HarrisDemocratic42.1%20,007TrumpRepublican56.2%26,726KennedyIndependent1.0%499
R+14.1- Lead
- 6,719
- Total
- 47,553
- vs nation
- R+12.7
- Turnout
- 55.8%
Akashiccounty
LaPorte County, IN
Office (updates table and map)
President margin by year
Place winner margin
Boundary by 2024 margin · Precinct returns · VEST · MIT Election Lab
President results by year
2024 turnout 55.8% of 86,194 citizens 18+
BidenDemocratic45.4%22,427TrumpRepublican52.6%25,997JorgensenLibertarian2.0%968
R+7.2- Lead
- 3,570
- Total
- 49,392
- vs nation
- R+11.7
- Turnout
- 59.6%
ClintonDemocratic43.4%19,795TrumpRepublican49.7%22,678JohnsonLibertarian5.5%2,521
R+6.3- Lead
- 2,883
- Total
- 45,597
- vs nation
- R+8.4
- Turnout
- 54.9%
ObamaDemocratic55.2%24,107RomneyRepublican42.6%18,615OtherAll other candidates2.2%959
D+12.6- Lead
- 5,492
- Total
- 43,681
- vs nation
- D+8.7
- Turnout
- —
ObamaDemocratic60.2%28,258McCainRepublican38.2%17,918OtherAll other candidates1.6%743
D+22.0- Lead
- 10,340
- Total
- 46,919
- vs nation
- D+14.8
- Turnout
- —
KerryDemocratic49.6%21,114BushRepublican49.1%20,916OtherAll other candidates1.4%576
D+0.5- Lead
- 198
- Total
- 42,606
- vs nation
- D+2.9
- Turnout
- —
GoreDemocratic49.7%19,736BushRepublican47.8%18,994OtherAll other candidates2.6%1,017
D+1.9- Lead
- 742
- Total
- 39,747
- vs nation
- D+1.3
- Turnout
- —
ClintonDemocratic50.5%19,879DoleRepublican35.8%14,106PerotReform13.0%5,133
D+14.7- Lead
- 5,773
- Total
- 39,377
- vs nation
- D+6.1
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+14.1MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 111,9172024 5-year
- Median household income
- $71,0552024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 76.0%2024 5-year
- Black
- 10.3%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 7.6%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+22.0 in 2008MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+33.7 in 1924MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- LaSalle County, IL · twin score 88.8
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 55.8%48,138 participants ÷ 86,194 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +22.1 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off versus state
- -3.1 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 33.8%–44.7%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 46,695 | 85,067 | 54.9% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 46,460 | 84,985 | 54.7% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 50,432 | 84,596 | 59.6% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 32,497 | 86,537 | 37.6% | A/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 48,138 | 86,194 | 55.8% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
172 precincts · 47,647 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -WILLSWILLS | 342 | 866 | 20 | 1,228 | 27.9% | 70.5% | R+42.7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -KANKAKEE 01KANKAKEE 01 | 362 | 683 | 24 | 1,069 | 33.9% | 63.9% | R+30.0 |
| Precinct -PLEASANTPLEASANT | 306 | 734 | 25 | 1,065 | 28.7% | 68.9% | R+40.2 |
| Precinct -SCIPIO 01SCIPIO 01 | 301 | 717 | 21 | 1,039 | 29.0% | 69.0% | R+40.0 |
| Precinct -CENTER 02CENTER 02 | 394 | 621 | 13 | 1,028 | 38.3% | 60.4% | R+22.1 |
| Precinct -COOLSPRING 04COOLSPRING 04 | 424 | 563 | 14 | 1,001 | 42.4% | 56.2% | R+13.9 |
| Precinct -WESTVILLEWESTVILLE | 327 | 641 | 27 | 995 | 32.9% | 64.4% | R+31.6 |
| Precinct -NEW DURHAM 01NEW DURHAM 01 | 332 | 641 | 12 | 985 | 33.7% | 65.1% | R+31.4 |
