. Voting District27_271210020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Brooten Voting District27_271210022 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Chippewa Falls Twp. Voting District27_271210025 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Cyrus Voting District27_271210030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Farwell Voting District27_271210035 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Gilchrist Twp. Voting District27_271210040 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Glenwood P-127_271210045 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Glenwood P-227_271210050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Glenwood Twp. Voting District27_271210055 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Grove Lake Twp. Voting District27_271210060 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Hoff Twp. Voting District27_271210065 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Lake Johanna Twp. Voting District27_271210070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Langhei Twp. Voting District27_271210075 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Leven Twp. Voting District27_271210080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Long Beach Voting District27_271210085 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Lowry Voting District27_271210090 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Minnewaska Twp. Voting District27_271210095 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| New Prairie Twp. Voting District27_271210100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Nora Twp. Voting District27_271210105 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Reno Twp. Voting District27_271210110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Rolling Forks Twp. Voting District27_271210115 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Sedan Voting District27_271210120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Starbuck Voting District27_271210125 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Villard Voting District27_271210130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Walden Twp. Voting District27_271210135 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Westport Twp. Voting District27_271210145 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Westport Voting District27_271210140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| White Bear Lake Twp. Voting District27_271210150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −41.7% |
| 1896 | −43.2% |
| 1900 | −55.7% |
| 1904 | −80.1% |
| 1908 | −57.9% |
| 1912 | +2.8% |
| 1916 | −7.7% |
| 1920 | −60.7% |
| 1924 | −42.6% |
| 1928 | −33.5% |
| 1932 | +35.1% |
| 1936 | +25.4% |
| 1940 | +7.6% |
| 1944 | +3.2% |
| 1948 | +20.8% |
| 1952 | −20.2% |
| 1956 | −2.8% |
| 1960 | −3.0% |
| 1964 | +23.2% |
| 1968 | +1.6% |
| 1972 | +5.3% |
| 1976 | +24.4% |
| 1980 | −10.3% |
| 1984 | −5.2% |
| 1988 | +7.7% |
| 1992 | +12.3% |
| 1996 | +14.7% |
| 2000 | −0.6% |
| 2004 | −0.0% |
| 2008 | +3.8% |
| 2012 | −2.6% |
| 2016 | −26.7% |
| 2020 | −27.6% |
| 2024 | −31.6% |
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 7,338 |
| 2018 | 7,211 |
| 2020 | 7,774 |
| 2022 | 7,661 |
| 2024 | 8,210 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−19 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +439 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $59,759 in average income, against $89,342 for residents who stayed — 33% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+33.5 on average — 1.9 points more Republican-leaning than Pope County, MN itself (R+31.6).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Douglas County, MN89R+35.0
- Stearns County, MN20R+26.7
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Douglas County, MN81
- Stearns County, MN34
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −41 |
| 2012 | −27 |
| 2013 | −14 |
| 2014 | +47 |
| 2015 | +7 |
| 2016 | +42 |
| 2017 | +7 |
| 2018 | +90 |
| 2019 | +151 |
| 2021 | +98 |
| 2022 | +29 |
| 2023 | −8 |
| 2024 | +77 |
| 2025 | −19 |
Pope County's sparse, agriculture-driven population and predominantly white, non-college demographic profile have pushed its presidential margins steadily rightward over the past two decades, reaching R+31.6 in 2024.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 35.1 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 80.1 points in 1904. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 3.9 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 31.6 points.
A population of 11,418, a 94% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $76,220 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Swift County and Chippewa County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Pope County, Minnesota. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/27121/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.