American Community Survey 2024 5-year (income, age, poverty, education, language, race, ancestry) · presidential returns from MIT Election Lab through 2024 · 2020 U.S. Religion Census (ASARB) — congregational adherents, unaffiliated is the unclaimed remainder.
Birmingham (Anniston and Tuscaloosa), Alabama
Akashic
Birmingham (Anniston and Tuscaloosa)TrumpR+29.7
18922024
How it voted
Share of the 2024 vote
Donald Trump ✓Republican
64.2%
563,856
Kamala HarrisDemocratic
34.5%
303,027
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.Independent
1.3%
11,814
D+60R+60
21 counties, each filled by 2024 D-vs-R margin. Hover any county for its result.
County-level results (21 counties) — table
2024 presidential result by county for Birmingham (Anniston and Tuscaloosa), AL — winner and D-vs-R margin.
County
Winner
Margin
Bibb County, AL
Republican
R+64.3
Blount County, AL
Republican
R+80.9
Calhoun County, AL
Republican
R+44.6
Cherokee County, AL
Republican
R+75.4
Chilton County, AL
Republican
R+72.0
Clay County, AL
Republican
R+70.1
Coosa County, AL
Republican
R+43.3
Cullman County, AL
Republican
R+80.3
Etowah County, AL
Republican
R+55.5
Fayette County, AL
Republican
R+71.9
Greene County, AL
Democratic
D+55.7
Hale County, AL
Democratic
D+6.8
Jefferson County, AL
Democratic
D+10.4
Marion County, AL
Republican
R+81.6
Pickens County, AL
Republican
R+23.3
Shelby County, AL
Republican
R+40.6
St. Clair County, AL
Republican
R+64.0
Talladega County, AL
Republican
R+33.7
Tuscaloosa County, AL
Republican
R+20.3
Walker County, AL
Republican
R+71.7
Winston County, AL
Republican
R+83.5
Akashic
34 presidential elections
Third column names the leading third-party or independent finisher. Source · MIT Election Lab · ICPSR · VEST (precinct-level 2024).
Year
Won
Democratic
Republican
Other
Margin
Total
R
34.5%Harris303,027
64.2%Trump563,856
1.3%Kennedy11,814
−29.7%
878,697
R
36.8%Biden338,485
61.8%Trump569,069
1.4%Jorgensen12,655
−25.1%
920,209
R
34.6%Clinton289,234
63.3%Trump529,187
2.1%Johnson17,191
−28.7%
835,612
R
37.3%Obama306,012
61.8%Romney506,596
0.9%Johnson7,650
−24.5%
820,258
R
37.9%Obama318,696
61.1%McCain513,881
1.0%Nader8,482
−23.2%
841,059
R
35.7%Kerry275,440
63.6%Bush490,816
0.7%Other5,541
−27.9%
771,797
R
41.2%Gore282,822
56.8%Bush390,411
2.0%Browne13,724
−15.7%
686,957
R
42.9%Clinton271,783
51.3%Dole324,908
5.8%Browne36,963
−8.4%
633,654
R
40.6%Clinton285,651
49.4%Bush347,927
10.0%Perot70,257
−8.8%
703,835
R
40.1%Dukakis233,185
59.0%Bush342,910
0.9%Paul5,298
−18.9%
581,393
R
38.3%Mondale227,082
60.6%Reagan359,425
1.1%Bergland6,810
−22.3%
593,317
R
46.6%Carter264,143
49.5%Reagan280,701
3.9%Anderson22,245
−2.9%
567,089
D
54.4%Carter267,470
44.0%Ford216,269
1.6%Maddox7,851
+10.4%
491,590
R
25.8%McGovern109,808
72.0%Nixon305,996
2.2%Schmitz9,319
−46.1%
425,123
O
20.0%Humphrey88,174
16.9%Nixon74,371
63.1%Wallace277,619
Wallace +43.0
440,164
R
0.0%Johnson0
69.2%Goldwater209,040
30.8%Hass92,866
−69.2%
301,906
D
51.2%Kennedy127,187
47.8%Nixon118,715
0.9%Byrd2,268
+3.4%
248,170
D
51.6%Stevenson113,928
44.9%Eisenhower99,030
3.6%Andrews7,839
+6.7%
220,797
D
59.9%Stevenson110,219
39.5%Eisenhower72,696
0.5%Hallinan989
+20.4%
183,904
O
0.0%Truman0
23.7%Dewey23,077
76.3%Thurmond74,205
Thurmond +52.6
97,282
D
75.2%Roosevelt79,278
24.2%Dewey25,560
0.6%Thomas616
+50.9%
105,454
D
79.3%Roosevelt99,467
20.3%Willkie25,459
0.5%Thomas565
+59.0%
125,491
D
82.2%Roosevelt93,206
16.7%Landon18,975
1.0%Lemke1,172
+65.5%
113,353
D
80.3%Roosevelt80,848
18.2%Hoover18,381
1.5%Thomas1,507
+62.0%
100,736
R
46.2%Smith47,368
53.6%Hoover54,999
0.2%Thomas211
−7.4%
102,578
D
61.0%Davis45,786
32.2%Coolidge24,220
6.8%La Follette5,098
+28.7%
75,104
D
60.9%Cox70,707
37.5%Harding43,559
1.6%Debs1,837
+23.4%