| Precinct -KANKAKEE 02KANKAKEE 02 | 259 | 660 | 23 | 942 | 27.5% | 70.1% | R+42.6 |
| Precinct -CENTER 01CENTER 01 | 325 | 577 | 17 | 919 | 35.4% | 62.8% | R+27.4 |
| Precinct -HUDSONHUDSON | 305 | 593 | 14 | 912 | 33.4% | 65.0% | R+31.6 |
| Precinct -NOBLENOBLE | 190 | 686 | 25 | 901 | 21.1% | 76.1% | R+55.0 |
| Precinct -LONG BEACHLONG BEACH | 480 | 400 | 14 | 894 | 53.7% | 44.7% | D+8.9 |
| Precinct -CENTER 05CENTER 05 | 357 | 502 | 21 | 880 | 40.6% | 57.0% | R+16.5 |
| Precinct -COOLSPRING 01COOLSPRING 01 | 351 | 463 | 18 | 832 | 42.2% | 55.6% | R+13.5 |
| Precinct -LINCOLNLINCOLN | 250 | 557 | 16 | 823 | 30.4% | 67.7% | R+37.3 |
| Precinct -SCIPIO 02SCIPIO 02 | 313 | 492 | 13 | 818 | 38.3% | 60.1% | R+21.9 |
| Precinct -MC 23MC 23 | 481 | 306 | 13 | 800 | 60.1% | 38.3% | D+21.9 |
| Precinct -CENTER 04CENTER 04 | 301 | 473 | 16 | 790 | 38.1% | 59.9% | R+21.8 |
| Precinct -COOLSPRING 02COOLSPRING 02 | 254 | 475 | 12 | 741 | 34.3% | 64.1% | R+29.8 |
| Precinct -MC 22MC 22 | 375 | 336 | 19 | 730 | 51.4% | 46.0% | D+5.3 |
| Precinct -CENTER 03CENTER 03 | 285 | 424 | 14 | 723 | 39.4% | 58.6% | R+19.2 |
| Precinct -MC 12MC 12 | 385 | 321 | 8 | 714 | 53.9% | 45.0% | D+9.0 |
| Precinct -LP 31LP 31 | 325 | 362 | 15 | 702 | 46.3% | 51.6% | R+5.3 |
| Precinct -LP 41LP 41 | 297 | 388 | 12 | 697 | 42.6% | 55.7% | R+13.1 |
| Precinct -MC 01MC 01 | 420 | 250 | 13 | 683 | 61.5% | 36.6% | D+24.9 |
| Precinct -TRAIL CREEK 01TRAIL CREEK 01 | 316 | 354 | 11 | 681 | 46.4% | 52.0% | R+5.6 |
| Precinct -CASSCASS | 178 | 465 | 11 | 654 | 27.2% | 71.1% | R+43.9 |
| Precinct -COOLSPRING 03COOLSPRING 03 | 280 | 349 | 11 | 640 | 43.8% | 54.5% | R+10.8 |
| Precinct -SPRINGFIELD 02SPRINGFIELD 02 | 202 | 416 | 8 | 626 | 32.3% | 66.5% | R+34.2 |
| Precinct -CLINTONCLINTON | 149 | 459 | 12 | 620 | 24.0% | 74.0% | R+50.0 |
| Precinct -SPRINGFIELD 01SPRINGFIELD 01 | 204 | 404 | 10 | 618 | 33.0% | 65.4% | R+32.4 |
| Precinct -GALENA 02GALENA 02 | 215 | 373 | 9 | 597 | 36.0% | 62.5% | R+26.5 |
| Precinct -LP 25LP 25 | 259 | 318 | 19 | 596 | 43.5% | 53.4% | R+9.9 |
| Precinct -LP 40LP 40 | 254 | 321 | 13 | 588 | 43.2% | 54.6% | R+11.4 |
| Precinct -NEW DURHAM 02NEW DURHAM 02 | 166 | 405 | 7 | 578 | 28.7% | 70.1% | R+41.3 |
| Precinct -MC 18MC 18 | 324 | 241 | 8 | 573 | 56.5% | 42.1% | D+14.5 |
| Precinct -LP 32LP 32 | 264 | 292 | 16 | 572 | 46.2% | 51.0% | R+4.9 |
| Precinct -MC 16MC 16 | 350 | 203 | 13 | 566 | 61.8% | 35.9% | D+26.0 |
| Precinct -HANNAHANNA | 158 | 390 | 13 | 561 | 28.2% | 69.5% | R+41.4 |
| Precinct -LP 33LP 33 | 233 | 318 | 10 | 561 | 41.5% | 56.7% | R+15.2 |
| Precinct -LP 34LP 34 | 252 | 266 | 15 | 533 | 47.3% | 49.9% | R+2.6 |
| Precinct -MC 06MC 06 | 274 | 245 | 13 | 532 | 51.5% | 46.1% | D+5.5 |
| Precinct -GALENA 01GALENA 01 | 203 | 314 | 7 | 524 | 38.7% | 59.9% | R+21.2 |
| Precinct -MC 19MC 19 | 266 | 227 | 10 | 503 | 52.9% | 45.1% | D+7.8 |
| Precinct -MC 20MC 20 | 310 | 178 | 11 | 499 | 62.1% | 35.7% | D+26.5 |
| Precinct -KINGSFORD HEIGHTSKINGSFORD HEIGHTS | 188 | 297 | 8 | 493 | 38.1% | 60.2% | R+22.1 |
| Precinct -LP 38LP 38 | 204 | 274 | 14 | 492 | 41.5% | 55.7% | R+14.2 |
| Precinct -LP 30LP 30 | 189 | 297 | 4 | 490 | 38.6% | 60.6% | R+22.0 |
| Precinct -LP 44LP 44 | 192 | 269 | 17 | 478 | 40.2% | 56.3% | R+16.1 |
| Precinct -SPRINGFIELD 03SPRINGFIELD 03 | 183 | 268 | 8 | 459 | 39.9% | 58.4% | R+18.5 |
| Precinct -MC 17MC 17 | 262 | 177 | 7 | 446 | 58.7% | 39.7% | D+19.1 |
| Precinct -MC 15MC 15 | 275 | 156 | 10 | 441 | 62.4% | 35.4% | D+27.0 |
