- Lead
- 19,200
- Total
- 35,352
- vs nation
- R+52.8
- Turnout
- 63.5%
Morgan County, IN
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 63.5% of 56,155 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 19,731
- Total
- 36,159
- vs nation
- R+59.0
- Turnout
- 68.6%
- Lead
- 17,631
- Total
- 31,453
- vs nation
- R+58.1
- Turnout
- 60.7%
- Lead
- 11,622
- Total
- 28,325
- vs nation
- R+44.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 7,799
- Total
- 28,811
- vs nation
- R+34.3
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 12,547
- Total
- 26,029
- vs nation
- R+45.7
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 9,058
- Total
- 22,036
- vs nation
- R+41.6
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 7,060
- Total
- 21,596
- vs nation
- R+41.2
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+54.3MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 72,6592024 5-year
- Median household income
- $79,4292024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 93.5%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.8%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 2.1%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+22.5 in 1912MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+56.1 in 2016MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Wells County, IN · twin score 92.5
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 63.5%35,686 participants ÷ 56,155 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +29.1 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off versus state
- +4.0 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 34.5%–52.7%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 32,040 | 52,808 | 60.7% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 36,261 | 53,259 | 68.1% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 36,994 | 53,894 | 68.6% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 21,943 | 55,447 | 39.6% | A/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 35,686 | 56,155 | 63.5% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
96 precincts · 35,352 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -GREEN 02GREEN 02 | 189 | 870 | 12 | 1,071 | 17.6% | 81.2% | R+63.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -WASHINGTON 10WASHINGTON 10 | 279 | 767 | 11 | 1,057 | 26.4% | 72.6% | R+46.2 |
| Precinct -MONROE 01MONROE 01 | 221 | 786 | 17 | 1,024 | 21.6% | 76.8% | R+55.2 |
| Precinct -GREEN 01GREEN 01 | 201 | 806 | 12 | 1,019 | 19.7% | 79.1% | R+59.4 |
| Precinct -MADISON 02MADISON 02 | 210 | 796 | 13 | 1,019 | 20.6% | 78.1% | R+57.5 |
| Precinct -MONROE 03MONROE 03 | 230 | 740 | 14 | 984 | 23.4% | 75.2% | R+51.8 |
| Precinct -WASHINGTON 09WASHINGTON 09 | 219 | 721 | 24 | 964 | 22.7% | 74.8% | R+52.1 |
| Precinct -MADISON 05MADISON 05 | 313 | 627 | 18 | 958 | 32.7% | 65.4% | R+32.8 |
| Precinct -WASHINGTON 07WASHINGTON 07 | 208 | 728 | 16 | 952 | 21.8% | 76.5% | R+54.6 |
| Precinct -MADISON 01MADISON 01 | 194 | 745 | 12 | 951 | 20.4% | 78.3% | R+57.9 |
| Precinct -MADISON 04MADISON 04 | 267 | 651 | 28 | 946 | 28.2% | 68.8% | R+40.6 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSON 02JEFFERSON 02 | 221 | 689 | 19 | 929 | 23.8% | 74.2% | R+50.4 |
| Precinct -ASHLAND 01ASHLAND 01 | 124 | 766 | 17 | 907 | 13.7% | 84.5% | R+70.8 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSON 01JEFFERSON 01 | 151 | 722 | 19 | 892 | 16.9% | 80.9% | R+64.0 |
| Precinct -WASHINGTON 05WASHINGTON 05 | 185 | 681 | 20 | 886 | 20.9% | 76.9% | R+56.0 |
| Precinct -BROWN 04BROWN 04 | 233 | 636 | 11 | 880 | 26.5% | 72.3% | R+45.8 |
| Precinct -MADISON 03MADISON 03 | 191 | 666 | 13 | 870 | 22.0% | 76.6% | R+54.6 |
| Precinct -WASHINGTON 06WASHINGTON 06 | 226 | 604 | 32 | 862 | 26.2% | 70.1% | R+43.9 |
| Precinct -GREGG 02GREGG 02 | 171 | 661 | 17 | 849 | 20.1% | 77.9% | R+57.7 |
| Precinct -JACKSON 01JACKSON 01 | 197 | 635 | 12 | 844 | 23.3% | 75.2% | R+51.9 |
| Precinct -HARRISON 01HARRISON 01 | 149 | 683 | 9 | 841 | 17.7% | 81.2% | R+63.5 |
| Precinct -BROWN 05BROWN 05 | 230 | 587 | 20 | 837 | 27.5% | 70.1% | R+42.7 |
