HarrisDemocratic38.9%22,810TrumpRepublican59.3%34,734KennedyIndependent1.1%661
R+20.3- Lead
- 11,924
- Total
- 58,612
- vs nation
- R+18.9
- Turnout
- 63.3%
Akashiccounty
Clark County, IN
Office (updates table and map)
President margin by year
Place winner margin
Boundary by 2024 margin · Precinct returns · VEST · MIT Election Lab
President results by year
2024 turnout 63.3% of 93,883 citizens 18+
BidenDemocratic39.9%23,093TrumpRepublican58.2%33,668JorgensenLibertarian1.9%1,108
R+18.3- Lead
- 10,575
- Total
- 57,869
- vs nation
- R+22.7
- Turnout
- 66.6%
ClintonDemocratic36.3%18,791TrumpRepublican58.0%30,012JohnsonLibertarian4.5%2,304
R+21.7- Lead
- 11,221
- Total
- 51,749
- vs nation
- R+23.8
- Turnout
- 61.3%
ObamaDemocratic44.0%20,807RomneyRepublican53.8%25,450JohnsonLibertarian1.8%866
R+9.8- Lead
- 4,643
- Total
- 47,278
- vs nation
- R+13.7
- Turnout
- —
ObamaDemocratic46.0%21,953McCainRepublican53.1%25,326OtherAll other candidates0.9%446
R+7.1- Lead
- 3,373
- Total
- 47,725
- vs nation
- R+14.3
- Turnout
- —
KerryDemocratic41.7%17,648BushRepublican57.9%24,495OtherAll other candidates0.5%194
R+16.2- Lead
- 6,847
- Total
- 42,337
- vs nation
- R+13.7
- Turnout
- —
GoreDemocratic46.5%17,360BushRepublican52.0%19,417OtherAll other candidates1.5%559
R+5.5- Lead
- 2,057
- Total
- 37,336
- vs nation
- R+6.0
- Turnout
- —
ClintonDemocratic49.6%17,799DoleRepublican40.1%14,396PerotReform10.0%3,578
D+9.5- Lead
- 3,403
- Total
- 35,916
- vs nation
- D+1.0
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+20.3MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 124,3542024 5-year
- Median household income
- $74,2142024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 79.6%2024 5-year
- Black
- 7.0%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 6.9%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+38.3 in 1964MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+21.7 in 2016MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Spokane County, WA · twin score 84.2
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 63.3%59,403 participants ÷ 93,883 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +26.4 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off versus state
- +1.3 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 36.9%–51.0%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 52,570 | 85,733 | 61.3% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 55,163 | 87,256 | 63.2% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 58,930 | 88,484 | 66.6% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 36,981 | 92,022 | 40.2% | A/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 59,403 | 93,883 | 63.3% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
155 precincts · 58,804 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -CHARLESTOWN 04CHARLESTOWN 04 | 573 | 1,295 | 35 | 1,903 | 30.1% | 68.1% | R+37.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -CHARLESTOWN 06CHARLESTOWN 06 | 550 | 1,230 | 37 | 1,817 | 30.3% | 67.7% | R+37.4 |
| Precinct -UTICA 02UTICA 02 | 887 | 879 | 45 | 1,811 | 49.0% | 48.5% | D+0.4 |
| Precinct -UTICA 04UTICA 04 | 820 | 919 | 35 | 1,774 | 46.2% | 51.8% | R+5.6 |
| Precinct -SILVER CREEK 06SILVER CREEK 06 | 569 | 1,079 | 40 | 1,688 | 33.7% | 63.9% | R+30.2 |
| Precinct -UTICA 03UTICA 03 | 649 | 956 | 30 | 1,635 | 39.7% | 58.5% | R+18.8 |
| Precinct -MONROE 02MONROE 02 | 312 | 1,157 | 27 | 1,496 | 20.9% | 77.3% | R+56.5 |
| Precinct -CARR 01CARR 01 | 415 | 1,016 | 26 | 1,457 | 28.5% | 69.7% | R+41.2 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONVILLE 25JEFFERSONVILLE 25 | 629 | 761 | 28 | 1,418 | 44.4% | 53.7% | R+9.3 |
| Precinct -CARR 02CARR 02 | 350 | 987 | 28 | 1,365 | 25.6% | 72.3% | R+46.7 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONVILLE 15JEFFERSONVILLE 15 | 690 | 623 | 24 | 1,337 | 51.6% | 46.6% | D+5.0 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONVILLE 13JEFFERSONVILLE 13 | 679 | 592 | 45 | 1,316 | 51.6% | 45.0% | D+6.6 |
| Precinct -UNION 01UNION 01 | 316 | 937 | 17 | 1,270 | 24.9% | 73.8% | R+48.9 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONVILLE 16JEFFERSONVILLE 16 | 559 | 651 | 29 | 1,239 | 45.1% | 52.5% | R+7.4 |
| Precinct -UNION 02UNION 02 | 287 | 778 | 15 | 1,080 | 26.6% | 72.0% | R+45.5 |