| Precinct -MC 10MC 10 | 234 | 198 | 5 | 437 | 53.5% | 45.3% | D+8.2 |
| Precinct -MC 03MC 03 | 307 | 116 | 11 | 434 | 70.7% | 26.7% | D+44.0 |
| Precinct -MC 05MC 05 | 250 | 172 | 9 | 431 | 58.0% | 39.9% | D+18.1 |
| Precinct -TRAIL CREEK 02TRAIL CREEK 02 | 195 | 217 | 11 | 423 | 46.1% | 51.3% | R+5.2 |
| Precinct -COOLSPRING 05COOLSPRING 05 | 211 | 199 | 8 | 418 | 50.5% | 47.6% | D+2.9 |
| Precinct -LP 43LP 43 | 173 | 244 | 1 | 418 | 41.4% | 58.4% | R+17.0 |
| Precinct -UNIONUNION | 123 | 278 | 11 | 412 | 29.9% | 67.5% | R+37.6 |
| Precinct -KINGSBURYKINGSBURY | 92 | 281 | 9 | 382 | 24.1% | 73.6% | R+49.5 |
| Precinct -LP 37LP 37 | 164 | 203 | 8 | 375 | 43.7% | 54.1% | R+10.4 |
| Precinct -MC 04MC 04 | 294 | 67 | 7 | 368 | 79.9% | 18.2% | D+61.7 |
| Precinct -MC 08MC 08 | 181 | 180 | 6 | 367 | 49.3% | 49.0% | D+0.3 |
| Precinct -MC 07MC 07 | 184 | 175 | 6 | 365 | 50.4% | 47.9% | D+2.5 |
| Precinct -MC 13MC 13 | 261 | 95 | 8 | 364 | 71.7% | 26.1% | D+45.6 |
| Precinct -MC 02MC 02 | 251 | 102 | 10 | 363 | 69.1% | 28.1% | D+41.0 |
| Precinct -WANATAH 01WANATAH 01 | 135 | 200 | 11 | 346 | 39.0% | 57.8% | R+18.8 |
| Precinct -LP 27LP 27 | 158 | 159 | 7 | 324 | 48.8% | 49.1% | R+0.3 |
| Precinct -MC 14MC 14 | 226 | 92 | 3 | 321 | 70.4% | 28.7% | D+41.7 |
| Precinct -LP 29LP 29 | 104 | 193 | 4 | 301 | 34.6% | 64.1% | R+29.6 |
| Precinct -WASHINGTONWASHINGTON | 101 | 185 | 2 | 288 | 35.1% | 64.2% | R+29.2 |
| Precinct -MC 09MC 09 | 192 | 84 | 4 | 280 | 68.6% | 30.0% | D+38.6 |
| Precinct -LA CROSSELA CROSSE | 72 | 172 | 1 | 245 | 29.4% | 70.2% | R+40.8 |
| Precinct -DEWEYDEWEY | 53 | 162 | 0 | 215 | 24.7% | 75.3% | R+50.7 |
| Precinct -WANATAH 02WANATAH 02 | 56 | 150 | 3 | 209 | 26.8% | 71.8% | R+45.0 |
| Precinct -LP 39LP 39 | 81 | 99 | 2 | 182 | 44.5% | 54.4% | R+9.9 |
| Precinct -LP 26LP 26 | 74 | 97 | 3 | 174 | 42.5% | 55.7% | R+13.2 |
| Precinct -LP 42LP 42 | 69 | 80 | 6 | 155 | 44.5% | 51.6% | R+7.1 |
| Precinct -POTTAWATTAMIE PARKPOTTAWATTAMIE PARK | 91 | 60 | 3 | 154 | 59.1% | 39.0% | D+20.1 |
| Precinct -MICHIANA SHORES 01MICHIANA SHORES 01 | 90 | 52 | 2 | 144 | 62.5% | 36.1% | D+26.4 |
| Precinct -DUNELAND BEACHDUNELAND BEACH | 82 | 60 | 0 | 142 | 57.7% | 42.3% | D+15.5 |
| Precinct -PRAIRIEPRAIRIE | 41 | 81 | 2 | 124 | 33.1% | 65.3% | R+32.3 |
| Precinct -MC 11MC 11 | 62 | 47 | 2 | 111 | 55.9% | 42.3% | D+13.5 |
| Precinct -JOHNSONJOHNSON | 31 | 67 | 6 | 104 | 29.8% | 64.4% | R+34.6 |
| Precinct -MC 21MC 21 | 75 | 22 | 1 | 98 | 76.5% | 22.4% | D+54.1 |
| Precinct -LP 28LP 28 | 46 | 48 | 1 | 95 | 48.4% | 50.5% | R+2.1 |
| Precinct -MICHIANA SHORES 02MICHIANA SHORES 02 | 62 | 26 | 1 | 89 | 69.7% | 29.2% | D+40.4 |
| Precinct -MC 45MC 45 | 50 | 7 | 2 | 59 | 84.7% | 11.9% | D+72.9 |
| Precinct -LP 36LP 36 | 27 | 31 | 0 | 58 | 46.6% | 53.4% | R+6.9 |
| Precinct -LP 35LP 35 | 18 | 18 | 4 | 40 | 45.0% | 45.0% | Exact tie |
| CASS18_1809100010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CENTER 118_1809100020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CENTER 218_1809100030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CENTER 318_1809100040 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CENTER- PINE LAKE18_1809100050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CLINTON18_1809100060 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| COOL SPRING 118_1809100070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| COOL SPRING 218_1809100080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| COOL SPRING 318_1809100090 