| Precinct -BROWN 03BROWN 03 | 223 | 588 | 15 | 826 | 27.0% | 71.2% | R+44.2 |
| Precinct -BROWN 02BROWN 02 | 201 | 609 | 13 | 823 | 24.4% | 74.0% | R+49.6 |
| Precinct -MADISON 06MADISON 06 | 160 | 630 | 21 | 811 | 19.7% | 77.7% | R+58.0 |
| Precinct -JACKSON 02JACKSON 02 | 143 | 635 | 9 | 787 | 18.2% | 80.7% | R+62.5 |
| Precinct -MONROE 02MONROE 02 | 203 | 537 | 17 | 757 | 26.8% | 70.9% | R+44.1 |
| Precinct -WASHINGTON 02WASHINGTON 02 | 153 | 553 | 15 | 721 | 21.2% | 76.7% | R+55.5 |
| Precinct -GREGG 01GREGG 01 | 128 | 582 | 8 | 718 | 17.8% | 81.1% | R+63.2 |
| Precinct -CLAY 03CLAY 03 | 156 | 547 | 14 | 717 | 21.8% | 76.3% | R+54.5 |
| Precinct -CLAY 02CLAY 02 | 146 | 553 | 16 | 715 | 20.4% | 77.3% | R+56.9 |
| Precinct -BROWN 01BROWN 01 | 182 | 508 | 14 | 704 | 25.9% | 72.2% | R+46.3 |
| Precinct -WASHINGTON 01WASHINGTON 01 | 133 | 547 | 9 | 689 | 19.3% | 79.4% | R+60.1 |
| Precinct -CLAY 01CLAY 01 | 156 | 508 | 12 | 676 | 23.1% | 75.1% | R+52.1 |
| Precinct -WASHINGTON 03WASHINGTON 03 | 102 | 548 | 9 | 659 | 15.5% | 83.2% | R+67.7 |
| Precinct -WASHINGTON 04WASHINGTON 04 | 174 | 465 | 15 | 654 | 26.6% | 71.1% | R+44.5 |
| Precinct -BROWN 07BROWN 07 | 154 | 480 | 9 | 643 | 24.0% | 74.7% | R+50.7 |
| Precinct -BROWN 08BROWN 08 | 131 | 477 | 11 | 619 | 21.2% | 77.1% | R+55.9 |
| Precinct -RAY 02RAY 02 | 89 | 452 | 6 | 547 | 16.3% | 82.6% | R+66.4 |
| Precinct -ADAMS 01ADAMS 01 | 94 | 438 | 12 | 544 | 17.3% | 80.5% | R+63.2 |
| Precinct -WASHINGTON 08WASHINGTON 08 | 133 | 392 | 11 | 536 | 24.8% | 73.1% | R+48.3 |
| Precinct -BROWN 06BROWN 06 | 99 | 376 | 6 | 481 | 20.6% | 78.2% | R+57.6 |
| Precinct -BAKER 01BAKER 01 | 56 | 340 | 7 | 403 | 13.9% | 84.4% | R+70.5 |
| Precinct -JACKSON 03JACKSON 03 | 58 | 322 | 3 | 383 | 15.1% | 84.1% | R+68.9 |
| Precinct -RAY 01RAY 01 | 34 | 166 | 2 | 202 | 16.8% | 82.2% | R+65.3 |
| Precinct -BROWN 09BROWN 09 | 48 | 145 | 2 | 195 | 24.6% | 74.4% | R+49.7 |
| ADAMS18_1810900010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ASHLAND 0118_1810900020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ASHLAND 0218_1810900030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BAKER18_1810900040 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BROWN 0118_1810900050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BROWN 0418_1810900080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BROWN 0618_1810900100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BROWN 0818_1810900120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BROWN 1018_1810900140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BROWN 11 NV18_1810900150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BROWN 218_1810900060 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BROWN 318_1810900070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BROWN 518_1810900090 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BROWN 718_1810900110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BROWN 918_1810900130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CLAY 118_1810900160 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CLAY 218_1810900170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GREEN 0118_1810900180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GREEN 0218_1810900190 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GREGG 118_1810900200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GREGG 218_1810900210 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HARRISON18_1810900220 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JACKSON 0118_1810900230 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JACKSON 0218_1810900240 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSON 118_1810900250 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSON 218_1810900260 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MADISON 0118_1810900270 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MADISON 0218_1810900280 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MADISON 0318_1810900290 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MADISON 0418_1810900300 