| Precinct -SILVER CREEK 04SILVER CREEK 04 | 367 | 669 | 29 | 1,065 | 34.5% | 62.8% | R+28.4 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONVILLE 18JEFFERSONVILLE 18 | 483 | 550 | 18 | 1,051 | 46.0% | 52.3% | R+6.4 |
| Precinct -SILVER CREEK_CLARKSVILLE 43SILVER CREEK_CLARKSVILLE 43 | 368 | 649 | 18 | 1,035 | 35.6% | 62.7% | R+27.1 |
| Precinct -CHARLESTOWN 03CHARLESTOWN 03 | 302 | 687 | 10 | 999 | 30.2% | 68.8% | R+38.5 |
| Precinct -CHARLESTOWN 07CHARLESTOWN 07 | 234 | 748 | 11 | 993 | 23.6% | 75.3% | R+51.8 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONVILLE 17JEFFERSONVILLE 17 | 437 | 506 | 24 | 967 | 45.2% | 52.3% | R+7.1 |
| Precinct -OREGON 01OREGON 01 | 179 | 743 | 15 | 937 | 19.1% | 79.3% | R+60.2 |
| Precinct -WASHINGTON 01WASHINGTON 01 | 137 | 731 | 17 | 885 | 15.5% | 82.6% | R+67.1 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONVILLE 24JEFFERSONVILLE 24 | 476 | 376 | 23 | 875 | 54.4% | 43.0% | D+11.4 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONVILLE 09JEFFERSONVILLE 09 | 446 | 412 | 14 | 872 | 51.1% | 47.2% | D+3.9 |
| Precinct -CHARLESTOWN 01CHARLESTOWN 01 | 278 | 573 | 17 | 868 | 32.0% | 66.0% | R+34.0 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONVILLE 20JEFFERSONVILLE 20 | 413 | 431 | 9 | 853 | 48.4% | 50.5% | R+2.1 |
| Precinct -MONROE 01MONROE 01 | 194 | 630 | 22 | 846 | 22.9% | 74.5% | R+51.5 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONVILLE 37JEFFERSONVILLE 37 | 371 | 431 | 22 | 824 | 45.0% | 52.3% | R+7.3 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONVILLE 40JEFFERSONVILLE 40 | 370 | 432 | 18 | 820 | 45.1% | 52.7% | R+7.6 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONVILLE 23JEFFERSONVILLE 23 | 406 | 385 | 20 | 811 | 50.1% | 47.5% | D+2.6 |
| Precinct -MONROE 03MONROE 03 | 199 | 577 | 21 | 797 | 25.0% | 72.4% | R+47.4 |
| Precinct -CHARLESTOWN 08CHARLESTOWN 08 | 186 | 587 | 14 | 787 | 23.6% | 74.6% | R+51.0 |
| Precinct -SILVER CREEK 03SILVER CREEK 03 | 244 | 523 | 14 | 781 | 31.2% | 67.0% | R+35.7 |
| Precinct -WOOD TWP 02WOOD TWP 02 | 188 | 559 | 17 | 764 | 24.6% | 73.2% | R+48.6 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONVILLE 38JEFFERSONVILLE 38 | 368 | 377 | 18 | 763 | 48.2% | 49.4% | R+1.2 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONVILLE 22JEFFERSONVILLE 22 | 371 | 340 | 14 | 725 | 51.2% | 46.9% | D+4.3 |
| Precinct -SILVER CREEK_CLARKSVILLE 44SILVER CREEK_CLARKSVILLE 44 | 296 | 396 | 16 | 708 | 41.8% | 55.9% | R+14.1 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONVILLE 07JEFFERSONVILLE 07 | 338 | 299 | 13 | 650 | 52.0% | 46.0% | D+6.0 |
| Precinct -CHARLESTOWN 05CHARLESTOWN 05 | 239 | 376 | 13 | 628 | 38.1% | 59.9% | R+21.8 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONVILLE 42JEFFERSONVILLE 42 | 242 | 327 | 16 | 585 | 41.4% | 55.9% | R+14.5 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONVILLE 04JEFFERSONVILLE 04 | 370 | 207 | 5 | 582 | 63.6% | 35.6% | D+28.0 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONVILLE 35JEFFERSONVILLE 35 | 309 | 251 | 11 | 571 | 54.1% | 44.0% | D+10.2 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONVILLE 26JEFFERSONVILLE 26 | 273 | 262 | 19 | 554 | 49.3% | 47.3% | D+2.0 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONVILLE 12JEFFERSONVILLE 12 | 261 | 262 | 25 | 548 | 47.6% | 47.8% | R+0.2 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONVILLE 14JEFFERSONVILLE 14 | 220 | 315 | 9 | 544 | 40.4% | 57.9% | R+17.5 |
| Precinct -SILVER CREEK 01SILVER CREEK 01 | 156 | 354 | 9 | 519 | 30.1% | 68.2% | R+38.2 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONVILLE 36JEFFERSONVILLE 36 | 245 | 259 | 12 | 516 | 47.5% | 50.2% | R+2.7 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONVILLE 03JEFFERSONVILLE 03 | 350 | 144 | 15 | 509 | 68.8% | 28.3% | D+40.5 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONVILLE 11JEFFERSONVILLE 11 | 244 | 244 | 16 | 504 | 48.4% | 48.4% | Exact tie |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONVILLE 41JEFFERSONVILLE 41 | 251 | 228 | 10 | 489 | 51.3% | 46.6% | D+4.7 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONVILLE 08JEFFERSONVILLE 08 | 232 | 248 | 7 | 487 | 47.6% | 50.9% | R+3.3 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONVILLE 33JEFFERSONVILLE 33 | 237 | 235 | 14 | 486 | 48.8% | 48.4% | D+0.4 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONVILLE 05JEFFERSONVILLE 05 | 275 | 192 | 11 | 478 | 57.5% | 40.2% | D+17.4 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONVILLE 10JEFFERSONVILLE 10 | 243 | 217 | 13 | 473 | 51.4% | 45.9% | D+5.5 |