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| COOL SPRING 418_1809100100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| COOL SPRING 518_1809100110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| COOL SPRING-TRAIL CREEK18_1809100120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| DEWEY18_1809100130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GALENA18_1809100140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HANNA18_1809100150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HUDSON18_1809100160 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HYDROLOGY - LAKE MICHIGAN18_1809100170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JOHNSON18_1809100180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| KANKAKEE 118_1809100190 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| KANKAKEE 218_1809100200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LAPORTE 1-118_1809100210 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LAPORTE 1-218_1809100220 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LAPORTE 1-3A CENTER (VW 1-3B KANKAKEE)18_1809100230 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LAPORTE 1-3B KANKAKEE (VW 1-3A CENTER)18_1809100240 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LAPORTE 2-118_1809100250 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LAPORTE 2-218_1809100260 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LAPORTE 2-318_1809100270 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LAPORTE 2-4 (NV)18_1809100280 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LAPORTE 3-118_1809100290 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LAPORTE 3-218_1809100300 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LAPORTE 3-3 A CENTER (VW 3-3-B,3-3-C)18_1809100310 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LAPORTE 3-3 B PLEASANT (VW 3-3A,3-3C)18_1809100320 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LAPORTE 3-3 C SCIPIO VW (3-3A,3-3B)18_1809100330 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LAPORTE 4-118_1809100340 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LAPORTE 4-2 A18_1809100350 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LAPORTE 4-2 B18_1809100360 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LAPORTE 4-318_1809100370 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LAPORTE 5-118_1809100380 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LAPORTE 5-218_1809100390 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LAPORTE 5-318_1809100400 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LAPORTE 5-418_1809100410 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LINCOLN18_1809100420 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LONG BEACH18_1809100430 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MICHIANA SHORES18_1809100440 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MICHIGAN 118_1809100450 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MICHIGAN 218_1809100460 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MICHIGAN CITY 1-118_1809100470 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MICHIGAN CITY 1-218_1809100480 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MICHIGAN CITY 1-318_1809100490 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MICHIGAN CITY 2-118_1809100500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MICHIGAN CITY 2-218_1809100510 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MICHIGAN CITY 2-318_1809100520 