- Lead
- 2,366
- Total
- 3,947
- vs nation
- R+58.5
- Turnout
- 71.4%
Kingman County, KS
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 71.4% of 5,530 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 2,378
- Total
- 3,949
- vs nation
- R+64.7
- Turnout
- 71.9%
- Lead
- 1,931
- Total
- 3,334
- vs nation
- R+60.0
- Turnout
- 57.7%
- Lead
- 1,664
- Total
- 3,231
- vs nation
- R+55.4
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,640
- Total
- 3,664
- vs nation
- R+52.0
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,897
- Total
- 3,764
- vs nation
- R+47.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,681
- Total
- 3,808
- vs nation
- R+44.7
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,653
- Total
- 4,113
- vs nation
- R+48.7
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+59.9MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 7,1862024 5-year
- Median household income
- $59,8422024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 89.7%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.3%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 4.1%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+35.4 in 1912MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+60.2 in 2020MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Mitchell County, KS · twin score 97.4
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 71.4%3,947 participants ÷ 5,530 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +17.0 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off versus state
- -1.9 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 54.4%–60.7%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 3,419 | 5,926 | 57.7% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 3,062 | 5,744 | 53.3% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 3,959 | 5,509 | 71.9% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 3,161 | 5,760 | 54.9% | C/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 3,947 | 5,530 | 71.4% | C/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 154/183.
- 2024: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 156/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
58 precincts · 3,947 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -KS095000150KS095000150 | 144 | 412 | 21 | 577 | 25.0% | 71.4% | R+46.4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -KS09500014AKS09500014A | 89 | 291 | 8 | 388 | 22.9% | 75.0% | R+52.1 |
| Precinct -KS095000030KS095000030 | 79 | 263 | 3 | 345 | 22.9% | 76.2% | R+53.3 |
| Precinct -KS095000100KS095000100 | 48 | 264 | 2 | 314 | 15.3% | 84.1% | R+68.8 |
| Precinct -KS095000170KS095000170 | 71 | 210 | 6 | 287 | 24.7% | 73.2% | R+48.4 |
| Precinct -KS095000160KS095000160 | 35 | 139 | 5 | 179 | 19.6% | 77.7% | R+58.1 |
| Precinct -KS095000070KS095000070 | 29 | 131 | 6 | 166 | 17.5% | 78.9% | R+61.4 |
| Precinct -KS095000230KS095000230 | 23 | 126 | 1 | 150 | 15.3% | 84.0% | R+68.7 |
| Precinct -KS095000190KS095000190 | 15 | 119 | 4 | 138 | 10.9% | 86.2% | R+75.4 |
| Precinct -KS095000260KS095000260 | 29 | 106 | 2 | 137 | 21.2% | 77.4% | R+56.2 |
| Precinct -KS095000110KS095000110 | 14 | 107 | 1 | 122 | 11.5% | 87.7% | R+76.2 |
| Precinct -KS09500027AKS09500027A | 17 | 93 | 1 | 111 | 15.3% | 83.8% | R+68.5 |
| Precinct -KS095000060KS095000060 | 16 | 74 | 1 | 91 | 17.6% | 81.3% | R+63.7 |
| Precinct -KS09500027CKS09500027C | 19 | 64 | 1 | 84 | 22.6% | 76.2% | R+53.6 |
| Precinct -KS095000220KS095000220 | 17 | 64 | 2 | 83 | 20.5% | 77.1% | R+56.6 |
| Precinct -KS095000120KS095000120 | 8 | 68 | 1 | 77 | 10.4% | 88.3% | R+77.9 |
| Precinct -KS095000080KS095000080 | 18 | 53 | 4 | 75 | 24.0% | 70.7% | R+46.7 |
| Precinct -KS095000130KS095000130 | 7 | 64 | 1 | 72 | 9.7% | 88.9% | R+79.2 |
| Precinct -KS095000180KS095000180 | 15 | 53 | 0 | 68 | 22.1% | 77.9% | R+55.9 |
| Precinct -KS095000010KS095000010 | 4 | 61 | 2 | 67 | 6.0% | 91.0% | R+85.1 |
| Precinct -KS095000090KS095000090 | 8 | 57 | 0 | 65 | 12.3% | 87.7% | R+75.4 |
| Precinct -KS095000200KS095000200 | 7 | 52 | 2 | 61 | 11.5% | 85.2% | R+73.8 |
| Precinct -KS095000250KS095000250 | 9 | 49 | 1 | 59 | 15.3% | 83.1% | R+67.8 |
| Precinct -KS095000040KS095000040 | 4 | 51 | 0 | 55 | 7.3% | 92.7% | R+85.5 |
| Precinct -KS095000210KS095000210 | 3 | 48 | 0 | 51 | 5.9% | 94.1% | R+88.2 |
| Precinct -KS095000050KS095000050 | 12 | 35 | 0 | 47 | 25.5% | 74.5% | R+48.9 |
| Precinct -KS095000240KS095000240 | 10 | 36 | 0 | 46 | 21.7% | 78.3% | R+56.5 |
| Precinct -KS095000020KS095000020 | 3 | 29 | 0 | 32 | 9.4% | 90.6% | R+81.3 |