| Precinct -SILVER CREEK 02SILVER CREEK 02 | 156 | 302 | 12 | 470 | 33.2% | 64.3% | R+31.1 |
| Precinct -OWENOWEN | 91 | 368 | 8 | 467 | 19.5% | 78.8% | R+59.3 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONVILLE 21JEFFERSONVILLE 21 | 203 | 245 | 17 | 465 | 43.7% | 52.7% | R+9.0 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONVILLE 39JEFFERSONVILLE 39 | 229 | 218 | 9 | 456 | 50.2% | 47.8% | D+2.4 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONVILLE 01JEFFERSONVILLE 01 | 205 | 221 | 9 | 435 | 47.1% | 50.8% | R+3.7 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONVILLE 30JEFFERSONVILLE 30 | 200 | 216 | 14 | 430 | 46.5% | 50.2% | R+3.7 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONVILLE 31JEFFERSONVILLE 31 | 170 | 246 | 12 | 428 | 39.7% | 57.5% | R+17.8 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONVILLE 06JEFFERSONVILLE 06 | 204 | 203 | 6 | 413 | 49.4% | 49.2% | D+0.2 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONVILLE 34JEFFERSONVILLE 34 | 192 | 195 | 11 | 398 | 48.2% | 49.0% | R+0.8 |
| Precinct -SILVER CREEK 05SILVER CREEK 05 | 145 | 227 | 8 | 380 | 38.2% | 59.7% | R+21.6 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONVILLE 02JEFFERSONVILLE 02 | 231 | 125 | 11 | 367 | 62.9% | 34.1% | D+28.9 |
| Precinct -CHARLESTOWN 02CHARLESTOWN 02 | 113 | 236 | 9 | 358 | 31.6% | 65.9% | R+34.4 |
| Precinct -WOOD TWP 01WOOD TWP 01 | 84 | 254 | 8 | 346 | 24.3% | 73.4% | R+49.1 |
| Precinct -UTICA 01UTICA 01 | 100 | 225 | 9 | 334 | 29.9% | 67.4% | R+37.4 |
| Precinct -WOOD TWP 03WOOD TWP 03 | 73 | 241 | 10 | 324 | 22.5% | 74.4% | R+51.9 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONVILLE 32JEFFERSONVILLE 32 | 138 | 163 | 12 | 313 | 44.1% | 52.1% | R+8.0 |
| Precinct -SILVER CREEK 07SILVER CREEK 07 | 88 | 185 | 1 | 274 | 32.1% | 67.5% | R+35.4 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONVILLE 27JEFFERSONVILLE 27 | 83 | 122 | 11 | 216 | 38.4% | 56.5% | R+18.1 |
| Precinct -BETHLEHEMBETHLEHEM | 22 | 150 | 3 | 175 | 12.6% | 85.7% | R+73.1 |
| BETHLEHEM18_1801900010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CARR18_1801900020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CHARLESTOWN 0518_1801900070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CHARLESTOWN 06 CITY18_1801900085 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CHARLESTOWN 07 CITY18_1801900091 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CHARLESTOWN 07 JEFFERSONVILLE 118_1801900095 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CHARLESTOWN 07 JEFFERSONVILLE 218_1801900096 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CHARLESTOWN 118_1801900030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CHARLESTOWN 218_1801900040 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CHARLESTOWN 318_1801900050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CHARLESTOWN 418_1801900060 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CHARLESTOWN 618_1801900080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CHARLESTOWN 718_1801900090 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CHARLESTOWN 818_1801900100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CHARLESTOWN 918_1801900110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSONVILLE 0218_1801900130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSONVILLE 0518_1801900160 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSONVILLE 0918_1801900200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSONVILLE 118_1801900120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSONVILLE 1018_1801900210 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSONVILLE 1118_1801900220 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSONVILLE 11A18_1801900230 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSONVILLE 1218_1801900240 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSONVILLE 1318_1801900250 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSONVILLE 1418_1801900260 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSONVILLE 1518_1801900270 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSONVILLE 1618_1801900280 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSONVILLE 1718_1801900300 