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MICHIGAN CITY 2-418_1809100530 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MICHIGAN CITY 3-118_1809100540 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MICHIGAN CITY 3-2 (VW M.C. 3-2 COOLSPRINGS)18_1809100550 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MICHIGAN CITY 3-2 COOLSPRING (VW MICHIGAN CITY 3-2)18_1809100560 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MICHIGAN CITY 4-118_1809100570 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MICHIGAN CITY 4-218_1809100580 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MICHIGAN CITY 4-318_1809100590 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MICHIGAN CITY 4-418_1809100600 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MICHIGAN CITY 5-118_1809100610 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MICHIGAN CITY 5-218_1809100620 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MICHIGAN CITY 5-318_1809100630 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MICHIGAN CITY 5-418_1809100640 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MICHIGAN CITY 6-118_1809100650 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MICHIGAN CITY 6-218_1809100660 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MICHIGAN CITY 6-3 A MICHIGAN (VW M.C. 6-3 B MICHIGAN)18_1809100680 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MICHIGAN CITY 6-3 B COOLSPRING (VW 6-3A MICHIGAN)18_1809100670 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| NEW DURHAM - OTIS/PINHOOK18_1809100690 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| NEW DURHAM - WESTVILLE18_1809100700 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| NOBLE18_1809100710 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT18_1809100720 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRAIRIE18_1809100730 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SCIPIO 118_1809100740 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SCIPIO 218_1809100750 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SPRINGFIELD 118_1809100760 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SPRINGFIELD 218_1809100770 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SPRINGFIELD 318_1809100780 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UNION18_1809100790 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON18_1809100800 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WILLS18_1809100810 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +13.7% |
| 1896 | −1.9% |
| 1900 | −0.3% |
| 1904 | −13.8% |
| 1908 | −1.2% |
| 1912 | +19.8% |
| 1916 | −4.0% |
| 1920 | −33.3% |
| 1924 | −33.7% |
| 1928 | −22.9% |
| 1932 | +16.0% |
| 1936 | +13.3% |
| 1940 | −6.9% |
| 1944 | −8.7% |
| 1948 | −5.8% |
| 1952 | −20.0% |
| 1956 | −26.1% |
| 1960 | −5.6% |
| 1964 | +15.4% |
| 1968 | −11.1% |
| 1972 | −32.7% |
| 1976 | −9.3% |
| 1980 | −17.4% |
| 1984 | −18.8% |
| 1988 | −7.7% |
| 1992 | +6.5% |
| 1996 | +14.7% |
| 2000 | +1.9% |
| 2004 | +0.5% |
| 2008 | +22.0% |
| 2012 | +12.6% |
| 2016 | −6.3% |
| 2020 | −7.2% |
| 2024 | −14.1% |
DemocraticRepublican
Federal and statewide elections · 2 House · 36 Senate · 3 Senate special · 12 governor
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
voter registration
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
Registered voters
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 84,112 |
| 2018 | 76,589 |
| 2020 | 79,110 |
| 2022 | 79,450 |
| 2024 | 78,916 |
domestic migration
