- Lead
- 8,720
- Total
- 11,069
- vs nation
- R+77.3
- Turnout
- 60.4%
George County, MS
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 60.4% of 18,313 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 8,495
- Total
- 11,049
- vs nation
- R+81.3
- Turnout
- 63.8%
- Lead
- 7,669
- Total
- 9,891
- vs nation
- R+79.6
- Turnout
- 58.0%
- Lead
- 7,017
- Total
- 9,856
- vs nation
- R+75.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 6,168
- Total
- 9,335
- vs nation
- R+73.3
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 4,499
- Total
- 8,001
- vs nation
- R+53.8
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 3,166
- Total
- 7,284
- vs nation
- R+44.0
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,423
- Total
- 5,943
- vs nation
- R+32.5
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+78.8MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 25,1702024 5-year
- Median household income
- $59,7582024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 85.1%2024 5-year
- Black
- 7.2%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 3.1%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+95.4 in 1932MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+86.6 in 1972MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Laurel County, KY · twin score 96.0
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 60.4%11,069 participants ÷ 18,313 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +26.2 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off versus state
- -1.7 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 34.2%–39.4%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 9,891 | 17,047 | 58.0% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 7,240 | 17,159 | 42.2% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 11,117 | 17,432 | 63.8% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 6,682 | 17,795 | 37.5% | A/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 11,069 | 18,313 | 60.4% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
43 precincts · 11,069 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -AgricolaAgricola | 77 | 1,285 | 7 | 1,369 | 5.6% | 93.9% | R+88.2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Rocky CreekRocky Creek | 80 | 1,207 | 6 | 1,293 | 6.2% | 93.3% | R+87.2 |
| Precinct -BasinBasin | 139 | 913 | 4 | 1,056 | 13.2% | 86.5% | R+73.3 |
| Precinct -BartonBarton | 67 | 770 | 7 | 844 | 7.9% | 91.2% | R+83.3 |
| Precinct -City HallCity Hall | 107 | 706 | 5 | 818 | 13.1% | 86.3% | R+73.2 |
| Precinct -Shady GroveShady Grove | 36 | 711 | 4 | 751 | 4.8% | 94.7% | R+89.9 |
| Precinct -BenndaleBenndale | 99 | 449 | 7 | 555 | 17.8% | 80.9% | R+63.1 |
| Precinct -Middle SchoolMiddle School | 186 | 296 | 5 | 487 | 38.2% | 60.8% | R+22.6 |
| Precinct -HowellHowell | 31 | 439 | 1 | 471 | 6.6% | 93.2% | R+86.6 |
| Precinct -BexleyBexley | 81 | 368 | 4 | 453 | 17.9% | 81.2% | R+63.4 |
| Precinct -WardWard | 19 | 373 | 0 | 392 | 4.8% | 95.2% | R+90.3 |
| Precinct -ShipmanShipman | 34 | 330 | 1 | 365 | 9.3% | 90.4% | R+81.1 |
| Precinct -CentralCentral | 28 | 327 | 1 | 356 | 7.9% | 91.9% | R+84.0 |
| Precinct -Twin CreekTwin Creek | 39 | 307 | 3 | 349 | 11.2% | 88.0% | R+76.8 |
| Precinct -MovellaMovella | 15 | 319 | 2 | 336 | 4.5% | 94.9% | R+90.5 |
| Precinct -DavisDavis | 8 | 249 | 4 | 261 | 3.1% | 95.4% | R+92.3 |
| Precinct -Multi MartMulti Mart | 24 | 217 | 6 | 247 | 9.7% | 87.9% | R+78.1 |
| Precinct -CourthouseCourthouse | 30 | 188 | 6 | 224 | 13.4% | 83.9% | R+70.5 |
| Precinct -BroomeBroome | 1 | 184 | 0 | 185 | 0.5% | 99.5% | R+98.9 |
| Precinct -FairgroundsFairgrounds | 15 | 145 | 0 | 160 | 9.4% | 90.6% | R+81.3 |
| Precinct -SalemSalem | 22 | 75 | 0 | 97 | 22.7% | 77.3% | R+54.6 |
| Agricola Voting District28_28039203 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Barton Voting District28_28039304 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Basin School Voting District28_28039303 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Benndale Crossing Voting District28_28039504 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Bexley School Voting District28_28039402 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Broom School Voting District28_28039505 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Central School Voting District28_28039503 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Courthouse Voting District28_28039201 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Davis School Voting District28_28039302 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Howell School Voting District28_28039204 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Lucedale City Hall Voting District28_28039401 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Lucedale High School Voting District28_28039501 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Movella Voting District28_28039205 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Multi-Mart Voting District28_28039104 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Multipurpose Bldg. Voting District28_28039301 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Pine Level Voting District28_28039202 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Rocky Creek Voting District28_28039101 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Salem School Voting District28_28039404 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Shady Grove Voting District28_28039403 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Shipman Voting District28_28039102 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Twin Creek Voting District28_28039502 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Ward Voting District28_28039103 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
Presidential margin, 1912–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1912 | +77.7% |
| 1916 | +76.9% |
| 1920 | +61.6% |
| 1924 | +76.1% |
| 1928 | −4.7% |
| 1932 | +95.4% |
| 1936 | +94.6% |
| 1940 | +92.3% |
| 1944 | +83.9% |
| 1948 | +7.1% |
| 1952 | +38.3% |
| 1956 | +45.0% |
| 1960 | +25.8% |
| 1964 | −84.1% |
| 1968 | +1.0% |
| 1972 | −86.6% |
| 1976 | +21.3% |
| 1980 | −5.0% |
| 1984 | −44.6% |
| 1988 | −27.1% |
| 1992 | −15.7% |
| 1996 | −23.9% |
| 2000 | −43.5% |
| 2004 | −56.2% |
| 2008 | −66.1% |
| 2012 | −71.2% |
| 2016 | −77.5% |
| 2020 | −76.9% |
| 2024 | −78.8% |
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 15,660 |
| 2018 | 15,718 |
| 2020 | 16,514 |
| 2022 | 16,460 |
| 2024 | 17,277 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+451 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +2,539 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $57,970 in average income, against $66,938 for residents who stayed — 13% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+34.7 on average — 44 points more Democratic-leaning than George County, MS itself (R+78.8).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Jackson County, MS143R+39.9
- Mobile County, AL110R+16.4
- Greene County, MS42R+69.8
- Harrison County, MS35R+28.9
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Jackson County, MS124
- Mobile County, AL70
- Greene County, MS52
- Harrison County, MS34
- Stone County, MS20
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +54 |
| 2012 | −96 |
| 2013 | +161 |
| 2014 | −86 |
| 2015 | −40 |
| 2016 | +131 |
| 2017 | +216 |
| 2018 | +29 |
| 2019 | +290 |
| 2021 | +451 |
| 2022 | +393 |
| 2023 | +330 |
| 2024 | +255 |
| 2025 | +451 |
George County, tucked in Mississippi's pine-belt southeast corner, recorded an R+78.8 margin in 2024, placing it among the most one-sided presidential results in the state. Its small, rural population has shifted steadily toward overwhelming Republican dominance over the past two decades.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 95.4 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 86.6 points in 1972. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.9 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 78.8 points.
A population of 25,170, a 85% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $59,758 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Laurel County and Upshur County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
George County, Mississippi. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/28039/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.