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSONVILLE 1818_1801900310 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSONVILLE 2018_1801900320 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSONVILLE 2118_1801900330 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSONVILLE 2218_1801900340 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSONVILLE 2318_1801900350 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSONVILLE 2418_1801900360 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSONVILLE 2518_1801900370 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSONVILLE 2718_1801900380 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSONVILLE 318_1801900140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSONVILLE 3018_1801900390 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSONVILLE 3118_1801900400 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSONVILLE 3218_1801900410 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSONVILLE 3318_1801900420 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSONVILLE 3418_1801900430 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSONVILLE 3518_1801900440 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSONVILLE 3618_1801900450 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSONVILLE 3718_1801900460 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSONVILLE 3818_1801900470 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSONVILLE 3918_1801900480 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSONVILLE 418_1801900150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSONVILLE 4018_1801900490 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSONVILLE 4118_1801900500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSONVILLE 4218_1801900510 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSONVILLE 618_1801900170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSONVILLE 718_1801900180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSONVILLE 818_1801900190 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MONROE 0118_1801900520 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MONROE 0218_1801900530 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MONROE 0318_1801900540 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| OREGON 0118_1801900550 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| OWEN18_1801900560 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SILVER CREEK / CLARKVILLE 4318_1801900650 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SILVER CREEK 0118_1801900580 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SILVER CREEK 0418_1801900610 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SILVER CREEK 0518_1801900620 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SILVER CREEK 0618_1801900630 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SILVER CREEK 218_1801900590 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SILVER CREEK 318_1801900600 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SILVER CREEK 718_1801900640 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UNION 0118_1801900660 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UTICA 0118_1801900670 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UTICA 0218_1801900680 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UTICA 02 JEFFERSONVILLE18_1801900685 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UTICA 0318_1801900690 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UTICA 03 JEFFERSONVILLE18_1801900695 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UTICA 0418_1801900700 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UTICA 04 CHARLESTOWN18_1801900705 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UTICA 04 JEFFERSONVILLE18_1801900701 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UTICA JEFF CITY 1918_1801900710 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON 0118_1801900720 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WOOD TWP 0118_1801900730 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WOOD TWP 0218_1801900740 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WOOD TWP 0318_1801900750 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +9.9% |
| 1896 | −1.4% |
| 1900 | +3.5% |
| 1904 | −0.8% |
| 1908 | +4.8% |
| 1912 | +37.0% |
| 1916 | +5.8% |
| 1920 | +2.0% |
