- Lead
- 5,953
- Total
- 9,257
- vs nation
- R+62.8
- Turnout
- 53.5%
Bibb County, AL
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 53.5% of 17,346 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 5,539
- Total
- 9,595
- vs nation
- R+62.2
- Turnout
- 54.8%
- Lead
- 4,864
- Total
- 8,736
- vs nation
- R+57.8
- Turnout
- 50.3%
- Lead
- 3,930
- Total
- 8,420
- vs nation
- R+50.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 3,963
- Total
- 8,644
- vs nation
- R+53.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 3,383
- Total
- 7,600
- vs nation
- R+42.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,563
- Total
- 7,101
- vs nation
- R+22.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 262
- Total
- 6,301
- vs nation
- R+12.7
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+64.3MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 22,1302024 5-year
- Median household income
- $52,5412024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 73.4%2024 5-year
- Black
- 19.7%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 3.5%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+82.3 in 1932MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+83.9 in 1964MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Randolph County, AL · twin score 93.6
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 53.5%9,278 participants ÷ 17,346 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +19.9 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off versus state
- -5.6 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 33.6%–37.9%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 8,853 | 17,589 | 50.3% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 6,896 | 17,672 | 39.0% | C/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 9,630 | 17,583 | 54.8% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 6,073 | 17,419 | 34.9% | C/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 9,278 | 17,346 | 53.5% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 150/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 154/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
8 precincts · 9,257 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -GREENPOND FIRE DEPT_GREENPOND FIRE DEPT_ | 164 | 1,745 | 19 | 1,928 | 8.5% | 90.5% | R+82.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLALTERNATIVE SCHOOL | 305 | 1,573 | 8 | 1,886 | 16.2% | 83.4% | R+67.2 |
| Precinct -NATIONAL GUARDNATIONAL GUARD | 245 | 1,078 | 10 | 1,333 | 18.4% | 80.9% | R+62.5 |
| Precinct -CENTREVILLE ROCK BLDGCENTREVILLE ROCK BLDG | 185 | 927 | 6 | 1,118 | 16.5% | 82.9% | R+66.4 |
| Precinct -SIX MILE COMM_ CTR_SIX MILE COMM_ CTR_ | 144 | 806 | 5 | 955 | 15.1% | 84.4% | R+69.3 |
| Precinct -BRENT CITY HALLBRENT CITY HALL | 453 | 346 | 8 | 807 | 56.1% | 42.9% | D+13.3 |
| Precinct -EOLINE FIRE DEPT_EOLINE FIRE DEPT_ | 68 | 666 | 6 | 740 | 9.2% | 90.0% | R+80.8 |
| Precinct -LAWLEY COMM_ CTR_LAWLEY COMM_ CTR_ | 55 | 431 | 4 | 490 | 11.2% | 88.0% | R+76.7 |
Presidential margin, 1876–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1876 | +45.5% |
| 1880 | +74.9% |
| 1884 | +38.5% |
| 1888 | +18.6% |
| 1892 | +47.4% |
| 1896 | +38.7% |
| 1900 | +19.0% |
| 1904 | +71.2% |
| 1908 | +57.8% |
| 1912 | +68.4% |
| 1916 | +64.9% |
| 1920 | +59.5% |
| 1924 | +45.4% |
| 1928 | +8.4% |
| 1932 | +82.3% |
| 1936 | +81.2% |
| 1940 | +81.9% |
| 1944 | +67.5% |
| 1948 | −9.2% |
| 1952 | +42.9% |
| 1956 | +18.1% |
| 1960 | +23.4% |
| 1964 | −83.9% |
| 1968 | +8.3% |
| 1972 | −58.7% |
| 1976 | +28.1% |
| 1980 | +10.8% |
| 1984 | −23.2% |
| 1988 | −12.5% |
| 1992 | −3.3% |
| 1996 | −4.2% |
| 2000 | −22.0% |
| 2004 | −44.5% |
| 2008 | −45.8% |
| 2012 | −46.7% |
| 2016 | −55.7% |
| 2020 | −57.7% |
| 2024 | −64.3% |
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2018 | 14,244 |
| 2020 | 15,014 |
| 2022 | 14,741 |
| 2024 | 15,154 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+72 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −303 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $52,978 in average income, against $65,667 for residents who stayed — 19% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+18.8 on average — 45 points more Democratic-leaning than Bibb County, AL itself (R+64.3).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Tuscaloosa County, AL121R+20.3
- Jefferson County, AL94D+10.4
- Shelby County, AL57R+40.6
- Chilton County, AL25R+72.0
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Tuscaloosa County, AL120
- Jefferson County, AL71
- Shelby County, AL59
- Chilton County, AL21
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −124 |
| 2012 | −105 |
| 2013 | −151 |
| 2014 | +16 |
| 2015 | +17 |
| 2016 | −30 |
| 2017 | −83 |
| 2018 | −164 |
| 2019 | +31 |
| 2021 | +241 |
| 2022 | −315 |
| 2023 | −69 |
| 2024 | +361 |
| 2025 | +72 |
Bibb County, a rural stretch of central Alabama with a population under 21,000, recorded an R+64.3 margin in 2024 — placing it among the state's most consistently one-sided presidential jurisdictions over the past two decades.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 82.3 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 83.9 points in 1964. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 6.6 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 64.3 points.
A population of 22,130, a 73% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $52,541 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Randolph County and Fayette County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Bibb County, Alabama. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/01007/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.