Boundary by 2024 margin · Precinct returns · VEST · MIT Election Lab
The precinct map shows the 2024 presidential vote; the timeline scrubs the city’s overall result across 1992–2024, on current city boundaries.
President results by year
Vote totals, margins, and source status
HarrisDemocratic35.4%879TrumpRepublican62.2%1,545OtherAll other candidates2.4%59
R+26.8
Lead
666
Total
2,483
vs nation
R+25.4
BidenDemocratic35.0%755TrumpRepublican63.0%1,360OtherAll other candidates2.0%43
R+28.0
Lead
605
Total
2,158
vs nation
R+32.5
ClintonDemocratic28.3%531TrumpRepublican62.8%1,176OtherAll other candidates8.9%167
R+34.4
Lead
645
Total
1,874
vs nation
R+36.5
ObamaDemocratic34.2%566RomneyRepublican63.4%1,048OtherAll other candidates2.4%39
R+29.2
Lead
482
Total
1,653
vs nation
R+33.0
ObamaDemocratic36.8%597McCainRepublican61.3%994OtherAll other candidates1.9%30
R+24.5
Lead
397
Total
1,621
vs nation
R+31.8
KerryDemocratic34.2%518BushRepublican65.0%984OtherAll other candidates0.7%11
R+30.8
Lead
466
Total
1,513
vs nation
R+28.3
ClintonDemocratic44.1%267DoleRepublican36.0%218OtherAll other candidates19.8%120
D+8.1
Lead
49
Total
605
vs nation
R+0.4
ClintonDemocratic31.3%176BushRepublican33.7%190OtherAll other candidates35.0%197
Other win
Lead
7
Total
563
vs nation
R+8.0
Key facts
2024 presidential margin
R+26.8MIT Election Lab
Population
3,6262024 5-year
Population density
659 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
Land area
5.5 sq miTIGER/Line
Median household income
$156,5362024 5-year
White (non-Hispanic)
90.8%2024 5-year
Black
0.0%2024 5-year
Hispanic / Latino
0.7%2024 5-year
Peak Democratic margin
D+8.1 in 1996MIT Election Lab
Peak Republican margin
R+34.4 in 2016MIT Election Lab
Participation
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
2004–20227 cycles · 4 audited
2022 turnout
73.4%1,722 participants ÷ 2,347 CVAP
2020→2022 drop-off
+20.5 ptsPresidential-dependent
Drop-off vs state
+0.6 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
Participation by cycle
Presidential Midterm Derived, pre-2016
0%20%40%60%80%100%
76.0%
73.4%
2004200820122016201820202022
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
Cycle
Participants
CVAP
Turnout
Series
Quality
2022Mid
1,722
2,347 ± 170
73.4%
Audited
E/A
2,162
2,303 ± 177
93.9%
Audited
E/A
2018Mid
1,629
2,143 ± 130
76.0%
Audited
E/A
1,885
2,054 ± 125
91.8%
Audited
E/A
1,653
1,965
84.1%
Derived
—
1,621
1,894
85.6%
Derived
—
1,513
1,823 extrapolated
83.0%
Derived
—
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
2022: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 322/184.
2020: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 321/4.
2018: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 320/139.
2016: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 319/133.
2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
presidential history
Party record book
Hanover, MN · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1992–2024 · 8 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Bill Clinton1996
44.1%
267 votes · D+8.1
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2008 · 36.8%
Republican
George W. Bush2004
65.0%
984 votes · R+30.8
Runner-up · Mitt Romney, 2012 · 63.4%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Kamala Harris2024
879votes
35.4% of the vote · R+26.8
Runner-up · Joe Biden, 2020 · 755 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
1,545votes
62.2% of the vote · R+26.8
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 1,360 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Bill Clinton1996
−0.4pts D vs U.S.
Place D+8.1 · U.S. D+8.5
Runner-up · Bill Clinton, 1992 · −8.0 pts
Republican
Donald Trump2016
+36.5pts R vs U.S.
Place R+34.4 · U.S. D+2.1
Runner-up · Mitt Romney, 2012 · +33.0 pts
U.S. House elections · 2 House
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Hanover · how this place’s counties split between candidates in each party’s presidential nominating contest, cycle by cycle. A primary is a contest inside one party, so it has no Democratic–Republican margin and is not part of the general-election record above.
Akashic reports votes cast, not delegates awarded. The two can disagree: Clinton led the 2008 national primary popular vote by less than half a point and did not win the nomination.
Primary returns are published at county grain and there is no roll-up above it. Each cell counts how many of this place’s counties a candidate led — a count of records, not a vote total. Who led the place as a whole is not knowable from these returns, because county rows carry a leader and a lead but no per-candidate votes.
Presidential nominating contests in Hanover, by party and cycle.
○no contest record — Akashic holds no result for that party and cycle here. It is not a claim that no contest was held. Telling apart a contest that was cancelled, one that went uncontested, and one simply not yet ingested needs a nominating-contest calendar, which is a separate ingest from results and does not exist yet.
Republican presidential primaries are not yet ingested — the Republican series runs from 1856 and is in scope. The row is kept so its absence is visible: a Democratic-only panel would otherwise read as though no one else held a contest.
Akashic carries 10 states for 2012 and 3 states for 2024. Cycles in which an incumbent president seeks renomination are thin by nature — few states run a contested primary — so a sparse column is politics, not a hole in the record.
County returns carry a leader and a lead over the runner-up, and nothing more. The full candidate field with vote shares is published at state grain — follow a cycle above to the state contest for it.
Hanover sits in the Upper Midwest. In 2024 it voted Republican.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 8.1 points in 1996 and a Republican high of 34.4 points in 2016. Between 2020 and 2024 the city moved 1.2 points toward the Democratic candidate; the 2024 margin was 26.8 points.
A population of 3,626, a 91% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $156,536 describe the city.
In 2024, Hanover, Minnesota voted Republican by 26.8 points (R+26.8), carried by the Republican candidate. Out of 2,483 votes cast, 879 went Democratic and 1,545 went Republican.
When did Hanover, Minnesota last vote Democratic?
The most recent presidential election in which Hanover, Minnesota voted Democratic was 1996.
How many people live in Hanover, Minnesota?
Hanover, Minnesota has a population of 3,626 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.
What is the median household income in Hanover, Minnesota?
Median household income in Hanover, Minnesota is $156,536 — above the national median of $80,734. The Minnesota state median is $89,062.
What is the political history of Hanover, Minnesota?
Akashic tracks 8 presidential elections in Hanover, Minnesota from 1992 to 2024. Of those, 1 went Democratic and 6 went Republican.