| Allen Township Voting District20_20095000010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Belmont Township Voting District20_20095000020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Bennett Township Voting District20_20095000030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Canton Township Voting District20_20095000040 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Chikaskia Township Voting District20_20095000050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Dale Township Voting District20_20095000060 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Dresden Township Voting District20_20095000070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Eagle Township Voting District20_20095000080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Eureka Township Voting District20_20095000090 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Evan Township Voting District20_20095000100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Galesburg Township Voting District20_20095000110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Hoosier Township Voting District20_20095000120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Kingman Township Voting District20_20095000130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Kingman Ward 120_2009500014A | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Kingman Ward 1 Exclave20_2009500014B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Kingman Ward 220_20095000150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Kingman Ward 320_20095000160 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Kingman Ward 420_20095000170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Liberty Township Voting District20_20095000180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Ninnescah Township Voting District20_20095000190 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Peters Township Voting District20_20095000200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Richland Township Voting District20_20095000210 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Rochester Township Voting District20_20095000220 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Rural Township Voting District20_20095000230 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Union Township Voting District20_20095000240 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Valley Township Voting District20_20095000250 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Vinita Township Voting District20_20095000260 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| White Township Part A Enclave Voting District20_2009500027B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| White Township Part A Voting District20_2009500027A | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| White Township Part B Voting District20_2009500027C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −43.1% |
| 1896 | +16.8% |
| 1900 | −4.1% |
| 1904 | −37.1% |
| 1908 | +1.2% |
| 1912 | +35.4% |
| 1916 | +14.9% |
| 1920 | −28.3% |
| 1924 | −30.1% |
| 1928 | −39.8% |
| 1932 | +22.3% |
| 1936 | +29.5% |
| 1940 | −9.6% |
| 1944 | −28.1% |
| 1948 | −13.4% |
| 1952 | −54.6% |
| 1956 | −38.5% |
| 1960 | −25.1% |
| 1964 | +7.4% |
| 1968 | −29.1% |
| 1972 | −41.2% |
| 1976 | +7.4% |
| 1980 | −36.0% |
| 1984 | −45.3% |
| 1988 | −20.9% |
| 1992 | −13.9% |
| 1996 | −40.2% |
| 2000 | −44.1% |
| 2004 | −50.4% |
| 2008 | −44.8% |
| 2012 | −51.5% |
| 2016 | −57.9% |
| 2020 | −60.2% |
| 2024 | −59.9% |
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 5.6 points more Democratic.
5,615 registered voters · 2025
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+107 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −37 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $50,773 in average income, against $66,174 for residents who stayed — 23% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+18.0 on average — 42 points more Democratic-leaning than Kingman County, KS itself (R+59.9).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Sedgwick County, KS84R+13.8
- Reno County, KS21R+34.5
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Sedgwick County, KS88
- Reno County, KS21
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +32 |
| 2012 | −35 |
| 2013 | +17 |
| 2014 | −129 |
| 2015 | −13 |
| 2016 | −179 |
| 2017 | −33 |
| 2018 | +32 |
| 2019 | −48 |
| 2021 | +38 |
| 2022 | +85 |
| 2023 | +69 |
| 2024 | +20 |
| 2025 | +107 |
Kingman County sits in south-central Kansas's hard-winter-wheat corridor, where a thinly spread agricultural population has delivered some of the state's widest presidential margins for decades.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 35.4 points in 1912 and a Republican high of 60.2 points in 2020. The 2024 margin was 59.9 points.
A population of 7,186, a 90% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $59,842 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Mitchell County and Sheridan County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Kingman County, Kansas. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/20095/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.