- Lead
- 2,584
- Total
- 5,600
- vs nation
- R+44.7
- Turnout
- 60.1%
Allen County, KS
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 60.1% of 9,398 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 2,648
- Total
- 5,892
- vs nation
- R+49.4
- Turnout
- 62.5%
- Lead
- 2,218
- Total
- 5,509
- vs nation
- R+42.4
- Turnout
- 57.2%
- Lead
- 1,447
- Total
- 5,310
- vs nation
- R+31.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,363
- Total
- 5,859
- vs nation
- R+30.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,945
- Total
- 5,873
- vs nation
- R+30.7
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,247
- Total
- 5,766
- vs nation
- R+22.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 498
- Total
- 5,943
- vs nation
- R+16.9
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+46.1MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 12,4832024 5-year
- Median household income
- $60,6892024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 88.5%2024 5-year
- Black
- 2.8%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 4.3%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+8.4 in 1964MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+57.2 in 1928MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Bourbon County, KS · twin score 86.1
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 60.1%5,648 participants ÷ 9,398 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +18.0 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off versus state
- -0.9 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 42.1%–45.8%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 5,686 | 9,944 | 57.2% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 4,520 | 9,703 | 46.6% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 5,939 | 9,506 | 62.5% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 4,246 | 9,548 | 44.5% | C/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 5,648 | 9,398 | 60.1% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 154/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
48 precincts · 5,600 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -KS001170020KS001170020 | 166 | 427 | 14 | 607 | 27.3% | 70.3% | R+43.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -KS001000210KS001000210 | 111 | 390 | 12 | 513 | 21.6% | 76.0% | R+54.4 |
| Precinct -KS001170040KS001170040 | 141 | 314 | 12 | 467 | 30.2% | 67.2% | R+37.0 |
| Precinct -KS001170030KS001170030 | 169 | 283 | 12 | 464 | 36.4% | 61.0% | R+24.6 |
| Precinct -KS001170010KS001170010 | 160 | 287 | 10 | 457 | 35.0% | 62.8% | R+27.8 |
| Precinct -KS001000080KS001000080 | 122 | 298 | 8 | 428 | 28.5% | 69.6% | R+41.1 |
| Precinct -KS001000070KS001000070 | 126 | 266 | 12 | 404 | 31.2% | 65.8% | R+34.7 |
| Precinct -KS001000140KS001000140 | 88 | 274 | 8 | 370 | 23.8% | 74.1% | R+50.3 |
| Precinct -KS00100020AKS00100020A | 61 | 226 | 4 | 291 | 21.0% | 77.7% | R+56.7 |
| Precinct -KS001000040KS001000040 | 50 | 216 | 5 | 271 | 18.5% | 79.7% | R+61.3 |
| Precinct -KS001000010KS001000010 | 32 | 136 | 8 | 176 | 18.2% | 77.3% | R+59.1 |
| Precinct -KS00100006AKS00100006A | 18 | 143 | 3 | 164 | 11.0% | 87.2% | R+76.2 |
| Precinct -KS001000170KS001000170 | 29 | 117 | 4 | 150 | 19.3% | 78.0% | R+58.7 |
| Precinct -KS001000180KS001000180 | 36 | 110 | 2 | 148 | 24.3% | 74.3% | R+50.0 |
| Precinct -KS00100016AKS00100016A | 32 | 108 | 4 | 144 | 22.2% | 75.0% | R+52.8 |
| Precinct -KS001000020KS001000020 | 17 | 100 | 0 | 117 | 14.5% | 85.5% | R+70.9 |
| Precinct -KS001000130KS001000130 | 30 | 83 | 1 | 114 | 26.3% | 72.8% | R+46.5 |
| Precinct -KS001000150KS001000150 | 20 | 72 | 3 | 95 | 21.1% | 75.8% | R+54.7 |
| Precinct -KS001000190KS001000190 | 15 | 65 | 2 | 82 | 18.3% | 79.3% | R+61.0 |
| Precinct -KS001000050KS001000050 | 13 | 67 | 1 | 81 | 16.0% | 82.7% | R+66.7 |
| Precinct -KS001000030KS001000030 | 9 | 47 | 1 | 57 | 15.8% | 82.5% | R+66.7 |
| Carlyle Township Voting District20_20001000010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Cottage Grove Township Voting District20_20001000020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Deer Creek Township Voting District20_20001000030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| East Elm Voting District20_20001000040 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Geneva Township Voting District20_20001000050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Humboldt Township Rural Enclave Voting District20_2000100006B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Humboldt Township Split Voting District20_2000100006C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Humboldt Township Voting District20_2000100006A | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Humboldt Ward 120_20001000070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Humboldt Ward 220_20001000080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Iola Ward 120_20001000090 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Iola Ward 220_2000100010A | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Iola Ward 2 Exclave20_2000100010B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Iola Ward 320_20001000110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Iola Ward 420_20001000120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Logan Township Voting District20_20001000130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Marmaton Township Voting District20_20001000140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| North Elmsmore Voting District20_20001000150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| North Iola Part A Rural Enclave Voting District20_2000100016B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| North Iola Part A Voting District20_2000100016A | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| North Iola Part B Voting District20_2000100016C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Osage Township Voting District20_20001000170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Salem Township Voting District20_20001000180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| South Elmsmore Voting District20_20001000190 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| South Iola Enclave Voting District20_2000100020B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| South Iola Voting District20_2000100020A | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| West Elm Voting District20_20001000210 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −51.2% |
| 1896 | −5.0% |
| 1900 | −12.6% |
| 1904 | −43.0% |
| 1908 | −11.5% |
| 1912 | +1.0% |
| 1916 | −0.9% |
| 1920 | −37.5% |
| 1924 | −44.9% |
| 1928 | −57.2% |
| 1932 | −2.9% |
| 1936 | −22.1% |
| 1940 | −33.3% |
| 1944 | −37.7% |
| 1948 | −23.6% |
| 1952 | −47.2% |
| 1956 | −42.6% |
| 1960 | −32.1% |
| 1964 | +8.4% |
| 1968 | −27.9% |
| 1972 | −41.1% |
| 1976 | −8.5% |
| 1980 | −28.5% |
| 1984 | −40.7% |
| 1988 | −17.6% |
| 1992 | −0.6% |
| 1996 | −8.4% |
| 2000 | −21.6% |
| 2004 | −33.1% |
| 2008 | −23.3% |
| 2012 | −27.3% |
| 2016 | −40.3% |
| 2020 | −44.9% |
| 2024 | −46.1% |
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 6.8 points more Democratic.
8,980 registered voters · 2025
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−30 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −835 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $43,986 in average income, against $63,489 for residents who stayed — 31% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+48.1 on average — 2.0 points more Republican-leaning than Allen County, KS itself (R+46.1).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Neosho County, KS42R+48.1
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Neosho County, KS48
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +13 |
| 2012 | −10 |
| 2013 | −188 |
| 2014 | −153 |
| 2015 | −184 |
| 2016 | −8 |
| 2017 | −110 |
| 2018 | −40 |
| 2019 | −115 |
| 2021 | −3 |
| 2022 | +74 |
| 2023 | −10 |
| 2024 | −71 |
| 2025 | −30 |
Allen County's 2024 presidential margin of R+46.1 reflects a broader pattern of lopsided Republican dominance across rural southeast Kansas, where small-town economies and sparse population have shifted voting patterns sharply over the past two decades.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 8.4 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 57.2 points in 1928. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.2 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 46.1 points.
A population of 12,483, a 89% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $60,689 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Bourbon County and Neosho County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Allen County, Kansas. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/20001/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.