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MADISON 0618_1810900315 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MADISON 518_1810900310 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MONROE 0118_1810900320 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MONROE 218_1810900330 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MONROE 318_1810900340 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| RAY 118_1810900350 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| RAY 218_1810900360 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON 0318_1810900390 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON 0418_1810900400 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON 118_1810900370 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON 1018_1810900480 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON 1118_1810900490 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON 1218_1810900500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON 1318_1810900510 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON 218_1810900380 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON 518_1810900410 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON 618_1810900420 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON 718_1810900450 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON 818_1810900460 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON 918_1810900470 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −7.8% |
| 1896 | −5.3% |
| 1900 | −4.8% |
| 1904 | −12.0% |
| 1908 | −4.7% |
| 1912 | +22.5% |
| 1916 | −4.3% |
| 1920 | −13.7% |
| 1924 | −13.4% |
| 1928 | −16.2% |
| 1932 | +8.8% |
| 1936 | −3.0% |
| 1940 | −14.9% |
| 1944 | −18.9% |
| 1948 | −12.1% |
| 1952 | −26.5% |
| 1956 | −27.3% |
| 1960 | −27.2% |
| 1964 | −8.7% |
| 1968 | −30.4% |
| 1972 | −55.7% |
| 1976 | −20.8% |
| 1980 | −40.5% |
| 1984 | −52.3% |
| 1988 | −45.1% |
| 1992 | −29.6% |
| 1996 | −32.7% |
| 2000 | −41.1% |
| 2004 | −48.2% |
| 2008 | −27.1% |
| 2012 | −41.0% |
| 2016 | −56.1% |
| 2020 | −54.6% |
| 2024 | −54.3% |
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | R | 25.3%2,039 | 74.7%6,005 | 8,044 |
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 51,790 |
| 2018 | 47,932 |
| 2020 | 51,779 |
| 2022 | 52,503 |
| 2024 | 55,232 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+974 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +3,562 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $63,880 in average income, against $79,815 for residents who stayed — 20% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+0.3 on average — 54 points more Democratic-leaning than Morgan County, IN itself (R+54.3).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Marion County, IN829D+27.6
- Hendricks County, IN397R+21.5
- Johnson County, IN284R+34.3
- Monroe County, IN105D+27.4
- Owen County, IN45R+50.7
- Putnam County, IN39R+52.0
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Marion County, IN521
- Hendricks County, IN297
- Johnson County, IN241
- Monroe County, IN87
- Owen County, IN67
- Putnam County, IN56
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −90 |
| 2012 | −189 |
| 2013 | +90 |
| 2014 | +67 |
| 2015 | −67 |
| 2016 | −86 |
| 2017 | +41 |
| 2018 | +178 |
| 2019 | +208 |
| 2021 | +509 |
| 2022 | +188 |
| 2023 | +946 |
| 2024 | +793 |
| 2025 | +974 |
Morgan County, directly south of Indianapolis, has shifted steadily toward lopsided Republican margins over the past two decades, with its 2024 presidential result of R+54.3 placing it among the state's most one-sided exurban counties.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 22.5 points in 1912 and a Republican high of 56.1 points in 2016. The 2024 margin was 54.3 points.
A population of 72,659, a 94% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $79,429 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Wells County and Wabash County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Morgan County, Indiana. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/18109/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.