116,103
D
67.3%Wilson37,025
30.6%Hughes16,843
2.1%Benson1,171
+36.7%
55,039
D
60.3%Wilson30,160
10.5%Taft5,231
29.3%Roosevelt14,663
+49.8%
50,054
D
60.6%Bryan26,969
34.0%Taft15,117
5.5%Debs2,440
+26.6%
44,526
D
64.4%Parker28,223
27.3%Roosevelt11,967
8.3%Debs3,645
+37.1%
43,835
D
52.9%Bryan26,376
41.1%McKinley20,528
6.0%Woolley2,990
+11.7%
49,894
D
66.3%Bryan42,330
29.6%McKinley18,926
4.1%Palmer2,635
+36.6%
63,891
D
57.6%Cleveland43,289
4.3%Harrison3,214
38.2%Weaver28,706
+53.3%
75,209
Akashic
presidential history
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
Presidential margin over time
Year
Margin (D minus R)
1892
+53.3%
1896
+36.6%
1900
+11.7%
1904
+37.1%
1908
+26.6%
1912
+49.8%
1916
+36.7%
1920
+23.4%
1924
+28.7%
1928
−7.4%
1932
+62.0%
1936
+65.5%
1940
+59.0%
1944
+50.9%
1948
−23.7%
1952
+20.4%
1956
+6.7%
1960
+3.4%
1964
−69.2%
1968
+3.1%
1972
−46.1%
1976
+10.4%
1980
−2.9%
1984
−22.3%
1988
−18.9%
1992
−8.8%
1996
−8.4%
2000
−15.7%
2004
−27.9%
2008
−23.2%
2012
−24.5%
2016
−28.7%
2020
−25.1%
2024
−29.7%
DemocraticRepublican
Akashic
voter registration
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
Registered voters
Voter registration in Birmingham (Anniston and Tuscaloosa)
Year
Total registered
2018
1,343,695
2020
1,429,494
2022
1,407,060
2024
1,463,845
Source: U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAVS)
Anchored by Jefferson County's urban core, the Birmingham market stretches into reliably Republican Tuscaloosa and Anniston exurbs, creating a viewing audience that mixes a substantial Black urban electorate with predominantly white rural and suburban counties.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 65.5 points in 1936 and a Republican high of 69.2 points in 1964. Between 2020 and 2024 the market moved 4.6 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 29.7 points.
A population of 1,972,775, a 64% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $66,894 describe the market. The market's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Hattiesburg-Laurel and Columbus-Tupelo-West Point-Houston.
Akashic
Political twins — media markets
The media markets whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Cite this page
All citations released under CC BY 4.0. Attribution: Akashic Intelligence.
Birmingham (Anniston and Tuscaloosa), Alabama. Akashic. https://akashic.app/dma/630/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.
License: CC BY 4.0
Embed this page
A live widget for your site — no API key, attribution built in, CC BY 4.0. All widgets & sizes →
How did Birmingham (Anniston and Tuscaloosa), Alabama vote in 2024?
In 2024, Birmingham (Anniston and Tuscaloosa), Alabama voted Republican by 29.7 points (R+29.7), carried by the Republican candidate. Out of 878,697 votes cast, 303,027 went Democratic and 563,856 went Republican.
When did Birmingham (Anniston and Tuscaloosa), Alabama last vote Democratic?
The most recent presidential election in which Birmingham (Anniston and Tuscaloosa), Alabama voted Democratic was 1976.
How many people live in Birmingham (Anniston and Tuscaloosa), Alabama?
Birmingham (Anniston and Tuscaloosa), Alabama has a population of 1,972,775 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.
What is the median household income in Birmingham (Anniston and Tuscaloosa), Alabama?
Median household income in Birmingham (Anniston and Tuscaloosa), Alabama is $66,894 — below the national median of $80,734. The Alabama state median is $63,999.
What is the political history of Birmingham (Anniston and Tuscaloosa), Alabama?
Akashic tracks 34 presidential elections in Birmingham (Anniston and Tuscaloosa), Alabama from 1892 to 2024. Of those, 17 went Democratic and 15 went Republican.