| 1924 | −6.3% |
| 1928 | −13.0% |
| 1932 | +23.3% |
| 1936 | +28.8% |
| 1940 | +19.7% |
| 1944 | +14.9% |
| 1948 | +21.8% |
| 1952 | +2.2% |
| 1956 | −2.5% |
| 1960 | +6.0% |
| 1964 | +38.3% |
| 1968 | +4.4% |
| 1972 | −19.4% |
| 1976 | +13.2% |
| 1980 | −4.4% |
| 1984 | −15.6% |
| 1988 | −6.5% |
| 1992 | +11.2% |
| 1996 | +9.5% |
| 2000 | −5.5% |
| 2004 | −16.2% |
| 2008 | −7.1% |
| 2012 | −9.8% |
| 2016 | −21.7% |
| 2020 | −18.3% |
| 2024 | −20.3% |
DemocraticRepublican
Federal and statewide elections · 37 Senate · 3 Senate special · 13 governor
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
voter registration
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
Registered voters
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 94,906 |
| 2018 | 88,398 |
| 2020 | 93,743 |
| 2022 | 98,877 |
| 2024 | 96,262 |
domestic migration
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+2,651 net domestic migration · 2025
20112025
Net +13,033 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $55,332 in average income, against $73,613 for residents who stayed — 25% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+9.4 on average — 11 points more Democratic-leaning than Clark County, IN itself (R+20.3).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Jefferson County, KY1,046D+16.5
- Floyd County, IN969R+15.5
- Harrison County, IN155R+46.9
- Scott County, IN136R+51.5
- Washington County, IN114R+54.8
- Bullitt County, KY65R+51.0
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Floyd County, IN976
- Jefferson County, KY683
- Scott County, IN150
- Harrison County, IN144
- Washington County, IN126
- Bullitt County, KY60
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +431 |
| 2012 | −87 |
| 2013 | +478 |
| 2014 | +935 |
| 2015 | +518 |
| 2016 | +524 |
| 2017 | +772 |
| 2018 | +415 |
| 2019 | +719 |
| 2021 | +1,511 |
| 2022 | +1,304 |
| 2023 | +1,182 |
| 2024 | +1,680 |
| 2025 | +2,651 |
Clark County sits directly across the Ohio River from Louisville, Kentucky, and despite its suburban character has moved from competitive to reliably Republican in presidential races, posting a 20-point margin in 2024.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 38.3 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 21.7 points in 2016. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 2.1 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 20.3 points.
A population of 124,354, a 80% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $74,214 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Spokane County and Eaton County.
Political twins — counties
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Spokane County
Washington
84.2twin score
2000–2024 trajectorypopulation scale
Eaton County
Michigan
83.5twin score
population scale2000–2024 trajectory% unaffiliated≠ Scottish ancestry
Clay County
Missouri
82.8twin score
population scale2000–2012 trajectory% unaffiliated
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Cite this page
All citations released under CC BY 4.0. Attribution: Akashic Intelligence.
Clark County, Indiana. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/18019/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.
License: CC BY 4.0
Embed this page
A live widget for your site — no API key, attribution built in, CC BY 4.0. All widgets & sizes →
Cities & towns in Clark County
Indiana at the ballot boxAll elections →
Frequently asked questions
How did Clark County, Indiana vote in 2024?
In 2024, Clark County, Indiana voted Republican by 20.3 points (R+20.3), carried by the Republican candidate. Out of 58,612 votes cast, 22,810 went Democratic and 34,734 went Republican.
When did Clark County, Indiana last vote Democratic?
The most recent presidential election in which Clark County, Indiana voted Democratic was 1996.
How many people live in Clark County, Indiana?
Clark County, Indiana has a population of 124,354 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.
What is the median household income in Clark County, Indiana?
Median household income in Clark County, Indiana is $74,214 — below the national median of $80,734. The Indiana state median is $71,957.
What is the political history of Clark County, Indiana?
Akashic tracks 38 presidential elections in Clark County, Indiana from 1876 to 2024. Of those, 18 went Democratic and 16 went Republican.