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+215 net domestic migration · 2025
20112025
Net −2,442 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $59,833 in average income, against $72,181 for residents who stayed — 17% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+0.2 on average — 14 points more Democratic-leaning than LaPorte County, IN itself (R+14.1).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Porter County, IN474R+10.5
- Lake County, IN226D+5.6
- St. Joseph County, IN218D+1.5
- Cook County, IL205D+41.6
- Berrien County, MI96R+7.9
- Starke County, IN81R+52.0
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Porter County, IN419
- St. Joseph County, IN249
- Lake County, IN192
- Cook County, IL156
- Berrien County, MI90
- Starke County, IN78
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −323 |
| 2012 | −162 |
| 2013 | −25 |
| 2014 | +118 |
| 2015 | −948 |
| 2016 | −769 |
| 2017 | −362 |
| 2018 | +20 |
| 2019 | −127 |
| 2021 | +338 |
| 2022 | −493 |
| 2023 | −274 |
| 2024 | +350 |
| 2025 | +215 |
LaPorte County sits on Indiana's northern tier bordering Lake Michigan, with a mix of small industrial cities and rural townships. Once a competitive swing county, it delivered a 14-point Republican margin in 2024 after voting much closer in earlier cycles.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 22.0 points in 2008 and a Republican high of 33.7 points in 1924. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 6.9 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 14.1 points.
A population of 111,917, a 76% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $71,055 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of LaSalle County and Muskegon County.
Political twins — counties
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
LaSalle County
Illinois
88.8twin score
elasticity2000–2008 trajectory≠ Polish ancestry
Muskegon County
Michigan
88.2twin score
2008–2016 trajectoryelasticity≠ Polish ancestry
Van Buren County
Michigan
86.6twin score
2004–2024 trajectory% Evangelical≠ elasticity
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Cite this page
All citations released under CC BY 4.0. Attribution: Akashic Intelligence.
LaPorte County, Indiana. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/18091/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.
License: CC BY 4.0
Embed this page
A live widget for your site — no API key, attribution built in, CC BY 4.0. All widgets & sizes →
Cities & towns in LaPorte County
Indiana at the ballot boxAll elections →
Frequently asked questions
How did LaPorte County, Indiana vote in 2024?
In 2024, LaPorte County, Indiana voted Republican by 14.1 points (R+14.1), carried by the Republican candidate. Out of 47,553 votes cast, 20,007 went Democratic and 26,726 went Republican.
When did LaPorte County, Indiana last vote Democratic?
The most recent presidential election in which LaPorte County, Indiana voted Democratic was 2012.
How many people live in LaPorte County, Indiana?
LaPorte County, Indiana has a population of 111,917 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.
What is the median household income in LaPorte County, Indiana?
Median household income in LaPorte County, Indiana is $71,055 — below the national median of $80,734. The Indiana state median is $71,957.
What is the political history of LaPorte County, Indiana?
Akashic tracks 38 presidential elections in LaPorte County, Indiana from 1876 to 2024. Of those, 11 went Democratic and 23 went Republican.