- Lead
- 4,211
- Total
- 8,522
- vs nation
- R+47.9
- Turnout
- 57.4%
Dawson County, NE
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 57.4% of 15,264 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 4,027
- Total
- 9,191
- vs nation
- R+48.3
- Turnout
- 63.4%
- Lead
- 3,848
- Total
- 8,635
- vs nation
- R+46.7
- Turnout
- 58.2%
- Lead
- 3,261
- Total
- 7,859
- vs nation
- R+45.3
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 3,061
- Total
- 7,986
- vs nation
- R+45.6
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 4,421
- Total
- 7,956
- vs nation
- R+53.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 3,771
- Total
- 7,507
- vs nation
- R+50.8
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 2,614
- Total
- 8,065
- vs nation
- R+40.9
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+49.4MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 24,2022024 5-year
- Median household income
- $69,8802024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 52.8%2024 5-year
- Black
- 6.4%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 37.4%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+34.3 in 1912MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+64.2 in 1984MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Grant County, KS · twin score 86.3
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 57.4%8,754 participants ÷ 15,264 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +25.8 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off versus state
- +4.0 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 31.6%–36.8%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 8,861 | 15,220 | 58.2% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 6,384 | 14,898 | 42.9% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 9,334 | 14,721 | 63.4% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 5,779 | 15,353 | 37.6% | A/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 8,754 | 15,264 | 57.4% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
20 precincts · 8,491 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -GOTH EAST 008GOTH EAST 008 | 224 | 811 | 11 | 1,046 | 21.4% | 77.5% | R+56.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -COZAD EAST 002COZAD EAST 002 | 174 | 679 | 3 | 856 | 20.3% | 79.3% | R+59.0 |
| Precinct -GOTH WEST 009GOTH WEST 009 | 179 | 662 | 9 | 850 | 21.1% | 77.9% | R+56.8 |
| Precinct -COZAD WEST 003COZAD WEST 003 | 157 | 620 | 12 | 789 | 19.9% | 78.6% | R+58.7 |
| Precinct -LEX 3RD 014LEX 3RD 014 | 267 | 511 | 4 | 782 | 34.1% | 65.3% | R+31.2 |
| Precinct -LEX 2ND 013LEX 2ND 013 | 240 | 433 | 5 | 678 | 35.4% | 63.9% | R+28.5 |
| Precinct -OVERTON 017OVERTON 017 | 87 | 445 | 6 | 538 | 16.2% | 82.7% | R+66.5 |
| Precinct -LEX 5TH 016LEX 5TH 016 | 221 | 280 | 8 | 509 | 43.4% | 55.0% | R+11.6 |
| Precinct -LEX 1ST 012LEX 1ST 012 | 149 | 235 | 3 | 387 | 38.5% | 60.7% | R+22.2 |
| Precinct -PLATTE 018PLATTE 018 | 74 | 264 | 2 | 340 | 21.8% | 77.6% | R+55.9 |
| Precinct -GRANT 010GRANT 010 | 39 | 195 | 2 | 236 | 16.5% | 82.6% | R+66.1 |
| Precinct -WOODRIVER 020WOODRIVER 020 | 23 | 210 | 1 | 234 | 9.8% | 89.7% | R+79.9 |
| Precinct -GILLAN 007GILLAN 007 | 35 | 181 | 3 | 219 | 16.0% | 82.6% | R+66.7 |
| Precinct -LEX 4TH 015LEX 4TH 015 | 89 | 106 | 2 | 197 | 45.2% | 53.8% | R+8.6 |
| Precinct -RINGGOLD 019RINGGOLD 019 | 40 | 151 | 2 | 193 | 20.7% | 78.2% | R+57.5 |
| Precinct -GERMAN 006GERMAN 006 | 13 | 135 | 1 | 149 | 8.7% | 90.6% | R+81.9 |
| Precinct -FAIRVIEW 004FAIRVIEW 004 | 28 | 115 | 2 | 145 | 19.3% | 79.3% | R+60.0 |
| Precinct -COYOTE 001COYOTE 001 | 30 | 102 | 1 | 133 | 22.6% | 76.7% | R+54.1 |
| Precinct -FARNAM 005FARNAM 005 | 19 | 108 | 0 | 127 | 15.0% | 85.0% | R+70.1 |
| Precinct -KENNEBEC 011KENNEBEC 011 | 13 | 69 | 1 | 83 | 15.7% | 83.1% | R+67.5 |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −40.8% |
| 1896 | +9.0% |
| 1900 | +4.3% |
| 1904 | −45.1% |
| 1908 | +5.0% |
| 1912 | +34.3% |
| 1916 | +15.4% |
| 1920 | −37.8% |
| 1924 | −25.0% |
| 1928 | −49.4% |
| 1932 | +22.0% |
| 1936 | +5.8% |
| 1940 | −32.0% |
| 1944 | −37.7% |
| 1948 | −23.5% |
| 1952 | −59.3% |
| 1956 | −52.3% |
| 1960 | −46.1% |
| 1964 | −9.4% |
| 1968 | −49.7% |
| 1972 | −62.7% |
| 1976 | −37.8% |
| 1980 | −60.7% |
| 1984 | −64.2% |
| 1988 | −43.1% |
| 1992 | −33.8% |
| 1996 | −32.4% |
| 2000 | −50.2% |
| 2004 | −55.6% |
| 2008 | −38.3% |
| 2012 | −41.5% |
| 2016 | −44.6% |
| 2020 | −43.8% |
| 2024 | −49.4% |
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 12 points more Democratic.
12,827 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−406 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −5,124 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $54,094 in average income, against $69,156 for residents who stayed — 22% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+29.1 on average — 20 points more Democratic-leaning than Dawson County, NE itself (R+49.4).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Buffalo County, NE55R+44.7
- Lincoln County, NE37R+55.0
- Lancaster County, NE36D+4.3
- Harris County, TX23D+5.5
- Hall County, NE21R+37.6
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Buffalo County, NE96
- Lancaster County, NE46
- Lincoln County, NE41
- Douglas County, NE37
- Hall County, NE34
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −275 |
| 2012 | −476 |
| 2013 | −164 |
| 2014 | −336 |
| 2015 | −420 |
| 2016 | −508 |
| 2017 | −471 |
| 2018 | −262 |
| 2019 | −474 |
| 2021 | −317 |
| 2022 | −335 |
| 2023 | −199 |
| 2024 | −481 |
| 2025 | −406 |
Dawson County, anchored by Lexington along the Platte River, recorded an R+49.6 presidential margin in 2024. Its meatpacking economy draws a sizable Latino workforce, yet countywide results remain among the state's most Republican.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 34.3 points in 1912 and a Republican high of 64.2 points in 1984. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 5.6 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 49.4 points.
A population of 24,202, a 53% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $69,880 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Grant County and Elko County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Dawson County, Nebraska. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/31047/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.